Skip to content

Safety Study of MRI-guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate Tissue to Treat Localized Prostate Cancer

Phase 1 Study: A Prospective, Multi-center, Single Arm Study - Evaluation of the Safety and Feasibility of MRI-guided Transurethral Ultrasound Therapy for the Ablation of Prostate Tissue in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01686958
Enrollment
30
Registered
2012-09-18
Start date
2013-03-13
Completion date
2019-06-11
Last updated
2020-02-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Keywords

Prostate Cancer, High intensity transurethral ultrasound ablation, MRI-guided, Minimally invasive, Real-time temperature feedback control

Brief summary

This study is to evaluate that the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided transurethral ultrasound therapy system is safe and feasible to ablate prostate tissue in men with localized prostate cancer.

Detailed description

Profound Medical Inc. has developed a novel technology called the MRI-guided transurethral ultrasound therapy system. The technology is developed for patients with organ confined prostate cancer. The therapeutic endpoint of this technology is thermal coagulation of prostate tissue. The treatment is conducted completely within an MRI suite, which enables real-time temperature images of the heated region to be acquired as the ultrasonic treatment is delivered. Using MRI thermometry during treatment, dynamic temperature feedback control over the intensity of the ultrasound beams and rotation of the Ultrasound Applicator can shape the pattern of thermal coagulation accurately and precisely in the prostate gland, thereby reducing the risk of possible damage to important surrounding anatomy such as the rectum, urinary sphincters, neurovascular bundles and pelvic bone. This coagulation method, therefore, has the potential to have lower complication rates than conventional therapies.

Interventions

DEVICEMR-Guided Transurethral US Ablation of Prostate Tissue

The technology is developed to treat patients with organ confined prostate cancer. The therapeutic endpoint of this technology is thermal coagulation of prostate tissue.

Sponsors

Profound Medical Inc.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
65 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male, age ≥65 * Patient with low-risk, early-stage organ-confined prostate cancer (Stage T1c or T2a, N0, M0). * Gleason score 6 (3+3) * Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≤ 10 ng/ml * Eligible for MR imaging (DOC-10252) * Meets the following criteria on pre-treatment transrectal ultrasound imaging: 1. No cysts or calcifications \> 1.0 cm in size 2. No evidence of extraprostatic extension or seminal vesicle invasion 3. Overall prostate size less than 5 cm in sagittal length and less than 7 cm in diameter * Biopsy confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate, performed at least 6 weeks prior to and no more than 6 months prior to the scheduled treatment. * Eligible for General Anesthesia, as defined in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) * Normal rectal anatomy and rectal mucosa on digital rectal examination

Exclusion criteria

* Bleeding disorder * Abnormal coagulation and current anticoagulant therapy. * Acute or chronic Urinary Tract Infection * Interest in future fertility * History of allergy relevant medication or other * History of any other malignancy other than skin cancer * Patients with peripheral arterial disease with intermittent claudication or Leriches Syndrome * Prior treatment of the prostate gland * Prior treatment with 5 alpha reductase inhibitor allowed (not as prostate cancer treatment or prevention) as long as drug has been stopped for minimum 3 months * History of any major rectal or pelvic surgery * History of ulcerative colitis or other chronic inflammatory conditions affecting rectum * History of documented clinical prostatitis requiring therapy within previous 6 months * History of urethral and bladder outlet disorders, including urethral stricture disease, urethral diverticulae, bladder neck contracture, urethral fistulae which had required prior urethrotomy, urethral stenting, urethroplasty or chronic indwelling urethral catheter * Patients with artificial urinary sphincter or any penile implant (metallic or non-metallic) * Neurologic bladder disorders * Untreated bladder stones * History of acute urinary retention * Confirmed or suspected bladder cancer * Urinary sphincter abnormalities * Active untreated gross hematuria for any cause * Post Void Residual (PVR) bladder volume \> 250 mL * Obstructing median lobe enlarged out of proportion to the rest of the prostate and protruding significantly into the bladder Additional

