Skip to content

Observational Study of Tocilizumab in Participants With Rheumatoid Arthritis in Australia

A Multi-National, Multi-Center Non-Interventional Study in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients Treated With Tocilizumab (ACT-UP)

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01683604
Enrollment
37
Registered
2012-09-12
Start date
2012-07-31
Completion date
2014-06-30
Last updated
2016-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

This multi-center, observational study will evaluate the treatment patterns in clinical practice, efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in participants with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have had an inadequate response (or were intolerant to) treatment with non-biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) or with one biological agent. Data will be collected from each eligible participant initiated on tocilizumab treatment by their treating physician according to approved label for 6 months from start of treatment.

Interventions

OTHERObservational study

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Severe RA. * Inadequate response (or intolerant) to non-biological DMARDs or one biologic agent * Participants initiating treatment with tocilizumab on their physician's decision (in accordance with the local label), including participants who started treatment with tocilizumab within the 8 weeks prior to the enrolment visit.

Exclusion criteria

* Tocilizumab treatment more than 8 weeks prior to the enrolment visit. * Previous tocilizumab treatment in a clinical trial or for compassionate use. * Enrolled in an ongoing clinical trial and/or treatment with any investigational agent within 4 weeks (or 5 half-lives of the investigational agent, whichever is longer) before starting treatment with tocilizumab. * History of autoimmune disease or any joint inflammatory disease other than RA.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Treatment at Month 6 After Treatment InitiationMonth 6Percentage of participants on tocilizumab treatment at Month 6 was calculated as: \[(participants on tocilizumab treatment at Month 6) divided by (participants evaluable for primary objective)\] multiplied by 100.
Patient Assessment of Pain Using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at BaselineBaselineParticipants measured the pain intensity due to RA on a 100 millimeter (mm) VAS, where the responses were on a continuous range from 0 = no pain to 100 = unbearable pain.
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Using VAS at BaselineBaselineThe patient's global assessment of disease activity was measured using a 100 mm VAS, where the responses were on a continuous range from 0 = managing very well to 100 = managing very poorly.
Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Using VAS at BaselineBaselinePhysician global assessment of disease activity was assessed on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 = no arthritis activity to 100 = extremely active arthritis.
Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Scores at BaselineBaselineThe HAQ-DI is a questionnaire that measures functional status (disability) and health-related quality of life. It measures the participant's ability to perform everyday tasks. The index consists of 20 questions regarding the function of the upper and lower extremities. These questions are summarized in 8 categories: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common activities over past week. Each question is evaluated according to the degree of severity on a 4-point scale. Total score for HAQ-DI is the average of all questions and ranges from 0 = without any difficulty to 3 = unable to do.
Tender Joint Count (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at BaselineBaselineTJC was determined by examining 28 and 68 joints and identifying the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. Tenderness was recorded on the joint assessment form at baseline, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1. SJC was determined by examining 28 and 66 joints and identifying when swelling was present. Swelling was recorded on the joint assessment form at baseline, no swelling = 0, swelling =1.
Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at BaselineBaselineESR is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation. The test assesses the rate at which red blood cells fall in a test tube. Normal range is 0-30 millimeters per hour (mm/hr). A decrease in the level indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at BaselineBaselineThe test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of Tocilizumab TreatmentBaseline up to Month 6
Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline, Month 3, Month 6Duration of morning stiffness was defined as the time elapsed between the time of usual awakening (even if not in the morning) and the time the participant was able to resume normal activities without stiffness. The participant assessment of morning stiffness was measured using a ruler on a 100 mm VAS by 1 of the six categories: less than (\<) 30 minutes, between 30 and 240 minutes, greater than (\>) 240 minutes and whole day.
Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessBaseline, Month 3, Month 6Morning stiffness was defined by the time elapsed between the time of usual awakening (even if not in the morning) and the time the participant was able to resume normal activities without stiffness. The participant assessed morning stiffness based on the following criteria: 1. Presence of participant's joints stiff when woke up that day, measured as yes or no 2. Duration of morning stiffness, measured using a ruler on a 100 mm VAS by 1 of the six categories: \< 30 minutes, between 30 and 240 minutes, \> 240 minutes, and the whole day. 3. Severity of morning stiffness measured using a ruler on a 100 mm VAS where the responses were on a continuous range from 0 = no stiffness to 100 = maximum stiffness.
Percentage of Participants Adhering to Local Label for Adverse EventsBaseline up to Month 6Percentage of participants who adhered to local label/protocol for the management of adverse events is reported.
Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count (DAS28) Score by VisitBaseline, Month 3, Month 6The DAS28 score is a measurement of RA activity on a 0 to 10 scale, with higher scores representing higher disease activity, and calculated as DAS28 = 0.56 x √TJC28 + 0.28 x √SJC28 + 0.70 x natural logarithm (ln) (CRP + 1) + 0.014 x PGH + 0.96, where TJC28 = tender joint count on 28 units, SJC28 = swollen joint count on 28 units, CRP = serum concentration of c-reactive protein (after converting units to mg/dL), PGH = patient global assessment of disease activity, which was measured on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 = managing very well and 100 = managing very poorly. A score of less than 2.6 represents clinical remission, a score of greater than or equal to 2.6 and less than or equal to 3.2 represents low disease activity, a score of greater than 3.2 and less than or equal to 5.1 represents moderate disease activity, and a score of greater than 5.1 represents high (or severe) disease.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Good European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Month 3 and Month 6Month 3 and Month 6Clinical response was assessed according to EULAR criteria that classified the participant according to individual changes in DAS28 score as good, moderate, or no response. The DAS28 score is a measurement of RA activity on a 0 to 10 scale, with higher scores represent higher disease activity, and calculated as DAS28 = 0.56 x √TJC28 + 0.28 x √SJC28 + 0.36 x ln(CRP + 1) + 0.014 x PGH + 0.96, where TJC28 = tender joint count on 28 units, SJC28 = swollen joint count on 28 units, CRP = serum concentration of c-reactive protein (after converting units to mg/dL), PGH = patient's global assessment of disease activity, which was measured on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 = managing very well and 100 = managing very poorly. Good responders experienced a change from baseline of greater than 1.2 with a DAS28 score less than or equal to 3.2.
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score by VisitBaseline, Month 3, Month 6The CDAI is a combined index for measuring disease activity in RA and calculated as CDAI = TJC28 + SJC28 + PGH (in centimeters) + PhGH (in centimeters), where TJC28 = tender joint count on 28 units, SJC28 = swollen joint count on 28 units, PGH = patient's global assessment of disease activity, assessed on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 = managing very well and 100 = managing very poorly, and PhGH = physician global assessment of disease activity, assessed on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 = no arthritis activity and 100 = extremely active arthritis; with a total score ranged from 0-76. Higher scores indicate greater disease activity. CDAI score of less than or equal to 2.8 represents clinical remission, score of less than or equal to 10.0 represents low disease activity, score of less than or equal to 22.0 represents moderate disease activity, and score of greater than 22.0 represents high (or severe) disease.
Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6Baseline, Month 3, Month 6TJC was determined by examining 28 and 68 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at baseline, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1. SJC was determined by examination of 28 and 66 joints and identifying when swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at baseline, no swelling = 0, swelling =1.
Percentage of Participants Starting Tocilizumab After Stopping a Biologic Treatment or After Failing DMARDsBaseline
Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 3 and Month 6ACR 20,50 or 70 response=an improvement of ≥ 20%, ≥ 50% or ≥ 70% respectively, as compared to baseline in TJC28 and SJC28, and 20%, 50% or 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following measures: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours, PGA, PhGA, HAQ, and acute phase reactant (either CRP or ESR). TJC and SJC, based on 28-joint assessments. Number of tender joints and swollen joints were recorded on the joint assessment form at baseline, no tenderness = 0 and tenderness = 1, no swelling = 0 and swelling =1, respectively. HAQ measures functional status (disability) and health-related quality of life with 20 questions, summarized in 8 categories: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common activities over past week, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do. Patient's assessment of pain assessed using a VAS; 0=no pain, 100=unbearable pain; PGA and PhGA, assessed using VAS ; 0= no disease activity, 100=maximum disease activity.
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Baseline, Month 3, Month 6The physician global assessment of disease activity was evaluated using a 100 mm VAS where 0 = no arthritis activity and 100 = extremely active arthritis. Higher scores indicated increased level of disease.
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Baseline, Month 3, Month 6The patient's global assessment of disease activity was measured using a 100 mm VAS, where the responses were on a continuous range from 0= managing very well and 100 = managing very poorly.
Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Months 3 and 6Baseline, Month 3, Month 6The HAQ-DI is a questionnaire that measures functional status (disability) and health-related quality of life. It measures the participant's ability to perform everyday tasks. The index consists of 20 questions regarding the function of the upper and lower extremities. These questions are summarized in 8 categories: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common activities over past week. Each question was evaluated according to the degree of severity on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 = without any difficulty to 3 = unable to do. Total score is the sum of each question, which ranges from 0 to 60, where higher scores represent higher disease activity. The change from baseline in HAQ-DI score at Month 3 and Month 6 was calculated as the difference between HAQ-D1 score reported at baseline and the HAQ-D1 score reported at Month 3 and Month 6.
Change From Baseline in VAS-Fatigue at Months 3 and 6Baseline, Month 3, Month 6Participants measured the level of fatigue due to RA using a 100 mm VAS, where the responses were on a continuous range from 0 = no fatigue to 100 = extreme fatigue.
Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Months 3 and 6Baseline, Month 3, Month 6Participants measured the pain intensity due to RA using a 100 mm VAS, where the responses were on a continuous range from 0 = no pain to 100 = unbearable pain.
Change From Baseline in Participant Assessment of Morning Stiffness Using VAS at Months 3 and 6Baseline, Month 3, Month 6The participant assessment of morning stiffness was measured using a ruler on a 100 mm VAS, where the responses were on a continuous range from 0 = no stiffness and 100 = maximum stiffness.
Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score by VisitBaseline, Month 3, Month 6The SDAI is a combined index for measuring disease activity in RA and calculated as SDAI = TJC28 + SJC28 + PGH (in centimeters) + PhGH (in centimeters) + CRP (in mg/dL), where TJC28 = tender joint count on 28 units, SJC28 = swollen joint count on 28 units, PGH = patient's global assessment of disease activity, assessed on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 = managing very well and 100 = managing very poorly, PhGH = physician global assessment of disease activity, assessed on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 = no arthritis activity and 100 = extremely active arthritis, CRP = serum concentration of c-reactive protein; with a total SDAI score ranged from 0-86. Higher scores indicate greater disease activity. SDAI scores of less than or equal to 3.3 represents clinical remission, less than or equal to 11.0 represents low disease activity, less than or equal to 26.0 represents moderate disease activity, and greater than 26.0 represents high (or severe) disease.
Median Dose at Month 6Month 6
Percentage of Participants With Tocilizumab Dose Changed According to the Reason for ChangeBaseline up to Month 6Percentage of participants with increase or decrease in tocilizumab administration according to the reason for dose modification was reported.
Mean Dosing Interval at Month 6Month 6The time interval between two successive doses in days was reported.
Percentage of Participants With Reasons Who Discontinued TocilizumabBaseline up to Month 6
Time to Restoration of Initial Dosing RegimenBaseline up to Month 6
Percentage of Participants by Reason for Choice of Monotherapy at BaselineBaseline up to Month 6
Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Monotherapy (8 mg/Kg) at Baseline and at Month 6Baseline, Month 6

