Skip to content

Study to Compare (COPD) Assessment Test in COPD Stage III and IV in a Prophylactic Treatment

A Prospective, Single Site, Randomized, Controlled, Parallel Group Study in Subjects With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Stage III and IV Using AlphaCore or Sham (Control, Not Active) as a Prophylactic Treatment

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01679314
Enrollment
54
Registered
2012-09-06
Start date
2012-07-31
Completion date
2013-05-31
Last updated
2016-05-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Keywords

COPD, vagus nerve stimulation, vagal nerve stimulation, nVNS, VNS, non invasive, gammacore

Brief summary

The study will assess the treatment of patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) stage III and IV who will self administer the AlphaCore stimulation three times a day over a course of 2 months. Patients will either receive an active AlphaCore device or a Sham device during these two months while not knowing which device they have been provided. At the end of the two months, all patients will be asked to continue in the study for another 2 months to self administer with the active AlphaCore device. Subjects will complete diaries at home on their breathing and quality of life and will return to the clinic monthly for assessment by the investigator.

Detailed description

PERFORMANCE AND SAFETY VARIABLES: The primary efficacy endpoint for this study is the total Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) Assessment Test (CAT) score change from baseline to the 8 week follow-up period comparing the two device groups. Secondary efficacy endpoints will be the mean difference from baseline to the 8 week follow-up for the following assessments: Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea scale, 6 minutes walking test and Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) Safety Variables: Each subject will be assessed throughout the study for Adverse Events and at the last visit (4 months) subjects will undergo another physical examination including vital signs and blood pressure.

Interventions

Each study group will go under the same treatment regimen and assessments.

Sponsors

ElectroCore INC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 40-75 years * Diagnosed Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease(COPD) stage III and IV according to Global Initiative for chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD) guideline * Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV 1) \< 50% * Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1/Forced expiratory vital capacity (FVC) \< 70% * Signed informed consent form

Exclusion criteria

* Participation in other clinical trials (drug or medical device) 30 days prior to start of this study * Subject is unable to comply with the procedures if the protocol for the study or any other reason judged by the Investigator that could interfere with the study assessment or follow-up * Has an abscess or other infection or lesion (including lymphadenopathy) at the AlphaCore® treatment site. * Is currently implanted with an electrical and/or neurostimulator device, including but not limited to cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator, vagal neurostimulator, deep brain stimulator, spinal stimulator, bone growth stimulator, or cochlear implant. * Has a history of carotid endarterectomy or vascular neck surgery on the right side. * Right side or bilateral vagotomy * Has a recent or repeated history of syncope. * Has a recent or repeated history of seizures. * Pregnant or breast feeding women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test (CAT) Scores (Quality of Life and Symptoms) Changes Within a Treatment Period and Comparison Between the Two Groups8 weeksChronic obstructive pulmonary disease Assessment Test (CAT) scores (Quality of life and symptoms) changes within a treatment period and comparison between the two groups. Eight (8) questions. The scale is rated from 0 to 5, min = 0, max = 5. Low rates = better, high rates = worse. Mean change in the period 8 weeks versus baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change 6 Minutes Walking TestBaseline vs 8 weeksSix minutes walking test: Measure distance (meter) after 6 minutes walk. Change from Baseline between treatment groups
Change in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1)Baseline vs 8 weeksForced Expiratory Volume (FEV1): Maximum volume that can be exhaled in the first second - after maximum inhalation. Change from baseline to week 8 between treatment groups
Change in Borg Dyspnoea ScoresBaseline vs 8 weeksBorg dyspnoea scale (Physical activity test): 0 - 11 (Not at all effected - Extremely effected) The result show the change between the the treatment groups from baseline to week 8
Number of Subjects With Adverse Events (AE)Throughout the course of the study (baseline to the 4 month follow-up visit)All AEs including but not limited to events reported by the subject or reported in response to an open question by the Clinical Investigator or member of this team, which fall into any of the above definitions must be recorded as an AE in the Case Report Form (CRF) and should include the following information. * Brief description of the event (diagnosis) * Start date (and time, if relevant) * Stop date (and time, if relevant) (or resolution) * Severity * Action taken regarding the medical device * Opinion on causality * Seriousness * Outcome
Change in Change in EuroQol, 5 Questions and 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Baseline vs 8 weeksVisual analogue scale (VAS) 0-100 where 0 is the worst imaginable health state and 100 the best imaginable health state
Change in EuroQol, 5 Questions and 3 Levels (EQ5D-3L)Baseline vs 8 weeksThe EQ-5D-3L (EuroQoL 5 questions and 3 answering levels) during the run-in period will be compared with the EQ-5D-3L during the treatment period. And treatment period will be compared to open label. Rating of questions Level 1 no problems Level 2 some problems Level 3 Significant problems Worst case is 15 points and best case is 5 points using index