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety - Evaluate the Frequency of Treatment Related Adverse Events12 months from the Treatment DateAll reported adverse events were recorded. The frequency was measured as the number of study participants who experienced a treatment/device related adverse event after receiving treatment delivery with PAD-105, the investigational device.
Safety - Evaluate the Severity of Treatment Related Adverse Events12 months from the Treatment DateSeverity of treatment/device related adverse events were evaluated in accordance with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) standard (version 4), published by the National Cancer Institute (NCI). There was no intraoperative complication, no rectal injury or fistula and no severe urinary incontinence. No Grade 4 (G4) or higher adverse events and only one attributable Grade 3 (G3) event; reported below. The common and significant Grade 1 (G1) and Grade 2 (G2) genitourinary events have also been reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility - Evaluate the Effectiveness of the Investigational System to Thermally Coagulate Prostate Tissue Conforming to the Target Volume With a High Degree of Accuracy and PrecisionOn Treatment DateConformal thermal coagulation of prostate tissue will be determined quantitatively using measures of targeting accuracy which compare the spatial difference between the target volume and target temperature isotherm determined from MR thermometry images acquired during treatment.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Treatment Efficacy - Quality of Life - Erectile FunctionBaseline and 12-months post TreatmentEvaluate quality of life in the first 12 months following Treatment compared to Baseline, using a standardized questionnaire, Erectile Function EF domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15), which focuses on erectile symptoms. Minimum score value - 0 Maximum score value - 30 A higher score corresponds to a better outcome; lower score indicative of erectile dysfunction
Treatment Efficacy - Biopsy12 months from the Treatment DateEvaluate the effectiveness of the treatment to achieve disease control at 12 months based on biopsy results.
Treatment Efficacy - Quality of Life - Bowel HabitsBaseline and 12-months post TreatmentEvaluate quality of life in the first 12 months following Treatment compared to Baseline, using a standardized questionnaire, Bowel Habits domain of the UCLA Prostate Cancer Index Short Form (UCLA-PCl-SF-BH), which focuses on bowel symptoms. Minimum score value - 0 Maximum score value - 100 A higher score corresponds to better outcome
Treatment Efficacy - PSAAs per the Study Schedule, measured at 1-month, 3-months, 6-months and 12-months from the Treatment Date compared to BaselineBased on measurements obtained at each study visit, characterize the pattern of PSA response within the first 12 months following treatment in comparison to baseline.
Treatment Efficacy - Quality of Life - Urinary SymptomsBaseline and 12-months post TreatmentEvaluate quality of life in the first 12 months following Treatment compared to Baseline, using a standardized questionnaire, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), which focuses on urinary symptoms. Total Score: 0 - 35 0-7 - mildly symptomatic 8-19 - moderately symptomatic 20-35 - severely symptomatic

Countries

Canada, Germany, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
MR-Guided Transurethral US Ablation
MR-Guided Transurethral US Ablation of Prostate Tissue MR-Guided Transurethral US Ablation of Prostate Tissue: The technology is developed to treat patients with organ confined prostate cancer. The therapeutic endpoint of this technology is thermal coagulation of prescribed prostate tissue.
30
Total30

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMR-Guided Transurethral US Ablation
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
28 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Multi-racial
1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White/Caucasian
29 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
12 participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
14 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
4 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
30 Participants
Subjects with erections sufficient for penetration at Baseline21 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
30 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Safety - Evaluate the Frequency of Treatment Related Adverse Events

All reported adverse events were recorded. The frequency was measured as the number of study participants who experienced a treatment/device related adverse event after receiving treatment delivery with PAD-105, the investigational device.

Time frame: 12 months from the Treatment Date

Population: The safety population consists of all subjects who underwent treatment delivery with PAD-105, the investigational medical device.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MR-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate TissueSafety - Evaluate the Frequency of Treatment Related Adverse Events30 Participants
Comparison: A total of 30 subjects will be accrued to this study and treated with the PAD-105. The sample size is based primarily on feasibility and logistical concerns, however, is sufficiently large to allow the safety objectives to be met. Specifically, with 30 total patients, if no treatment-related grade 4 or 5 adverse events are observed, then a one-sided, 95% confidence interval would have an upper bound of 0.095.
Primary

Safety - Evaluate the Severity of Treatment Related Adverse Events

Severity of treatment/device related adverse events were evaluated in accordance with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) standard (version 4), published by the National Cancer Institute (NCI). There was no intraoperative complication, no rectal injury or fistula and no severe urinary incontinence. No Grade 4 (G4) or higher adverse events and only one attributable Grade 3 (G3) event; reported below. The common and significant Grade 1 (G1) and Grade 2 (G2) genitourinary events have also been reported.

Time frame: 12 months from the Treatment Date

Population: The safety population consists of all subjects who underwent treatment delivery with PAD-105, the investigational medical device.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
MR-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate TissueSafety - Evaluate the Severity of Treatment Related Adverse EventsHematuria - G143 % of subjects
MR-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate TissueSafety - Evaluate the Severity of Treatment Related Adverse EventsHematuria - G26.7 % of subjects
MR-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate TissueSafety - Evaluate the Severity of Treatment Related Adverse EventsEpididymitis - G33.3 % of subjects
MR-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate TissueSafety - Evaluate the Severity of Treatment Related Adverse EventsUrinary retention - G110 % of subjects
MR-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate TissueSafety - Evaluate the Severity of Treatment Related Adverse EventsObstructive micturition10 % of subjects
MR-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate TissueSafety - Evaluate the Severity of Treatment Related Adverse EventsUrinary incontinence - G13.3 % of subjects
MR-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate TissueSafety - Evaluate the Severity of Treatment Related Adverse EventsUrinary stricture - G23.3 % of subjects
MR-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate TissueSafety - Evaluate the Severity of Treatment Related Adverse EventsUrinary tract infection - G233 % of subjects
MR-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate TissueSafety - Evaluate the Severity of Treatment Related Adverse EventsUrinary retention - G217 % of subjects
MR-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate TissueSafety - Evaluate the Severity of Treatment Related Adverse EventsUrinary incontinence - G210 % of subjects
MR-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate TissueSafety - Evaluate the Severity of Treatment Related Adverse EventsUrinary stricture - G13.3 % of subjects
Secondary

Feasibility - Evaluate the Effectiveness of the Investigational System to Thermally Coagulate Prostate Tissue Conforming to the Target Volume With a High Degree of Accuracy and Precision

Conformal thermal coagulation of prostate tissue will be determined quantitatively using measures of targeting accuracy which compare the spatial difference between the target volume and target temperature isotherm determined from MR thermometry images acquired during treatment.

