Skip to content

A Non-Interventional Study of RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis

A Multi-national, Multi-center Non-interventional Study in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Patients Treated With Tocilizumab

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01670045
Enrollment
43
Registered
2012-08-21
Start date
2012-03-31
Completion date
2014-06-30
Last updated
2016-10-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

This multi-center observational study will evaluate the use and efficacy of RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis. Eligible patients initiated on RoActemra/Actemra treatment according to the licensed label will be followed for 6 months.

Interventions

DRUGTocilizumab

Tocilizumab in accordance with the licensed label recommendation.

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients, \>/= 18 years of age * Moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis according to the revised (1987) ACR criteria * Patient in whom the treating physician has made the decision to commence RoActemra/Actemra treatment in accordance with the local label (DMARD-IR, TNF-IR or need of RoActemra/Actemra monotherapy); this can include patients who have received RoActemra/Actemra treatment within 8 weeks prior to the enrolment visit

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who have received RoActemra/Actemra more than 8 weeks prior to the enrolment visit * Patients who have previously received RoActemra/Actemra in a clinical trial or for compassionate use * Patients who have received treatment with an investigational agent within 4 weeks (or 5 half-lives of the investigational agent, whichever is longer) before starting treatment with RoActemra/Actemra * Patients with a history of autoimmune disease or any joint inflammatory disease other than rheumatoid arthritis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of Participants Who Remained on Tocilizumab Treatment at 6 Months After Treatment InitiationMonth 6

