Skip to content

Phase 3b Safety and Efficacy Study of Apremilast to Treat Moderate to Severe Plaque-plaque Psoriasis

A Phase 3B, Multicenter, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy, Study Of The Efficacy And Safety Of Apremilast (CC-10004), Etanercept, And Placebo, In Subjects With Moderate To Severe Plaque Psoriasis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01690299
Enrollment
250
Registered
2012-09-21
Start date
2012-10-01
Completion date
2016-04-04
Last updated
2022-03-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Psoriasis, Psoriatic Arthritis

Keywords

Psoriasis, arthritis, psoriatic, palmoplantar, scalp, psoriasis pill, psoriasis tablet, plaque psoriasis, plaque type psoriasis, moderate to severe plaque type psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis

Brief summary

This study will test the clinical effectiveness and safety of apremilast compared with placebo as well as etanercept compared with placebo in the same group of patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

Detailed description

This is a phase 3b, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy, study of the efficacy and safety of apremilast, etanercept, and placebo, in adults with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. 250 participants will be randomized 1:1:1 to the three treatment groups. All subjects will receive both tablets and injections through Week 16. The study will consist of four phases: * Screening Phase - up to 35 days * Double-blind Placebo-controlled Phase - Weeks 0-16 * Apremilast Extension Phase - Weeks 16-104 * Post-treatment Observational Follow-up Phase During the double-blind, placebo-controlled phase, subjects will receive treatment with one of the following: * apremilast (APR) 30 mg tablets orally twice a day (BID) plus once weekly (QW) evaluator/subject-blinded subcutaneous (SC) saline (placebo) injections (1 mL x 2 injections SC), or * etanercept (ETN) 50 mg evaluator/subject-blinded subcutaneous (SC) once weekly (QW) injections (2 x 25 mg) plus placebo tablets orally twice a day (BID), or * placebo tablets and evaluator/subject-blinded subcutaneous (SC) saline (placebo) injections. All subjects will be asked to participate in a 4-week Post-treatment Observational Follow-up Phase either upon completion of the study or upon discontinuation of investigational product for those subjects who terminate the study early.

Interventions

DRUGApremilast

Apremilast 30 mg tablet orally BID

DRUGEtanercept

Etanercept 50 mg evaluator/subject-blinded SC QW injection

DRUGPlacebo tablet

Placebo tablets BID

DRUGPlacebo injection

Once weekly evaluator/subject-blinded SC placebo (1 mL x 2 injections SC)

Sponsors

Amgen
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Males or females, ≥ 18 years of age * Diagnosis of chronic, moderate to severe plaque psoriasis for at least 12 months prior to Screening, and a candidate for phototherapy and/or systemic (including etanercept) therapy * Had an inadequate response, intolerance, or contraindication to at least 1 conventional systemic agent for the treatment of psoriasis. * No prior exposure to biologics for treatment of psoriatic arthritis or psoriasis

