Skip to content

Comparison of Rubidium PET and SPECT With CZT Crystals for Detection of Myocardial Ischemia in Overweighed Patients and Women

Comparison of the Diagnostic Performances of 82Rubidium Positron Emission Tomography and Conventional Scintigraphy With CZT Cameras for Detection of Myocardial Ischemia in a Population of Overweighed Patients and Women

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01679886
Acronym
RUBIS
Enrollment
313
Registered
2012-09-06
Start date
2012-09-30
Completion date
2016-06-30
Last updated
2017-02-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myocardial Ischemia

Keywords

Position emission tomography;, Rubidium;, Women;, Overweighted patients

Brief summary

The main objective of this study will be to compare the diagnostic performances of 82Rubidium-PET associated to pharmacologic stress (Persantine) to 99mTc-Sestamibi-SPECT with CZT cameras associated to a stress test (exercise, pharmacological, mixed) for detection of myocardial ischemia in a population of overweighed patients on one hand, and women on the other hand, in a population with an intermediate prevalence of coronary artery disease (≥ 3 cardiovascular risk factors in asymptomatic patients or prevalence of CAD ≥ 30 % using the DIAMOND-FORRESTER score in symptomatic patients).

Detailed description

The main objective of this study will be to compare the diagnostic performances of 82Rubidium-PET associated to pharmacologic stress (Persantine) to 99mTc-Sestamibi-SPECT with CZT cameras associated to a stress test (exercise, pharmacological, mixed) for detection of myocardial ischemia in a population of overweighed patients on one hand, and women on the other hand, in a population with an intermediate prevalence of coronary artery disease (≥ 3 cardiovascular risk factors in asymptomatic patients or prevalence of CAD ≥ 30 % using the DIAMOND-FORRESTER score in symptomatic patients). Secondary objectives. (1) Comparison between the size and intensity of myocardial ischemia quantified using the sum difference score, left ventricular function at stress and at rest, measured with 99mTc-Sestamibi-SPECT with CZT cameras and 82Rubidium-PET. (2) Comparison between the values of coronary fractional flow reserve measured invasively and noninvasively with 82Rubidium-PET in patients with stenosis ≥ 50 % on coronary angiography. (3) Comparison of the effective dose caused by radiation exposure with 99mTc-Sestamibi-SPECT with CZT cameras and 82Rubidium-PET. (4) Comparison of the costs of the two diagnostic strategies in this population of patients. Inclusion criteria: Overweighed (body mass index ≥ 25) or women addressed in the Department of Nuclear Medicine for diagnostic cardiac scintigraphy with an intermediate pre-test prevalence of CAD (≥ 3 cardiovascular risk factors in asymptomatic patients or prevalence of CAD ≥ 30 % using the DIAMOND-FORRESTER score in symptomatic patients). Non-inclusion criteria: Pregnant women; contraindication to dipyridamole injection. Number of patients: 310 patients Duration of the study. Duration of the study for a patient will be 16 months and 28 months for the first patients. Total duration of the study will be 40 months, including an 24-month inclusion time period. Primary endpoint: Patients will be classified as positive in case of: * Myocardial ischemia defined as the presence of coronary stenosis ≥ 50 % on coronary angiography with functional impairment of blood flow confirmed by invasive measurement of coronary flow reserve (fractional flow reserve, FFR \< 0.8), or, in absence of measurement of FFR, a critical coronary stenosis confirmed by the validation committee of coronary angiographies. * In absence of coronary angiography, the presence of cardiovascular event (cardiovascular or unknown cause of death, admission for acute coronary syndrome, unstable angina, myocardial ischemia or coronary revascularization) validated by the endpoint adjudication committee in the year following inclusion of the patient in the study. Secondary endpoints: (1) Size and intensity of myocardial ischemia quantified using the sum difference score and, left ventricular function at stress and at rest, measured with 99mTc-Sestamibi-SPECT with CZT cameras and 82Rubidium-PET. (2) Values of coronary fractional flow reserve measured invasively and noninvasively with 82Rubidium-PET in patients with stenosis ≥ 50 % on coronary angiography. (3) Effective dose caused by radiation exposure with 99mTc-Sestamibi-SPECT with CZT cameras and 82Rubidium-PET. (4) Costs of the two diagnostic strategies in this population of patients.

Interventions

RADIATIONRubidium PET

Rubidium PET

Sponsors

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

: -Overweighed (body mass index ≥ 25) or women addressed in the Department of Nuclear Medicine for diagnostic cardiac scintigraphy with an intermediate pre-test prevalence of CAD (≥ 3 cardiovascular risk factors in asymptomatic patients or prevalence of CAD ≥ 30 % using the DIAMOND-FORRESTER score in symptomatic patients).

Exclusion criteria

: * Pregnant women; * Contraindication to dipyridamole injection.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Myocardial ischemia1 yearPatients will be classified as positive in case of: * Coronary stenosis ≥ 50 % on coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve \< 0.8, or, in absence of FFR, a critical coronary stenosis. * In absence of coronary angiography, presence of cardiovascular event during the following year.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Size and intensity of myocardial ischemia1 year1. Size and intensity of myocardial ischemia quantified using the sum difference score, 2. Left ventricular function at stress and at rest 3. Values of FFR measured invasively and noninvasively 4. Effective dose caused by radiation exposure 5. Costs of the two diagnostic strategies

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 10, 2026