Skip to content

Remote Monitoring in Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Remote Monitoring in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Management in Military Veterans

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01678560
Enrollment
52
Registered
2012-09-05
Start date
2014-01-31
Completion date
2016-12-31
Last updated
2019-12-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Keywords

Obstructive sleep apnea PAP adherence efficacy economics

Brief summary

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) among Veterans is a condition that imparts a great burden to the patient in terms of serious co-morbidities and results in a great cost to the VA Health Care System to treat the co-morbidities, which include heart disease, stroke and neuropsychiatric disorders. Positive airway pressure (PAP) is used to treat sleep apnea and studies have shown a poor adherence to treatment. The investigators hypothesize that using wireless technology will lead to early detection of problems of treatment use and will translate into early remedial action which will improve the use and effectiveness of treatment. The investigators will compare two methods. Usual care involves downloading data from PAP machines at designated 3-month intervals, requiring a face-to-face clinician visit. Wireless care involved more frequent monitoring and intervention in the event of anomalies in treatment use or effectiveness.

Detailed description

Prior to enrollment, patients were seen by a clinician at the Veterans Administration (VA) Hospital in West Haven, Connecticut. Either a facility-based diagnostic polysomnogram or unattended home sleep testing was performed at the evaluating clinician's discretion. Clinicians that saw the patient determined whether PAP therapy was needed, and either auto-titrating continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or set pressures of CPAP were ordered for the patient. Patients received education about OSA and about their equipment from a respiratory therapist and physician's assistant within the VA who then provided the equipment for them. Patients coming to this internal Durable Medical Equipment (DME) provider were screened for participation in the study.The study was overseen by the Institutional Review Board at the Veterans Affairs Connecticut Health Care in West Haven, Connecticut. Informed consent was obtained from all participants. Patients were included in the study if they were diagnosed with OSA (defined as AHI or apnea-hypopnea index greater than five per hour with symptoms, or AHI greater than 15/hour), and if they were being exposed to PAP for the first time. Patients who were previously treated with PAP, had central apnea, chronic respiratory failure, recent in-patient hospital admissions (=\< 2 weeks), or were living outside cellular network coverage area were excluded from the study. Patients that met study inclusion criteria were provided ResMed S9 devices with wireless modems. Their usage and treatment data was tracked using EasyCare Online, a cloud-based system for the ResMed devices. After the initial setup and educational settings, the patients received supplies as needed and troubleshooting of side effects of treatment as needed. Devices were not removed after 3 months if they were not adherent. Patients in the usual care group were monitored on a 3-month, 6-month, 9-month and 12-month intervals with scheduling face-to-face visits. Adherence and efficacy data were only assessed by the clinician at these intervals. Patients in the wireless care group were monitored more frequently using wireless modems as the method to obtain adherence and efficacy data. We then determined adherence using CMS (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) criteria at 3 months, and at 12 months. To obtain this data, we evaluated whether the PAP devices were used for 4 or more hours per night on 70% of nights during a consecutive 30-day period anytime during the first 3 months of initial use, and then a consecutive 30-day period in months 4-12. We also examined the daily use from the first to last day looking of overall patterns of utilization monthly, quarterly, semiannually and annually. Data was collected and maintained in a REDCap database (REDCap is a secure web application for building and managing online surveys and databases). Sensitivity and specificity calculations were then performed to evaluate predictability of adherence at 1 year using adherence at 3 months. Fisher's exact test was also used to evaluate the association between adherence at 3 months and 1 year and the association between AHI (Apnea -Hypopnea Index) and adherence.

Interventions

DEVICEMonitoring every 3 months by face-to-face visits

These patients will be monitored on a 3-month, 6-month, 9-month and 12-month intervals with scheduling face-to-face visits. Adherence and efficacy data will only be assessed by the clinician at these intervals.

DEVICEFrequent remote monitoring

These patients will be monitored using wireless modems as the method to obtain adherence and efficacy and follow-up phone calls

Sponsors

VA Connecticut Healthcare System
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Newly diagnosed OSA patients * AHI of 5/hour or greater * Prescribed CPAP therapy * Able to comply with treatment and understand treatment instructions

Exclusion criteria

* Not able to understand study requirements * Significant cardiorespiratory disease - e.g. COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), severe CHF (congestive heart failure) * Clinical instability at time of apnea diagnosis * Prescribed BiPap (bilevel positive airway pressure) or ASV (Adaptive Support Ventilation), which are other types of PAP

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Adherence After 3 Months4-12 MonthsDemonstrated Periodic Adherence After 3 Months of Treatment During 4-12 months defined as mean PAP use being \> 4 hours per night for greater than 70% of nights
Number of Participants With Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Adherence in the First 3 MonthsFirst 3 monthsPositive Airway Pressure Treatment Adherence defined as mean PAP use being \> 4 hours per night for greater than 70% of nights.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Receiving Effective Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea12 monthsEvaluate whether patients are effectively being treated with PAP or with alternate means of treatment for OSA (obstructive sleep apnea) at the end of 12 months.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Usual Care
These patients will be monitored on a 3-month, 6-month, 9-month and 12-month intervals with face-to-face visits. Adherence and efficacy data will only be assessed by the clinician at these intervals. Monitoring every 3 months by face-to-face visits
26
Wireless Care
These patients will be monitored using wireless modems as the method to obtain adherence and efficacy data. Frequent remote monitoring
26
Total52