Countries

Australia

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
RA Participants (All Groups)
Participants with severe RA were prescribed with tocilizumab, in accordance with routine clinic practice and were observed for 6 months.
37
Total37

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event2
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy1
Overall StudyOther2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRA Participants (All Groups)
Age, Continuous59.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.62
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 37
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 37

Outcome results

Primary

C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Baseline

The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: FAS population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Baseline15.3 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 17.36
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Baseline22.6 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 42.91
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Baseline22.5 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 24.3
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Baseline16.0 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 24.84
RA Participants (All Groups)C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Baseline16.9 milligrams per liter (mg/L)Standard Deviation 24.53
Primary

Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Baseline

ESR is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation. The test assesses the rate at which red blood cells fall in a test tube. Normal range is 0-30 millimeters per hour (mm/hr). A decrease in the level indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: FAS population. Here, Number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Baseline27.0 mm/hrStandard Deviation 24.79
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Baseline35.2 mm/hrStandard Deviation 36.78
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Baseline34.8 mm/hrStandard Deviation 26.79
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Baseline27.3 mm/hrStandard Deviation 27.04
RA Participants (All Groups)Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Baseline28.4 mm/hrStandard Deviation 26.74
Primary

Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Scores at Baseline

The HAQ-DI is a questionnaire that measures functional status (disability) and health-related quality of life. It measures the participant's ability to perform everyday tasks. The index consists of 20 questions regarding the function of the upper and lower extremities. These questions are summarized in 8 categories: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common activities over past week. Each question is evaluated according to the degree of severity on a 4-point scale. Total score for HAQ-DI is the average of all questions and ranges from 0 = without any difficulty to 3 = unable to do.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: FAS population. Here, Number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Scores at Baseline1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.86
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Scores at Baseline1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.98
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Scores at Baseline1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Scores at Baseline1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
RA Participants (All Groups)Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Scores at Baseline1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
Primary

Patient Assessment of Pain Using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Baseline

Participants measured the pain intensity due to RA on a 100 millimeter (mm) VAS, where the responses were on a continuous range from 0 = no pain to 100 = unbearable pain.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: FAS population. Here, Number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Patient Assessment of Pain Using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Baseline60.1 millimeters (mm)Standard Deviation 31.08
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Patient Assessment of Pain Using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Baseline47.2 millimeters (mm)Standard Deviation 31.93
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Patient Assessment of Pain Using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Baseline79.3 millimeters (mm)Standard Deviation 19.55
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Patient Assessment of Pain Using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Baseline55.3 millimeters (mm)Standard Deviation 31.49
RA Participants (All Groups)Patient Assessment of Pain Using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Baseline57.6 millimeters (mm)Standard Deviation 31.14
Primary

Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Using VAS at Baseline

The patient's global assessment of disease activity was measured using a 100 mm VAS, where the responses were on a continuous range from 0 = managing very well to 100 = managing very poorly.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: FAS population. Here, Number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Using VAS at Baseline69.6 mmStandard Deviation 29.71
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Using VAS at Baseline59.0 mmStandard Deviation 33.03
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Using VAS at Baseline85.0 mmStandard Deviation 11.36
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Using VAS at Baseline65.5 mmStandard Deviation 31.02
RA Participants (All Groups)Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity Using VAS at Baseline67.5 mmStandard Deviation 30.11
Primary

Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Treatment at Month 6 After Treatment Initiation

Percentage of participants on tocilizumab treatment at Month 6 was calculated as: \[(participants on tocilizumab treatment at Month 6) divided by (participants evaluable for primary objective)\] multiplied by 100.

Time frame: Month 6

Population: FAS population

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Treatment at Month 6 After Treatment Initiation79.3 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Treatment at Month 6 After Treatment Initiation100 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Treatment at Month 6 After Treatment Initiation80 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Treatment at Month 6 After Treatment Initiation84.4 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Treatment at Month 6 After Treatment Initiation83.8 percentage of participants
Primary

Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Using VAS at Baseline

Physician global assessment of disease activity was assessed on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 = no arthritis activity to 100 = extremely active arthritis.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: FAS population. Here, Number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Using VAS at Baseline65.2 mmStandard Deviation 24.53
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Using VAS at Baseline63.3 mmStandard Deviation 9.61
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Using VAS at Baseline69.0 mmStandard Deviation 9
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Using VAS at Baseline64.4 mmStandard Deviation 23.33
RA Participants (All Groups)Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity Using VAS at Baseline64.9 mmStandard Deviation 22.3
Primary

Tender Joint Count (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Baseline

TJC was determined by examining 28 and 68 joints and identifying the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. Tenderness was recorded on the joint assessment form at baseline, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1. SJC was determined by examining 28 and 66 joints and identifying when swelling was present. Swelling was recorded on the joint assessment form at baseline, no swelling = 0, swelling =1.

Time frame: Baseline

Population: FAS population. Here, Number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for the outcome measure and n= participants with available data for the specified category.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Tender Joint Count (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at BaselineTJC28 (n= 27, 6, 4, 29, 33)15.6 joint countsStandard Deviation 7.68
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Tender Joint Count (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at BaselineTJC68 (n= 18, 5, 2, 21, 23)34.4 joint countsStandard Deviation 16.97
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Tender Joint Count (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at BaselineSJC28 (n= 27, 6, 4, 29, 33)14.0 joint countsStandard Deviation 6.66
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Tender Joint Count (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at BaselineSJC66 (n= 18, 5, 2, 21, 23)27.7 joint countsStandard Deviation 13.73
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Tender Joint Count (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at BaselineTJC28 (n= 27, 6, 4, 29, 33)14.7 joint countsStandard Deviation 8.48
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Tender Joint Count (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at BaselineSJC66 (n= 18, 5, 2, 21, 23)21.0 joint countsStandard Deviation 13.62
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Tender Joint Count (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at BaselineTJC68 (n= 18, 5, 2, 21, 23)24.2 joint countsStandard Deviation 18.43
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Tender Joint Count (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at BaselineSJC28 (n= 27, 6, 4, 29, 33)14.0 joint countsStandard Deviation 7.51
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Tender Joint Count (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at BaselineSJC66 (n= 18, 5, 2, 21, 23)26.5 joint countsStandard Deviation 7.78
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Tender Joint Count (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at BaselineTJC68 (n= 18, 5, 2, 21, 23)26.0 joint countsStandard Deviation 7.07
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Tender Joint Count (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at BaselineSJC28 (n= 27, 6, 4, 29, 33)12.5 joint countsStandard Deviation 3.79
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Tender Joint Count (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at BaselineTJC28 (n= 27, 6, 4, 29, 33)13.0 joint countsStandard Deviation 8.41
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Tender Joint Count (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at BaselineTJC28 (n= 27, 6, 4, 29, 33)15.8 joint countsStandard Deviation 7.69
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Tender Joint Count (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at BaselineTJC68 (n= 18, 5, 2, 21, 23)32.8 joint countsStandard Deviation 18.07
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Tender Joint Count (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at BaselineSJC66 (n= 18, 5, 2, 21, 23)26.2 joint countsStandard Deviation 14.25
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Tender Joint Count (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at BaselineSJC28 (n= 27, 6, 4, 29, 33)14.2 joint countsStandard Deviation 7.03
RA Participants (All Groups)Tender Joint Count (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at BaselineSJC66 (n= 18, 5, 2, 21, 23)26.3 joint countsStandard Deviation 13.69
RA Participants (All Groups)Tender Joint Count (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at BaselineSJC28 (n= 27, 6, 4, 29, 33)14.0 joint countsStandard Deviation 6.7
RA Participants (All Groups)Tender Joint Count (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at BaselineTJC68 (n= 18, 5, 2, 21, 23)32.2 joint countsStandard Deviation 17.4
RA Participants (All Groups)Tender Joint Count (TJC) and Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at BaselineTJC28 (n= 27, 6, 4, 29, 33)15.4 joint countsStandard Deviation 7.7
Secondary

Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Months 3 and 6

The HAQ-DI is a questionnaire that measures functional status (disability) and health-related quality of life. It measures the participant's ability to perform everyday tasks. The index consists of 20 questions regarding the function of the upper and lower extremities. These questions are summarized in 8 categories: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common activities over past week. Each question was evaluated according to the degree of severity on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 = without any difficulty to 3 = unable to do. Total score is the sum of each question, which ranges from 0 to 60, where higher scores represent higher disease activity. The change from baseline in HAQ-DI score at Month 3 and Month 6 was calculated as the difference between HAQ-D1 score reported at baseline and the HAQ-D1 score reported at Month 3 and Month 6.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: FAS population. Here, Number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for the outcome measure and n = participants with available HAQ-DI score at specified visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n= 24, 6, 3, 27, 30)1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.86
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n= 12, 2, 2, 12, 14)-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.48
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n= 16, 4, 2, 18, 20)-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.94
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n= 16, 4, 2, 18, 20)-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.37
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n= 24, 6, 3, 27, 30)1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.98
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n= 12, 2, 2, 12, 14)-0.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n= 16, 4, 2, 18, 20)-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.35
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n= 24, 6, 3, 27, 30)1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n= 12, 2, 2, 12, 14)-0.4 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.09
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n= 24, 6, 3, 27, 30)1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.9
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n= 12, 2, 2, 12, 14)-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.51
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n= 16, 4, 2, 18, 20)-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
RA Participants (All Groups)Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n= 16, 4, 2, 18, 20)-0.5 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.85
RA Participants (All Groups)Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n= 24, 6, 3, 27, 30)1.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.87
RA Participants (All Groups)Change From Baseline in HAQ-DI Score at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n= 12, 2, 2, 12, 14)-0.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.46
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Participant Assessment of Morning Stiffness Using VAS at Months 3 and 6

The participant assessment of morning stiffness was measured using a ruler on a 100 mm VAS, where the responses were on a continuous range from 0 = no stiffness and 100 = maximum stiffness.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: FAS population. Here, Number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for the outcome measure and n= participants with available data at the specified visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Change From Baseline in Participant Assessment of Morning Stiffness Using VAS at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n= 25, 6, 3, 28, 31)65.6 mmStandard Deviation 31.29
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Change From Baseline in Participant Assessment of Morning Stiffness Using VAS at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n= 12, 2, 2, 12, 14)-30.2 mmStandard Deviation 35.88
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Change From Baseline in Participant Assessment of Morning Stiffness Using VAS at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n= 15, 4, 2, 17, 19)-30.7 mmStandard Deviation 37.88
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Change From Baseline in Participant Assessment of Morning Stiffness Using VAS at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n= 15, 4, 2, 17, 19)-34.0 mmStandard Deviation 17.8
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Change From Baseline in Participant Assessment of Morning Stiffness Using VAS at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n= 25, 6, 3, 28, 31)57.3 mmStandard Deviation 29.92
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Change From Baseline in Participant Assessment of Morning Stiffness Using VAS at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n= 12, 2, 2, 12, 14)-38.0 mmStandard Deviation 14.14
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Change From Baseline in Participant Assessment of Morning Stiffness Using VAS at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n= 15, 4, 2, 17, 19)-42.5 mmStandard Deviation 14.85
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Change From Baseline in Participant Assessment of Morning Stiffness Using VAS at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n= 25, 6, 3, 28, 31)77.3 mmStandard Deviation 22.03
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Change From Baseline in Participant Assessment of Morning Stiffness Using VAS at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n= 12, 2, 2, 12, 14)-31.5 mmStandard Deviation 4.95
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Change From Baseline in Participant Assessment of Morning Stiffness Using VAS at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n= 25, 6, 3, 28, 31)62.5 mmStandard Deviation 31.46
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Change From Baseline in Participant Assessment of Morning Stiffness Using VAS at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n= 12, 2, 2, 12, 14)-31.3 mmStandard Deviation 36.23
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Change From Baseline in Participant Assessment of Morning Stiffness Using VAS at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n= 15, 4, 2, 17, 19)-30.1 mmStandard Deviation 35.86
RA Participants (All Groups)Change From Baseline in Participant Assessment of Morning Stiffness Using VAS at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n= 15, 4, 2, 17, 19)-31.4 mmStandard Deviation 34.21
RA Participants (All Groups)Change From Baseline in Participant Assessment of Morning Stiffness Using VAS at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n= 25, 6, 3, 28, 31)64.0 mmStandard Deviation 30.71
RA Participants (All Groups)Change From Baseline in Participant Assessment of Morning Stiffness Using VAS at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n= 12, 2, 2, 12, 14)-31.3 mmStandard Deviation 33.35
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6

The patient's global assessment of disease activity was measured using a 100 mm VAS, where the responses were on a continuous range from 0= managing very well and 100 = managing very poorly.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: FAS population. Here, Number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for the outcome measure and n= participants with available data at the specified visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n=24, 6, 3, 27, 30)69.6 mmStandard Deviation 29.71
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n= 16, 4, 2, 18, 20 )-43.2 mmStandard Deviation 35.87
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n= 13, 2, 2, 13, 15)-26.4 mmStandard Deviation 31.28
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n= 13, 2, 2, 13, 15)-37.0 mmStandard Deviation 33.94
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n=24, 6, 3, 27, 30)59.0 mmStandard Deviation 33.03
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n= 16, 4, 2, 18, 20 )-34.5 mmStandard Deviation 18.7
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n= 13, 2, 2, 13, 15)-32.0 mmStandard Deviation 26.87
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n= 16, 4, 2, 18, 20 )-50.0 mmStandard Deviation 16.97
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n=24, 6, 3, 27, 30)85.0 mmStandard Deviation 11.36
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n=24, 6, 3, 27, 30)65.5 mmStandard Deviation 31.02
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n= 16, 4, 2, 18, 20 )-40.5 mmStandard Deviation 34.42
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n= 13, 2, 2, 13, 15)-27.2 mmStandard Deviation 32.05
RA Participants (All Groups)Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n=24, 6, 3, 27, 30)67.5 mmStandard Deviation 30.11
RA Participants (All Groups)Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n= 13, 2, 2, 13, 15)-27.8 mmStandard Deviation 30.57
RA Participants (All Groups)Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n= 16, 4, 2, 18, 20 )-41.5 mmStandard Deviation 32.92
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Months 3 and 6

Participants measured the pain intensity due to RA using a 100 mm VAS, where the responses were on a continuous range from 0 = no pain to 100 = unbearable pain.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: FAS population. Here, Number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for the outcome measure and n = participants with available data for the specified visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n= 25, 6, 3, 28, 31)60.1 mmStandard Deviation 31.08
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n= 13, 2, 2, 13, 15)-32.3 mmStandard Deviation 34.88
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n= 16, 4, 2, 18, 20)-35.6 mmStandard Deviation 39.39
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n= 16, 4, 2, 18, 20)-15.8 mmStandard Deviation 26.99
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n= 25, 6, 3, 28, 31)47.2 mmStandard Deviation 31.93
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n= 13, 2, 2, 13, 15)-47.0 mmStandard Deviation 14.14
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n= 16, 4, 2, 18, 20)-39.5 mmStandard Deviation 14.85
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n= 25, 6, 3, 28, 31)79.3 mmStandard Deviation 19.55
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n= 13, 2, 2, 13, 15)-51.5 mmStandard Deviation 7.78
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n= 25, 6, 3, 28, 31)55.3 mmStandard Deviation 31.49
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n= 13, 2, 2, 13, 15)-31.6 mmStandard Deviation 34.68
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n= 16, 4, 2, 18, 20)-30.8 mmStandard Deviation 39.38
RA Participants (All Groups)Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n= 16, 4, 2, 18, 20)-31.17 mmStandard Deviation 37.5
RA Participants (All Groups)Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n= 25, 6, 3, 28, 31)57.6 mmStandard Deviation 31.14
RA Participants (All Groups)Change From Baseline in Patient's Assessment of Pain at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n= 13, 2, 2, 13, 15)-34.3 mmStandard Deviation 32.93
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6

