Skip to content

California Transport Cooling Trial

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Therapeutic Hypothermia During Transport for Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy (HIE): Device-regulated Cooling Versus Standard Practice.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01683383
Acronym
CTCT
Enrollment
101
Registered
2012-09-11
Start date
2012-09-30
Completion date
2013-10-31
Last updated
2014-12-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hypoxic Ischemic Encephalopathy

Keywords

Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, Therapeutic hypothermia, Whole body cooling, Transport cooling

Brief summary

Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) remains a major cause of death and severe disability despite advances in neonatal and perinatal medicine. Therapeutic hypothermia is the single most promising intervention for HIE. Reduction of brain temperature by 2° to 5°C has shown to be neuroprotective in newborn and adult animal models of brain ischemia. Therapeutic hypothermia instituted within 6 hours of birth has been shown to significantly improve survival and neurodevelopmental outcome in term newborns with HIE. Hypothermia is most effective if begun during the latent period, before the secondary energy failure. It is not known whether cooling initiated after 6 hours of age is effective. The goal of this proposal is to test the efficacy of the cooling device in achieving the target temperatures in patients with moderate to severe HIE during transport when compared with current practices.

Detailed description

Statement of the Problem: Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) remains a major cause of death and severe disability despite advances in neonatal and perinatal medicine. Therapeutic hypothermia is the single most promising intervention for HIE. Reduction of brain temperature by 2° to 5°C has shown to be neuroprotective in newborn and adult animal models of brain ischemia. Therapeutic hypothermia instituted within 6 hours of birth has been shown to significantly improve survival and neurodevelopmental outcome in term newborns with HIE. Hypothermia is most effective if begun during the latent period, before secondary energy failure. It is not known whether cooling initiated after 6 hours of age is effective. Animal studies have shown that the sooner the initiation of cooling, the better the outcome. They have also suggested that the latent period may be shorter with a more severe insult. Cooling should be initiated as soon as possible, preferably within 2 hours and not later than 6 hours. There have been six large randomized clinical trials supporting the efficacy of therapeutic hypothermia for HIE and it is now the standard of care in the U.S. and internationally. Once a patient qualifies for cooling, whole body cooling or selective head cooling is initiated. However, most birth hospitals do not have the ability to provide therapeutic hypothermia; thus, patients must be transported to Level 3 NICUs specially equipped to provide this therapy. As there is a limited therapeutic window for induction of hypothermia, it would be ideal to initiate therapeutic hypothermia as soon as the patient qualifies for cooling therapy. If cooling is initiated at the birth hospital, neuroprotective temperatures can be achieved several hours prior to arrival in the cooling center. At this time patients cooled in transport receive passive cooling (turning off the active warming devices such as the transport isolette) or active cooling (ice packs placed around the baby). These practices have been shown to present a significant risk for over-cooling and under-cooling. The risks associated with excessive cooling include bradycardia, cardiac arrest, and coagulation disturbances. Undercooling likely results in reduced efficacy of the neuroprotective effects provided by therapeutic hypothermia. Primary and secondary endpoints Primary end point: The percentage of temperatures in the target range (33°-34°C) both within and between enrolled infants after cooling initiation by the transport team. Secondary end point: Time to the target temperature range (33°-34°C), percentage of newborns in target temperature range one hour after cooling initiation by transport team, and temperature ranges. Study Design The proposed California Transport Cooling Trial (CTCT) is a prospective randomized multi-center clinical trial to be conducted by nine transport teams based at level III NICUs in California who perform therapeutic hypothermia for HIE. The on-call neonatologist at the participating cooling center will determine if the infant qualifies for cooling. Infants greater than or equal to 35 weeks and less than six hours of age who are being transported to a cooling center will be eligible. The transport team will randomize the infant to either cooling as per center practice (Arm 1) or device-regulated cooling (Arm 2). Subjects in Arm 1 will receive passive or active cooling as per center practice with rectal temperatures being recorded every 15 minutes. Subjects in Arm 2 will be placed on cooling blanket connected to the Tecotherm Neo. Temperature will be monitored continuously and servo-regulated using a rectal temperature probe. Pertinent clinical data will be collected using CPQCC/CPeTS data forms and CTCT data forms. Temperatures from initiation of cooling until admission to the cooling center will be analyzed for percentage of temperatures in the target range after cooling initiation by the transport team, time to target temperature range, percentage of newborns in the target temperature range 1 hour after cooling initiation by the transport team, and temperature ranges. ANOVA method will be used to compare the temperature ranges across arms. Cox proportional hazard model will be used to compare time to target temperature. Safety outcomes will be compared using standard logistic regression. Study Methods Subjects assigned to Arm 1 will be cooled as per the usual center practice with recording of rectal temperatures every 15 minutes. Arm 2 subjects will be cooled using a portable servo-regulated cooling device using a rectal probe. Temperatures will be stored on the memory card every minute. No PHI will be stored in the cooling device. Data will be downloaded from the device at the conclusion of the transport. Sample Size and Estimated Study Duration Power calculations for this study were based on anticipated 140 patients requiring initiation of therapeutic hypothermia by nine transport teams over a period of one year. A 70% consent rate and 50 patients per arm will provide 90% power to detect 30% absolute difference in the percentage of temperatures in the target range assuming a standard deviation for percentage of temperature in the target range of 45% based on the Kendall study, published in Archives of Diseases of Childhood in 2010. All analyses will adjust for center and will be two-sided and conducted at the 0.05 level of significance. We estimate that patient enrollment will take approximately one year. Data analysis, manuscript preparation, and submission will be completed within 6 months of completion of enrollment.

