Skip to content

Phase I: At-Home Support for Rural Women Using Group Video Calling

At-Home Support for Rural Women Using Group Video Calling

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01672684
Enrollment
34
Registered
2012-08-27
Start date
2012-10-31
Completion date
2014-06-30
Last updated
2014-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Depression, Post-traumatic Stress Disorder, Recurrent Breast Cancer, Stage IA Breast Cancer, Stage IB Breast Cancer, Stage II Breast Cancer, Stage IIIA Breast Cancer, Stage IIIB Breast Cancer, Stage IIIC Breast Cancer, Stage IV Breast Cancer

Keywords

quality of life

Brief summary

This randomized phase I trial studies at-home group video calling sessions in quality of life in rural patients with breast cancer. At-home group video calling support sessions may improve the well-being and quality of life of women who have breast cancer

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To examine whether delivering at-home professionally-led breast cancer support using group video calling is feasible, acceptable and satisfactory for women in rural northern California. II. To evaluate the feasibility of using on-line tools to recruit, screen, treat, and assess this population for a subsequent randomized clinical trial. III. Assess whether the rate of recruitment of women in this region in this study using predominantly on-line means of recruitment can be improved over that of the previous study using predominantly face-to-face means of recruitment. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Estimate effect size changes in measures of quality of life (post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms, depression symptoms, perceived stress, and positive states of mind), satisfaction with social support, and self-efficacy for coping with cancer. II. Prescribe sample size. III. Perform I and II for all of these outcomes. OUTLINE: Participants are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. ARM I (experimental arm): Participants complete at-home group video calling sessions for 1 1/2 hours once weekly for 8 weeks. ARM II (control arm): Participants receive an educational workbook journal. After completion of study treatment, participants are followed up for 1 week.

Interventions

Complete at-home group video calling support sessions

OTHEReducational intervention

Receive an educational workbook journal

Sponsors

California Breast Cancer Research Program
CollaboratorOTHER
Stanford University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
21 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* To be eligible for this study, the participant must have been diagnosed with breast cancer within the previous 5 years prior to study entry; individuals who have been diagnosed with any stage of breast cancer are eligible * There are no limitations regarding allowable type and amount of prior therapy * There are no race/ethnic restrictions * There are no life expectancy restrictions * Neither Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) nor Karnofsky performance status will be employed * There are no requirements for organ and marrow function * Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document; this will be assessed in the telephone screen conducted by Lisa Frankel as she will review each section of the consent form with the participant and ask if she has any questions about it; this telephone screen will have been approved by the Stanford University Institutional Review Board (IRB), and Lisa Frankel will conduct the interviews in a private location to ensure confidentiality * Eligibility for this study requires that a woman be a resident of one of 27 rural counties in California (Alpine, Amador, Butte, Calaveras, Colusa, Del Norte, El Dorado, Glenn, Imperial, Inyo, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Modoc, Mono, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Shasta, Sierra, Siskiyou, Sutter, Tehama, Trinity, Tuolumne, or Yuba, except we will not include women living within the following cities: Chico, Madera, Redding, Rocklin, Roseville or Yuba City, due to this study's more rural focus) * Eligibility for this study requires that a woman has sufficient hearing to be able to engage in conversation over the phone * Eligibility for this study requires that a woman has a private place available where she can access the internet * Eligibility for this study requires that a woman is potentially available to meet at the day of the week and time of the day that the group intervention is scheduled â in the event that she is randomly assigned to receive the at-home group calling intervention * Eligibility for this study requires that women have broadband or digital subscriber line (DSL) internet access * Eligibility for this study requires that women have a computer with a webcam and either a microphone or a phone available to call into the video conference

Exclusion criteria

* There are no therapy restrictions * There are no restrictions regarding use of other investigational agents * There are no exclusion requirements due to co-morbid disease or incurrent illness * Requirements regarding history of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to investigational agent or device are not applicable to this study * There are no

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Feasibility of the study protocol as determined primarily through qualitative analysis of the group sessions and the interview dataAt 1 week post-interventionThe major criterion for determining feasibility is to determine whether we can recruit rural women with breast cancer more rapidly using predominantly on-line procedures in this study than in our previous study that predominantly used face-to-face procedures. The qualitative data for determining the feasibility will be collected during the at-home group video calling sessions and from women's interviews conducted at the end of the study. Will be assessed using mixed methods.
Acceptability of the study protocol as determined primarily through qualitative analysis of the group sessions and the interview dataAt 1 week post-interventionThe qualitative data for determining the acceptability will be collected during the at-home group video calling sessions and from women's interviews conducted at the end of the study. Will be assessed using mixed methods.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Changes in quality of life (posttraumatic stress, depression symptoms, perceived stress, and positive states of mind)From baseline to 1 week post-interventionTreatment effect size will be estimated for each measure for the purpose of prescribing the sample size for a subsequent larger randomized clinical trial examining efficacy of the intervention. Will be analyzed using generalized linear mixed models.
Changes in satisfaction with social supportFrom baseline to 1 week post-interventionTreatment effect size will be estimated for each measure for the purpose of prescribing the sample size for a subsequent larger randomized clinical trial examining efficacy of the intervention. Will be analyzed using generalized linear mixed models.
Changes in self-efficacy for coping with cancerFrom baseline to 1 week post-interventionTreatment effect size will be estimated for each measure for the purpose of prescribing the sample size for a subsequent larger randomized clinical trial examining efficacy of the intervention. Will be analyzed using generalized linear mixed models.

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026