Skip to content

Mask Ventilation With Different Face Masks During Neonatal Resuscitation

Comparison of Two Round Face Masks During Neonatal Resuscitation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01685697
Enrollment
56
Registered
2012-09-14
Start date
2013-03-31
Completion date
2013-09-30
Last updated
2018-11-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Respiration; Insufficient or Poor, Newborn

Brief summary

Most premature babies have difficulty breathing at birth and need help (what we call resuscitation). The treatment for this is to gently inflate their lungs with a resuscitation device and a facemask. The device commonly used is a T-Piece infant resuscitator (which we call the T-Piece) and is used at The Royal Alexandra Hospital and all round the world. To gentle inflate an infants lung the clinical team put a face mask around your baby's mouth and nose. The clinical team tries to achieve a good seal between the face and the mask. A problem of mask ventilation is that air can escape between the mask and the face (what we call mask leak). Currently, two different types of facemasks (Laerdal mask or Fisher & Paykel mask) are routinely used in the delivery room at The Royal Alexandra Hospital. The purpose of this study is to find out if one facemask is leaking less between the face and the mask.

Detailed description

We will use a Laerdal round mask (Laerdal, Stavanger, Norway) compared to a Fisher & Paykel (FP) (Fisher & Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand) 'round' neonatal resuscitation mask. The two point top hold for Laerdal 'round' mask and the rim hold for the Fisher & Paykel mask. A Respiratory Function Monitor will be placed between the face mask and the ventilation device. It uses a small (dead space 1 mL) flow sensor to measure gas flow in and out of a face mask. This signal is automatically integrated to provide inspired and expired tidal volume. The difference equals the leak from the face mask. It also calculates respiratory rate and minute ventilation, measures spontaneous inspirations and ventilation pressures. The signals of airway flow, tidal volumes, airway pressure, inspired oxygen concentration, temperature, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, heart rate will be digitised and recorded at 200Hz using the Spectra physiological recording program (a customised neonatal respiratory physiology program). We will compare the % of mask leak within the two face masks.

Interventions

PROCEDUREMask ventilation with a Laerdal face mask

Mask leak will be measured using a respiratory function monitor. Mask ventilation will be analyzed over a period of 5 minutes. The mean mask leak will be compared to the intervention group.

PROCEDUREMask ventilation with a F&P face mask

Mask leak will be measured using a respiratory function monitor. Mask ventilation will be analyzed over a period of 5 minutes. The mean mask leak will be compared to the control group.

Sponsors

University of Alberta
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 30 Minutes
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Preterm infants \<32 weeks gestation born at The Royal Alexandra Hospital who require resuscitation in the delivery room will be recorded.

Exclusion criteria

* Infants will be excluded from final analysis if they have a congenital abnormality or condition that might have an adverse effect on breathing or ventilation, including: Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia. Infants will also be excluded if their parents refuse to give consent to this study. Participants will be included in the first minutes after birth if they require mask ventilation for poor respiratory effort. Data will be collected from the Hospital chart until discharge at around 40 weeks gestation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in Percentage of Leakduring mask ventilation in the first 5 minutes after birthPrimary outcome: Difference in percentage of Leak

Countries

Canada

Participant flow

Recruitment details

March 2013 to September 2013

Pre-assignment details

The study used deferred consent approach. In this approach patient are randomized and asked to participant afterwards because of minimal risk to participation this study. Therefore there are a larger number of participant at the start date of the study and if they decline to participate a lower enrolled number.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Laerdal Mask
Mask ventilation with a Laerdal face mask Mask ventilation with a Laerdal face mask: Mask leak will be measured using a respiratory function monitor. Mask ventilation will be analyzed over a period of 5 minutes. The mean mask leak will be compared to the intervention group. Mask ventilation with a F&P face mask: Mask leak will be measured using a respiratory function monitor. Mask ventilation will be analyzed over a period of 5 minutes. The mean mask leak will be compared to the control group.
28
F&P Mask
Mask ventilation with a F&P face mask Mask ventilation with a Laerdal face mask: Mask leak will be measured using a respiratory function monitor. Mask ventilation will be analyzed over a period of 5 minutes. The mean mask leak will be compared to the intervention group. Mask ventilation with a F&P face mask: Mask leak will be measured using a respiratory function monitor. Mask ventilation will be analyzed over a period of 5 minutes. The mean mask leak will be compared to the control group.
28
Total56

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation33

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicF&P MaskTotalLaerdal Mask
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
28 Participants56 Participants28 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Continuous
Gestational age in weeks
28 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3
28 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
28 weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2
Region of Enrollment
Canada
28 participants56 participants28 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
13 Participants26 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
15 Participants30 Participants15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
2 / 282 / 28
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 280 / 28
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 282 / 28

Outcome results

Primary

Difference in Percentage of Leak

Primary outcome: Difference in percentage of Leak

Time frame: during mask ventilation in the first 5 minutes after birth

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Laerdal MaskDifference in Percentage of Leak35 % (percentage of mass leak)
F&P MaskDifference in Percentage of Leak30 % (percentage of mass leak)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026