The physician global assessment of disease activity was evaluated using a 100 mm VAS where 0 = no arthritis activity and 100 = extremely active arthritis. Higher scores indicated increased level of disease.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: FAS population. Here, Number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for the outcome measure and n= participants with available data at the specified visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n= 25, 6, 3, 28, 31)65.2 mmStandard Deviation 24.53
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n= 13, 2, 2, 13, 15)-35.2 mmStandard Deviation 28.12
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n= 13, 4, 2, 15, 17)-40.8 mmStandard Deviation 24.07
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n= 13, 4, 2, 15, 17)-33.8 mmStandard Deviation 11.56
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n= 25, 6, 3, 28, 31)63.3 mmStandard Deviation 9.61
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n= 13, 2, 2, 13, 15)-38.5 mmStandard Deviation 13.44
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n= 13, 4, 2, 15, 17)-43.5 mmStandard Deviation 4.95
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n= 25, 6, 3, 28, 31)69.0 mmStandard Deviation 9
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n= 13, 2, 2, 13, 15)-45.5 mmStandard Deviation 23.33
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n= 25, 6, 3, 28, 31)64.4 mmStandard Deviation 23.33
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n= 13, 2, 2, 13, 15)-34.2 mmStandard Deviation 27.27
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n= 13, 4, 2, 15, 17)-38.6 mmStandard Deviation 23.05
RA Participants (All Groups)Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n= 13, 4, 2, 15, 17)-39.2 mmStandard Deviation 21.66
RA Participants (All Groups)Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n= 25, 6, 3, 28, 31)64.9 mmStandard Deviation 22.3
RA Participants (All Groups)Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n= 13, 2, 2, 13, 15)-35.7 mmStandard Deviation 26.31
Secondary

Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6

TJC was determined by examining 28 and 68 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at baseline, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1. SJC was determined by examination of 28 and 66 joints and identifying when swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at baseline, no swelling = 0, swelling =1.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: FAS population. Here, Number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for the outcome measure and n= participants with available data at the specified visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6SJC28: Change at Month 3 (n= 14, 4, 3, 15, 18)-13.8 joint countsStandard Deviation 4.54
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6SJC66: Change at Month 3 (n= 11, 3, 2, 12, 14)-27.2 joint countsStandard Deviation 9.58
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6TJC28: Baseline (n= 27, 6, 4, 29, 33)15.6 joint countsStandard Deviation 7.68
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6TJC68: Baseline (n= 18, 5, 2, 21, 23 )34.4 joint countsStandard Deviation 16.97
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6TJC68: Change at Month 6 (n= 11, 1, 2, 10, 12 )-27.5 joint countsStandard Deviation 17.41
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6SJC66: Change at Month 6 (n= 11, 1, 2, 10, 12)-26.0 joint countsStandard Deviation 13.8
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6SJC66: Baseline (n= 18, 5, 2, 21, 23)27.7 joint countsStandard Deviation 13.73
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6TJC28: Change at Month 6 (n= 14, 2, 3, 13, 16)-11.1 joint countsStandard Deviation 8.56
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6TJC68: Change at Month 3 (n= 11, 3, 2, 12, 14)-30.5 joint countsStandard Deviation 8.13
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6SJC28: Baseline (n= 27, 6, 4, 29, 33)14.0 joint countsStandard Deviation 6.66
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6TJC28: Change at Month 3 (n= 14, 4, 3, 15, 18)-13.9 joint countsStandard Deviation 5.17
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6SJC28: Change at Month 6 (n= 14, 2, 3, 13, 16)-10.8 joint countsStandard Deviation 6.34
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6SJC66: Change at Month 6 (n= 11, 1, 2, 10, 12)-17.0 joint counts
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6TJC68: Change at Month 6 (n= 11, 1, 2, 10, 12 )-17.0 joint counts
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6TJC28: Change at Month 3 (n= 14, 4, 3, 15, 18)-11.0 joint countsStandard Deviation 6.78
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6SJC28: Baseline (n= 27, 6, 4, 29, 33)14.0 joint countsStandard Deviation 7.51
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6TJC28: Baseline (n= 27, 6, 4, 29, 33)14.7 joint countsStandard Deviation 8.48
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6SJC66: Change at Month 3 (n= 11, 3, 2, 12, 14)-12.7 joint countsStandard Deviation 5.51
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6TJC28: Change at Month 6 (n= 14, 2, 3, 13, 16)-15.0 joint countsStandard Deviation 7.07
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6SJC28: Change at Month 3 (n= 14, 4, 3, 15, 18)-10.5 joint countsStandard Deviation 6.81
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6SJC66: Baseline (n= 18, 5, 2, 21, 23)21.0 joint countsStandard Deviation 13.62
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6TJC68: Baseline (n= 18, 5, 2, 21, 23 )24.2 joint countsStandard Deviation 18.43
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6SJC28: Change at Month 6 (n= 14, 2, 3, 13, 16)-13.5 joint countsStandard Deviation 4.95
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6TJC68: Change at Month 3 (n= 11, 3, 2, 12, 14)-12.3 joint countsStandard Deviation 6.66
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6SJC66: Change at Month 3 (n= 11, 3, 2, 12, 14)-18.5 joint countsStandard Deviation 13.44
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6TJC28: Baseline (n= 27, 6, 4, 29, 33)13.0 joint countsStandard Deviation 8.41
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6TJC28: Change at Month 3 (n= 14, 4, 3, 15, 18)-7.0 joint countsStandard Deviation 5.57
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6TJC28: Change at Month 6 (n= 14, 2, 3, 13, 16)-8.3 joint countsStandard Deviation 6.66
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6TJC68: Baseline (n= 18, 5, 2, 21, 23 )26.0 joint countsStandard Deviation 7.07
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6TJC68: Change at Month 3 (n= 11, 3, 2, 12, 14)-18.0 joint countsStandard Deviation 12.73
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6TJC68: Change at Month 6 (n= 11, 1, 2, 10, 12 )-21.5 joint countsStandard Deviation 6.36
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6SJC28: Baseline (n= 27, 6, 4, 29, 33)12.5 joint countsStandard Deviation 3.79
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6SJC28: Change at Month 3 (n= 14, 4, 3, 15, 18)-9.3 joint countsStandard Deviation 5.51
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6SJC28: Change at Month 6 (n= 14, 2, 3, 13, 16)-11.7 joint countsStandard Deviation 2.89
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6SJC66: Baseline (n= 18, 5, 2, 21, 23)26.5 joint countsStandard Deviation 7.78
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6SJC66: Change at Month 6 (n= 11, 1, 2, 10, 12)-21.5 joint countsStandard Deviation 6.36
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6TJC68: Change at Month 6 (n= 11, 1, 2, 10, 12 )-27.7 joint countsStandard Deviation 18.34
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6TJC28: Baseline (n= 27, 6, 4, 29, 33)15.8 joint countsStandard Deviation 7.69
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6SJC28: Change at Month 3 (n= 14, 4, 3, 15, 18)-13.8 joint countsStandard Deviation 4.86
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6TJC68: Change at Month 3 (n= 11, 3, 2, 12, 14)-28.1 joint countsStandard Deviation 10.42
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6SJC28: Change at Month 6 (n= 14, 2, 3, 13, 16)-11.0 joint countsStandard Deviation 6.72
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6TJC68: Baseline (n= 18, 5, 2, 21, 23 )32.8 joint countsStandard Deviation 18.07
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6SJC66: Change at Month 6 (n= 11, 1, 2, 10, 12)-26.0 joint countsStandard Deviation 14.54
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6SJC66: Baseline (n= 18, 5, 2, 21, 23)26.2 joint countsStandard Deviation 14.25
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6TJC28: Change at Month 6 (n= 14, 2, 3, 13, 16)-12.3 joint countsStandard Deviation 8.67
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6TJC28: Change at Month 3 (n= 14, 4, 3, 15, 18)-14.5 joint countsStandard Deviation 4.7
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6SJC66: Change at Month 3 (n= 11, 3, 2, 12, 14)-25.0 joint countsStandard Deviation 10.54
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6SJC28: Baseline (n= 27, 6, 4, 29, 33)14.2 joint countsStandard Deviation 7.03
RA Participants (All Groups)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6TJC68: Change at Month 6 (n= 11, 1, 2, 10, 12 )-26.7 joint countsStandard Deviation 16.88
RA Participants (All Groups)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6SJC66: Baseline (n= 18, 5, 2, 21, 23)26.3 joint countsStandard Deviation 13.69
RA Participants (All Groups)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6TJC28: Baseline (n= 27, 6, 4, 29, 33)15.4 joint countsStandard Deviation 7.7
RA Participants (All Groups)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6SJC28: Change at Month 3 (n= 14, 4, 3, 15, 18)-13.1 joint countsStandard Deviation 5.09
RA Participants (All Groups)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6TJC28: Change at Month 3 (n= 14, 4, 3, 15, 18)-13.2 joint countsStandard Deviation 5.48
RA Participants (All Groups)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6TJC68: Baseline (n= 18, 5, 2, 21, 23 )32.2 joint countsStandard Deviation 17.4
RA Participants (All Groups)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6SJC66: Change at Month 6 (n= 11, 1, 2, 10, 12)-25.3 joint countsStandard Deviation 13.41
RA Participants (All Groups)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6TJC68: Change at Month 3 (n= 11, 3, 2, 12, 14)-26.6 joint countsStandard Deviation 10.85
RA Participants (All Groups)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6SJC28: Change at Month 6 (n= 14, 2, 3, 13, 16)-11.1 joint countsStandard Deviation 6.11
RA Participants (All Groups)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6SJC28: Baseline (n= 27, 6, 4, 29, 33)14.0 joint countsStandard Deviation 6.7
RA Participants (All Groups)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6TJC28: Change at Month 6 (n= 14, 2, 3, 13, 16)-11.6 joint countsStandard Deviation 8.29
RA Participants (All Groups)Change From Baseline in TJC and SJC at Month 3 and Month 6SJC66: Change at Month 3 (n= 11, 3, 2, 12, 14)-24.1 joint countsStandard Deviation 10.65
Secondary