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath01
Overall StudyPhysician Decision44
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicUsual CareWireless CareTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
12 Participants4 Participants16 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
14 Participants22 Participants36 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
21 Participants24 Participants45 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants5 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
3 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
2 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
18 Participants19 Participants37 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
26 Participants25 Participants51 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 261 / 26
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 260 / 26
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 263 / 26

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Participants With Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Adherence After 3 Months

Demonstrated Periodic Adherence After 3 Months of Treatment During 4-12 months defined as mean PAP use being \> 4 hours per night for greater than 70% of nights

Time frame: 4-12 Months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Usual CareNumber of Participants With Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Adherence After 3 Months10 Participants
Wireless CareNumber of Participants With Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Adherence After 3 Months10 Participants
Comparison: CPAP devices delivery to the patients was outsourced by the institution eliminating the point of recruitment for the study at our department The recruitment was halted and the study proceeded with the follow-up of already recruited patients. As a result of the limited recruitment, planned statistical data analysis was not performed on the primary outcomes due to the smaller then expected number of subjects (expected 110 subjects in the Usual arm and 110 subjects in the Wireless armp-value: <0.01Fisher Exact
Primary

Number of Participants With Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Adherence in the First 3 Months

Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Adherence defined as mean PAP use being \> 4 hours per night for greater than 70% of nights.

Time frame: First 3 months

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Usual CareNumber of Participants With Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Adherence in the First 3 Months10 Participants
Wireless CareNumber of Participants With Positive Airway Pressure Treatment Adherence in the First 3 Months9 Participants
Comparison: PAP devices delivery to the patients was outsourced by the institution eliminating the point of recruitment for the study at our department. The recruitment was halted and the study proceeded with the follow-up of already recruited patients. As a result of the limited recruitment, planned statistical data analysis was not performed on the primary outcomes due to the smaller then expected number of subjects (expected 110 subjects in the Usual arm and 110 subjects in the Wireless arm.p-value: <0.01Fisher Exact
Secondary

Receiving Effective Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Evaluate whether patients are effectively being treated with PAP or with alternate means of treatment for OSA (obstructive sleep apnea) at the end of 12 months.

Time frame: 12 months

Population: 1 subject from the Wireless group was assigned to Provent treatment. 1 subject from the Usual group was assigned to Dental device treatment. Both subjects stopped using PAP and PAP monitoring and were considered not receiving effective PAP treatment for obstructive sleep apnea. Both subjects were lost in follow-up for our research study.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Usual CareReceiving Effective Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea10 Participants
Wireless CareReceiving Effective Treatment for Obstructive Sleep Apnea10 Participants
Comparison: CPAP devices delivery to the patients was outsourced by the institution eliminating the point of recruitment for the study at our department The recruitment was halted and the study proceeded with the follow-up of already recruited patients. As a result of the limited recruitment, planned statistical data analysis was not performed on the primary outcomes due to the smaller then expected number of subjects (expected 110 subjects in the Usual arm and 110 subjects in the Wireless arm.p-value: <0.01Fisher Exact
Post Hoc

Adherence and AHI

PAP adherence in subjects who had more than 20 respiratory events per hour during the initial sleep study was compared with the PAP adherence in subjects who had less than 20 respiratory events per hour during the initial sleep study.Patient data representing subjects who had more than 20 respiratory events per hour during the initial sleep study and subjects who had less than 20 respiratory events per hour during the initial sleep study was collected across both Usual care and Wireless Care Arms.

Time frame: 1 year/12 months

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Usual CareAdherence and AHIAdherent in 12 months19 Participants
Usual CareAdherence and AHIANon-Adherent in 12 months4 Participants
Wireless CareAdherence and AHIAdherent in 12 months7 Participants
Wireless CareAdherence and AHIANon-Adherent in 12 months12 Participants
Comparison: Exact Fisher test was used on the collected information from the limited populationp-value: <0.01Fisher Exact
Post Hoc

PAP Treatment Adherence in the First 3 Months of Treatment Compared to the PAP Treatment Adherence in the Next 9 Months of Treatment

PAP treatment Adherence in the first 3 months of treatment (according to the CMS - Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services - criteria) was compared to the PAP treatment Adherence in the next 9 months of treatment to verify the predictability of initial adherence or non-adherence for the future adherence or non-adherence (during the year) to PAP treatment. Adherence/non-adherence was analyzed based on the PAP usage reports (downloads) from the supplied PAP device, based on the yearly, quarterly and monthly portions of the reports. Patient data representing initial adherence or non-adherence and adherence or non-adherence during the year to PAP treatment was collected across both Usual care and Wireless Care Arms.

Time frame: 12 months

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Usual CarePAP Treatment Adherence in the First 3 Months of Treatment Compared to the PAP Treatment Adherence in the Next 9 Months of TreatmentAdherent in the next 9 months13 Participants
Usual CarePAP Treatment Adherence in the First 3 Months of Treatment Compared to the PAP Treatment Adherence in the Next 9 Months of TreatmentNon-Adherent in the next 9 months6 Participants
Wireless CarePAP Treatment Adherence in the First 3 Months of Treatment Compared to the PAP Treatment Adherence in the Next 9 Months of TreatmentAdherent in the next 9 months7 Participants
Wireless CarePAP Treatment Adherence in the First 3 Months of Treatment Compared to the PAP Treatment Adherence in the Next 9 Months of TreatmentNon-Adherent in the next 9 months16 Participants
Comparison: Exact Fisher test was used on the collected information from the limited populationp-value: <0.01Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 4, 2026