Skip to content

A Clinical Evaluation of ST Changes in a Group of Patients Having Ventricular Arrhythmias

A Clinical Evaluation of ST Changes in a Group of Patients Having Ventricular Arrhythmias

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01685047
Acronym
inSighT
Enrollment
481
Registered
2012-09-13
Start date
2012-12-31
Completion date
2016-04-30
Last updated
2019-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

Coronary Artery Disease, Ventricular Arrhythmias, ST Segment Changes

Brief summary

The purpose of this investigation is to determine the prevalence of device-recorded ST segment changes occurring before appropriate Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD) therapies (ATP or Shock) and to define their temporal relationship to ventricular arrhythmias.

Detailed description

Sudden cardiac death due to cardiac arrhythmia is a devastating and unpredictable complication of coronary artery disease. Implantation of automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) is a well established therapy for the treatment and prevention of sudden cardiac death. Evidence for the use of these devices has been provided by a number of landmark clinical trials over the last 16 years. Reduction in ischemia can be achieved by coronary artery revascularization but in many patients may occur a gradual progression to recurrence of ischemia resulting in further life threatening arrhythmias. It is reasonable to assume that unchecked progression of ischemic heart disease may result in increased mortality in ICD patients. It has been shown that the long term mortality risk for ICD patients can be linked to the time since the last coronary revascularization procedure. Both MADIT-II and Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure trial (SCD-HeFT) showed that patients receiving inappropriate ICD therapy have an increased risk of death. It has been speculated that this may be due to progression of the disease and recurrent ischemia. A feature available in some ICDs manufactured by St Jude medical enables the constant beat to beat monitoring of the intra-cardiac ST segment using the implanted ICD leads. Similar systems have demonstrated this approach to be a reliable method of identifying ischemic events. However, the predictive value of the ST monitoring feature in identifying pending arrhythmic events has yet to be established. Prediction of worsening ischemia could play an important part in allowing physicians to identify ICD patients with greater mortality risk and allow them the time to personalize patient therapy in order to reduce that risk.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Abbott Medical Devices
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The patient is implanted with an St Jude Medical (SJM) ICD with ST Monitoring and ShockGuard™ features (and remote care feature in case Merlin.net will be used) * The patient, in the opinion of the investigator, will not require ventricular pacing for more than 20% of the time. * The patient, in the opinion of the investigator, has or is at high risk of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD). * The patient is ≥ 18 years of age. * The patient is able to provide written Informed Consent prior to any investigational related procedure.

Exclusion criteria

* The patient has longstanding persistent Atrial Fibrillation (AF) /Atrial Flutter (AFl) or permanent AF/AFl * The patient has documented complete heart block. * The patient is known to have uncontrolled ventricular bigeminy or trigeminy (PVCs on regular basis). * The patient has severe Left Ventricular Hypertrophy resulting in interventricular conduction defect (IVCD). * The patient has intermittent bundle branch blocks (BBB). * The patient is unable to comply with the follow up schedule. * The patient is participating in another investigational device or drug investigation. * The patient is pregnant or is planning to become pregnant during the duration of the investigation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Among Patients With an Appropriate ICD Therapy (Shock or ATP) for Ventricular Tachycardia or Fibrillation, the Number of Patients Who Have Characterized ST Segment Changes From Baseline Prior to the Therapy Was Calculated.Until the end of follow up period

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Patient Population
Patients implanted with a St. Jude Medical ICD device with ST monitoring and ShockGuard feature, a right ventricular lead and, when applicable, a right atrial lead, were eligible for this investigation.
480
Total480

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event5
Overall StudyDeath26
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up8
Overall Studypatient withdrawn by sponsor1
Overall StudyPhysician Decision25
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject20

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPatient Population
Age, Continuous63.95 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.29
Atrial Arrhythmia history
Atrial Fibrillation
76 participants
Atrial Arrhythmia history
Atrial Flutter
14 participants
Indication for Implant
Primary prevention
296 participants
Indication for Implant
Secondary prevention
184 participants
Medical History
Arrhythmogenic RV cardiomyopathy
3 participants
Medical History
Diabetic cardiomyopathy
3 participants
Medical History
Dilated cardiomyopathy
93 participants
Medical History
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
9 participants
Medical History
Inschemic cardiomyopathy
366 participants
Medical History
Non Ischemic cardiomyopathy
12 participants
Medical History
Obesity associated cardiomyopathy
1 participants
Medical History
Other
23 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
80 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
400 Participants
Ventricular Arrhythmia history
Monomorphic ventricular tachycardia
107 participants
Ventricular Arrhythmia history
Other
23 participants
Ventricular Arrhythmia history
Polymorphic ventricular tachycardia
10 participants
Ventricular Arrhythmia history
Premature ventricular contractions
27 participants
Ventricular Arrhythmia history
Ventricular fibrillation
79 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
57 / 481
serious
Total, serious adverse events
147 / 481

Outcome results

Primary

Among Patients With an Appropriate ICD Therapy (Shock or ATP) for Ventricular Tachycardia or Fibrillation, the Number of Patients Who Have Characterized ST Segment Changes From Baseline Prior to the Therapy Was Calculated.

Time frame: Until the end of follow up period

Population: The other subjects enrolled in this study had no treated VT/VF events.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Patient PopulationAmong Patients With an Appropriate ICD Therapy (Shock or ATP) for Ventricular Tachycardia or Fibrillation, the Number of Patients Who Have Characterized ST Segment Changes From Baseline Prior to the Therapy Was Calculated.56 participants
Comparison: There were no formal pre-specified statistical hypotheses for the endpoints of the study due to the exploratory nature of this study. Some data was excluded from the primary analysis. All device detections resulting in therapy have been reviewed for appropriateness of the therapy. VT/VF therapy delivered from the device as a result of a non-ventricular arrhythmia or as a result of oversensing by the device has not been included in the primary data analysis.p-value: <0.05t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026