Change From Baseline in VAS-Fatigue at Months 3 and 6

Participants measured the level of fatigue due to RA using a 100 mm VAS, where the responses were on a continuous range from 0 = no fatigue to 100 = extreme fatigue.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: FAS population. Here, Number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for the outcome measure and n= participants with available data at the specified visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Change From Baseline in VAS-Fatigue at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n= 25, 6, 3, 28, 31)59.0 mmStandard Deviation 34.35
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Change From Baseline in VAS-Fatigue at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n=12, 2, 2, 12, 14)-19.8 mmStandard Deviation 29.81
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Change From Baseline in VAS-Fatigue at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n= 16, 4, 2, 18, 20)-23.2 mmStandard Deviation 29.9
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Change From Baseline in VAS-Fatigue at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n= 16, 4, 2, 18, 20)-37.8 mmStandard Deviation 24.93
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Change From Baseline in VAS-Fatigue at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n= 25, 6, 3, 28, 31)67.8 mmStandard Deviation 27.01
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Change From Baseline in VAS-Fatigue at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n=12, 2, 2, 12, 14)-34.0 mmStandard Deviation 22.63
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Change From Baseline in VAS-Fatigue at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n= 16, 4, 2, 18, 20)-38.5 mmStandard Deviation 13.44
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Change From Baseline in VAS-Fatigue at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n= 25, 6, 3, 28, 31)86.3 mmStandard Deviation 8.08
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Change From Baseline in VAS-Fatigue at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n=12, 2, 2, 12, 14)-51.5 mmStandard Deviation 2.12
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Change From Baseline in VAS-Fatigue at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n= 25, 6, 3, 28, 31)58.0 mmStandard Deviation 33.35
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Change From Baseline in VAS-Fatigue at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n=12, 2, 2, 12, 14)-16.8 mmStandard Deviation 27.91
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Change From Baseline in VAS-Fatigue at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n= 16, 4, 2, 18, 20)-24.7 mmStandard Deviation 30.13
RA Participants (All Groups)Change From Baseline in VAS-Fatigue at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n= 16, 4, 2, 18, 20)-26.1 mmStandard Deviation 28.98
RA Participants (All Groups)Change From Baseline in VAS-Fatigue at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n= 25, 6, 3, 28, 31)60.7 mmStandard Deviation 32.84
RA Participants (All Groups)Change From Baseline in VAS-Fatigue at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n=12, 2, 2, 12, 14)-21.8 mmStandard Deviation 28.6
Secondary

Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score by Visit

The CDAI is a combined index for measuring disease activity in RA and calculated as CDAI = TJC28 + SJC28 + PGH (in centimeters) + PhGH (in centimeters), where TJC28 = tender joint count on 28 units, SJC28 = swollen joint count on 28 units, PGH = patient's global assessment of disease activity, assessed on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 = managing very well and 100 = managing very poorly, and PhGH = physician global assessment of disease activity, assessed on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 = no arthritis activity and 100 = extremely active arthritis; with a total score ranged from 0-76. Higher scores indicate greater disease activity. CDAI score of less than or equal to 2.8 represents clinical remission, score of less than or equal to 10.0 represents low disease activity, score of less than or equal to 22.0 represents moderate disease activity, and score of greater than 22.0 represents high (or severe) disease.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: FAS population. Here, Number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for the outcome measure and n= participants with CDAI score available at specified visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score by VisitBaseline (n= 22, 6, 3, 25, 28)46.41 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.482
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score by VisitMonth 6 (n= 13, 3, 4, 12, 16)13.20 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.017
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score by VisitMonth 3 (n= 13, 5, 4, 14, 18)12.37 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.97
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score by VisitMonth 3 (n= 13, 5, 4, 14, 18)16.00 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.632
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score by VisitBaseline (n= 22, 6, 3, 25, 28)40.90 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.277
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score by VisitMonth 6 (n= 13, 3, 4, 12, 16)14.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.14
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score by VisitMonth 3 (n= 13, 5, 4, 14, 18)13.05 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.468
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score by VisitBaseline (n= 22, 6, 3, 25, 28)45.40 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.9
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score by VisitMonth 6 (n= 13, 3, 4, 12, 16)11.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.338
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score by VisitBaseline (n= 22, 6, 3, 25, 28)45.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.643
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score by VisitMonth 6 (n= 13, 3, 4, 12, 16)14.27 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.254
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score by VisitMonth 3 (n= 13, 5, 4, 14, 18)13.47 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.564
RA Participants (All Groups)Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score by VisitMonth 3 (n= 13, 5, 4, 14, 18)13.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.758
RA Participants (All Groups)Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score by VisitBaseline (n= 22, 6, 3, 25, 28)45.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.687
RA Participants (All Groups)Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) Score by VisitMonth 6 (n= 13, 3, 4, 12, 16)13.53 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.534
Secondary

Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count (DAS28) Score by Visit

The DAS28 score is a measurement of RA activity on a 0 to 10 scale, with higher scores representing higher disease activity, and calculated as DAS28 = 0.56 x √TJC28 + 0.28 x √SJC28 + 0.70 x natural logarithm (ln) (CRP + 1) + 0.014 x PGH + 0.96, where TJC28 = tender joint count on 28 units, SJC28 = swollen joint count on 28 units, CRP = serum concentration of c-reactive protein (after converting units to mg/dL), PGH = patient global assessment of disease activity, which was measured on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 = managing very well and 100 = managing very poorly. A score of less than 2.6 represents clinical remission, a score of greater than or equal to 2.6 and less than or equal to 3.2 represents low disease activity, a score of greater than 3.2 and less than or equal to 5.1 represents moderate disease activity, and a score of greater than 5.1 represents high (or severe) disease.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: FAS population. Here, Number of participants analyzed = Participants evaluable for the outcome measure and n= participants with DAS28 score available at the specified visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count (DAS28) Score by VisitBaseline (n=22, 6, 3, 25, 28)6.34 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.611
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count (DAS28) Score by VisitMonth 6 (n=12, 2, 2, 12, 14)3.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.459
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count (DAS28) Score by VisitMonth 3 (n=13, 4, 2, 15, 17)2.69 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.274
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count (DAS28) Score by VisitMonth 3 (n=13, 4, 2, 15, 17)2.98 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.25
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count (DAS28) Score by VisitBaseline (n=22, 6, 3, 25, 28)6.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.272
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count (DAS28) Score by VisitMonth 6 (n=12, 2, 2, 12, 14)2.75 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.42
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count (DAS28) Score by VisitMonth 3 (n=13, 4, 2, 15, 17)3.61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.151
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count (DAS28) Score by VisitBaseline (n=22, 6, 3, 25, 28)6.73 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.868
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count (DAS28) Score by VisitMonth 6 (n=12, 2, 2, 12, 14)3.49 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.38
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count (DAS28) Score by VisitBaseline (n=22, 6, 3, 25, 28)6.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.592
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count (DAS28) Score by VisitMonth 6 (n=12, 2, 2, 12, 14)2.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.502
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count (DAS28) Score by VisitMonth 3 (n=13, 4, 2, 15, 17)2.64 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.275
RA Participants (All Groups)Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count (DAS28) Score by VisitMonth 3 (n=13, 4, 2, 15, 17)2.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.236
RA Participants (All Groups)Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count (DAS28) Score by VisitBaseline (n=22, 6, 3, 25, 28)6.28 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.528
RA Participants (All Groups)Disease Activity Score Based on 28 Joint Count (DAS28) Score by VisitMonth 6 (n=12, 2, 2, 12, 14)2.98 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.402
Secondary

Duration of Tocilizumab Treatment

Time frame: Baseline up to Month 6

Population: FAS population.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Duration of Tocilizumab Treatment181.1 daysStandard Deviation 56.31
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Duration of Tocilizumab Treatment211.3 daysStandard Deviation 28.17
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Duration of Tocilizumab Treatment174.8 daysStandard Deviation 48.43
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Duration of Tocilizumab Treatment189.7 daysStandard Deviation 53.79
RA Participants (All Groups)Duration of Tocilizumab Treatment187.6 daysStandard Deviation 52.71
Secondary

Mean Dosing Interval at Month 6

The time interval between two successive doses in days was reported.

