Skip to content

Research to Evaluate a Possible Relation Between Values Obtained After Processing CT Images, Lung Function Tests and the Experience of the Patient During an Exacerbation in COPD Patients.

Correlation of Functional Respiratory Imaging Parameters With Lung Function Parameters and Patient Reported Outcome Measures During Exacerbation of COPD.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01684384
Enrollment
53
Registered
2012-09-13
Start date
2012-09-30
Completion date
2014-09-30
Last updated
2014-12-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

Keywords

Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, COPD, Exacerbation, Functional Respiratory Imaging, High Resolution Computed Tomography, HRCT scan, Patient Reported Outcome, PRO, Computational Fluid Dynamic, CFD, Lung function parameters

Brief summary

In this study the consequences of exacerbations will be visualized by high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan at functional residual capacity (FRC) and total lung capacity (TLC) as taken during an episode of exacerbation and after recovering. Changes in HRCT based airway dimensions and computational fluid dynamic (CFD) -based resistance values will be correlated with changes in patient reported outcomes (PROs) and lung function tests recorded at the same time.

Interventions

HRCT scan at FRC and TLC as taken during an episode of exacerbation and after recovering.

Sponsors

FLUIDDA nv
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female, ≥ 40 years old * COPD as defined by the global Initiative on obstructive lung disease4 * Post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC \< 70% AND post-bronchodilator FEV1 \<80%pred as documented in the last 5 years. * Smoking history of at least 10 pack-years * At entry in the study experiencing an exacerbation defined as an acute change in the patient 's baseline dyspnea, cough, and/or sputum that is beyond normal day to day variations, and that necessitates the administration or doubling of systemic corticosteroid treatment. * Patients must be able to understand and complete protocol requirements, instructions, questionnaires and protocol-stated restrictions. * Written and signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or lactating females * Patient diagnosed with asthma * Patient with pneumonia as defined radiologically at the start of the exacerbation * Patient with a history of or presence of lung cancer * Patient with an indication for non-invasive ventilation * Patient unlikely to comply with the protocol or unable to understand the nature, scope and possible consequences of the study. * Patient who received any investigational new drug within the last 4 weeks prior to visit 1.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in functional respiratory imaging parametersBaseline (= during exacerbation) and after about 6 weeks (= after recovering)The primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether changes in HRCT based airway dimensions and Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD)-based resistance values correlate with changes in lung function parameters, under the conditions of exacerbation of COPD as well as after recovering from exacerbation.
Changes in lung function parametersBaseline (= during exacerbation) and after about 6 weeks (= after recovering)The primary objective of this study is to evaluate whether changes in HRCT based airway dimensions and Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD)-based resistance values correlate with changes in lung function parameters, under the conditions of exacerbation of COPD as well as after recovering from exacerbation.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in patient reported outcome (PRO) measuresBaseline (= during exacerbation) and after about 6 weeks (= after recovering)The secondary objective is to check if the changes in CFD data actually correlate better with changes in PRO than changes in lung function parameters.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Reproducibility of segmentationWithin 1 month of visitAs tertiary objective the reproducibility of the segmentations done by the centers will be evaluated. To accomplish reproducible segmentations the multiple centers will be guided to perform accurate segmentations, and bottlenecks in the usage of the program will be identified and resolved in order to simplify it where necessary and possible.

Countries

Belgium, Italy, Netherlands

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026