Skip to content

An Observational Study of Mircera (Methoxy Polyethylene Glycol-Epoetin Beta) in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients on Dialysis With Renal Anemia

Efficacy of C.E.R.A. for Correction of Anemia and Maintenance of the Hb Levels in CKD Patients on Dialysis , Treated According to Routine Clinical Practice

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01677767
Enrollment
127
Registered
2012-09-03
Start date
2011-04-30
Completion date
2013-09-30
Last updated
2017-07-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anemia

Brief summary

This observational study will evaluate the use in clinical practice and efficacy of Mircera (methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta) in chronic kidney disease patients on dialysis receiving Mircera for the treatment of chronic renal anemia. Eligible patients will be followed for 24 weeks.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients, 18 to 65 years of age, inclusive * Patients with chronic kidney disease on dialysis * ESA naïve with Hb \< 10 g/dL, or on treatment with ESAs other than Mircera and Hb within the target range of 10-12 g/dL * Adequate irons status as judged by the treating physician

Exclusion criteria

* Hypersensitivity to recombinant human erythropoietin, polyethylene glycol or to any constituent of the study medication * Clinically significant concomitant disease or disorder as defined by protocol * Clinical suspicion of pure red cell aplasia (PRCA) * Planned elective surgery during the study period , except for cataract surgery or vascular access surgery * Transfusion of red blood cells in the previous 2 months * Pregnant women * Contraindications for Mircera according to local prescribing information or as judged by the investigator

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Who Had Received Treatment With Other Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents Maintaining Hb Level Within 1 Gram/Deciliter of Baseline Value During Study Period in Participants.Up to Week 24Percentage of participants maintaining Hb level within 1 g/dL of baseline value during study period who had received treatment with other Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs) were reported.
Mean Age of Participants Treated With C.E.R.ABaseline (Week 0)Age was calculated on screening/Baseline visit day by using formula: Age = (Screening visit date - Date of birth)/365.25
Mean Weight of Participants Treated With C.E.R.ABaseline (Week 0)Weight of the participants was measured at the Baseline and summarized with descriptive statistics.
Number of Participants With Co-morbidity Treated With C.E.R.AUp to Week 24Co-morbidity is the presence of one or more additional disorders (or diseases) co-occurring with a primary disease or disorder; or the effect of such additional disorders or diseases. Co-morbid participants with renal and urinary disorders, vascular disorders, metabolism and nutrition disorders were reported.
Mean Time Required to Achieve Target Hemoglobin RangeUp to Week 24The target range of hemoglobin (Hb) was 10-12 gram/deciliter (g/dL). Time to achieve target range = (Date of Hb evaluation when participant achieved target Hb range at first time - visit date of first dosing) + 1
Percentage of Participants Achieved Target Range of HemoglobinUp to Week 24The target range of Hb was 10-12 gram/deciliter (g/dL). Time to achieve target range = (Date of Hb evaluation when participant achieved target Hb range at first time - visit date of first dosing) + 1. The percentage of participants with Hb \< 10 g/dL at enrollment, achieving the target range of hemoglobin 10-12 g/dL was reported.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Time Spent by Participants in the Hb Target RangeUp to Week 24Maintenance of target Hb was evaluated by assessing the mean time spent by participants in target Hb range. The target Hb range in the study was 10-12 g/dL.
Evaluation of Route of Administration for C.E.R.AUp to Week 24C.E.R.A. was administered by Intravenous (IV) and Subcutaneous (SC) route of administration. The frequency (number of injections) for both of these routes of administration used in the study was reported.
Evaluation of Dose Per Injection of C.E.R.AUp to Week 24The dosing and titration of C.E.R.A treatment were at the discretion of the investigator in accordance with local clinical practice or approved prescribing information. Mean dose per injection of C.E.R.A received by participants was reported.
Number of Participants Received Concomitant MedicationsUp to Week 24Medications that were used during the study treatment period (from the first dose date of study medication to the end of the study) were included as concomitant medications. The prescribed concomitant medications (in greater than or equal to 10% of participants) in the study were prazosin, torasemide, vitamin and nutritional supplements, omeprazole, amlodipine, calcium supplements, calcitriol, and clonidine. Participants treated with the each of these concomitant medications were reported.
Number of Participants Achieving Hb Target Range (10-12 Hb g/dL) at Least Once During the StudyUp to Week 24For correction of anemia, number of participants achieving Hb target range (10-12 g/dL) at least once during the study were reported.

