Skip to content

Safety, Efficacy and PK/PD of QGE031 vs. Placebo in Patients With Active Bullous Pemphigoid Despite Oral Steroid Treatment

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled, Parallel Group Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of QGE031 in the Treatment of Patients With Bullous Pemphigoid With Disease Refractory to Oral Steroid Treatment

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01688882
Enrollment
20
Registered
2012-09-20
Start date
2013-01-31
Completion date
2015-03-31
Last updated
2016-04-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bullous Pemphigoid

Keywords

bullous pemphigoid, QGE031

Brief summary

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of QGE031 versus placebo in patients with bullous pemphigoid. Efficacy will be assessed as a reduction of disease activity. How QGE031 is broken down by the body and the impact it has on different blood and tissue markers will also be explored.

Detailed description

This study was planned to be divided into 2 distinct parts. Part 1 was a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy, safety, PK and PD of multiple, subcutaneous doses of QGE031 in the treatment of patients with BP with disease refractory to oral steroid treatment. Patients were treated with QGE031 or placebo in a 2:1 ratio. Part 2 of this study was planned to be a multi-center, open label, dose range finding study evaluating the efficacy, safety, PK and PD of multiple, subcutaneous doses of QGE031 in the treatment of patients with BP with disease refractory to oral steroid treatment. This study was stopped after Part 1 completed and was terminated because the predefined criteria of efficacy was not reached ( \>50% better then placebo)

Interventions

DRUGQGE031

QGE031 will be evaluated at various dose levels and regimens, based on the impact on disease of the next highest dose level and regimen.

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo will be used to control for normal variability in disease severity.

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients diagnosed with bullous pemphigoid * Stable dose of prednisone at or above 10mg per day but no greater than 1 mg/kg/day * Weigh between 40-120kg * total IgE level up to 5000 IU/mL

Exclusion criteria

* Use of rituximab within 1 year Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients That Had a Clinical Global Assessment of Change (CGA-C) Responder Rate by Week 1212 weeksClinical Global Assessment of Change (CGA-C) responder rate was the responder rate at 12 weeks based on the CGA-C in bullous pemphigoid (BP). A patient with a CGA-C score of 3 or 4 indicating 'at least marked improvement from baseline' at 12 weeks was considered a responder. The CGA-C is an investigator assessment of change from baseline and is scored as follows: -4 = Very marked worsening (100% worsening); -3 = Marked worsening (67-99% worsening); -2 = Moderate worsening (34-66% worsening); -1 = Slight worsening (1-33% worsening); 1= Slight improvement (1-33% improvement); 2 = Moderate improvement (34-66% improvement); 3 = Marked improvement (67-99% improvement); 4 = Complete clearance (100% improvement)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Response Based on Clinical Global Assessment of Change CGA-C Score at 6 Weeks6 weeksClinical Global Assessment of Change (CGA-C) responder rate was the responder rate at 6 weeks based on the CGA-C score in bullous pemphigoid (BP). A patient with a CGA-C score of 3 or 4 indicating marked improvement from baseline at 6 weeks was considered a responder. The CGA-C is an investigator assessment of change from baseline and is scored as follows: -4 = Very marked worsening (100% worsening); -3 = Marked worsening (67-99% worsening); -2 = Moderate worsening (34-66% worsening); -1 = Slight worsening (1-33% worsening); 1= Slight improvement (1-33% improvement); 2 = Moderate improvement (34-66% improvement); 3 = Marked improvement (67-99% improvement); 4 = Complete clearance (100% improvement)
Number of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksBaseline (week 0), week 6 and week 12Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) - (scale of 0 to 4, where 0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate and 4=severe)

Countries

Austria, France, Germany, Japan, Taiwan, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
QGE031
QGE031 240 mg Q2W s.c.
13
Placebo
Placebo to Match Q2W s.c.
7
Total20

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdministrative problems10
Overall StudyAdverse Event10
Overall StudyUnsatisfactory therapeutic effect11

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicQGE031PlaceboTotal
Age, Continuous63.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.85
67.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.6
65.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.52
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants4 Participants7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants3 Participants13 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
11 / 136 / 72 / 410 / 113 / 52 / 4
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 132 / 71 / 42 / 110 / 50 / 4

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Patients That Had a Clinical Global Assessment of Change (CGA-C) Responder Rate by Week 12