Time frame: Month 6

Population: FAS population. Here, Number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Mean Dosing Interval at Month 630.97 daysStandard Deviation 3.803
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Mean Dosing Interval at Month 632.10 daysStandard Deviation 3.783
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Mean Dosing Interval at Month 629.63 daysStandard Deviation 1.505
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Mean Dosing Interval at Month 631.48 daysStandard Deviation 3.978
RA Participants (All Groups)Mean Dosing Interval at Month 631.22 daysStandard Deviation 3.775
Secondary

Median Dose at Month 6

Time frame: Month 6

Population: FAS population. Here Number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Median Dose at Month 68 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg)
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Median Dose at Month 68 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg)
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Median Dose at Month 68 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg)
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Median Dose at Month 68 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg)
RA Participants (All Groups)Median Dose at Month 68 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg)
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Good European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Month 3 and Month 6

Clinical response was assessed according to EULAR criteria that classified the participant according to individual changes in DAS28 score as good, moderate, or no response. The DAS28 score is a measurement of RA activity on a 0 to 10 scale, with higher scores represent higher disease activity, and calculated as DAS28 = 0.56 x √TJC28 + 0.28 x √SJC28 + 0.36 x ln(CRP + 1) + 0.014 x PGH + 0.96, where TJC28 = tender joint count on 28 units, SJC28 = swollen joint count on 28 units, CRP = serum concentration of c-reactive protein (after converting units to mg/dL), PGH = patient's global assessment of disease activity, which was measured on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 = managing very well and 100 = managing very poorly. Good responders experienced a change from baseline of greater than 1.2 with a DAS28 score less than or equal to 3.2.

Time frame: Month 3 and Month 6

Population: FAS population. Here, Number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for the outcome measure and n= participants with EULAR response available at specified visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants Achieving Good European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Month 3 and Month 6Month 3 (n= 11, 3, 1, 13, 14)63.6 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants Achieving Good European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Month 3 and Month 6Month 6 (n= 10, 1,1, 10, 11)50.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants Achieving Good European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Month 3 and Month 6Month 3 (n= 11, 3, 1, 13, 14)66.7 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants Achieving Good European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Month 3 and Month 6Month 6 (n= 10, 1,1, 10, 11)100 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants Achieving Good European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Month 3 and Month 6Month 3 (n= 11, 3, 1, 13, 14)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants Achieving Good European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Month 3 and Month 6Month 6 (n= 10, 1,1, 10, 11)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants Achieving Good European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Month 3 and Month 6Month 6 (n= 10, 1,1, 10, 11)60.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants Achieving Good European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Month 3 and Month 6Month 3 (n= 11, 3, 1, 13, 14)69.2 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants Achieving Good European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Month 3 and Month 6Month 3 (n= 11, 3, 1, 13, 14)64.3 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants Achieving Good European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Month 3 and Month 6Month 6 (n= 10, 1,1, 10, 11)54.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Adhering to Local Label for Adverse Events

Percentage of participants who adhered to local label/protocol for the management of adverse events is reported.

Time frame: Baseline up to Month 6

Population: FAS population. Number of participants analyzed = participants with available data for this outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants Adhering to Local Label for Adverse Events100 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants Adhering to Local Label for Adverse Events100 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants Adhering to Local Label for Adverse Events100 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants Adhering to Local Label for Adverse Events75 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants Adhering to Local Label for Adverse Events80 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning Stiffness

Duration of morning stiffness was defined as the time elapsed between the time of usual awakening (even if not in the morning) and the time the participant was able to resume normal activities without stiffness. The participant assessment of morning stiffness was measured using a ruler on a 100 mm VAS by 1 of the six categories: less than (\<) 30 minutes, between 30 and 240 minutes, greater than (\>) 240 minutes and whole day.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: FAS population. Here, n= participants with available data at specified visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3 (60-120 minutes) (n= 13, 4, 3, 14, 17)7.7 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline (60-120 minutes) (n= 22, 6, 2, 26, 28)18.2 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3 (30-60 minutes) (n= 13, 4, 3, 14, 17)53.8 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline (whole day) (n= 22, 6, 2, 26, 28)9.1 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6 (30-60 minutes) (n= 12, 3, 3, 12, 15)16.7 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3 (< 30 minutes) (n=13, 4, 3, 14, 17)30.8 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6 (whole day) (n= 12, 3, 3, 12, 15)8.3 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6 (> 240 minutes) (n= 12, 3, 3, 12, 15)8.3 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3 (> 240 minutes) (n= 13, 4, 3, 14, 17)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline (> 240 minutes) (n= 22, 6, 2, 26, 28)22.7 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6 (< 30 minutes) (n= 12, 3, 3, 12, 15)33.3 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline ( < 30 minutes) (n= 22, 6, 2, 26, 28)4.5 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6 (120-240 minutes) (n=12, 3, 3, 12, 15)25.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3 (120-240 minutes) (n= 13, 4, 3, 14, 17)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline (120-240 minutes) (n= 22, 6, 2, 26, 28)31.8 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline (30-60 minutes) (n= 22, 6, 2, 26, 28)13.6 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3 (whole day) (n= 13, 4, 3, 14, 17)7.7 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6 (60-120 minutes) (n= 12, 3, 3, 12, 15)8.3 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6 (< 30 minutes) (n= 12, 3, 3, 12, 15)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline ( < 30 minutes) (n= 22, 6, 2, 26, 28)16.7 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3 (< 30 minutes) (n=13, 4, 3, 14, 17)75.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline (30-60 minutes) (n= 22, 6, 2, 26, 28)16.7 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3 (30-60 minutes) (n= 13, 4, 3, 14, 17)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6 (30-60 minutes) (n= 12, 3, 3, 12, 15)66.7 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline (60-120 minutes) (n= 22, 6, 2, 26, 28)16.7 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3 (60-120 minutes) (n= 13, 4, 3, 14, 17)25.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6 (60-120 minutes) (n= 12, 3, 3, 12, 15)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline (120-240 minutes) (n= 22, 6, 2, 26, 28)33.3 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3 (120-240 minutes) (n= 13, 4, 3, 14, 17)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6 (120-240 minutes) (n=12, 3, 3, 12, 15)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline (> 240 minutes) (n= 22, 6, 2, 26, 28)16.7 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3 (> 240 minutes) (n= 13, 4, 3, 14, 17)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6 (> 240 minutes) (n= 12, 3, 3, 12, 15)33.3 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline (whole day) (n= 22, 6, 2, 26, 28)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3 (whole day) (n= 13, 4, 3, 14, 17)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6 (whole day) (n= 12, 3, 3, 12, 15)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6 (whole day) (n= 12, 3, 3, 12, 15)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6 (< 30 minutes) (n= 12, 3, 3, 12, 15)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6 (30-60 minutes) (n= 12, 3, 3, 12, 15)66.7 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6 (120-240 minutes) (n=12, 3, 3, 12, 15)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline (whole day) (n= 22, 6, 2, 26, 28)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6 (> 240 minutes) (n= 12, 3, 3, 12, 15)33.3 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3 (< 30 minutes) (n=13, 4, 3, 14, 17)33.3 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3 (> 240 minutes) (n= 13, 4, 3, 14, 17)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline (> 240 minutes) (n= 22, 6, 2, 26, 28)50.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline (30-60 minutes) (n= 22, 6, 2, 26, 28)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline ( < 30 minutes) (n= 22, 6, 2, 26, 28)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline (120-240 minutes) (n= 22, 6, 2, 26, 28)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3 (60-120 minutes) (n= 13, 4, 3, 14, 17)33.3 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3 (30-60 minutes) (n= 13, 4, 3, 14, 17)33.3 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6 (60-120 minutes) (n= 12, 3, 3, 12, 15)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3 (whole day) (n= 13, 4, 3, 14, 17)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3 (120-240 minutes) (n= 13, 4, 3, 14, 17)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline (60-120 minutes) (n= 22, 6, 2, 26, 28)50.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3 (30-60 minutes) (n= 13, 4, 3, 14, 17)42.9 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3 (60-120 minutes) (n= 13, 4, 3, 14, 17)7.1 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline ( < 30 minutes) (n= 22, 6, 2, 26, 28)7.7 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6 (60-120 minutes) (n= 12, 3, 3, 12, 15)8.3 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6 (whole day) (n= 12, 3, 3, 12, 15)8.3 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline (120-240 minutes) (n= 22, 6, 2, 26, 28)34.6 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6 (< 30 minutes) (n= 12, 3, 3, 12, 15)33.3 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3 (120-240 minutes) (n= 13, 4, 3, 14, 17)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3 (whole day) (n= 13, 4, 3, 14, 17)7.1 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6 (120-240 minutes) (n=12, 3, 3, 12, 15)25.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline (> 240 minutes) (n= 22, 6, 2, 26, 28)19.2 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3 (< 30 minutes) (n=13, 4, 3, 14, 17)42.9 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3 (> 240 minutes) (n= 13, 4, 3, 14, 17)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6 (> 240 minutes) (n= 12, 3, 3, 12, 15)8.3 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6 (30-60 minutes) (n= 12, 3, 3, 12, 15)16.7 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline (whole day) (n= 22, 6, 2, 26, 28)7.7 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline (60-120 minutes) (n= 22, 6, 2, 26, 28)15.4 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline (30-60 minutes) (n= 22, 6, 2, 26, 28)15.4 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6 (120-240 minutes) (n=12, 3, 3, 12, 15)20.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline (60-120 minutes) (n= 22, 6, 2, 26, 28)17.9 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6 (> 240 minutes) (n= 12, 3, 3, 12, 15)13.3 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline ( < 30 minutes) (n= 22, 6, 2, 26, 28)7.1 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3 (120-240 minutes) (n= 13, 4, 3, 14, 17)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline (whole day) (n= 22, 6, 2, 26, 28)7.1 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3 (30-60 minutes) (n= 13, 4, 3, 14, 17)41.2 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline (120-240 minutes) (n= 22, 6, 2, 26, 28)32.1 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6 (< 30 minutes) (n= 12, 3, 3, 12, 15)26.7 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6 (60-120 minutes) (n= 12, 3, 3, 12, 15)6.7 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3 (60-120 minutes) (n= 13, 4, 3, 14, 17)11.8 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6 (30-60 minutes) (n= 12, 3, 3, 12, 15)26.7 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline (> 240 minutes) (n= 22, 6, 2, 26, 28)21.4 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3 (whole day) (n= 13, 4, 3, 14, 17)5.9 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline (30-60 minutes) (n= 22, 6, 2, 26, 28)14.3 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3 (> 240 minutes) (n= 13, 4, 3, 14, 17)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3 (< 30 minutes) (n=13, 4, 3, 14, 17)41.2 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants by Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6 (whole day) (n= 12, 3, 3, 12, 15)6.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants by Reason for Choice of Monotherapy at Baseline

