Skip to content

Post-Market Study of JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™ With Lidocaine for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01680497
Enrollment
70
Registered
2012-09-07
Start date
2012-06-01
Completion date
2014-03-06
Last updated
2019-04-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds

Brief summary

A prospective, open-label, multi-center, observational, post-market study evaluating JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™ for the correction of moderate to severe nasolabial folds

Interventions

DEVICECrosslinked hyaluronic acid dermal filler

All treatment details are at the discretion of the Investigator and should be guided by the Directions for Use. Up to 3 treatments will be administered: Initial treatment, optional top-up treatment at Day 14 post-initial treatment, and optional repeat treatment at Month 12 post-initial treatment.

Sponsors

Allergan
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female 18 years of age or older * Have 2 fully visible, approximately symmetrical nasolabial folds and has severity scores of 2 or 3 on the 5-point photographic nasolabial fold severity scale (range 0-4) for both nasolabial folds, as judged by the Investigator * Have a reasonable expectation for correction by injection via deep dermis, as described in the protocol * Agree to refrain from undergoing other anti-wrinkle/volumizing treatments in the lower two-thirds of the face (below the orbital rim) for the duration of the study * Understand and be willing to follow all aspects of the study protocol and have signed and dated the Informed Consent prior to any study-related procedures being performed * Be in good health as in the opinion of the Investigator

Exclusion criteria

* Has undergone cosmetic facial procedures (e.g., face lift or other surgeries) which may alter the appearance of the nasolabial fold area * Cosmetic injections in the lower two-thirds of the face (below the orbital rim), within 6 months prior to entry in the study, or be planning to undergo any of these procedures at any time during the study. NOTE: Prior treatment with HA fillers and/or collagen is allowed, provided the treatment was administered more than 6 months prior to study entry * Has undergone volumizing of the mid/lower face within 9 months prior to study entry * Has ever received semi-permanent fillers or permanent facial implants (e.g., calcium hydroxylapatite, poly-L-lactic acid, polymethylmethacrylate, silicone, expanded poly-tetrafluoroethylene) anywhere in the lower face (below the orbital rim), or be planning to be implanted with any of these products at any time during the study * Have a history of anaphylaxis, multiple severe allergies, atopy, allergy to lidocaine (an any amide-based anesthetics), HA products, or Streptococcal protein, or be planning to undergo a desensitization therapy during the term of the study * Be a pregnant female, lactating, or planning to become pregnant at any time during the study * Be a female of childbearing potential not using a reliable means of contraception * Have received any investigational product within 30 days prior to study enrollment or be planning to participate in another investigation during the course of this study * Suffer from an uncontrolled personality disorder (e.g., body dysmorphia, depression) * Have a history of or currently suffer from autoimmune disease (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, Crohn's disease) * Have a history of streptococcal disease (e.g., strep throat or rheumatic fever with or without heart complications) * Have a history of skin cancer * Suffer from porphyria * Have epilepsy, which is not controlled by anti-epilepsy therapy * Current cutaneous inflammatory and/or infectious processes (e.g., acne, herpes) * Have a history of treatment with interferon * Be on an ongoing regimen of anti-coagulation therapy (e.g., warfarin) or have taken non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) (e.g., aspirin, ibuprofen) or other substances known to increase coagulation time (e.g., herbal supplements with garlic or ginkgo biloba) within 10 days of undergoing study device injection. NOTE: Study device injection may be delayed as necessary to accommodate this 10-day period * Be on a concurrent regimen of high doses of lidocaine (more than 400 mg) which may cause acute toxic reactions * Be on a concurrent regimen of other local anesthetics structurally related to amide-type local anesthetics * Have impaired cardiac conduction, severely impaired hepatic function, or severe renal dysfunction * Have a condition or be in a situation that, in the Investigator's opinion, may put the subject at significant risk, may confound the study results, or may interfere significantly with the subject's participation in the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Investigator Assessment of Nasolabial Fold Severity Using the 5-point Nasolabial Fold Severity Scale (NLFSS)Month 12Nasolabial fold severity is evaluated by the Investigator on the 5-point NLFSS on both the right and left sides. Scores are assessed as 1 (none), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe), and 5 (extreme).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Investigator Satisfaction With Aesthetic Outcome on an 11-Point ScaleDay 14, Month 1, Month 9, Month 12Investigator satisfaction with aesthetic outcome is assessed on an 11-point scale. Scores range from -5 (definitely not satisfied), 0 (don't know/unsure), and 5 (definitely satisfied).
Investigator Assessment of Ease of Injection Use on a 10-Point ScaleDay 0, Day 14Investigator assessment of ease of injection use is assessed on a 10-point scale. Scores range from 0 (easy) to 10 (hard).
Investigator Assessment of Nasolabial Fold Severity Using the 5-point NLFSSDay 0, Day 14, Month 1, Month 9Nasolabial fold severity is evaluated by the Investigator on the 5-point NLFSS on both the right and left sides. Scores are assessed as 1 (none), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe), and 5 (extreme).
Subject Satisfaction With Aesthetic Outcome on an 11-Point ScaleDay 14, Month 1, Month 9, Month 12Subject satisfaction with aesthetic outcome is assessed on an 11-point scale. Scores range from -5 (definitely not satisfied), 0 (don't know/unsure), and 5 (definitely satisfied).
Subject Assessments of Pain, Swelling, and Bruising Intensity on an 11-Point ScaleDay 0, Day 14, Month 12, Month 12.5Subject assessment of pain, swelling and bruising intensity on an 11-point scale. Scores range from 0 (No pain/swelling/bruising) to 10 (worst pain/swelling/bruising imaginable).
Subject Assessment of Nasolabial Fold Severity Using the 5-point NLFSSDay 0, Day 14, Month 1, Month 9, Month 12Nasolabial fold severity is evaluated by the subject on the 5-point NLFSS on both the right and left sides. Scores are assessed as 1 (none), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe), and 5 (extreme).

