Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Conditions
Keywords
Obstructive sleep apnea PAP adherence efficacy economics
Brief summary
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) among Veterans is a condition that imparts a great burden to the patient in terms of serious co-morbidities and results in a great cost to the VA Health Care System to treat the co-morbidities, which include heart disease, stroke and neuropsychiatric disorders. Positive airway pressure (PAP) is used to treat sleep apnea and studies have shown a poor adherence to treatment. The investigators hypothesize that using wireless technology will lead to early detection of problems of treatment use and will translate into early remedial action which will improve the use and effectiveness of treatment. The investigators will compare two methods. Usual care involves downloading data from PAP machines at designated 3-month intervals, requiring a face-to-face clinician visit. Wireless care involved more frequent monitoring and intervention in the event of anomalies in treatment use or effectiveness.
Detailed description
Prior to enrollment, patients were seen by a clinician at the Veterans Administration (VA) Hospital in West Haven, Connecticut. Either a facility-based diagnostic polysomnogram or unattended home sleep testing was performed at the evaluating clinician's discretion. Clinicians that saw the patient determined whether PAP therapy was needed, and either auto-titrating continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or set pressures of CPAP were ordered for the patient. Patients received education about OSA and about their equipment from a respiratory therapist and physician's assistant within the VA who then provided the equipment for them. Patients coming to this internal Durable Medical Equipment (DME) provider were screened for participation in the study.The study was overseen by the Institutional Review Board at the Veterans Affairs Connecticut Health Care in West Haven, Connecticut. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Patients were included in the study if they were diagnosed with OSA (defined as AHI or apnea-hypopnea index greater than five per hour with symptoms, or AHI greater than 15/hour), and if they were being exposed to PAP for the first time. Patients who were previously treated with PAP, had central apnea, chronic respiratory failure, recent in-patient hospital admissions (=\< 2 weeks), or were living outside cellular network coverage area were excluded from the study. Patients that met study inclusion criteria were provided ResMed S9 devices with wireless modems. Their usage and treatment data was tracked using EasyCare Online, a cloud-based system for the ResMed devices. After the initial setup and educational settings, the patients received supplies as needed and troubleshooting of side effects of treatment as needed. Devices were not removed after 3 months if they were not adherent. Patients in the usual care group were monitored on a 3-month, 6-month, 9-month and 12-month intervals with scheduling face-to-face visits. Adherence and efficacy data were only assessed by the clinician at these intervals. Patients in the wireless care group were monitored more frequently using wireless modems as the method to obtain adherence and efficacy data. We then determined adherence using CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) criteria at 3 months, and at 12 months. To obtain this data, we evaluated whether the PAP devices were used for 4 or more hours per night on 70% of nights during a consecutive 30-day period anytime during the first 3 months of initial use, and then a consecutive 30-day period in months 4-12. We also examined the daily use from the first to last day looking of overall patterns of utilization monthly, quarterly, semiannually and annually. Data was collected and maintained in a REDCap database (REDCap is a secure web application for building and managing online surveys and databases). Sensitivity and specificity calculations were then performed to evaluate predictability of adherence at 1 year using adherence at 3 months. Fisher's exact test was also used to evaluate the association between adherence at 3 months and 1 year and the association between AHI (Apnea -Hypopnea Index) and adherence.
Interventions
These patients will be monitored on a 3-month, 6-month, 9-month and 12-month intervals with scheduling face-to-face visits. Adherence and efficacy data will only be assessed by the clinician at these intervals.
These patients will be monitored using wireless modems as the method to obtain adherence and efficacy and follow-up phone calls
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Newly diagnosed OSA patients * AHI of 5/hour or greater * Prescribed CPAP therapy * Able to comply with treatment and understand treatment instructions
Exclusion criteria
* Not able to understand study requirements * Significant cardiorespiratory disease - e.g. COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), severe CHF (congestive heart failure) * Clinical instability at time of apnea diagnosis * Prescribed BiPap (bilevel positive airway pressure) or ASV (Adaptive Support Ventilation), which are other types of PAP
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Adherence After 3 Months | 4-12 Months | Demonstrated Periodic Adherence After 3 Months of Treatment During 4-12 months defined as mean PAP use being \> 4 hours per night for greater than 70% of nights |
| Number of Participants With Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Adherence in the First 3 Months | First 3 months | Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Adherence defined as mean PAP use being \> 4 hours per night for greater than 70% of nights. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Receiving Effective Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea | 12 months | Evaluate whether patients are effectively being treated with PAP or with alternate means of treatment for OSA (obstructive sleep apnea) at the end of 12 months. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Usual Care These patients will be monitored on a 3-month, 6-month, 9-month and 12-month intervals with face-to-face visits. Adherence and efficacy data will only be assessed by the clinician at these intervals.
