Skip to content

Multimodal Approach to Improve the Outcome of Patients With a Proximal Femoral Fracture

Can a Multimodal Approach Improve the Outcome of Patients With a Proximal Femoral Fracture?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01673776
Acronym
FEMO
Enrollment
132
Registered
2012-08-28
Start date
2012-03-31
Completion date
2016-10-15
Last updated
2018-08-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Proximal Femoral Fracture

Keywords

Proximal femoral fracture, multimodal intervention, goal directed therapy (GDT), hemodynamic intervention, outcome

Brief summary

This study is designed to compare the outcome of patients with proximal femoral fractures with different perioperative regimes: a group with a multimodal intervention and a control group.

Detailed description

Femoral neck fractures constitute both a social and economic challenge. The one year mortality of affected patients amounts to 33%, wherein cardio-vascular complications are the major contributor. It is an objective of the present study to investigate whether a multi-modal perioperative intervention can improve the outcome of these patients. We plan to carry out a prospective randomized controlled clinical study. Patients with an age above 60 years and proximal femoral fractures (femoral neck fractures or pertrochanteric femoral fractures) are to be included. These are divided into two groups, K and M. General anaesthesia is applied to both groups. In group K a commonly used therapy will be applied whereas in group M an intesified perioperative care will be carried out. The objectives are to provide sufficient analgesia, normotonia and normothermia. Hence, a femoral catheter is applied for pain therapy already preoperatively. Moreover, the pulmonal situation is improved by means of oxygen as needed. The cardiovascular situation is evaluated and optimized by means of extended hemodynamic monitoring both pre- and postoperatively. If needed, the nutrition of the patients is supplemented with highly caloric drinks. A primary common endpoint is the appearance of postoperative complications. These include cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, pulmonal, renal and surgical complications. Secondary endpoints are mortality, duration of the stay at the hospital and intensive care duration. It is the objective of the study to reduce the probability for at least one postoperative complication from 50% to 25% (α=0,05 and 1-β=0,80). To this end 132 patients would have to be included in the study. All participants are to be contacted by phone one year after the surgery and their health situation is to be determined.

Interventions

DEVICEPulsioFlex® Monitoring

* goal directed therapy according to PulsioFlex® Monitoring- measurements * femoral catheter * extended perioperative monitoring * nutritional supplementation, (if necessary)

Sponsors

Technical University of Munich
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* proximal femoral fracture (femoral neck fracture/ pertrochanteric femoral fracture) * Age ≥ 60 years * written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* pathological fracture * multiple trauma * fracture during a hospital stay due to a different disease

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
postoperative complicationsThe participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 14 dayspostoperative complications: cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, pulmonal, renal and surgical complications

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
mortality1 year
duration of the stay at the hospital1 year
intensive care duration1 year

Countries

Germany

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026