Skip to content

Effects of Two Training Protocols in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Effects of Two Training Protocols in Physical Activity in Daily Life and Balance in Patients With COPD: Land Versus Water

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01691131
Enrollment
36
Registered
2012-09-24
Start date
2011-07-31
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2018-04-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

COPD

Keywords

Physical activity in daily life, Balance, COPD, Exercise training

Brief summary

Introduction: There is evidence that demonstrate the beneficial effects of pulmonary rehabilitation programs (PR) on symptoms, exercise capacity, muscle strength and quality of life in patients with Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The majority of the studies used high intensity endurance and strength exercise training on land. Exercise on water is an effective form of training that has been used for decades for rehabilitation in different chronic conditions. In addition, there are promising preliminary results on the literature regarding aquatic training in patients with COPD. However, several gaps remain. Aim: Compare the effects of two rehabilitation programs with 6 months of duration in patients with COPD on physical activity in daily life and balance: land versus water. Methods: The sample will consist of 36 patients with COPD diagnosed according to the GOLD criteria, 50 years old or more and clinically stable. Patients will be evaluated in 3 different moments: before the PR, after the PR and 6 months after the end of the PR (follow up). In addition to the assessment of physical activity in daily life and balance, the investigators will also evaluate pulmonary function, peripheral and respiratory muscle strength, body composition, maximal and submaximal exercise capacity, functional status and quality of life. Both groups (land or water) will be submitted for 3 sessions of exercise training per week, with 45 minutes of duration, during 6 months. The sessions of both groups include the same exercises sequence. Endurance exercise training will be performed on a bicycle and walking on land and strength training using free weights. Workload will be established according to the tests performance on assessment and progression will follow a predetermined schedule and adjusted according symptoms. On water the same approach will be followed. Expected results: the investigators expect improvement in terms of symptoms, exercise capacity, muscle strength, quality of life, functional status and physical activity in daily life at the end of the two training protocols. However, it is unclear whether one training protocol will be superior than the other. Due to the characteristics involved in the aquatic training, the investigators hypothesized that this type of training can result in better results on balance.

Detailed description

There is evidence that demonstrate the beneficial effects of pulmonary rehabilitation programs (PR) on symptoms, exercise capacity, muscle strength and quality of life in patients with Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The majority of the studies used high intensity endurance and strength exercise training on land. Exercise on water is an effective form of training that has been used for decades for rehabilitation in different chronic conditions. In addition, there are promising preliminary results on the literature regarding aquatic training in patients with COPD. However, several gaps remain. Therefore, we aim to compare the effects of two rehabilitation programs with 6 months of duration in patients with COPD on physical activity in daily life and balance: land versus water. The sample will consist of 36 patients with COPD diagnosed according to the GOLD criteria, 50 years old or more and clinically stable. Patients will be evaluated in 3 different moments: before the PR, after the PR and 6 months after the end of the PR (follow up). In addition to the assessment of physical activity in daily life and balance, the investigators will also evaluate pulmonary function, peripheral and respiratory muscle strength, body composition, maximal and submaximal exercise capacity, functional status and quality of life. Both groups (land or water) will be submitted for 3 sessions of exercise training per week, with 45 minutes of duration, during 6 months. The sessions of both groups include the same exercises sequence. Endurance exercise training will be performed on a bicycle and walking on land and strength training using free weights. Workload will be established according to the tests performance on assessment and progression will follow a predetermined schedule and adjusted according symptoms. On water the same approach will be followed. Expected results: the investigators expect improvement in terms of symptoms, exercise capacity, muscle strength, quality of life, functional status and physical activity in daily life at the end of the two training protocols. However, it is unclear whether one training protocol will be superior than the other. Due to the characteristics involved in the aquatic training, the investigators hypothesized that this type of training can result in better results on balance.

Interventions

OTHERExercise training

Comparison of high intensity exercise training on land versus water.

Sponsors

Universidade Norte do Paraná
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* COPD diagnosis (according to the GOLD criteria); * Stable condition, no exacerbations or infections in the last 3 months; * No severe or unstable heart disease; * No other pathological conditions that could influence the training performance; * Not have participated in other rehabilitation programs in the last six months.

Exclusion criteria

* Occurrence of acute exacerbation during the evaluation period; * Not understanding or non-cooperation regarding the procedures and research methods; * Option of the participant to leave the study for any reason; * Presence of vestibular disorders (BPPV, labyrinthitis, among others).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Physical activity in daily life (measuremet unit: number of steps per day)four yearsThe objectively assessed level of physical activity in daily life will be monitored using the activity monitor Power Walker PW 610 (Yamax, Japan). This device is validated in patients with COPD and the main variables are the number of steps per day and estimation of daily energy expenditure. The monitor will be individually set taking into consideration body weight and step length (measured in a 10-meter walking at usual speed). Patients will wear the device 12 hours per day during 6 days, and the average of these six days will be used for analysis.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Functional status (LCADL: score in points)four yearsFunctional status will be assessed by using the questionnaire London Chest Activity of Daily Living scale (LCADL). A total score is calculated according to the patient report for each domain.
Static Balance (Center of Pressure Area in cm2)four yearsStatic balance will be evaluated using a force platform (BIOMEC400, EMG System of Brazil, Brazil), which is a reliable instrument for stabilographic measures in both, older and young adults.
Dynamic Balance (Timed up and go test in seconds)four yearsDynamic balance will be assessed by Timed up and go test (TUG).
Exercise capacity (6MWT: distance covered in meters; ISWT: distance covered in meters)four yearsThe 6-minute walking test (6MWT) will be performed to verify functional exercise capacity and the Incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT) to assess maximal exercise capacity.
Quality of life (CRDQ: score in points)four yearsThe Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRDQ) will be applied to assess quality of life.

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026