Time frame: Baseline up to Month 6

Population: Analysis was not performed as the data was not collected on case report form.

Secondary

Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Monotherapy (8 mg/Kg) at Baseline and at Month 6

Time frame: Baseline, Month 6

Population: FAS population. n= participants with available data at the specified visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Monotherapy (8 mg/Kg) at Baseline and at Month 6Baseline (n=29,8,5,32,37)93.1 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Monotherapy (8 mg/Kg) at Baseline and at Month 6Month 6 (n=20,8,4,24,28)87.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Monotherapy (8 mg/Kg) at Baseline and at Month 6Month 6 (n=20,8,4,24,28)100 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Monotherapy (8 mg/Kg) at Baseline and at Month 6Baseline (n=29,8,5,32,37)100 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Monotherapy (8 mg/Kg) at Baseline and at Month 6Month 6 (n=20,8,4,24,28)100.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Monotherapy (8 mg/Kg) at Baseline and at Month 6Baseline (n=29,8,5,32,37)100.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Monotherapy (8 mg/Kg) at Baseline and at Month 6Month 6 (n=20,8,4,24,28)88.9 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Monotherapy (8 mg/Kg) at Baseline and at Month 6Baseline (n=29,8,5,32,37)93.8 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Monotherapy (8 mg/Kg) at Baseline and at Month 6Month 6 (n=20,8,4,24,28)90.3 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Monotherapy (8 mg/Kg) at Baseline and at Month 6Baseline (n=29,8,5,32,37)94.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Starting Tocilizumab After Stopping a Biologic Treatment or After Failing DMARDs

Time frame: Baseline

Population: FAS population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants Starting Tocilizumab After Stopping a Biologic Treatment or After Failing DMARDsPrevious biologic therapy0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants Starting Tocilizumab After Stopping a Biologic Treatment or After Failing DMARDsPrevious DMARD therapy31.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants Starting Tocilizumab After Stopping a Biologic Treatment or After Failing DMARDsPrevious biologic therapy100 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants Starting Tocilizumab After Stopping a Biologic Treatment or After Failing DMARDsPrevious DMARD therapy7.5 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants Starting Tocilizumab After Stopping a Biologic Treatment or After Failing DMARDsPrevious biologic therapy40 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants Starting Tocilizumab After Stopping a Biologic Treatment or After Failing DMARDsPrevious DMARD therapy100 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants Starting Tocilizumab After Stopping a Biologic Treatment or After Failing DMARDsPrevious DMARD therapy34.4 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants Starting Tocilizumab After Stopping a Biologic Treatment or After Failing DMARDsPrevious biologic therapy18.8 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants Starting Tocilizumab After Stopping a Biologic Treatment or After Failing DMARDsPrevious biologic therapy21.6 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants Starting Tocilizumab After Stopping a Biologic Treatment or After Failing DMARDsPrevious DMARD therapy43.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab Treatment

ACR 20,50 or 70 response=an improvement of ≥ 20%, ≥ 50% or ≥ 70% respectively, as compared to baseline in TJC28 and SJC28, and 20%, 50% or 70% improvement in at least 3 of the 5 following measures: Patient's Assessment of Pain over the previous 24 hours, PGA, PhGA, HAQ, and acute phase reactant (either CRP or ESR). TJC and SJC, based on 28-joint assessments. Number of tender joints and swollen joints were recorded on the joint assessment form at baseline, no tenderness = 0 and tenderness = 1, no swelling = 0 and swelling =1, respectively. HAQ measures functional status (disability) and health-related quality of life with 20 questions, summarized in 8 categories: dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common activities over past week, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do. Patient's assessment of pain assessed using a VAS; 0=no pain, 100=unbearable pain; PGA and PhGA, assessed using VAS ; 0= no disease activity, 100=maximum disease activity.

Time frame: Month 3 and Month 6

Population: FAS population. Here, Number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for the outcome measure and n= participants with available data for the specified visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 3: ACR20 responders (n= 11, 3, 2, 12, 14)90.9 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 6: ACR20 responders (n= 10, 1, 2, 9, 11)80.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 3: ACR50 responders (n= 11, 3, 2, 12, 14)63.6 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 6: ACR50 responders (n= 10, 1, 2, 9, 11)70.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 3: ACR70 responders (n= 11, 3, 2, 12, 14)36.4 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 6: ACR70 responders (n= 10, 1, 2, 9, 11)50.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 3: ACR70 responders (n= 11, 3, 2, 12, 14)0.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 6: ACR70 responders (n= 10, 1, 2, 9, 11)0.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 3: ACR20 responders (n= 11, 3, 2, 12, 14)100.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 3: ACR50 responders (n= 11, 3, 2, 12, 14)33.3 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 6: ACR50 responders (n= 10, 1, 2, 9, 11)0.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 6: ACR20 responders (n= 10, 1, 2, 9, 11)100.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 6: ACR50 responders (n= 10, 1, 2, 9, 11)50.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 3: ACR70 responders (n= 11, 3, 2, 12, 14)0.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 3: ACR20 responders (n= 11, 3, 2, 12, 14)100.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 3: ACR50 responders (n= 11, 3, 2, 12, 14)0.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 6: ACR20 responders (n= 10, 1, 2, 9, 11)100.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 6: ACR70 responders (n= 10, 1, 2, 9, 11)0.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 6: ACR50 responders (n= 10, 1, 2, 9, 11)66.7 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 6: ACR20 responders (n= 10, 1, 2, 9, 11)77.8 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 3: ACR50 responders (n= 11, 3, 2, 12, 14)66.7 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 6: ACR70 responders (n= 10, 1, 2, 9, 11)55.6 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 3: ACR70 responders (n= 11, 3, 2, 12, 14)33.3 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 3: ACR20 responders (n= 11, 3, 2, 12, 14)91.7 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 3: ACR70 responders (n= 11, 3, 2, 12, 14)28.6 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 3: ACR50 responders (n= 11, 3, 2, 12, 14)57.1 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 6: ACR20 responders (n= 10, 1, 2, 9, 11)81.8 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 6: ACR70 responders (n= 10, 1, 2, 9, 11)45.5 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 6: ACR50 responders (n= 10, 1, 2, 9, 11)63.6 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20%, 50%, or 70% (ACR20/50/70) Response at Month 3 and Month 6 From the Start of Tocilizumab TreatmentMonth 3: ACR20 responders (n= 11, 3, 2, 12, 14)92.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning Stiffness