Countries

Germany

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Active AlphaCore Device
AlphaCore active stimulation treatment AlphaCore device: Each study group will go under the same treatment regimen and assessments.
26
Sham AlphaCore Device
AlphaCore sham device AlphaCore device: Each study group will go under the same treatment regimen and assessments.
28
Total54

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicActive AlphaCore DeviceSham AlphaCore DeviceTotal
Age, Continuous61.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.2
58.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6
59.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5
Region of Enrollment
Germany
26 participants28 participants54 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants12 Participants21 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
17 Participants16 Participants33 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
4 / 263 / 28
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 261 / 28

Outcome results

Primary

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test (CAT) Scores (Quality of Life and Symptoms) Changes Within a Treatment Period and Comparison Between the Two Groups

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Assessment Test (CAT) scores (Quality of life and symptoms) changes within a treatment period and comparison between the two groups. Eight (8) questions. The scale is rated from 0 to 5, min = 0, max = 5. Low rates = better, high rates = worse. Mean change in the period 8 weeks versus baseline.

Time frame: 8 weeks

Population: One patient in the Active AlphaCore device Group missing data at 8 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Active AlphaCore DeviceChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test (CAT) Scores (Quality of Life and Symptoms) Changes Within a Treatment Period and Comparison Between the Two Groups-1.3 units on a scale
Sham AlphaCore DeviceChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test (CAT) Scores (Quality of Life and Symptoms) Changes Within a Treatment Period and Comparison Between the Two Groups-0.9 units on a scale
Secondary

Change 6 Minutes Walking Test

Six minutes walking test: Measure distance (meter) after 6 minutes walk. Change from Baseline between treatment groups

Time frame: Baseline vs 8 weeks

Population: One patient in the Active AlphaCore group is missing data at week 8

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active AlphaCore DeviceChange 6 Minutes Walking Test8.1 MeterStandard Deviation 61.5
Sham AlphaCore DeviceChange 6 Minutes Walking Test12.6 MeterStandard Deviation 55.2
Secondary

Change in Borg Dyspnoea Scores

Borg dyspnoea scale (Physical activity test): 0 - 11 (Not at all effected - Extremely effected) The result show the change between the the treatment groups from baseline to week 8

Time frame: Baseline vs 8 weeks

Population: One subject in the Active AlphaCore device Group missing data at 8 weeks.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active AlphaCore DeviceChange in Borg Dyspnoea Scores0.7 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 2
Sham AlphaCore DeviceChange in Borg Dyspnoea Scores0.4 Scores on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.6
Secondary

Change in Change in EuroQol, 5 Questions and 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

Visual analogue scale (VAS) 0-100 where 0 is the worst imaginable health state and 100 the best imaginable health state

Time frame: Baseline vs 8 weeks

Population: One patient in the Active AlphaCore group missing data at 8 weeks.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active AlphaCore DeviceChange in Change in EuroQol, 5 Questions and 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Baseline53.3 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20
Active AlphaCore DeviceChange in Change in EuroQol, 5 Questions and 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)8 weeks52.8 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.3
Sham AlphaCore DeviceChange in Change in EuroQol, 5 Questions and 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)Baseline51.6 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.9
Sham AlphaCore DeviceChange in Change in EuroQol, 5 Questions and 3 Levels (EQ-5D-3L), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)8 weeks55.7 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20
Secondary

Change in EuroQol, 5 Questions and 3 Levels (EQ5D-3L)

The EQ-5D-3L (EuroQoL 5 questions and 3 answering levels) during the run-in period will be compared with the EQ-5D-3L during the treatment period. And treatment period will be compared to open label. Rating of questions Level 1 no problems Level 2 some problems Level 3 Significant problems Worst case is 15 points and best case is 5 points using index