Exclusion criteria

* Other than psoriasis, history of any clinically significant and uncontrolled systemic diseases; any condition, including the presence of laboratory abnormalities, which would place the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study. * Pregnant or breast feeding. * Have failed more than 3 systemic agents for treatment of psoriasis. * History of allergy to any component of the investigational product (IP), including human immunoglobulin (Ig) proteins or allergy to etanercept. * Hepatitis B surface antigen or anti-hepatitis C antibody positive at Screening. * Latent, active tuberculosis (TB) or inadequately treated TB; nontuberculous mycobacterial infection or opportunistic infection (eg, cytomegalovirus, Pneumocystis carinii, aspergillosis, Clostridium difficile). * Have a history of, or ongoing, chronic or recurrent infectious disease * Have received, or are expected to receive, any live virus or bacterial vaccination within 3 months before first administration of IP, or through Week 20 during the study. * Had a Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccination within 1 year prior to screening. * History of positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), or have congenital or acquired immunodeficiency (eg, common variable immunodeficiency disease). * Active substance abuse or a history of substance abuse within 6 months prior to Screening. * Malignancy or history of malignancy, except for treated \[ie, cured\] basal cell or squamous cell in situ skin carcinomas and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia \[CIN\] or carcinoma in situ of the cervix with no evidence of recurrence within the previous 5 years. * Psoriasis flare or rebound within 4 weeks prior to Screening. * Topical therapy within 2 weeks of randomization or systemic therapy for psoriasis within 4 weeks prior to randomization * Use of phototherapy within 4 weeks prior to randomization or prolonged sun exposure or use of tanning booths or other ultraviolet (UV) light sources. * Any investigational drug within 4 weeks prior to randomization, or 5 pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic half lives, if known (whichever is longer). * Prior treatment with apremilast or etanercept.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI-75) for the Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo at Week 16 From BaselineBaseline to Week 16PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The PASI score was set to missing if any severity score or degree of involvement was missing.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With at Least 2 Points Reduction for Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 16Baseline and Week 16The sPGA is an assessment by the Investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. The sPGA is a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe), incorporating an assessment of the severity of the three primary signs of the disease: erythema, scaling and plaque elevation. When making the assessment of overall severity, the Investigator should factor in areas that have already been cleared (ie, have scores of 0) and not just evaluate remaining lesions for severity, ie, the severity of each sign is averaged across all areas of involvement, including cleared lesions. In the event of different severities across disease signs, the sign that is the predominant feature of the disease should be used to help determine the sPGA score.
Percent Change From Baseline in the Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) for Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 16Baseline to Week 16BSA is a measurement of involved skin. The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated based on the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or handprint including the fingers), which equates to approximately 1% of total body surface area. BSA percent change from baseline was determined at each visit of the study, and is calculated as 100\*(post-baseline BSA - baseline BSA) / baseline BSA.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI-50) for Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 16Baseline to Week 16PASI-50 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The PASI score was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The PASI score was set to missing if any severity score or degree of involvement was missing.
Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score In Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 16Baseline to Week 16DLQI is a simple, compact, and practical questionnaire for use in a dermatology clinical setting to assess limitations related to the impact of skin disease. The instrument contains ten items dealing with the participant's skin. With the exception of Item Number 7, the participant responds on a four-point scale, ranging from Very Much (score 3) to Not at All or Not relevant (score 0). Item Number 7 is a multi-part item, the first part of which ascertains whether the participant's skin prevented them from working or studying (Yes or No, scores 3 or 0 respectively), and if No, then the participant is asked how much of a problem the skin has been at work or study over the past week, with response alternatives being A lot, A little, or Not at all (scores 2, 1, or 0 respectively). The DLQI total score is derived by summing all item scores, which has a possible range of 0 to 30, with 30 corresponding to the worst quality of life, and 0 corresponding to the best.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) for the Comparison Between Etanercept 50mg SC QW and Placebo at Week 16Baseline and Week 16PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The PASI score was set to missing if any severity score or degree of involvement was missing.
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment (LS-PGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear at Week 16 in Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 16Baseline to Week 16The Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment is a global assessment performed by the investigator of psoriasis severity. Integrating ranges of BSA involvement with assessments of overall plaque severity (using a 4 point scale from none to marked for the signs of plaque elevation, erythema and scale), the LS-PGA produces an overall assessment of psoriasis severity on an 8-point scale, ranging from clear to very severe. To determine the final score, the lattice portion is governed by the BSA and among the plaque qualities, weights plaque elevation as most important, erythema next, and scale least.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseWeek 0 to Week 16; mean duration of exposure was 14.90 weeks for placebo group, 15.13 weeks for apremilast group and 15.87 weeks for Etanercept groupA TEAE is an AE with a start date on or after the date of the first dose of study drug and no later than 28 days after the last dose of study drug for participants who discontinued early. An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during the study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the patient's health, including laboratory test values, regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, clinically significant adverse change in frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) should be considered an AE. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward AE that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a condition that may jeopardize or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes above.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Apremilast-exposure PeriodFrom the first dose of apremilast (either Week 0 for participants originally randomized to apremilast or Week 16 for those originally randomized to placebo or etanercept who were switched to apremilast at week 16) until 28 days after last apremilast doseA TEAE in the apremilast-exposure phase is an AE with a start date on or after the date of the first dose of study drug and no later than 28 days after the last dose of study drug. An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during the study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the subject's health, including laboratory test values, regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) should be considered an AE. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward AE that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a condition that may jeopardize or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.
Psoriasis Flare/ReboundWeek 0 to Week 16; Placebo controlled phasePsoriasis flare is an AE and represents an atypical or unusual worsening of disease during treatment. It is defined as a sudden intensification of psoriasis requiring medical intervention or a diagnosis of new generalized erythrodermic, inflammatory, or pustular psoriasis. Rebound is an AE and is defined as a severe and sudden worsening of disease that occurs after treatment has been discontinued. This exacerbation is characterized by a PASI ≥125% of baseline or a new generalized pustular, erythrodermic, or more inflammatory psoriasis after stopping therapy.
Change From Baseline in the Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score of the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-item (SF-36) Health Survey Version 2.0 in Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 16Baseline to Week 16The SF-36 is a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Scores from the 8 scales were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population to have a mean of 50 and variance = 10, with higher scores indicating better health. From these 8 scale, two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS), both having the same mean of 50 and variance = 10 as noted for the individual scales for the U.S. general population, and with higher scores indicating better health. For MCS, change from baseline was calculated, where change = visit value - baseline value.