Interventions

DEVICEDevice (servo-regulated cooling)

Subjects in Arm 2 will be placed on cooling blanket connected to the Tecotherm Neo (Inspiration Healthcare LTD UK). Temperature will be monitored continuously and servo-regulated using a rectal temperature probe.

OTHERControl (standard practice)

Subjects in Arm 1 will receive passive or active cooling as per center practice with rectal temperatures being recorded every 15 minutes.

Sponsors

Inspiration Healthcare
CollaboratorOTHER
Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 6 Hours
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Term or near-term infants with gestational age ≥35 weeks who meet institutional criteria for use of therapeutic hypothermia and in whom the decision has been made to perform cooling during transport.

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of a congenital or lethal chromosomal anomaly * Decision to not provide full intensive care * Refusal to consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Temperatures in Target Range During TransportParticipants will be followed for the duration of neonatal transport from the birth hospital to the cooling center, an expected average of 4 hoursThe percentage of temperatures in the target range (33°-34°C) during transport after cooling initiation by the transport team.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Target TemperatureParticipants will be followed for the duration of neonatal transport from the birth hospital to the cooling center, an expected average of 4 hoursTime to the target temperature range (33°-34°C) from initiation of cooling by the transport team
Percentage of Participants in the Target Range at 1 HourParticipants will be followed for the duration of neonatal transport from the birth hospital to the cooling center, an expected average of 4 hoursPercentage of participants in target range (33°-34°C) one hour after cooling initiation by the transport team
Participants in Target Temperature Range Anytime During TransportParticipants will be followed for the duration of neonatal transport from the birth hospital to the cooling center, an expected average of 4 hoursParticipants in target temperature range (33-34 C) anytime during transport

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety OutcomesParticipants will be followed for the duration of neonatal transport from the birth hospital to the cooling center, an expected average of 4 hoursThe incidence, intervention and outcome of cardiac arrhythmia, major bleeding, altered skin integrity, pulmonary hypertension, device-related events, death, and other serious adverse events from the time of initiation of transport cooling to the time of completion will be monitored.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

131 infants were screened for eligibility at nine participating NICUs between October 1, 2012 and September 27th, 2013. Eligible infants had a gestational age of at least 35 weeks, met institutional criteria for use of therapeutic hypothermia, and a decision had been made to initiate cooling in transport.