Time frame: Baseline vs 8 weeks

Population: One patient in the Active AlphaCore group is missing data at 8 weeks.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Active AlphaCore DeviceChange in EuroQol, 5 Questions and 3 Levels (EQ5D-3L)Mobility-no problem baseline7 participants
Active AlphaCore DeviceChange in EuroQol, 5 Questions and 3 Levels (EQ5D-3L)Mobility-no problem week 88 participants
Active AlphaCore DeviceChange in EuroQol, 5 Questions and 3 Levels (EQ5D-3L)Self Care-no problem baseline17 participants
Active AlphaCore DeviceChange in EuroQol, 5 Questions and 3 Levels (EQ5D-3L)Self Care-no problem week 817 participants
Active AlphaCore DeviceChange in EuroQol, 5 Questions and 3 Levels (EQ5D-3L)Daily Activiies-no problem baseline6 participants
Active AlphaCore DeviceChange in EuroQol, 5 Questions and 3 Levels (EQ5D-3L)Daily Activies- no problem week 84 participants
Active AlphaCore DeviceChange in EuroQol, 5 Questions and 3 Levels (EQ5D-3L)Pain-no problem baseline12 participants
Active AlphaCore DeviceChange in EuroQol, 5 Questions and 3 Levels (EQ5D-3L)Pain-no problem week 815 participants
Active AlphaCore DeviceChange in EuroQol, 5 Questions and 3 Levels (EQ5D-3L)Anxiety-no problem baseline12 participants
Active AlphaCore DeviceChange in EuroQol, 5 Questions and 3 Levels (EQ5D-3L)Anxiety-no problem week 814 participants
Sham AlphaCore DeviceChange in EuroQol, 5 Questions and 3 Levels (EQ5D-3L)Pain-no problem week 822 participants
Sham AlphaCore DeviceChange in EuroQol, 5 Questions and 3 Levels (EQ5D-3L)Mobility-no problem baseline6 participants
Sham AlphaCore DeviceChange in EuroQol, 5 Questions and 3 Levels (EQ5D-3L)Daily Activies- no problem week 87 participants
Sham AlphaCore DeviceChange in EuroQol, 5 Questions and 3 Levels (EQ5D-3L)Mobility-no problem week 87 participants
Sham AlphaCore DeviceChange in EuroQol, 5 Questions and 3 Levels (EQ5D-3L)Anxiety-no problem week 817 participants
Sham AlphaCore DeviceChange in EuroQol, 5 Questions and 3 Levels (EQ5D-3L)Self Care-no problem baseline21 participants
Sham AlphaCore DeviceChange in EuroQol, 5 Questions and 3 Levels (EQ5D-3L)Pain-no problem baseline19 participants
Sham AlphaCore DeviceChange in EuroQol, 5 Questions and 3 Levels (EQ5D-3L)Self Care-no problem week 822 participants
Sham AlphaCore DeviceChange in EuroQol, 5 Questions and 3 Levels (EQ5D-3L)Anxiety-no problem baseline13 participants
Sham AlphaCore DeviceChange in EuroQol, 5 Questions and 3 Levels (EQ5D-3L)Daily Activiies-no problem baseline9 participants
Secondary

Change in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1)

Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1): Maximum volume that can be exhaled in the first second - after maximum inhalation. Change from baseline to week 8 between treatment groups

Time frame: Baseline vs 8 weeks

Population: One subject in the Active AlphaCore group missing data at week 8

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Active AlphaCore DeviceChange in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1)Baseline30.7 Percentage of predicted valueStandard Deviation 8.8
Active AlphaCore DeviceChange in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1)Week 831.0 Percentage of predicted valueStandard Deviation 9.5
Sham AlphaCore DeviceChange in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1)Baseline29.7 Percentage of predicted valueStandard Deviation 8
Sham AlphaCore DeviceChange in Forced Expiratory Volume (FEV1)Week 831.0 Percentage of predicted valueStandard Deviation 9.1
Secondary

Number of Subjects With Adverse Events (AE)

All AEs including but not limited to events reported by the subject or reported in response to an open question by the Clinical Investigator or member of this team, which fall into any of the above definitions must be recorded as an AE in the Case Report Form (CRF) and should include the following information. * Brief description of the event (diagnosis) * Start date (and time, if relevant) * Stop date (and time, if relevant) (or resolution) * Severity * Action taken regarding the medical device * Opinion on causality * Seriousness * Outcome

Time frame: Throughout the course of the study (baseline to the 4 month follow-up visit)

Population: All subjects reporting any Adverse Event

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Active AlphaCore DeviceNumber of Subjects With Adverse Events (AE)10 participants
Sham AlphaCore DeviceNumber of Subjects With Adverse Events (AE)6 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 18, 2026