Countries

Australia, Belgium, Canada, Czechia, Estonia, Germany, Hungary, Latvia, Netherlands, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The study was conducted at 65 study centers in 11 countries.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomized 1:1:1 to the three treatment groups. Participants were stratified according to their calculated body mass index (BMI) categories at Screening (BMI \< 30 or BMI ≥ 30).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received placebo tablets PO BID and 2-1 ml SC saline (placebo) injections QW during the 16-week randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled phase
84
Apremilast Plus Placebo Injection
Participants received apremilast 30 mg PO BID plus 2-1ml SC saline (placebo) injections QW during the 16-week randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled phase
83
Etanercept Plus Placebo Tablet
Participants received etanercept 50 mg by SC injection QW plus placebo tablets PO BID during the 16-week randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled phase
83
Total250

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005
Apremilast Extension Phase (Weeks16-104)Adverse Event000343
Apremilast Extension Phase (Weeks16-104)Lack of Efficacy0009108
Apremilast Extension Phase (Weeks16-104)Lost to Follow-up0006136
Apremilast Extension Phase (Weeks16-104)Non-compliance With Study Drug000011
Apremilast Extension Phase (Weeks16-104)Protocol Violation000001
Apremilast Extension Phase (Weeks16-104)Withdrawal by Subject0008511
Placebo-controlled Phase (Weeks 0-16)Adverse Event221000
Placebo-controlled Phase (Weeks 0-16)Lack of Efficacy400000
Placebo-controlled Phase (Weeks 0-16)Other211000
Placebo-controlled Phase (Weeks 0-16)Withdrawal by Subject130000

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboApremilast Plus Placebo InjectionEtanercept Plus Placebo TabletTotal
Age, Continuous43.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.91
46.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.59
47.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.07
45.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.23
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants34 Participants34 Participants93 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
59 Participants49 Participants49 Participants157 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
25 / 8441 / 8327 / 8330 / 7352 / 8332 / 79
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 843 / 832 / 835 / 736 / 834 / 79

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI-75) for the Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo at Week 16 From Baseline

PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The PASI score was set to missing if any severity score or degree of involvement was missing.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 16

Population: The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug and had both a baseline PASI and at least one post-treatment PASI evaluation. Missing data imputation: Last observation carried forward (LOCF).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI-75) for the Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo at Week 16 From Baseline11.9 Percentage of participants
Apremilast Plus Placebo InjectionPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI-75) for the Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo at Week 16 From Baseline39.8 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [14.9, 40.1]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score In Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 16

DLQI is a simple, compact, and practical questionnaire for use in a dermatology clinical setting to assess limitations related to the impact of skin disease. The instrument contains ten items dealing with the participant's skin. With the exception of Item Number 7, the participant responds on a four-point scale, ranging from Very Much (score 3) to Not at All or Not relevant (score 0). Item Number 7 is a multi-part item, the first part of which ascertains whether the participant's skin prevented them from working or studying (Yes or No, scores 3 or 0 respectively), and if No, then the participant is asked how much of a problem the skin has been at work or study over the past week, with response alternatives being A lot, A little, or Not at all (scores 2, 1, or 0 respectively). The DLQI total score is derived by summing all item scores, which has a possible range of 0 to 30, with 30 corresponding to the worst quality of life, and 0 corresponding to the best.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 16