Morning stiffness was defined by the time elapsed between the time of usual awakening (even if not in the morning) and the time the participant was able to resume normal activities without stiffness. The participant assessed morning stiffness based on the following criteria: 1. Presence of participant's joints stiff when woke up that day, measured as yes or no 2. Duration of morning stiffness, measured using a ruler on a 100 mm VAS by 1 of the six categories: \< 30 minutes, between 30 and 240 minutes, \> 240 minutes, and the whole day. 3. Severity of morning stiffness measured using a ruler on a 100 mm VAS where the responses were on a continuous range from 0 = no stiffness to 100 = maximum stiffness.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: FAS population. Here, Number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for the outcome measure and n= participants with available data at the specified visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessBaseline(with morning stiffness)(n=24,6,3,27,30)95.8 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessBaseline(without morningstiffness)(n=24,6,3,27,30)4.2 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessMonth 3(with morning stiffness)(n=14,5,4,15,19)92.9 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessMonth 3(without morning stiffness)(n=14,5,4,15,19)7.1 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessMonth 6(with morning stiffness)(n=14,3,4,13,17)92.9 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessMonth 6(without morning stiffness)(n=14,3,4,13,17)17.1 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessMonth 6(with morning stiffness)(n=14,3,4,13,17)100 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessMonth 6(without morning stiffness)(n=14,3,4,13,17)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessBaseline(with morning stiffness)(n=24,6,3,27,30)100 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessMonth 3(with morning stiffness)(n=14,5,4,15,19)100 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessMonth 3(without morning stiffness)(n=14,5,4,15,19)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessBaseline(without morningstiffness)(n=24,6,3,27,30)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessMonth 3(without morning stiffness)(n=14,5,4,15,19)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessMonth 6(with morning stiffness)(n=14,3,4,13,17)100 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessBaseline(with morning stiffness)(n=24,6,3,27,30)100 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessMonth 3(with morning stiffness)(n=14,5,4,15,19)100 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessBaseline(without morningstiffness)(n=24,6,3,27,30)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessMonth 6(without morning stiffness)(n=14,3,4,13,17)0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessMonth 3(without morning stiffness)(n=14,5,4,15,19)6.7 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessBaseline(without morningstiffness)(n=24,6,3,27,30)3.7 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessMonth 3(with morning stiffness)(n=14,5,4,15,19)93.3 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessMonth 6(without morning stiffness)(n=14,3,4,13,17)7.7 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessMonth 6(with morning stiffness)(n=14,3,4,13,17)92.3 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessBaseline(with morning stiffness)(n=24,6,3,27,30)96.3 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessMonth 6(with morning stiffness)(n=14,3,4,13,17)94.1 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessMonth 3(with morning stiffness)(n=14,5,4,15,19)94.7 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessBaseline(without morningstiffness)(n=24,6,3,27,30)3.3 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessMonth 6(without morning stiffness)(n=14,3,4,13,17)5.9 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessMonth 3(without morning stiffness)(n=14,5,4,15,19)5.3 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants With and Without Morning StiffnessBaseline(with morning stiffness)(n=24,6,3,27,30)96.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Reasons Who Discontinued Tocilizumab

Time frame: Baseline up to Month 6

Population: FAS population. Here, Number of Participants Analyzed (N) signifies participants who discontinued tocilizumab treatment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants With Reasons Who Discontinued TocilizumabLack of efficacy20.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants With Reasons Who Discontinued TocilizumabUnspecified40.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants With Reasons Who Discontinued TocilizumabAdverse event40.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants With Reasons Who Discontinued TocilizumabLack of efficacy0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants With Reasons Who Discontinued TocilizumabUnspecified100.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants With Reasons Who Discontinued TocilizumabAdverse event0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants With Reasons Who Discontinued TocilizumabAdverse event50.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants With Reasons Who Discontinued TocilizumabLack of efficacy25.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants With Reasons Who Discontinued TocilizumabUnspecified25.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants With Reasons Who Discontinued TocilizumabLack of efficacy20.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants With Reasons Who Discontinued TocilizumabUnspecified40.0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants With Reasons Who Discontinued TocilizumabAdverse event40.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Tocilizumab Dose Changed According to the Reason for Change

Percentage of participants with increase or decrease in tocilizumab administration according to the reason for dose modification was reported.

Time frame: Baseline up to Month 6

Population: FAS population.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants With Tocilizumab Dose Changed According to the Reason for ChangeIncrease in dose0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants With Tocilizumab Dose Changed According to the Reason for ChangeReason:Unspecified3.4 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Percentage of Participants With Tocilizumab Dose Changed According to the Reason for ChangeDecrease in dose3.4 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants With Tocilizumab Dose Changed According to the Reason for ChangeDecrease in dose0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants With Tocilizumab Dose Changed According to the Reason for ChangeIncrease in dose12.5 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Percentage of Participants With Tocilizumab Dose Changed According to the Reason for ChangeReason:Unspecified12.5 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants With Tocilizumab Dose Changed According to the Reason for ChangeDecrease in dose0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants With Tocilizumab Dose Changed According to the Reason for ChangeIncrease in dose0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Percentage of Participants With Tocilizumab Dose Changed According to the Reason for ChangeReason:Unspecified0 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants With Tocilizumab Dose Changed According to the Reason for ChangeIncrease in dose3.1 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants With Tocilizumab Dose Changed According to the Reason for ChangeReason:Unspecified6.3 percentage of participants
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Percentage of Participants With Tocilizumab Dose Changed According to the Reason for ChangeDecrease in dose3.1 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants With Tocilizumab Dose Changed According to the Reason for ChangeDecrease in dose2.7 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants With Tocilizumab Dose Changed According to the Reason for ChangeIncrease in dose2.7 percentage of participants
RA Participants (All Groups)Percentage of Participants With Tocilizumab Dose Changed According to the Reason for ChangeReason:Unspecified5.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score by Visit

The SDAI is a combined index for measuring disease activity in RA and calculated as SDAI = TJC28 + SJC28 + PGH (in centimeters) + PhGH (in centimeters) + CRP (in mg/dL), where TJC28 = tender joint count on 28 units, SJC28 = swollen joint count on 28 units, PGH = patient's global assessment of disease activity, assessed on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 = managing very well and 100 = managing very poorly, PhGH = physician global assessment of disease activity, assessed on a 100 mm VAS, where 0 = no arthritis activity and 100 = extremely active arthritis, CRP = serum concentration of c-reactive protein; with a total SDAI score ranged from 0-86. Higher scores indicate greater disease activity. SDAI scores of less than or equal to 3.3 represents clinical remission, less than or equal to 11.0 represents low disease activity, less than or equal to 26.0 represents moderate disease activity, and greater than 26.0 represents high (or severe) disease.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: FAS population. Here, Number of participants analyzed = participants evaluable for the outcome measure and n= participants with SDAI score available at the specified visit.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score by VisitBaseline (n= 22, 6, 3, 25, 28)48.01 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.853
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score by VisitMonth 6 (n= 12, 2, 2, 12, 14)14.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.357
RA Participants (Biologic Naïve Group)Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score by VisitMonth 3 (n= 11, 4, 2, 13, 15)13.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.602
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score by VisitMonth 3 (n= 11, 4, 2, 13, 15)15.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.066
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score by VisitBaseline (n= 22, 6, 3, 25, 28)43.57 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.898
RA Participants (Biologic Exposed Group)Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score by VisitMonth 6 (n= 12, 2, 2, 12, 14)14.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.798
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score by VisitMonth 3 (n= 11, 4, 2, 13, 15)14.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.536
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score by VisitBaseline (n= 22, 6, 3, 25, 28)47.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.689
RA Participants (Monotherapy Group)Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score by VisitMonth 6 (n= 12, 2, 2, 12, 14)13.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.142
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score by VisitBaseline (n= 22, 6, 3, 25, 28)47.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.173
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score by VisitMonth 6 (n= 12, 2, 2, 12, 14)14.70 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.301
RA Participants (Combination Therapy Group)Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score by VisitMonth 3 (n= 11, 4, 2, 13, 15)13.61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.997
RA Participants (All Groups)Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score by VisitMonth 3 (n= 11, 4, 2, 13, 15)13.79 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.236
RA Participants (All Groups)Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score by VisitBaseline (n= 22, 6, 3, 25, 28)47.06 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.293
RA Participants (All Groups)Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) Score by VisitMonth 6 (n= 12, 2, 2, 12, 14)14.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.218
Secondary

Time to Restoration of Initial Dosing Regimen

Time frame: Baseline up to Month 6

Population: Analysis was not performed due to inadequate data available for this outcome measure.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026