Countries

India

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 127 participants were enrolled from 7 centers in India. This study was conducted between 14 April 2011 and 23 September 2013.

Pre-assignment details

Out of 127 participants enrolled in the study, 1 participant was enrolled wrongly and data for 2 participants were not available at the study Centre. Therefore, 124 participants were evaluated in this study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
C.E.R.A.
Participants with chronic renal anemia received C.E.R.A according to routine clinical practice treatment in line with approved prescribing information for a duration of 6 months/24 weeks.
124
Total124

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1
Overall StudyDeath4
Overall StudyNon-compliance by the participants3
Overall StudyProtocol Violation4
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicC.E.R.A.
Age, Continuous48.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.26
Height157.83 Centimeters
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.056
Sex: Female, Male
Female
41 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
83 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
21 / 124
serious
Total, serious adverse events
6 / 124

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Age of Participants Treated With C.E.R.A

Age was calculated on screening/Baseline visit day by using formula: Age = (Screening visit date - Date of birth)/365.25

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0)

Population: The safety population included all participants enrolled into the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
C.E.R.A.Mean Age of Participants Treated With C.E.R.A48.1 YearsStandard Deviation 12.26
Primary

Mean Time Required to Achieve Target Hemoglobin Range

The target range of hemoglobin (Hb) was 10-12 gram/deciliter (g/dL). Time to achieve target range = (Date of Hb evaluation when participant achieved target Hb range at first time - visit date of first dosing) + 1

Time frame: Up to Week 24

Population: ITT population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of C.E.R.A (Week 0) and for whom data for at least one follow-up variable was available. The analysis population reflects those participants whose Hb value was less than (\<) 10 g/dL at enrollment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
C.E.R.A.Mean Time Required to Achieve Target Hemoglobin Range11.66 WeekStandard Deviation 5.652
Primary

Mean Weight of Participants Treated With C.E.R.A

Weight of the participants was measured at the Baseline and summarized with descriptive statistics.

Time frame: Baseline (Week 0)

Population: The safety population included all participants enrolled into the study. The analysis population reflects those participants whose weights were assessed at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
C.E.R.A.Mean Weight of Participants Treated With C.E.R.A57.44 KilogramsStandard Deviation 13.269
Primary

Number of Participants With Co-morbidity Treated With C.E.R.A

Co-morbidity is the presence of one or more additional disorders (or diseases) co-occurring with a primary disease or disorder; or the effect of such additional disorders or diseases. Co-morbid participants with renal and urinary disorders, vascular disorders, metabolism and nutrition disorders were reported.

Time frame: Up to Week 24

Population: The safety population included all participants enrolled into the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
C.E.R.A.Number of Participants With Co-morbidity Treated With C.E.R.ATotal comorbid participants107 Number of participants
C.E.R.A.Number of Participants With Co-morbidity Treated With C.E.R.AComorbidity, renal and urinary disorders63 Number of participants
C.E.R.A.Number of Participants With Co-morbidity Treated With C.E.R.AComorbidity, vascular disorders61 Number of participants
C.E.R.A.Number of Participants With Co-morbidity Treated With C.E.R.AComorbidity, metabolism and nutrition disorders46 Number of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Achieved Target Range of Hemoglobin

The target range of Hb was 10-12 gram/deciliter (g/dL). Time to achieve target range = (Date of Hb evaluation when participant achieved target Hb range at first time - visit date of first dosing) + 1. The percentage of participants with Hb \< 10 g/dL at enrollment, achieving the target range of hemoglobin 10-12 g/dL was reported.

