Skip to content

A Study of Implantation of Retinal Pigment Epithelium in Subjects with Acute Wet Age Related Macular Degeneration

Phase 1, Open-label, Safety and Feasibility Study of Implantation of Pf-05206388 (human Embryonic Stem Cell Derived Retinal Pigment Epithelium (rpe) Living Tissue Equivalent) in Subjects with Acute Wet Age Related Macular Degeneration and Recent Rapid Vision Decline

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01691261
Enrollment
9
Registered
2012-09-24
Start date
2021-10-14
Completion date
2024-06-24
Last updated
2024-11-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Age Related Macular Degeneration

Brief summary

Phase 1 trial of retinal pigment epithelium replacement in subjects with wet age-related macular degeneration in whom there is rapidly progressing vision loss

Detailed description

Phase 1, open-label, safety and feasibility study of implantation of PF-05206388 (human embryonic stem cell derived retinal pigment epithelium) in subjects with wet age related macular degeneration and rapid vision loss

Interventions

BIOLOGICALPF-05206388

PF-05206388 will be provided as a Retinal Pigment Epithelium living tissue equivalent for intraocular use in the form of a monolayer of Retinal Pigmented Epithelial (RPE) cells immobilized on a polyester membrane. The membrane is approximately 6 mm x 3 mm and will contain a confluent layer of RPE cells, at a nominal dose of 17 mm2. The implant is intended to be life-long.

Sponsors

University College, London
CollaboratorOTHER
Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male and /or post-menopausal female subjects aged 60 years or above. * Diagnosis of wet Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) plus rapid recent vision decline * An informed consent document signed and dated by the subject or a legal representative.

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant females; breastfeeding females; and females of childbearing potential. * Treatment with an investigational drug within 30 days (or as determined by the local requirement, whichever is longer) or 5 half-lives preceding the first dose of study medication. * Current or previous significant other ocular disease in the study eye, as determined by the investigator.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence and severity of adverse events.52 weeksThe number of Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE) noted during the study and an assessment of whether they are trial product related
Change in baseline in ETDRS best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) - Proportion of subjects with an improvement of 15 letters or more at Week 24.24 weeksThe number of patients with a difference between the baseline BCVA and BCVA at 24 weeks in ETDRS letters, where the differences is 15 letters or more, as a percentage of the total number of cases.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Position of PF-05206388 by serial biomicroscopic evaluation.Day 2 and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 52Measurement of movement in millimetre and rotation in degrees measure relative to baseline, at day 2 and weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 52
Position and presence of pigmented RPE cells by serial fundus photographyWeeks 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36, 52The subjective reporting of area of pigmentation as a % with cross reference to the OCT at weeks 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 16, 24, 36 and 52
Mean change from baseline in contrast sensitivity by Pelli Robson testWeeks 24, 52The mean difference between the baseline BCVA and final BCVA in Pelli Robson letters read, across all subjects
Change in baseline in ETDRS best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) - Proportion of subjects with an improvement of 15 letters or moreWeeks 1,2,4,8, 12,16, 36, 52The number of patients with a difference between the baseline BCVA and BCVA at weeks 1,2,4,8, 12,16, 36, 52 in ETDRS letters, where the differences is 15 letters or more, as a percentage of the total number of cases.
Change in leakage or perfusion in normal fundal vasculature and presence of abnormal vasculature by fundus fluorescein angiography.Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24 and 52Assessment and noting of abnormalities on Funded fluorescine angiography at weeks 4, 8, 12, 24 and 52.
Change in central 30 degree of visual function by Humphrey Field test.Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24 and 52Recording and reporting of any changes on the central 30 degree field on the automated Humphrey Field test at weeks 4, 8, 12, 24 and 52
Change in thickness of RPE layer by B-mode orbital ultrasound.Weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 36, 52Recording of any changes in thickness of RPE layer by B-mode orbital ultrasound carried out by the ocular oncologist or medical physicist at weeks 4, 8, 16, 24, 36, 52.
Change in liver and renal function by blood tests and liver ultrasound .Weeks 24 and 52Record of any abnormalities in liver and renal function on blood testing and any abnormalities detected on the liver ultrasound.
Mean change of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline by study visit.52 weeksThe mean difference between the baseline BCVA and final BCVA in ETDRS letters for all cases

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026