Population: mITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug and had both a baseline PASI and at least one post-treatment PASI evaluation. Missing data imputation: LOCF.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score In Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 16-3.9 units on a scale
Apremilast Plus Placebo InjectionChange From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score In Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 16-8.4 units on a scale
Etanercept Plus Placebo TabletChange From Baseline in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Total Score In Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 16-7.8 units on a scale
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-6.82, -2.14]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.000495% CI: [-6.27, -1.6]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score of the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-item (SF-36) Health Survey Version 2.0 in Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 16

The SF-36 is a 36-item general health status instrument and consists of 8 scales: physical function (PF), role limitations-physical (RP), vitality (VT), general health perceptions (GH), bodily pain (BP), social function (SF), role limitations-emotional (RE), and mental health (MH). Scale scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Scores from the 8 scales were transformed to the norm-based scores using weights from U.S. general population to have a mean of 50 and variance = 10, with higher scores indicating better health. From these 8 scale, two overall summary scores were obtained - a Physical Component Summary score (PCS) and a Mental Component Summary score (MCS), both having the same mean of 50 and variance = 10 as noted for the individual scales for the U.S. general population, and with higher scores indicating better health. For MCS, change from baseline was calculated, where change = visit value - baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 16

Population: mITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug and had both a baseline PASI and at least one post-treatment PASI evaluation. Missing data imputation: LOCF.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score of the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-item (SF-36) Health Survey Version 2.0 in Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 162.6 units on a scale
Apremilast Plus Placebo InjectionChange From Baseline in the Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score of the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-item (SF-36) Health Survey Version 2.0 in Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 163.5 units on a scale
Etanercept Plus Placebo TabletChange From Baseline in the Mental Component Summary (MCS) Score of the Medical Outcome Study Short Form 36-item (SF-36) Health Survey Version 2.0 in Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 164.8 units on a scale
p-value: 0.711295% CI: [-2.05, 3.9]ANCOVA
p-value: 0.171995% CI: [-0.75, 5.19]ANCOVA
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Apremilast-exposure Period

A TEAE in the apremilast-exposure phase is an AE with a start date on or after the date of the first dose of study drug and no later than 28 days after the last dose of study drug. An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during the study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the subject's health, including laboratory test values, regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, any clinically significant adverse change in the frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) should be considered an AE. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward AE that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a condition that may jeopardize or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.

Time frame: From the first dose of apremilast (either Week 0 for participants originally randomized to apremilast or Week 16 for those originally randomized to placebo or etanercept who were switched to apremilast at week 16) until 28 days after last apremilast dose

Population: All participants who received apremilast at any time during the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Apremilast-exposure PeriodAny TEAE45 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Apremilast-exposure PeriodAny Drug-related TEAE23 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Apremilast-exposure PeriodAny Severe TEAE4 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Apremilast-exposure PeriodAny Serious TEAE5 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Apremilast-exposure PeriodAny Serious Drug-related TEAE2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Apremilast-exposure PeriodAny TEAE Leading to Drug Interruption8 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Apremilast-exposure PeriodAny TEAE Leading to Drug Withdrawal3 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Apremilast-exposure PeriodAny TEAE Leading to Death0 participants
Apremilast Plus Placebo InjectionNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Apremilast-exposure PeriodAny Severe TEAE7 participants
Apremilast Plus Placebo InjectionNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Apremilast-exposure PeriodAny TEAE Leading to Drug Withdrawal7 participants
Apremilast Plus Placebo InjectionNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Apremilast-exposure PeriodAny Serious TEAE6 participants
Apremilast Plus Placebo InjectionNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Apremilast-exposure PeriodAny Serious Drug-related TEAE2 participants
Apremilast Plus Placebo InjectionNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Apremilast-exposure PeriodAny TEAE Leading to Drug Interruption13 participants
Apremilast Plus Placebo InjectionNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Apremilast-exposure PeriodAny TEAE71 participants
Apremilast Plus Placebo InjectionNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Apremilast-exposure PeriodAny Drug-related TEAE36 participants
Apremilast Plus Placebo InjectionNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Apremilast-exposure PeriodAny TEAE Leading to Death0 participants
Etanercept Plus Placebo TabletNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Apremilast-exposure PeriodAny Severe TEAE7 participants
Etanercept Plus Placebo TabletNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Apremilast-exposure PeriodAny Drug-related TEAE15 participants
Etanercept Plus Placebo TabletNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Apremilast-exposure PeriodAny TEAE54 participants
Etanercept Plus Placebo TabletNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Apremilast-exposure PeriodAny Serious TEAE4 participants
Etanercept Plus Placebo TabletNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Apremilast-exposure PeriodAny TEAE Leading to Drug Withdrawal2 participants
Etanercept Plus Placebo TabletNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Apremilast-exposure PeriodAny TEAE Leading to Drug Interruption7 participants
Etanercept Plus Placebo TabletNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Apremilast-exposure PeriodAny Serious Drug-related TEAE1 participants
Etanercept Plus Placebo TabletNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Apremilast-exposure PeriodAny TEAE Leading to Death0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled Phase

