Skip to content

Influence of Skeletal Muscle Paralysis on Metabolism in Hypothermic Patients After Cardiac Arrest

Influence of Skeletal Muscle Paralysis on Metabolism in Hypothermic Patients After Cardiac Arrest

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01683006
Enrollment
43
Registered
2012-09-11
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
2014-11-30
Last updated
2017-08-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Arrest, Critical Illness

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of muscle relaxing drugs on the energy rate during hypothermia after cardiac arrest.

Detailed description

Mild hypothermia improves neurological outcome after cardiac arrest. Neuromuscular blockers are in use, together with analgesia and sedation, during the cooling process in many centers to prevent shivering. However, neuromuscular blockers are accused to be associated with various side effects causing serious harm and/or leading to prolonged ICU stay. Furthermore, the use of neuromuscular blockers may mask epileptic activity. Therefore, the advantages and disadvantages of neuromuscular blockers during therapeutic hypothermia need to be re-evaluated. Aim of this study is to investigate if continuous application of neuromuscular blockers is necessary to prevent shivering and thereby avoiding an increase in energy expenditure in patients during therapeutic hypothermia and rewarming after cardiac arrest (initial 72h).

Interventions

DRUGRocuronium

Continuous application of Rocuronium (0.5 mg/kg body weight/hour). Bolus application of placebo in case of shivering.

DRUGPlacebo

Continuous application of placebo during therapeutic hypothermia. Bolus application of Rocuronium (0.5 mg/kg body weight) in case of shivering.

Sponsors

Medical University of Vienna
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* All patients receiving mild therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest of presumed cardiopulmonary origin

Exclusion criteria

* age \< 18 * cardiac arrest \>6 hours before admittance at the hospital * patients with known or clinically apparent pregnancy * patients who reach our hospital with a body temperature below 35°C * patients with known allergic reactions against rocuronium * patients with a history of myasthenia gravis * patients with obvious intoxication * wards of the state/prisoners * patients with known epileptic disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of resting energy expenditure compared to baseline at 33C°initial 72h after cardiac arrest at defined temperatures or timepoints: 1) 33°C 2) 34.5°C 3) 36 °C 4) 36.5 - 37.5 °C 5) after 48-72hresting energy expenditure will be assessed with indirect calorimetry at different measurement time points: 1. 12-24 h after initiation of mild hypothermia (33C°) 2. during warming up (at 34.5°C) 3. during warming up (at 36°C) 4. during warming up (at 36.5°C - 37.5°C) 5. normal Temperature, after 48 - 72 h after initiation of mild hypothermia

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change of substrate oxidation rate (protein, fat and glucose) compared to baseline at 33C°initial 72h after cardiac arrest at defined temperatures or timepoints: 1) 33°C 2) 34.5°C 3) 36 °C 4) 36.5 - 37.5 °C 5) after 48-72hsubstrate oxidation rates will be assessed with indirect calorimetry at different measurement time points: 1. 12-24 h after initiation of mild hypothermia (33C°) 2. during warming up (at 34.5°C) 3. during warming up (at 36°C) 4. during warming up (at 36.5°C - 37.5°C) 5. at normal Temperature, after 48 - 72 h after initiation of mild hypothermia

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Difference in resting energy expenditure between patients with favorable and unfavorable outcomeinitial 72h after cardiac arrest at defined temperatures or timepoints: 1) 33°C 2) 34.5°C 3) 36 °C 4) 36.5 - 37.5 °C 5) after 48-72hresting energy expenditure will be assessed with indirect calorimetry at different measurement time points: 1. 12-24 h after initiation of mild hypothermia (33C°) 2. during warming up (at 34.5°C) 3. during warming up (at 36°C) 4. during warming up (at 36.5°C - 37.5°C) 5. normal Temperature, after 48 - 72 h after initiation of mild hypothermia
Difference in substrate metabolism between patients with favorable and unfavorable outcomeinitial 72h after cardiac arrest at defined temperatures or timepoints: 1) 33°C 2) 34.5°C 3) 36 °C 4) 36.5 - 37.5 °C 5) after 48-72hsubstrate oxidation rates will be assessed with indirect calorimetry at different measurement time points: 1. 12-24 h after initiation of mild hypothermia (33C°) 2. during warming up (at 34.5°C) 3. during warming up (at 36°C) 4. during warming up (at 36.5°C - 37.5°C) 5. at normal Temperature, after 48 - 72 h after initiation of mild hypothermia

Countries

Austria

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026