Countries

Germany, Netherlands

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™
All subjects receiving treatment with JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™.
70
Total70

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicJUVÉDERM VOLIFT™
Age, Continuous49.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
Sex: Female, Male
Female
66 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 70
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 70

Outcome results

Primary

Investigator Assessment of Nasolabial Fold Severity Using the 5-point Nasolabial Fold Severity Scale (NLFSS)

Nasolabial fold severity is evaluated by the Investigator on the 5-point NLFSS on both the right and left sides. Scores are assessed as 1 (none), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe), and 5 (extreme).

Time frame: Month 12

Population: Efficacy Population: all subjects who completed their first treatment session as planned, had no major protocol violations that would potentially affect outcome measures, and had data at the time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Investigator Assessment of Nasolabial Fold Severity Using the 5-point Nasolabial Fold Severity Scale (NLFSS)12 Months - Right2.8 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.8
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Investigator Assessment of Nasolabial Fold Severity Using the 5-point Nasolabial Fold Severity Scale (NLFSS)12 Months - Left2.8 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Secondary

Investigator Assessment of Ease of Injection Use on a 10-Point Scale

Investigator assessment of ease of injection use is assessed on a 10-point scale. Scores range from 0 (easy) to 10 (hard).

Time frame: Day 0, Day 14

Population: Efficacy Population: all subjects who completed their first treatment session as planned, had no major protocol violations that would potentially affect outcome measures, and had data at the time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Investigator Assessment of Ease of Injection Use on a 10-Point ScaleDay 01.2 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.3
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Investigator Assessment of Ease of Injection Use on a 10-Point ScaleDay 14 (N=27)0.9 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.5
Secondary

Investigator Assessment of Nasolabial Fold Severity Using the 5-point NLFSS

Nasolabial fold severity is evaluated by the Investigator on the 5-point NLFSS on both the right and left sides. Scores are assessed as 1 (none), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe), and 5 (extreme).