Time frame: Up to Week 24

Population: ITT population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of C.E.R.A (Week 0) and for whom data for at least one follow-up variable was available. The analysis population reflects those participants whose Hb value was less than (\<) 10 g/dL at enrollment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
C.E.R.A.Percentage of Participants Achieved Target Range of Hemoglobin74.7 Percentage of participants
Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Had Received Treatment With Other Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents Maintaining Hb Level Within 1 Gram/Deciliter of Baseline Value During Study Period in Participants.

Percentage of participants maintaining Hb level within 1 g/dL of baseline value during study period who had received treatment with other Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESAs) were reported.

Time frame: Up to Week 24

Population: ITT population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of C.E.R.A (Week 0) and for whom data for at least one follow-up variable was available. The analysis population reflects those participants who had been on other ESAs and had Hb greater than or equal to (≥)10 g/dL at baseline.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
C.E.R.A.Percentage of Participants Who Had Received Treatment With Other Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents Maintaining Hb Level Within 1 Gram/Deciliter of Baseline Value During Study Period in Participants.20 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Evaluation of Dose Per Injection of C.E.R.A

The dosing and titration of C.E.R.A treatment were at the discretion of the investigator in accordance with local clinical practice or approved prescribing information. Mean dose per injection of C.E.R.A received by participants was reported.

Time frame: Up to Week 24

Population: The safety population included all participants enrolled into the study

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
C.E.R.A.Evaluation of Dose Per Injection of C.E.R.A64.0 MicrogramStandard Deviation 21.3
Secondary

Evaluation of Route of Administration for C.E.R.A

C.E.R.A. was administered by Intravenous (IV) and Subcutaneous (SC) route of administration. The frequency (number of injections) for both of these routes of administration used in the study was reported.

Time frame: Up to Week 24

Population: The safety population included all participants enrolled into the study

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
C.E.R.A.Evaluation of Route of Administration for C.E.R.AIntravenous administration11 Number of injections
C.E.R.A.Evaluation of Route of Administration for C.E.R.ASubcutaneous administration647 Number of injections
Secondary

Mean Time Spent by Participants in the Hb Target Range

Maintenance of target Hb was evaluated by assessing the mean time spent by participants in target Hb range. The target Hb range in the study was 10-12 g/dL.

Time frame: Up to Week 24

Population: ITT population included the participants who received at least 1 dose of C.E.R.A (Week 0) and for whom data for at least one follow-up variable was available.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
C.E.R.A.Mean Time Spent by Participants in the Hb Target Range13.54 WeekStandard Deviation 6.143
Secondary

Number of Participants Achieving Hb Target Range (10-12 Hb g/dL) at Least Once During the Study

For correction of anemia, number of participants achieving Hb target range (10-12 g/dL) at least once during the study were reported.

Time frame: Up to Week 24

Population: ITT population included all the participants who received at least 1 dose of C.E.R.A (Week 0) and for whom data for at least one follow-up variable was available.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
C.E.R.A.Number of Participants Achieving Hb Target Range (10-12 Hb g/dL) at Least Once During the Study83 Number of participants
Secondary

Number of Participants Received Concomitant Medications

Medications that were used during the study treatment period (from the first dose date of study medication to the end of the study) were included as concomitant medications. The prescribed concomitant medications (in greater than or equal to 10% of participants) in the study were prazosin, torasemide, vitamin and nutritional supplements, omeprazole, amlodipine, calcium supplements, calcitriol, and clonidine. Participants treated with the each of these concomitant medications were reported.

Time frame: Up to Week 24

Population: The safety population included all participants enrolled into the study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
C.E.R.A.Number of Participants Received Concomitant Medications122 Number of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026