A TEAE is an AE with a start date on or after the date of the first dose of study drug and no later than 28 days after the last dose of study drug for participants who discontinued early. An AE is any noxious, unintended, or untoward medical occurrence that may appear or worsen during the study. It may be a new intercurrent illness, a worsening concomitant illness, an injury, or any concomitant impairment of the patient's health, including laboratory test values, regardless of etiology. Any worsening (ie, clinically significant adverse change in frequency or intensity of a preexisting condition) should be considered an AE. A serious AE (SAE) is any untoward AE that is fatal, life-threatening, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, requires or prolongs existing in-patient hospitalization, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is a condition that may jeopardize or may require intervention to prevent one of the outcomes above.

Time frame: Week 0 to Week 16; mean duration of exposure was 14.90 weeks for placebo group, 15.13 weeks for apremilast group and 15.87 weeks for Etanercept group

Population: Safety population includes all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny TEAE45 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny Drug-related TEAE17 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny Severe TEAE2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny Serious TEAE0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny Serious Drug-related TEAE0 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny TEAE Leading to Drug Interruption1 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny TEAE Leading to Drug Withdrawal2 participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny TEAE Leading to Death0 participants
Apremilast Plus Placebo InjectionNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny Severe TEAE3 participants
Apremilast Plus Placebo InjectionNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny TEAE Leading to Drug Withdrawal3 participants
Apremilast Plus Placebo InjectionNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny Serious TEAE3 participants
Apremilast Plus Placebo InjectionNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny Serious Drug-related TEAE2 participants
Apremilast Plus Placebo InjectionNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny TEAE Leading to Drug Interruption9 participants
Apremilast Plus Placebo InjectionNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny TEAE59 participants
Apremilast Plus Placebo InjectionNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny Drug-related TEAE27 participants
Apremilast Plus Placebo InjectionNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny TEAE Leading to Death0 participants
Etanercept Plus Placebo TabletNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny Severe TEAE3 participants
Etanercept Plus Placebo TabletNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny Drug-related TEAE21 participants
Etanercept Plus Placebo TabletNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny TEAE44 participants
Etanercept Plus Placebo TabletNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny Serious TEAE2 participants
Etanercept Plus Placebo TabletNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny TEAE Leading to Drug Withdrawal2 participants
Etanercept Plus Placebo TabletNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny TEAE Leading to Drug Interruption3 participants
Etanercept Plus Placebo TabletNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny Serious Drug-related TEAE1 participants
Etanercept Plus Placebo TabletNumber of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) During the Placebo-Controlled PhaseAny TEAE Leading to Death0 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI-50) for Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 16

PASI-50 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 50% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The PASI score was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The PASI score was set to missing if any severity score or degree of involvement was missing.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 16

Population: mITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug and had both a baseline PASI and at least one post-treatment PASI evaluation. Missing data imputation: Last observation carried forward (LOCF).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI-50) for Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 1633.3 percentage of participants
Apremilast Plus Placebo InjectionPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI-50) for Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 1662.7 percentage of participants
Etanercept Plus Placebo TabletPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a 50% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI-50) for Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 1683.1 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.000295% CI: [14.9, 43.9]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [36.9, 62.7]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) for the Comparison Between Etanercept 50mg SC QW and Placebo at Week 16