Pre-assignment details

Infants were excluded if they had a lethal congenital or chromosomal anomaly, the decision had been made to not provide full intensive care, or there was refusal of consent. Of 131 infants screened for eligibility, 30 were excluded, and 101 consented and were randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Control (Standard Cooling)
Infants were cooled as per the birth hospital practice either passively (turning the radiant warmer /incubator off) and/or actively (ice or gel packs).
49
Device (Servo-regulated Cooling)
Infants were placed on a servo-controlled cooling blanket after a rectal or esophageal probe was inserted. The temperature was servo-controlled using the Tecotherm Neo (Inspiration Medical LTD, Leicester, UK) (Appendix 1; online only) with the target temperature set to 33.5°C.
51
Total100

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyInfant was not transported10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalDevice (Servo-regulated Cooling)Control (Standard Cooling)
Age, Customized
Chron. age at cooling initiation at birth hospital
27 Hours
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
28 Hours
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
26 Hours
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
Apgar scores @ 10 minutes
Apgar @ 10 min ≤ 5
51 Participants24 Participants27 Participants
Apgar scores @ 10 minutes
Apgar @ 10 min > 5
49 Participants27 Participants22 Participants
Apgar scores @ 1 minute
Apgar @ 1 min ≤ 5
89 Participants42 Participants47 Participants
Apgar scores @ 1 minute
Apgar @ 1 min > 5
11 Participants9 Participants2 Participants
Apgar scores @ 5 minutes
Apgar @ 5 min ≤ 5
80 Participants38 Participants42 Participants
Apgar scores @ 5 minutes
Apgar @ 5 min > 5
20 Participants13 Participants7 Participants
Birth weight3358 Grams
STANDARD_DEVIATION 610
3321 Grams
STANDARD_DEVIATION 523
3397 Grams
STANDARD_DEVIATION 627
Cord gas: base deficit14.8 mEq/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6
14.0 mEq/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.7
15.6 mEq/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.1
Cord gas: pH6.96 pH
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.18
7.01 pH
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.15
6.91 pH
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
Delivery room resuscitation: Bag and mask
Bag and mask
86 Participants43 Participants43 Participants
Delivery room resuscitation: Bag and mask
No bag and mask
14 Participants8 Participants6 Participants
Delivery room resuscitation: Chest compressions
Chest compressions
42 Participants22 Participants20 Participants
Delivery room resuscitation: Chest compressions
No chest compressions
58 Participants29 Participants29 Participants
Delivery room resuscitation: CPAP
CPAP
34 Participants16 Participants18 Participants
Delivery room resuscitation: CPAP
No CPAP
66 Participants35 Participants31 Participants
Delivery room resuscitation: Epinephrine
Epinephrine
23 Participants10 Participants13 Participants
Delivery room resuscitation: Epinephrine
No epinephrine
77 Participants41 Participants36 Participants
Delivery room resuscitation: Intubation with ventilation
Intubation with ventilation
66 Participants32 Participants34 Participants
Delivery room resuscitation: Intubation with ventilation
No intubation with ventilation
34 Participants19 Participants15 Participants
Delivery room resuscitation: Oxygen
No oxygen
7 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Delivery room resuscitation: Oxygen
Oxygen
93 Participants47 Participants46 Participants
First postnatal gas: base deficit17.3 mEq/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.8
17.5 mEq/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.9
17.0 mEq/L
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7
First postnatal gas: pH7.04 pH
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.19
7.02 pH
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.19
7.06 pH
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.2
Gestational age39.1 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
39.1 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
39.1 Weeks
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.7
Pressors at randomization
No pressors used
93 Participants47 Participants46 Participants
Pressors at randomization
Pressors used
7 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Respiratory support @ randomization: Conventional mechanical ventilation
Conventional mechanical ventilation: No
45 Participants22 Participants23 Participants
Respiratory support @ randomization: Conventional mechanical ventilation
Conventional mechanical ventilation: Yes
55 Participants29 Participants26 Participants
Respiratory support @ randomization: High-frequency ventilation
High-frequency ventilation: No
93 Participants47 Participants46 Participants
Respiratory support @ randomization: High-frequency ventilation
High-frequency ventilation: Yes
7 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Respiratory support @ randomization: Inhaled nitric oxide
Inhaled nitric oxide: No
94 Participants47 Participants47 Participants
Respiratory support @ randomization: Inhaled nitric oxide
Inhaled nitric oxide: Yes
6 Participants4 Participants2 Participants
Respiratory support @ randomization: Non-invasive ventilation
Non-invasive ventilation: No
76 Participants42 Participants34 Participants
Respiratory support @ randomization: Non-invasive ventilation
Non-invasive ventilation: Yes
24 Participants9 Participants15 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
47 Participants22 Participants25 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
53 Participants29 Participants24 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 492 / 51
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 4910 / 51