Time frame: Day 0, Day 14, Month 1, Month 9

Population: Efficacy Population: all subjects who completed their first treatment session as planned, had no major protocol violations that would potentially affect outcome measures, and had data at the time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Investigator Assessment of Nasolabial Fold Severity Using the 5-point NLFSSDay 0 - Right3.6 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.5
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Investigator Assessment of Nasolabial Fold Severity Using the 5-point NLFSSDay 0 -Left3.7 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.5
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Investigator Assessment of Nasolabial Fold Severity Using the 5-point NLFSSDay 14 - Right1.7 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.5
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Investigator Assessment of Nasolabial Fold Severity Using the 5-point NLFSSDay 14 - Left1.7 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.5
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Investigator Assessment of Nasolabial Fold Severity Using the 5-point NLFSSMonth 1 - Right (N=66)1.8 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.6
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Investigator Assessment of Nasolabial Fold Severity Using the 5-point NLFSSMonth 1 - Left (N=661.9 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.6
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Investigator Assessment of Nasolabial Fold Severity Using the 5-point NLFSSMonth 9 - Right (N=66)2.5 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.7
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Investigator Assessment of Nasolabial Fold Severity Using the 5-point NLFSSMonth 9 - Left (N=66)2.4 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.7
Secondary

Investigator Satisfaction With Aesthetic Outcome on an 11-Point Scale

Investigator satisfaction with aesthetic outcome is assessed on an 11-point scale. Scores range from -5 (definitely not satisfied), 0 (don't know/unsure), and 5 (definitely satisfied).

Time frame: Day 14, Month 1, Month 9, Month 12

Population: Efficacy Population: all subjects who completed their first treatment session as planned, had no major protocol violations that would potentially affect outcome measures, and had data at the time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Investigator Satisfaction With Aesthetic Outcome on an 11-Point ScaleDay 144.6 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.6
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Investigator Satisfaction With Aesthetic Outcome on an 11-Point ScaleMonth 1 (N=66)4.5 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.7
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Investigator Satisfaction With Aesthetic Outcome on an 11-Point ScaleMonth 9 (N=65)4.0 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.1
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Investigator Satisfaction With Aesthetic Outcome on an 11-Point ScaleMonth 12 (N=65)4.4 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1
Secondary

Subject Assessment of Nasolabial Fold Severity Using the 5-point NLFSS

Nasolabial fold severity is evaluated by the subject on the 5-point NLFSS on both the right and left sides. Scores are assessed as 1 (none), 2 (mild), 3 (moderate), 4 (severe), and 5 (extreme).

Time frame: Day 0, Day 14, Month 1, Month 9, Month 12

Population: Efficacy Population: all subjects who completed their first treatment session as planned, had no major protocol violations that would potentially affect outcome measures, and had data at the time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessment of Nasolabial Fold Severity Using the 5-point NLFSSDay 0 - Left3.9 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.7
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessment of Nasolabial Fold Severity Using the 5-point NLFSSDay 0 - Right3.8 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.7
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessment of Nasolabial Fold Severity Using the 5-point NLFSSDay 14 - Right1.8 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.7
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessment of Nasolabial Fold Severity Using the 5-point NLFSSDay 14 - Left1.8 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.7
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessment of Nasolabial Fold Severity Using the 5-point NLFSSMonth 1 - Right (N=66)2.0 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.9
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessment of Nasolabial Fold Severity Using the 5-point NLFSSMonth 1 - Left (N=65)2.1 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.8
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessment of Nasolabial Fold Severity Using the 5-point NLFSSMonth 9 - Right (N=66)2.6 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.8
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessment of Nasolabial Fold Severity Using the 5-point NLFSSMonth 9 - Left (N=66)2.6 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.8
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessment of Nasolabial Fold Severity Using the 5-point NLFSSMonth 12 - Right (N=54)2.9 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.8
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessment of Nasolabial Fold Severity Using the 5-point NLFSSMonth 12 - Left (N=54)3.0 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.9
Secondary

Subject Assessments of Pain, Swelling, and Bruising Intensity on an 11-Point Scale

Subject assessment of pain, swelling and bruising intensity on an 11-point scale. Scores range from 0 (No pain/swelling/bruising) to 10 (worst pain/swelling/bruising imaginable).