Monitoring every 3 months by face-to-face visits | 26 |
| Wireless Care These patients will be monitored using wireless modems as the method to obtain adherence and efficacy data.
Frequent remote monitoring | 26 |
| Total | 52 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Death | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 4 | 4 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Usual Care | Wireless Care | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 12 Participants | 4 Participants | 16 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 14 Participants | 22 Participants | 36 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 21 Participants | 24 Participants | 45 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 3 Participants | 5 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 3 Participants | 1 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 2 Participants | 1 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 18 Participants | 19 Participants | 37 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 26 Participants | 25 Participants | 51 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 26 | 1 / 26 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 26 | 0 / 26 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 3 / 26 | 3 / 26 |
Outcome results
Number of Participants With Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Adherence After 3 Months
Demonstrated Periodic Adherence After 3 Months of Treatment During 4-12 months defined as mean PAP use being \> 4 hours per night for greater than 70% of nights
Time frame: 4-12 Months
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Usual Care | Number of Participants With Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Adherence After 3 Months | 10 Participants |
| Wireless Care | Number of Participants With Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Adherence After 3 Months | 10 Participants |
Number of Participants With Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Adherence in the First 3 Months
Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Adherence defined as mean PAP use being \> 4 hours per night for greater than 70% of nights.
Time frame: First 3 months
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Usual Care | Number of Participants With Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Adherence in the First 3 Months | 10 Participants |
| Wireless Care | Number of Participants With Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Adherence in the First 3 Months | 9 Participants |
Receiving Effective Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Evaluate whether patients are effectively being treated with PAP or with alternate means of treatment for OSA (obstructive sleep apnea) at the end of 12 months.
Time frame: 12 months
Population: 1 subject from the Wireless group was assigned to Provent treatment. 1 subject from the Usual group was assigned to Dental device treatment. Both subjects stopped using PAP and PAP monitoring and were considered not receiving effective PAP treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. Both subjects were lost in follow-up for our research study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Usual Care | Receiving Effective Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea | 10 Participants |
| Wireless Care | Receiving Effective Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea | 10 Participants |
Adherence and AHI
PAP adherence in subjects who had more than 20 respiratory events per hour during the initial sleep study was compared with the PAP adherence in subjects who had less than 20 respiratory events per hour during the initial sleep study.Patient data representing subjects who had more than 20 respiratory events per hour during the initial sleep study and subjects who had less than 20 respiratory events per hour during the initial sleep study was collected across both Usual care and Wireless Care Arms.
Time frame: 1 year/12 months
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Usual Care | Adherence and AHI | Adherent in 12 months | 19 Participants |
| Usual Care | Adherence and AHI | ANon-Adherent in 12 months | 4 Participants |
| Wireless Care | Adherence and AHI | Adherent in 12 months | 7 Participants |
| Wireless Care | Adherence and AHI | ANon-Adherent in 12 months | 12 Participants |
PAP Treatment Adherence in the First 3 Months of Treatment Compared to the PAP Treatment Adherence in the Next 9 Months of Treatment
PAP treatment Adherence in the first 3 months of treatment (according to the CMS - Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services - criteria) was compared to the PAP treatment Adherence in the next 9 months of treatment to verify the predictability of initial adherence or non-adherence for the future adherence or non-adherence (during the year) to PAP treatment. Adherence/non-adherence was analyzed based on the PAP usage reports (downloads) from the supplied PAP device, based on the yearly, quarterly and monthly portions of the reports. Patient data representing initial adherence or non-adherence and adherence or non-adherence during the year to PAP treatment was collected across both Usual care and Wireless Care Arms.
Time frame: 12 months
| Arm | Measure | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Usual Care | PAP Treatment Adherence in the First 3 Months of Treatment Compared to the PAP Treatment Adherence in the Next 9 Months of Treatment | Adherent in the next 9 months | 13 Participants |
| Usual Care | PAP Treatment Adherence in the First 3 Months of Treatment Compared to the PAP Treatment Adherence in the Next 9 Months of Treatment | Non-Adherent in the next 9 months | 6 Participants |
| Wireless Care | PAP Treatment Adherence in the First 3 Months of Treatment Compared to the PAP Treatment Adherence in the Next 9 Months of Treatment | Adherent in the next 9 months | 7 Participants |
| Wireless Care | PAP Treatment Adherence in the First 3 Months of Treatment Compared to the PAP Treatment Adherence in the Next 9 Months of Treatment | Non-Adherent in the next 9 months | 16 Participants |