Clinical Global Assessment of Change (CGA-C) responder rate was the responder rate at 12 weeks based on the CGA-C in bullous pemphigoid (BP). A patient with a CGA-C score of 3 or 4 indicating 'at least marked improvement from baseline' at 12 weeks was considered a responder. The CGA-C is an investigator assessment of change from baseline and is scored as follows: -4 = Very marked worsening (100% worsening); -3 = Marked worsening (67-99% worsening); -2 = Moderate worsening (34-66% worsening); -1 = Slight worsening (1-33% worsening); 1= Slight improvement (1-33% improvement); 2 = Moderate improvement (34-66% improvement); 3 = Marked improvement (67-99% improvement); 4 = Complete clearance (100% improvement)

Time frame: 12 weeks

Population: Pharmacodynamics (PD) analysis set included all randomized patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
QGE031Number of Patients That Had a Clinical Global Assessment of Change (CGA-C) Responder Rate by Week 128 number of participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients That Had a Clinical Global Assessment of Change (CGA-C) Responder Rate by Week 122 number of participants
Secondary

Number of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 Weeks

Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) - (scale of 0 to 4, where 0=clear, 1=almost clear, 2=mild, 3=moderate and 4=severe)

Time frame: Baseline (week 0), week 6 and week 12

Population: Pharmacodynamics (PD) analysis set included all randomized patients.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
QGE031Number of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksWeek 6 - IGA Score: 14 Number of participants
QGE031Number of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksWeek 12 - IGA Score: 21 Number of participants
QGE031Number of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksWeek 6 - IGA Score: 01 Number of participants
QGE031Number of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksWeek 0 - IGA Score: 34 Number of participants
QGE031Number of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksWeek 12 - IGA Score: 15 Number of participants
QGE031Number of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksWeek 6 - IGA Score: 32 Number of participants
QGE031Number of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksWeek 0 - IGA Score: 10 Number of participants
QGE031Number of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksWeek 12 - IGA Score: 34 Number of participants
QGE031Number of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksWeek 0 - IGA Score: 20 Number of participants
QGE031Number of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksWeek 0 - IGA Score: 49 Number of participants
QGE031Number of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksWeek 12 - IGA Score: 01 Number of participants
QGE031Number of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksWeek 6 - IGA Score: 40 Number of participants
QGE031Number of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksWeek 6 - IGA Score: 24 Number of participants
QGE031Number of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksWeek 12- IGA Score: 40 Number of participants
QGE031Number of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksWeek 0 - IGA Score: 00 Number of participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksWeek 12- IGA Score: 40 Number of participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksWeek 0 - IGA Score: 00 Number of participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksWeek 6 - IGA Score: 02 Number of participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksWeek 12 - IGA Score: 02 Number of participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksWeek 0 - IGA Score: 10 Number of participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksWeek 6 - IGA Score: 12 Number of participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksWeek 12 - IGA Score: 11 Number of participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksWeek 0 - IGA Score: 20 Number of participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksWeek 6 - IGA Score: 20 Number of participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksWeek 12 - IGA Score: 22 Number of participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksWeek 0 - IGA Score: 35 Number of participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksWeek 6 - IGA Score: 32 Number of participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksWeek 12 - IGA Score: 31 Number of participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksWeek 0 - IGA Score: 42 Number of participants
PlaceboNumber of Patients Investigator Global Assessment Score Over 12 WeeksWeek 6 - IGA Score: 40 Number of participants
Secondary

Response Based on Clinical Global Assessment of Change CGA-C Score at 6 Weeks

Clinical Global Assessment of Change (CGA-C) responder rate was the responder rate at 6 weeks based on the CGA-C score in bullous pemphigoid (BP). A patient with a CGA-C score of 3 or 4 indicating marked improvement from baseline at 6 weeks was considered a responder. The CGA-C is an investigator assessment of change from baseline and is scored as follows: -4 = Very marked worsening (100% worsening); -3 = Marked worsening (67-99% worsening); -2 = Moderate worsening (34-66% worsening); -1 = Slight worsening (1-33% worsening); 1= Slight improvement (1-33% improvement); 2 = Moderate improvement (34-66% improvement); 3 = Marked improvement (67-99% improvement); 4 = Complete clearance (100% improvement)

Time frame: 6 weeks

Population: Pharmacodynamics (PD) analysis set included all randomized patients.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
QGE031Response Based on Clinical Global Assessment of Change CGA-C Score at 6 Weeks8 number of participants
PlaceboResponse Based on Clinical Global Assessment of Change CGA-C Score at 6 Weeks2 number of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026