Skip to content

Effectiveness of Fixed PC Interval Using SMS for Afternoon Colonoscopy

Effectiveness of Fixed Preparation-to-Colonoscopy Interval Using Short Message Service (SMS) for Afternoon Colonoscopy: a Randomized Control Study

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01675739
Enrollment
280
Registered
2012-08-30
Start date
2011-10-31
Completion date
2012-04-30
Last updated
2012-08-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Effectiveness of SMS to Fix PC Interval

Keywords

colonoscopy, bowel preparation, short message service

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of SMS (short message service of mobile phone) reminder to fix PC interval for bowel preparation in afternoon colonoscopy.

Detailed description

Bowel preparation quality for colonoscopy is influenced by several factors and preparation-to-colonoscopy (PC) interval is one of the important factors. The bowel preparation with split-dose PEG (polyethylene glycol) is an obviously uncomfortable process, it is usually difficult to ingest PEG in time. Therefore, the investigators conducted a prospective randomized control study to evaluate the effectiveness of fixed PC interval for satisfactory bowel preparation in the afternoon colonoscopy using mobile phone short message service (SMS), which reported that it could increase patient's compliance in other practical era

Interventions

BEHAVIORALShort message service of mobile phone (SMS)

In SMS group, patients took 1st dose polyethylene glycol (PEG) 2L at 6-8pm the day before colonoscopy and then start to take 2nd dose PEG 2L after receiving Short message service of mobile phone (SMS) 6hours before afternoon colonoscopy.

No-SMS group took 1st 2L of PEG solution at 6-8 PM on the day before colonoscopy and started drinking the 2nd 2L PEG at about 6hours before the day of the colonoscopy. SMS group took 1st 2L PEG as same manner of No-SMS group and then started drinking the 2nd 2L PEG at about 6hours before the day of the colonoscopy after receiving scheduled SMS

Sponsors

Inje University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* 18 and 80 years who were scheduled for afternoon colonoscopy (screening or surveillance)

Exclusion criteria

* unavailable mobile phone nor SMS * age younger than 18 years * pregnancy * breastfeeding * history of large-bowel resection * renal failure (serum creatinine ≥ 3.0 mg/dL \[normal 0.8-1.4\]) * drug addiction or major psychiatric illness * allergy to PEG * refusal to participate in the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the Ottawa bowel preparation scaleat the end of time of the colonoscopic examination (about 30 minutes-1hour)This scale assesses cleanliness and fluid volume respectively and presents the total score as sum of these two values. Cleanliness was assessed for the right colon (cecum, ascending colon), midcolon (transverse, descending colon), and the rectosigmoid colon; each colon section was individually rated from 0 to 4 (0 = no liquid, 1 = minimal liquid, no suction required, 2 = suction required to see mucosa, 3 = wash and suction required, 4 = solid stool, not washable). Fluid quantity was rated from 0 to 2 for the entire colon (0 = minimal, 1 = moderate, 2 = large). The Ottawa Scale scores range from 0 (perfect) to 14 (solid stool in each colon segment and large amount of fluid).

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026