PASI-75 response is the percentage of participants who achieved at least a 75% reduction (improvement) from baseline in PASI score at Week 16. The improvement in PASI score was used as a measure of efficacy. The PASI was a measure of psoriatic disease severity taking into account qualitative lesion characteristics (erythema, thickness, and scaling) and degree of skin surface area involvement on defined anatomical regions. PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores reflecting greater disease severity. Erythema, thickness, and scaling are scored on a scale of 0 (none) to 4 (very severe) on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head, trunk, upper limbs, and lower limbs. Degree of involvement on each of the 4 anatomic regions is scored on a scale of 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90% to 100% involvement). The PASI score was set to missing if any severity score or degree of involvement was missing.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

Population: mITT population consisted of all participants who were re-randomized and received at least one dose of study drug and had both a baseline PASI and at least one post-treatment PASI evaluation. Missing data imputation: Last observation carried forward (LOCF).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) for the Comparison Between Etanercept 50mg SC QW and Placebo at Week 1611.9 percentage of participants
Apremilast Plus Placebo InjectionPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a 75% Improvement (Response) in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) for the Comparison Between Etanercept 50mg SC QW and Placebo at Week 1648.2 percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [23.3, 48.5]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment (LS-PGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear at Week 16 in Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 16

The Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment is a global assessment performed by the investigator of psoriasis severity. Integrating ranges of BSA involvement with assessments of overall plaque severity (using a 4 point scale from none to marked for the signs of plaque elevation, erythema and scale), the LS-PGA produces an overall assessment of psoriasis severity on an 8-point scale, ranging from clear to very severe. To determine the final score, the lattice portion is governed by the BSA and among the plaque qualities, weights plaque elevation as most important, erythema next, and scale least.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 16

Population: mITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug and had both a baseline PASI and at least one post-treatment PASI evaluation. Missing data imputation: LOCF.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment (LS-PGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear at Week 16 in Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 166.0 percentage of participants
Apremilast Plus Placebo InjectionPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment (LS-PGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear at Week 16 in Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 1624.1 percentage of participants
Etanercept Plus Placebo TabletPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment (LS-PGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear at Week 16 in Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 1622.9 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.001195% CI: [7.6, 28.6]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: 0.002195% CI: [6.5, 26.9]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved a Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With at Least 2 Points Reduction for Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 16

The sPGA is an assessment by the Investigator of the overall disease severity at the time of evaluation. The sPGA is a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (clear) to 4 (severe), incorporating an assessment of the severity of the three primary signs of the disease: erythema, scaling and plaque elevation. When making the assessment of overall severity, the Investigator should factor in areas that have already been cleared (ie, have scores of 0) and not just evaluate remaining lesions for severity, ie, the severity of each sign is averaged across all areas of involvement, including cleared lesions. In the event of different severities across disease signs, the sign that is the predominant feature of the disease should be used to help determine the sPGA score.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 16

Population: mITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug and had both a baseline PASI and at least one post-treatment PASI evaluation. Missing data imputation: Last observation carried forward (LOCF).

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With at Least 2 Points Reduction for Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 163.6 percentage of participants
Apremilast Plus Placebo InjectionPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With at Least 2 Points Reduction for Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 1621.7 percentage of participants
Etanercept Plus Placebo TabletPercentage of Participants Who Achieved a Static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) Score of Clear (0) or Almost Clear (1) With at Least 2 Points Reduction for Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 1628.9 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.000595% CI: [8.4, 27.7]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [14.8, 35.5]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percent Change From Baseline in the Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) for Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 16

BSA is a measurement of involved skin. The overall BSA affected by psoriasis was estimated based on the palm area of the participant's hand (entire palmar surface or handprint including the fingers), which equates to approximately 1% of total body surface area. BSA percent change from baseline was determined at each visit of the study, and is calculated as 100\*(post-baseline BSA - baseline BSA) / baseline BSA.

