Skip to content

A Study to Assess the Ability of 2% Lidocaine Gel to Reduce the Discomfort of Urethral Catheterization

A Randomized Blinded Controlled Trial of 2% Lidocaine Gel Compared to Standard of Care in Children Undergoing Urethral Catheterization

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01690767
Enrollment
133
Registered
2012-09-24
Start date
2011-12-31
Completion date
2014-12-31
Last updated
2015-03-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Urinary Tract Infection

Keywords

Urethral catheterization, Lidocaine

Brief summary

Children 0-24 months of age requiring a urethral catheterization for urine collection will be randomized to receive either topical and intraurethral 2% lidocaine or standard of care to assess for the effectiveness of the former in minimizing pain during urethral catheterization. It is hypothesized that administration of 2% lidocaine gel both topically and intraurethrally will confer a greater degree of pain reduction compared to standard of care.

Detailed description

An estimated 10% of children 0-24 months of age that present to the emergency department (ED) with fever and/or vomiting have a urinary tract infection (UTI). An accurate diagnosis of a UTI ensures timely and appropriate treatment given to reduce the risk of renal scarring, which is the greatest in this age group. To ensure diagnostic accuracy, urethral catheterization is the preferred method to obtain a urine sample from a young child. In contrast to adults, most children do not receive local analgesia for urethral catheterization; despite growing recognition that children experience avoidable pain and discomfort during invasive procedures. Following informed consent, participants will be randomized by block randomization in a concealed fashion to receive either topical and intraurethral 2% lidocaine or standard of care using a computerized random number generator. The research nurse will access a sequentially numbered, opaque sealed envelope that will contain the participant's group assignment. No adjunctive analgesic methods will be used. A research pharmacist will prepare 2% lidocaine gel in a 3 cc syringe attached to a 24 gauge angiocath. Children \< 7 kg and \> 7 kg will receive 1 cc and 1.5 cc, respectively (2). The entire procedure will be videotaped and participants pain will be scored using a brow bulging score and visual analogue scale by independent, blinded raters.

Interventions

Children \< 7 kg and \> 7 kg will receive 1 cc and 1.5 cc of 2% lidocaine gel, respectively

DRUGHealth Care Lubricating Jelly

Non-medicinal lubrication gel

Sponsors

London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 24 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* children 0-24 months of age presenting to the emergency department requiring a urethral catheterization to obtain a urine specimen

Exclusion criteria

* unstable * external genitourinary anomalies * lidocaine allergy and * previous catheterization within 24 hours

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Brow Bulging Score30 seconds post intervention compared to baselineThe presence of brow bulging will be scored in 2-second intervals for the first 30 seconds for each of the six phases. The percentage of time that brow bulging is observed will then be calculated for each phase.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Facial grimacing score30 seconds post intervention compared to placeboThe presence of brow bulging, nasolabial furrowing and eyes squeezing shut will be scored in 2-second intervals for the first 30 seconds for each of the six phases. The percentage of time that all three of these features is observed will then be calculated for each phase.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026