Skip to content

Stretta In Reflux Uncontrolled by IPP

Stretta In Reflux Uncontrolled by Intake of Inhibitors of Protons Pump (IPP).- The SIRUP Trial- Multicentric, Randomized, Double Blind, Prospective Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01682265
Acronym
SIRUP
Enrollment
62
Registered
2012-09-10
Start date
2012-03-26
Completion date
2018-11-27
Last updated
2026-09-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Brief summary

The aim of the study is to compare the Stretta procedure and the Sham procedure efficiency 6months post-procedure in reflux uncontrolled by intake of Inhibitors of Protons Pump (IPP) patients.

Detailed description

The study is over a period of 1 year. After checking eligibility, the patient will be randomised in double blind : stretta procedure /sham procedure. Control visits will take place after 4 weeks (on site), 8 weeks (by phone), 12 weeks (by phone), 18 weeks(on site) and 24 weeks(on site).During the 24 weeks visit, the therapeutic success will be evaluated. In case of success, endoscopic control will be performed and the patient will come back on site at week 36 and 48 (end of study). In case of therapeutic failure, the stretta procedure will be proposed to the patient without breaking the blind for the 1st procedure. The procedure will be scheduled between week 24 and week 27. The patient will come back for a visit on site at weeks 31, 36 and 48 (end of visit)

Interventions

OTHERStretta procedure
OTHERSham procedure

No radiofrequency delivered

Sponsors

Nantes University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 ans * Severe or moderate heartburn (at least 3 heartburn times per week), persistent under treatment with IPP

Exclusion criteria

* Recent oeso-gastro-duodenal endoscopy(\< 3 months) * Oesophagitis \> grade A * Endobrachyoesophagus \> C0M1 * Hiatal Hernia \> 2 cm * Symptoms insufficiently relieved with continued intake of IPP or with intake of IPP according to needs * Predominant symptom of Gastrooesophageal reflux disease other than heartburn * Patients contra-indicated for radiofrequency technique * Pregnant women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficiency of the treatment 6 months post-procedure6 monthsEvaluate the efficiency of the treatment 6 months post-procedure according to the patient's answers to the 2 following items : IPP treatment taken less than 7 days /week and adequate relief of symptoms. These results will be completed by the patient on a calendar during 2 weeks before the visit week 24

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effects on digestive symptoms6 monthsCompare Stretta and sham procedure according to complete relief of digestive symptoms and pyrosis (calculation based upon number of days without digestive symptoms and pyrosis as indicated by the patient on a questionary completed during the 2 weeks preceding visits à 6 months)
Necessity of IPP treatment6 monthsCompare Stretta and sham procedure according to necessity of IPP treatment
necessity of IPP treatment1 yearCompare Stretta and sham procedure according to necessity of IPP treatment
Tolerance6 monthsCompare Stretta and sham procedure according to Tolerance analysed by recording of adverse events (sides effects of each procedure) until week 24.
Quality of live6 monthsCompare Stretta and sham procedure according to Quality of life (use of quality of life questionaries)
Quality of life1 yearCompare Stretta and sham procedure according to Quality of life
pH-impedancemetry predictive factorsAt InclusionpH-impedancemetry will be realized at clinical trial start, when patient is under PPI intake to determine pH-impedancemetry predictive factors for positive response to stretta method. Acid and non acid exposition of the esophagus will be measured as well as the SAP (Symptom Association Probability) which corresponds to the probability of association between symptoms felt by the patient during the pH-impedancemetry and episodes of acid or non acid reflux.
Efficiency1 yearEvaluate efficiency of the stretta procedure in patients unsatisfied after the sham procedure at week 48 according to the patient's answers to the 2 following items : IPP treatment taken less than 7 days /week and adequate relief of symptoms. These results will be completed by the patient on a calendar during 2 weeks before the visit week 48

Countries

France

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORStanislas Bruley des Varannes, Professor

Nantes Universitary Hospital

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORChloe Melchior, Doctor

Rouen Universitary Hospital

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORThierry Ponchon, Professor

Lyon Universitary Hospital

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORFranck Zerbib, Professor

Bordeaux Universitary Hospital

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORFranck Cholet, Doctor

Brest Universitary hospital

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORBenoit Coffin, Professor

APHP-Louis Mourier hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 15, 2026