Time frame: Baseline to Week 16

Population: mITT population consisted of all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug and had both a baseline PASI and at least one post-treatment PASI evaluation. Missing data imputation: LOCF.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboPercent Change From Baseline in the Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) for Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 16-16.3 percent change
Apremilast Plus Placebo InjectionPercent Change From Baseline in the Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) for Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 16-47.7 percent change
Etanercept Plus Placebo TabletPercent Change From Baseline in the Affected Body Surface Area (BSA) for Comparison Between Apremilast and Placebo and Etanercept and Placebo at Week 16-56.1 percent change
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-43.33, -19.46]ANCOVA
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-51.78, -27.92]ANCOVA
Secondary

Psoriasis Flare/Rebound

Psoriasis flare is an AE and represents an atypical or unusual worsening of disease during treatment. It is defined as a sudden intensification of psoriasis requiring medical intervention or a diagnosis of new generalized erythrodermic, inflammatory, or pustular psoriasis. Rebound is an AE and is defined as a severe and sudden worsening of disease that occurs after treatment has been discontinued. This exacerbation is characterized by a PASI ≥125% of baseline or a new generalized pustular, erythrodermic, or more inflammatory psoriasis after stopping therapy.

Time frame: Week 0 to Week 16; Placebo controlled phase

Population: Safety population includes all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPsoriasis Flare/ReboundAny psoriasis rebound captured as a TEAE0 participants
PlaceboPsoriasis Flare/ReboundAny psoriasis flare captured as a TEAE3 participants
PlaceboPsoriasis Flare/ReboundThose with PASI ≥125% baseline score and D/C APR1 participants
Apremilast Plus Placebo InjectionPsoriasis Flare/ReboundAny psoriasis rebound captured as a TEAE0 participants
Apremilast Plus Placebo InjectionPsoriasis Flare/ReboundAny psoriasis flare captured as a TEAE1 participants
Apremilast Plus Placebo InjectionPsoriasis Flare/ReboundThose with PASI ≥125% baseline score and D/C APR0 participants
Etanercept Plus Placebo TabletPsoriasis Flare/ReboundAny psoriasis flare captured as a TEAE0 participants
Etanercept Plus Placebo TabletPsoriasis Flare/ReboundThose with PASI ≥125% baseline score and D/C APR0 participants
Etanercept Plus Placebo TabletPsoriasis Flare/ReboundAny psoriasis rebound captured as a TEAE0 participants
Secondary

Psoriasis Flare/Rebound

Psoriasis flare is an AE and represents an atypical or unusual worsening of disease during treatment. It is defined as a sudden intensification of psoriasis requiring medical intervention or a diagnosis of new generalized erythrodermic, inflammatory, or pustular psoriasis. Rebound is an AE and is defined as a severe and sudden worsening of disease that occurs after treatment has been discontinued. This exacerbation is characterized by a PASI ≥125% of baseline or a new generalized pustular, erythrodermic, or more inflammatory psoriasis after stopping therapy. PASI ≥125% of baseline score at any visit after the last dose date for those who discontinued within the phase.

Time frame: From the first dose of apremilast (either Week 0 or Week 16 for participants originally randomized to placebo or etanercept who were switched at Week 16) until 28 days after the last dose of apremilast.

Population: Safety population includes all participants who were randomized and received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPsoriasis Flare/ReboundThose with PASI ≥125% baseline score and D/C APR0 participants
PlaceboPsoriasis Flare/ReboundAny psoriasis rebound captured as a TEAE1 participants
PlaceboPsoriasis Flare/ReboundAny psoriasis flare captured as a TEAE1 participants
Apremilast Plus Placebo InjectionPsoriasis Flare/ReboundAny psoriasis rebound captured as a TEAE2 participants
Apremilast Plus Placebo InjectionPsoriasis Flare/ReboundAny psoriasis flare captured as a TEAE4 participants
Apremilast Plus Placebo InjectionPsoriasis Flare/ReboundThose with PASI ≥125% baseline score and D/C APR0 participants
Etanercept Plus Placebo TabletPsoriasis Flare/ReboundAny psoriasis flare captured as a TEAE0 participants
Etanercept Plus Placebo TabletPsoriasis Flare/ReboundThose with PASI ≥125% baseline score and D/C APR1 participants
Etanercept Plus Placebo TabletPsoriasis Flare/ReboundAny psoriasis rebound captured as a TEAE7 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 11, 2026