Time frame: On Treatment Date

Population: The analysis population consists of all subjects who underwent treatment delivery with PAD-105, the investigational medical device.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
MR-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate TissueFeasibility - Evaluate the Effectiveness of the Investigational System to Thermally Coagulate Prostate Tissue Conforming to the Target Volume With a High Degree of Accuracy and PrecisionThermal ablation accuracy0.1 mmStandard Deviation 0.4
MR-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate TissueFeasibility - Evaluate the Effectiveness of the Investigational System to Thermally Coagulate Prostate Tissue Conforming to the Target Volume With a High Degree of Accuracy and PrecisionThermal ablation precision1.3 mmStandard Deviation 0.4
Other Pre-specified

Treatment Efficacy - Biopsy

Evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment to achieve disease control at 12 months based on biopsy results.

Time frame: 12 months from the Treatment Date

Population: One patient did not complete the 12-month visit, therefore 29 patients were included in this analysis.

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
MR-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate TissueTreatment Efficacy - BiopsyPositive biopsy (clinically significant disease)9 Participants
MR-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate TissueTreatment Efficacy - BiopsyOverall absence of clinically significant disease20 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Treatment Efficacy - PSA

Based on measurements obtained at each study visit, characterize the pattern of PSA response within the first 12 months following treatment in comparison to baseline.

Time frame: As per the Study Schedule, measured at 1-month, 3-months, 6-months and 12-months from the Treatment Date compared to Baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
MR-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate TissueTreatment Efficacy - PSAPSA @ Baseline5.8 ng/ml
MR-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate TissueTreatment Efficacy - PSAPSA @ 1 month0.8 ng/ml
MR-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate TissueTreatment Efficacy - PSAPSA @ 3 months0.9 ng/ml
MR-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate TissueTreatment Efficacy - PSAPSA @ 6 months0.8 ng/ml
MR-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate TissueTreatment Efficacy - PSAPSA @ 12 months0.8 ng/ml
Other Pre-specified

Treatment Efficacy - Quality of Life - Bowel Habits

Evaluate quality of life in the first 12 months following Treatment compared to Baseline, using a standardized questionnaire, Bowel Habits domain of the UCLA Prostate Cancer Index Short Form (UCLA-PCl-SF-BH), which focuses on bowel symptoms. Minimum score value - 0 Maximum score value - 100 A higher score corresponds to better outcome

Time frame: Baseline and 12-months post Treatment

Population: One patient did not complete the 12-month visit questionnaire in its entirety, hence overall number of patients analyzed is 29 versus 30 at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
MR-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate TissueTreatment Efficacy - Quality of Life - Bowel HabitsUCLA-PCI-SF-BH @ Baseline100 units on a scale
MR-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate TissueTreatment Efficacy - Quality of Life - Bowel HabitsUCLA-PCI-SF-BH @ 12 months100 units on a scale
Other Pre-specified

Treatment Efficacy - Quality of Life - Erectile Function

Evaluate quality of life in the first 12 months following Treatment compared to Baseline, using a standardized questionnaire, Erectile Function EF domain of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15), which focuses on erectile symptoms. Minimum score value - 0 Maximum score value - 30 A higher score corresponds to a better outcome; lower score indicative of erectile dysfunction

Time frame: Baseline and 12-months post Treatment

Population: One patient did not complete the 12-month visit questionnaire in its entirety, hence overall number of patients analyzed is 29 versus 30 at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
MR-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate TissueTreatment Efficacy - Quality of Life - Erectile FunctionIIEF-EF-15 @ Baseline13 units on a scale
MR-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate TissueTreatment Efficacy - Quality of Life - Erectile FunctionIIEF-EF-15 @ 12 months13 units on a scale
Other Pre-specified

Treatment Efficacy - Quality of Life - Urinary Symptoms

Evaluate quality of life in the first 12 months following Treatment compared to Baseline, using a standardized questionnaire, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), which focuses on urinary symptoms. Total Score: 0 - 35 0-7 - mildly symptomatic 8-19 - moderately symptomatic 20-35 - severely symptomatic

Time frame: Baseline and 12-months post Treatment

Population: One patient did not complete the 12-month visit questionnaire in its entirety, hence overall number of patients analyzed is 29 versus 30 at baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
MR-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate TissueTreatment Efficacy - Quality of Life - Urinary SymptomsIPSS @ Baseline8 units on a scale
MR-Guided Transurethral Ultrasound Ablation of Prostate TissueTreatment Efficacy - Quality of Life - Urinary SymptomsIPSS @ 12 months5 units on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 14, 2026