Skip to content

Fluid Resuscitation in Patients Suffering From Burns Injury

Prospective Randomised Controlled Open-label Explorative Multi-centre Pilot Trial of Volulyte®-Supplemented Versus Albumin-supplemented Fluid Resuscitation for Major Burns

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01689506
Enrollment
11
Registered
2012-09-21
Start date
2012-12-31
Completion date
2013-09-30
Last updated
2014-06-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Burns

Brief summary

This clinical study compares two fluid resuscitation treatments in patients suffering from burns injury. The treatments are Volulyte® and Human Serum Albumin (HSA) which will be administered as infusion solutions. It will be evaluated whether Volulyte® is effective and safe, and provides any benefit.

Detailed description

Severe burns injury presents a unique resuscitation problem due to simultaneous loss of electrolyte and protein-rich exudate from the burn wound itself and leakage of fluid and protein from the circulation into the interstitial compartment. In the post shock phase of burn resuscitation, patients frequently suffer oedema of unburned tissues and organs and a positive fluid balance of many litres. This pilot study will compare two burns fluid resuscitation regimes (supplementation with 6% HES 130/0.4 in an isotonic electrolyte solution, Volulyte 6%, versus supplementation with Human Serum Albumin, HSA 50g/L) on patient outcome with particular regard to fluid balance at 24 hours after burns injury (primary variable).

Interventions

6 % hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 in an isotonic electrolyte solution will be intravenously infused in order to achieve and maintain predefined hemodynamics goals and may be given up to a total daily dose of 50 mL/kg body weight/day.

5% Human Serum Albumin will be intravenously infused in order to achieve and maintain predefined hemodynamics goals with no daily dose limit.

Sponsors

Fresenius Kabi
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female patients ≥18 years of age * 15%≥ Burn Total Body Surface Area Injury ≤60% * Signed written informed consent from patient or legal representative

Exclusion criteria

* Patient age \>80 years * Delay of patient randomisation \>8 hours post-burn * Known pregnancy * Known renal failure with oliguria or anuria not related to hypovolaemia (e.g. patients receiving dialysis treatment) * High voltage electrical conduction injury * Known severe liver disease * Known fluid overload (hyperhydration), especially in cases of pulmonary oedema and congestive cardiac failure * Intracranial bleeding (known active or suspicion of intracranial bleeding)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Cumulative fluid balance (input-output)at 24 hours after burns injury

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Oedema monitoring: patient's weight, circumference measurement of unburned limbonce daily until day 7 after burns injury
Urine outputhourly until 24 hours after burns injury, at 24 hours after randomization and, thereafter, once daily until day 7 after burns injury
Cumulative fluid balance (input-output)at 8 hours after burns injury, at 24 hours after randomisation, and until day 7 after burns injury
Bladder pressureonce daily until day 7 after burns injury
Use of vasoactive and inotropic drugsuntil 24 hours after randomisation
Haemodynamicshourly until 24 hours after burns injury, at 24 hours after randomization and, thereafter, 4 times daily until day 7 after burns injury

Countries

United Kingdom

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026