Time frame: Day 0, Day 14, Month 12, Month 12.5

Population: Efficacy Population: all subjects who completed their first treatment session as planned, had no major protocol violations that would potentially affect outcome measures, and had data at the time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessments of Pain, Swelling, and Bruising Intensity on an 11-Point ScalePain Intensity Day 0 - Right2.0 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.8
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessments of Pain, Swelling, and Bruising Intensity on an 11-Point ScalePain Intensity Day 0 - Left2.0 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.8
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessments of Pain, Swelling, and Bruising Intensity on an 11-Point ScalePain Intensity Day 14 - Right (N=66)0.8 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.7
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessments of Pain, Swelling, and Bruising Intensity on an 11-Point ScalePain Intensity Day 14 - Left (N=66)0.7 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.5
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessments of Pain, Swelling, and Bruising Intensity on an 11-Point ScalePain Intensity Month 12 - Right (N=51)1.5 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.8
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessments of Pain, Swelling, and Bruising Intensity on an 11-Point ScalePain Intensity Month 12 - Left (N=51)1.5 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.1
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessments of Pain, Swelling, and Bruising Intensity on an 11-Point ScalePain Intensity Month 12.5 - Right (N=12)0.0 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessments of Pain, Swelling, and Bruising Intensity on an 11-Point ScalePain Intensity Month 12.5 - Left (N=12)0.0 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessments of Pain, Swelling, and Bruising Intensity on an 11-Point ScaleSwelling Intensity Day 0 - Right1.7 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.6
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessments of Pain, Swelling, and Bruising Intensity on an 11-Point ScaleSwelling Intensity Day 0 - Left1.7 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.6
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessments of Pain, Swelling, and Bruising Intensity on an 11-Point ScaleSwelling Intensity Day 14 - Right (N=66)1.5 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.2
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessments of Pain, Swelling, and Bruising Intensity on an 11-Point ScaleSwelling Intensity Day 14 - Left (N=66)1.4 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.2
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessments of Pain, Swelling, and Bruising Intensity on an 11-Point ScaleSwelling Intensity Month 12 - Right (N=51)1.4 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.5
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessments of Pain, Swelling, and Bruising Intensity on an 11-Point ScaleSwelling Intensity Month 12 - Left (N=51)1.4 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.6
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessments of Pain, Swelling, and Bruising Intensity on an 11-Point ScaleSwelling Intensity Month 12.5 - Right (N=12)0.1 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.3
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessments of Pain, Swelling, and Bruising Intensity on an 11-Point ScaleSwelling Intensity Month 12.5 - Left (N=12)0.2 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.4
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessments of Pain, Swelling, and Bruising Intensity on an 11-Point ScaleBruising Intensity Day 0 - Right0.3 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.9
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessments of Pain, Swelling, and Bruising Intensity on an 11-Point ScaleBruising Intensity Day 0 - Left0.3 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.9
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessments of Pain, Swelling, and Bruising Intensity on an 11-Point ScaleBruising Intensity Day 14 - Right (N=66)0.9 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.9
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessments of Pain, Swelling, and Bruising Intensity on an 11-Point ScaleBruising Intensity Day 14 - Left (N=66)0.5 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.3
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessments of Pain, Swelling, and Bruising Intensity on an 11-Point ScaleBruising Intensity Month 12 - Right (N=51)0.4 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.8
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessments of Pain, Swelling, and Bruising Intensity on an 11-Point ScaleBruising Intensity Month 12 - Left (N=51)0.4 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.9
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessments of Pain, Swelling, and Bruising Intensity on an 11-Point ScaleBruising Intensity Month 12.5 - Right (N=12)0.3 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.7
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Assessments of Pain, Swelling, and Bruising Intensity on an 11-Point ScaleBruising Intensity Month 12.5 - Left (N=12)0.5 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 0.8
Secondary

Subject Satisfaction With Aesthetic Outcome on an 11-Point Scale

Subject satisfaction with aesthetic outcome is assessed on an 11-point scale. Scores range from -5 (definitely not satisfied), 0 (don't know/unsure), and 5 (definitely satisfied).

Time frame: Day 14, Month 1, Month 9, Month 12

Population: Efficacy Population: all subjects who completed their first treatment session as planned, had no major protocol violations that would potentially affect outcome measures, and had data at the time point

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Satisfaction With Aesthetic Outcome on an 11-Point ScaleDay 144.2 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Satisfaction With Aesthetic Outcome on an 11-Point ScaleMonth 1 (N=66)4.2 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Satisfaction With Aesthetic Outcome on an 11-Point ScaleMonth 9 (N=66)3.2 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 2.4
JUVÉDERM VOLIFT™Subject Satisfaction With Aesthetic Outcome on an 11-Point ScaleMonth 12 (N=54)3.3 Scores on a ScaleStandard Deviation 1.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026