Skip to content

Ischia Spinous Fascia Fixation Procedure Versus Modified Total Pelvic Floor Reconstructive Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Stage III

A Prospective,Multicenter Pilot Study to Compare Ischia Spinous Fascia Fixation Procedure With Modified Total Pelvic Floor Reconstruction Surgery For Pelvic Organ Prolapse Stage III

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01670682
Enrollment
80
Registered
2012-08-22
Start date
2012-08-31
Completion date
2016-08-31
Last updated
2012-08-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Keywords

Stage III

Brief summary

Pelvic organ prolapse is a common problem. The primary treatment is surgery. Ischia spinous fascia fixation procedure and modified total pelvic floor reconstructive surgery with mesh are both developed in China for vaginal apex fixation, the former is native tissue repairs, and the latter is augmentation with mesh. This study is designed to determine the effectiveness and safety of ischia spinous fascia fixation procedure compared with modified total pelvic floor reconstructive surgery with mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse stage III. Patients enrolled into the study will be followed up for up to 3 years after surgery. Evaluation will take place during surgery and postoperative visit. Stage of prolapse before and after surgery, patient satisfaction through quality of life and sexual function questionnaires before and after surgery, and peri-operative complication rates will be evaluated.

Detailed description

Pelvic Organ prolapse (a feeling of bulge in the vagina) may cause some distressing symptoms such as loss of control of the bowel or bladder, and may also cause problems with patient's sex life. An ideal procedure for vaginal apical support should provide a durable suspension, have minimal complications, and not affect sexual or visceral function. Vaginal procedures used for restoring the vaginal apex support include Ischia spinous fascia fixation procedure with native tissue and modified total pelvic floor reconstructive surgery with mesh. They are both developed and popular in China. Clinical practice showed that they were both safe, efficient and cost-effective. Recurrent rates of both procedures after 1 year follow-up were about 10%, and quality of life improved significantly from the baseline, while the.complications are different. The purpose of this multicenter, prospective, and comparative study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of these two procedures in the treatment of symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse Stage III in China.

Interventions

PROCEDUREischia spinous fascia fixation

Subjects of this group were submitted to surgical treatment with ischia spinous fascia fixation.

PROCEDUREModified Pelvic Floor Reconstruction Surgery with Mesh

Subjects of this group were submitted to surgical treatment with Modified Total Pelvic Floor Reconstruction Surgery with Mesh.

DEVICEpolypropylene mesh(Gynemesh)

Pelvic floor reconstruction will be conducted using surgical mesh made from polypropylene.

Sponsors

Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
55 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Candidates with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse of POP-Q Stage III, suitable for surgical repair. * Vaginal hysterectomy and anti-incontinence procedures could be performed concurrently. * Age ≥ 55 years. * Agrees to participate in the study, including completion of all study-related procedures, evaluations and questionnaires.

Exclusion criteria

* Previous repair of pelvic organ prolapse involving insertion of mesh. * Experimental drug or experimental medical device within 3 months prior to the planned procedure. * Active genital, urinary or systemic infection at the time of the surgical procedure. Surgery may be delayed in such subjects until the infection is cleared. * Coagulation disorder or on therapeutic anticoagulant therapy at the time of surgery. * History of chemotherapy or pelvic radiation therapy. * Systemic disease known to affect bladder or bowel function (e.g. Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury or trauma). * Current evaluation or treatment for chronic pelvic pain (e.g. interstitial cystitis, endometriosis, coccydynia, vulvodynia). * Nursing or pregnant or intends future pregnancy. * Chronic cough not well-controlled. * BMI ≥ 30. * In the investigator's opinion, any medical condition or psychiatric illness that could potentially be life threatening or affect their ability to complete the study visits according to this protocol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
•Anatomical improvement according to POP-Q score.6 weeks

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
•Pain score measured using Visual Analog Scale (VAS).24 hours post surgery and at the 6-week visit
•Presence/absence of complications (composite score).Up to 6 weeks.The occurrence (in the per-operative phase or within 6 weeks post-op) of at least one of the following: 1) bleeding complications; 2) infectious complications; 3) any wound caused by a surgeon movement: bladder, ureteral, or vascular injuries; 4)medical complications: deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and etc.Complications will be categorized using the Dindo surgical complication grading scale.
•Change from baseline in PFIQ-7 scores.1 year, 2 years and 3 years.
•Hospital data including operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, maximum temperature, time of voiding recovery.At discharge, an expected average of 5 days after operation.
•Subject global impression assessed on a 5 point Likert scale1 year, 2 years and 3 years.
•Presence/absence of complications (composite score)Up to 3 years.Long-term negative outcomes of the surgical procedure will also be recorded until 3 years after surgery. For example, mesh erosion, de novo urinary incontinence, de novo dyspareunia and overall failure rate. Complications will be categorized using the Dindo surgical complication grading scale.
•In subjects sexually active at baseline, assessment of sexual function using PISQ-12 (mean scores and change from baseline)1 year, 2 years and 3 years.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactLan Zhu
zhu_julie@sina.com13911714696
Backup ContactJuan Chen
pumchcj@sina.com13521354364

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026