Skip to content

Simulation-Based Training for Ultrasound-Guided Perineural Catheter Insertion

A Prospective Study to Determine the Efficacy of Simulation-based Training on Practicing Anesthesiologists' Acquisition of Ultrasound-guided Perineural Catheter Insertion Skills

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01688271
Enrollment
32
Registered
2012-09-19
Start date
2012-08-31
Completion date
2014-07-31
Last updated
2014-10-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain Management, Simulation, Training, Ultrasonography

Keywords

simulation, ultrasound, perineural infusion, continuous peripheral nerve block

Brief summary

This study will determine the efficacy of a teaching program incorporating hybrid simulation in training practicing anesthesiologists on ultrasound (US)-guided continuous peripheral nerve block (CPNB). This study will also examine the extent of practice change following participation in a regional anesthesia teaching program incorporating hybrid simulation. In addition, this study will assess remaining obstacles to incorporating the use of US-guided perineural catheters through identifying potential future interventions and tool-kits for setting up perineural catheter programs.

Detailed description

Study subjects will complete a pre-course survey to assess prior experience then participate in a standardized one-day workshop comprised of two sessions; 1) a didactic lecture and model scanning session and 2) a simulation session. Quantitative and qualitative assessments will be performed using video analysis by two blinded reviewers after equipment orientation (baseline), following first session, and following second session. Performance times, number of attempts, and composite scores for procedural performance and ergonomics will be analyzed within and between groups. Every 3 months for one year, subjects will be surveyed to assess implementation of PNB in practice and identify remaining barriers.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Stanford University
CollaboratorOTHER
VA Palo Alto Health Care System
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Anesthesiologists in practice ten years or more; active board certification (American Board of Anesthesiologists); active license to practice medicine in California; and willingness to spend one full day (8 hours) participating in the standardized workshop and undergo interval survey and interview follow-up for one year.

Exclusion criteria

* Formal training (e.g., post-graduate fellowship) in regional anesthesia; current practice includes the routine performance of US-guided PNB (≥10 blocks per month); or visual, hearing, or other communication impairment that would interfere with video recording or require substantial deviation from the standardized teaching curriculum.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in video assessment score from baselinebaseline (time 0), interval assessment (time 1), and post-course (time 2)The primary outcome is the change in composite score from baseline assessment based on the video analysis tool used by blinded reviewers. The baseline assessment at time 0 will take place after initial orientation to the simulation lab. This procedure will take approximately 15 min to perform and record. After the morning session of training (4 hours), the interval assessment at time 1 will take place in the same manner. The final assessment will take place following the entire course (8 hours total) according to the same procedures at time 2. Video recordings will be reviewed at a later date after completion of the training day.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Implementation of new trainingEvery 3 months post-training for 1 yearStarting 3 months after the workshop and every 3 months thereafter for one year, subjects will be sent an online practice assessment survey similar to the pre-course survey by the research assistant and will be asked to report their case logs.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026