Skip to content

Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Induce Liver Transplant Tolerance

Human Umbilical Cord Mesenchymal Stem Cell Induce Liver Allografts Tolerance

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01690247
Enrollment
50
Registered
2012-09-21
Start date
2012-02-29
Completion date
2015-02-28
Last updated
2013-05-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Evidence of Liver Transplantation

Keywords

mesenchymal stem cells, liver transplantation, clinical trial, rejection

Brief summary

Liver transplantation is the only lifesaving intervention for patients with end-stage liver diseases. Despite the ability of current immunosuppressive agents to reduce the incidence of acute rejection, the rate of acute rejection reaches to 20-50% after liver transplantation. Furthermore, the long-term toxicity associated with current regimens for liver transplant recipients now is increasingly being perceived as an unmet clinical need. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) appeared to be effective in regulating the invoked immune response in setting such as tissue injury, transplantation, and autoimmunity, and have been used successfully to treat graft versus host disease and show immune modulation function both in vitro and in vivo and may help in repairing damaged tissue(s). Here, we evaluate umbilical cord derived MSC (UC-MSC) as an alternative immunosuppressive agents for liver transplanted patients, and examine if UC-MSC could improve the recovery of liver function.

Detailed description

Liver transplantation is the only lifesaving intervention for patients with end-stage liver diseases. The current immunosuppressive agents reduce the incidence of acute cellular rejection; however, the rate of acute rejection reaches to 20-50% after liver transplantation. Furthermore, the long-term side effects of these regimens now has become a major challenge for liver transplant recipients and is increasingly being perceived as an unmet clinical need, for example, increases in the incidence of bacterial, viral infections, nephrotoxicity with chronic renal impairment, de novo diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, arterial hypertension, cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, neurotoxicity, hematological toxicity. Mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) appeared to be effective in regulating the invoked immune response in setting such as tissue injury, transplantation, and autoimmunity, and have been used successfully to treat graft versus host disease and show immune modulation function both in vitro and in vivo and may help in repairing damaged tissue(s). Current clinical trails demonstrated that the use of autologous bone marrow MSC (BM-MSC) for renal transplanted patients resulted in lower incidence of acute rejection, decreased risk of opportunistic infection, and better estimated renal function. Compared with BM-MSC, umbilical cord derived MSC (UC-MSC) may be the better choice for clinical application. One main reason is that the collection of BM-MSC from liver transplanted patients would be harmful for the patients. Moreover, the proliferative abilities of BM-MSC from patients with liver disease are deficient, whereas, UC-MSC can be obtained from discarded umbilical cords and can be produced on a larger scale. Our and other studies reported that the infusion of human UC-MSC are feasible and can improve liver function of liver fibrosis and liver failure. The purpose of this study is to learn whether and how UC-MSC can improve the conditions in liver transplanted patients. This study will also look at how well UC-MSC is tolerated and its safety in liver transplanted patients. Participants in the study will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment arms: Arm A: Participants will receive 12 weeks of standard regular immunosuppressive agents plus UC-MSC treatment. Arm B: Participants will receive 12 weeks of standard regular immunosuppressive agents plus placebo. UC-MSC will be prepared according to standard procedures and is collected in plastic bags containing anti coagulant. MSCs are given via i.v. under sonography monitoring. After UC-MSC transfusion, patients are followed up at week 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 and 48, and the evaluation of liver function recovery was performed.

Interventions

DRUGConventional plus UC-MSC

Received conventional treatment and taken i.v., once per 4 week, at a dose of 1×106 UC-MSC/kg body weight for 12 weeks.

DRUGConventional plus placebo

Received conventional treatment and taken i.v., once per 4 week, at 50 ml saline for 12 weeks.

Sponsors

Beijing 302 Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Written informed consent. 2. Patients must be between the ages of 18 and 70 years and meet the criteria for liver transplantation. 3. Patient is receiving the first liver transplant. 4. Patient is receiving a liver transplant only. 5. Negative pregnancy test (female patients in fertile age). 6. Willing to comply with the study visits.

Exclusion criteria

1. Previously received or is receiving an organ transplant other than a liver. 2. Vital organs failure (Cardiac, Renal or Respiratory, et al). 3. Currently receiving an investigational drug or received an investigational drug within 30 days prior to transplant. 4. Currently receiving any immunosuppressive agent. 5. Clinically active bacterial, fungal, viral or parasitic infection. 6. Pregnant or lactating women. 7. Other candidates who are judged to be not applicable to this study by investigators.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Incidence rate of acute rejection and early liver function recovery48 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Patient and graft survival, and prevalence of adverse events48 weeks

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactFu-Sheng Wang, PHD
fswang302@163.com86-10-63879735
Backup ContactMing Shi, PHD
shiming302@sina.com86-10-63879735

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026