Skip to content

SCD Use to Prevent Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT) in Patients With PICC Lines

Sequential Pneumatic Compression to Prevent PICC-related Upper Extremity Venous Thrombosis in Critically Ill Neurological Patients

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01670188
Enrollment
78
Registered
2012-08-22
Start date
2012-08-31
Completion date
2016-10-13
Last updated
2018-01-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Deep Vein Thrombosis

Keywords

Pneumatic sequential compression device (SCD), Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters (PICC)

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to see if a compression device on the arm where a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line has been inserted can prevent the formation of a blood clot around the PICC line.

Detailed description

In a pilot prospective randomized controlled trial, consecutive patients requiring placement of a PICC line in the Neuroscience intensive care unit were randomly assigned to either the SCD (intervention) group or a non SCD (control) group. Standardized vascular access patency protocols was used in all enrolled patients. All patients had an indwelling 5 French, double lumen PICC unless additional venous access was required by the primary service. Patients randomized to the intervention arm had an SCD placed in the arm with the PICC within 24 hours of PICC placement. Five to seven days after placement of the PICC, the patients were examined with venous duplex ultrasound of the upper extremity to assess for the presence of venous thrombosis. The patients also had the ultrasound again 12-14 days post insertion if the PICC was kept for more than 10 days. If the PICC line was removed before 5-7 days, an upper extremity ultrasound was obtained upon PICC removal. In case of suspected symptomatic venous thromboembolism, the investigations were performed according to current practice standards. Data collection was be considered complete upon removal of the PICC line.

Interventions

DEVICEPneumatic SCD - VenaFlow System (DJO Global)

Sponsors

Mayo Clinic
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subject's age is greater than or equal to 18 years * Subject is patient in neuro intensive care unit at time of PICC placement

Exclusion criteria

* Acute trauma to the upper extremity harboring the PICC * Current use of prophylactic anticoagulation * Inability to fit the SCD on the arm because of arm size * Documented previous upper extremity DVT in the arm harboring the PICC line

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Patients Who Experienced an Ultrasonographically-confirmed Venous Thrombosisbaseline to 14 days post insertion of PICC lineUltrasonographically-confirmed upper extremity venous thrombosis (symptomatic and asymptomatic) in arm with PICC catheter

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients requiring placement of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line in the neuroscience intensive care unit were recruited at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota.

Pre-assignment details

One patient randomized to the non-SCD arm died before the first ultrasound could be obtained and therefore could not be entered into the analysis.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Pneumatic SCD
Use of pneumatic sequential compression device (SCD) (VenaFlow System - DJO Global) on upper extremity with peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line inserted.
38
Non-SCD Group
Patients enrolled in this group received standard care.
39
Total77

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicNon-SCD GroupTotalPneumatic SCD
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
10 Participants21 Participants11 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
29 Participants56 Participants27 Participants
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
39 participants77 participants38 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants49 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
13 Participants28 Participants15 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 380 / 39
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 380 / 39
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 380 / 39

Outcome results

Primary

Number of Patients Who Experienced an Ultrasonographically-confirmed Venous Thrombosis

Ultrasonographically-confirmed upper extremity venous thrombosis (symptomatic and asymptomatic) in arm with PICC catheter

Time frame: baseline to 14 days post insertion of PICC line

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Pneumatic SCDNumber of Patients Who Experienced an Ultrasonographically-confirmed Venous Thrombosis13 Participants
Non-SCD GroupNumber of Patients Who Experienced an Ultrasonographically-confirmed Venous Thrombosis5 Participants
p-value: 0.02t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026