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Temperatures in Target Range During Transport

The percentage of temperatures in the target range (33°-34°C) during transport after cooling initiation by the transport team.

Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of neonatal transport from the birth hospital to the cooling center, an expected average of 4 hours

Population: Total patients in each study arm

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Control (Standard Cooling)Percentage of Temperatures in Target Range During Transport0 Percentage of temperatures
Device (Servo-regulated Cooling)Percentage of Temperatures in Target Range During Transport73 Percentage of temperatures
p-value: <0.001Adjusted Wald estimation
Secondary

Participants in Target Temperature Range Anytime During Transport

Participants in target temperature range (33-34 C) anytime during transport

Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of neonatal transport from the birth hospital to the cooling center, an expected average of 4 hours

Population: Total participants in each study arm

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Control (Standard Cooling)Participants in Target Temperature Range Anytime During Transport24 Participants
Device (Servo-regulated Cooling)Participants in Target Temperature Range Anytime During Transport41 Participants
p-value: <0.001Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in the Target Range at 1 Hour

Percentage of participants in target range (33°-34°C) one hour after cooling initiation by the transport team

Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of neonatal transport from the birth hospital to the cooling center, an expected average of 4 hours

Population: Total participants in each study arm, excluding 8 participants in the control arm and 12 participants in the device arm who completed transport in \< 1 hour.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Control (Standard Cooling)Percentage of Participants in the Target Range at 1 Hour8 Percentage of participants
Device (Servo-regulated Cooling)Percentage of Participants in the Target Range at 1 Hour28 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Time to Target Temperature

Time to the target temperature range (33°-34°C) from initiation of cooling by the transport team

Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of neonatal transport from the birth hospital to the cooling center, an expected average of 4 hours

Population: Total patients in each study arm

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Control (Standard Cooling)Time to Target Temperature63 MinutesStandard Deviation 37
Device (Servo-regulated Cooling)Time to Target Temperature44 MinutesStandard Deviation 31
p-value: 0.04Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Other Pre-specified

Safety Outcomes

The incidence, intervention and outcome of cardiac arrhythmia, major bleeding, altered skin integrity, pulmonary hypertension, device-related events, death, and other serious adverse events from the time of initiation of transport cooling to the time of completion will be monitored.

Time frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of neonatal transport from the birth hospital to the cooling center, an expected average of 4 hours

Population: Total participants in each study arm

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Control (Standard Cooling)Safety OutcomesMajor bleeding (pulmonary hemorrhage)0 Participants
Control (Standard Cooling)Safety OutcomesCardiac arrhythmia0 Participants
Control (Standard Cooling)Safety OutcomesDevice-related events0 Participants
Control (Standard Cooling)Safety OutcomesAltered skin integrity0 Participants
Control (Standard Cooling)Safety OutcomesDeath6 Participants
Control (Standard Cooling)Safety OutcomesPulmonary hypertension0 Participants
Device (Servo-regulated Cooling)Safety OutcomesDeath9 Participants
Device (Servo-regulated Cooling)Safety OutcomesCardiac arrhythmia0 Participants
Device (Servo-regulated Cooling)Safety OutcomesMajor bleeding (pulmonary hemorrhage)1 Participants
Device (Servo-regulated Cooling)Safety OutcomesAltered skin integrity0 Participants
Device (Servo-regulated Cooling)Safety OutcomesPulmonary hypertension0 Participants
Device (Servo-regulated Cooling)Safety OutcomesDevice-related events2 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026