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With Different Body Mass Index (BMI)Baseline up to Day 5BMI was calculated by weight divided by height squared and measured as kilogram per square meter (kg/m\^2). BMI from 16 to 18.5 = underweight, BMI from 18.5 to 25= normal weight, BMI from 25 to 30= overweight, BMI from 30 to 40 = obese.
Percentage of Participants With Rheumatoid Factor StatusBaseline up to Day 5Percentage of participants with rheumatoid factor status was reported as positive or negative.
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Citrullinated Cyclic Peptide (Anti-CCP) StatusBaseline up to Day 5Percentage of participants with anti-CCP status were reported as positive, negative and unknown.
Percentage of Participants With a Reduction of at Least 2.6 Units in DAS28 From BaselineBaseline, Month 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6The DAS28 score is a measure of the participants' disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) \[28 joints\], swollen joint count (SJC) \[28 joints\], participant's global assessment (PtGA) of disease activity \[visual analog scale (VAS): 0 millimeter (mm)=no disease activity to 100 mm=maximum disease activity\] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). DAS28 was calculated using following formulas: DAS28-ESR = 0.56\*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70\*natural logarithm (ln) (ESR) + 0.014\*PtGA of disease activity. A total possible score of 0 to approximately 10, with higher score indicating worse disease activity. A reduction of at least 2.6 units from Baseline in DAS28 was considered as significant clinical improvement.
Number of Participants Achieving a Response According to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) CriteriaBaseline up to Month 6Response was determined using EULAR criteria based upon DAS28 absolute scores at the assessment visit and the DAS28 improvement from Baseline. Participants with a score less than or equal to (≤) 3.2 and DAS28 improvement of greater than (\>) 1.2 points were assessed as having a 'good' response. Participants with a score ≤3.2 and DAS28 improvement of \>0.6 to ≤1.2 points, score of \>3.2 and ≤5.1 with DAS28 improvement of \>0.6 to ≤1.2 points, score of \>3.2 and ≤5.1 with DAS28 improvement of \>1.2 points, score of \>5.1 and DAS28 improvement of \>1.2 points were assessed as having a 'moderate' response. Participants with a score ≤3.2 and DAS28 improvement of ≤ 0.6 points, score of \>3.2 and ≤5.1 with DAS28 improvement of ≤ 0.6 points, score of \>5.1 and DAS28 improvement of \>0.6 to ≤1.2 points, score of \>5.1 and DAS28 improvement of ≤ 0.6 points were assessed as having a 'no' response.
Percentage of Participants With RA DiagnosisBaseline up to Day 5Percentage of participants was reported based on the timing RA was diagnosed. Timings included more than 5 years, less than 5 years. Participants with unknown timing were reported under unknown.
Number of Participants With Different Types of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)Baseline up to Month 6The CDAI was calculated as \[SJC (28 joints) + TJC (28 joints) + VAS patient global assessment of disease activity + VAS physician global assessment of disease activity\]. VAS assessments: 0 cm =no disease activity to 100 cm=maximum disease activity'. CDAI scores ranged from 0 to 76, with higher scores indicating increased disease activity. CDAI score ≤ 2.8 is 'remission', score \> 2.8 and ≤ 10 is 'low disease activity', score \> 10 and ≤ 22 is 'moderate disease activity', score \> 22 is 'high disease activity'. CDAI was reported as 'not available' for participants with no data on physical/patient global assessment of disease activity.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Response According to ACR CriteriaMonth 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6ACR20/50/70 percent (%) response is defined as a ≥ 20%/50%/70% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both TJC28 and SJC28, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Participant's assessment of pain over the previous 24 hours: using a VAS, left end of the line 0 cm=no pain to right end of the line 10 cm=unbearable pain; Patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; health assessment questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant \[either C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate\].
Number of Participants With Reduction/Withdrawal of Disease-modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) and/or CorticosteroidsBaseline, up to Month 6Participants with reduction/withdrawal of DMARDs and corticosteroids at baseline (before trial period) and up to Month 6 (during trial period) were reported.
Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Baseline, Months 3, 6Physician's global assessment of disease activity over the previous 24 hours was assessed using a VAS where left end of the line 0 mm=no disease activity to right end of the line 100 mm=maximum disease activity.
Percentage of Participants With Tocilizumab Dose ModificationsBaseline up to Month 6
Number of Participants With Different Types of Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)Baseline up to Month 6The SDAI was calculated as \[SJC (28 joints) + TJC (28 joints) + VAS patient global assessment of disease activity + VAS physician global assessment of disease activity+CRP level(milligram/deciliter {mg/dL})\]. VAS assessments: 0 centimeters (cm)=no disease activity to 10 cm=maximum disease activity'. Scores ranged from 0 to 86, with higher scores also indicating increased disease activity. SDAI score ≤ 3.3 is 'remission', score \> 3.3 and ≤ 11 is 'low disease activity', score \> 11 and ≤ 26 is 'moderate disease activity', score \> 26 is 'high disease activity'. SDAI was reported as 'not available' for participants with no data on physical/patient global assessment of disease activity.

Countries

Indonesia

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Rheumatoid Arthritis Participants
Participants with moderate to severe RA according to the ACR criteria and the DAS28 who were on tocilizumab treatment within 8 weeks prior to start of study received tocilizumab in accordance with the licensed label recommendations, were observed for 6 months. The study was designed as non-interventional, no additional intervention in terms of follow-up visit, complementary examination or medication was required.
43
Total43

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event1
Overall StudyDeath1
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up11
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject3

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRheumatoid Arthritis Participants
Age, Continuous44 years
Sex: Female, Male
Female
31 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
12 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 43
serious
Total, serious adverse events
14 / 43

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Who Remained on Tocilizumab Treatment at 6 Months After Treatment Initiation

Time frame: Month 6

Population: ITT.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Who Remained on Tocilizumab Treatment at 6 Months After Treatment Initiation63 percentage of participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6

Physician's global assessment of disease activity over the previous 24 hours was assessed using a VAS where left end of the line 0 mm=no disease activity to right end of the line 100 mm=maximum disease activity.

Time frame: Baseline, Months 3, 6

Population: ITT. Here number of participants analyzed included evaluable participants for the outcome measure and n included evaluable participants at specified time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Month 3 (n=36)-29 mmStandard Deviation 3.11
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsChange From Baseline in Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Months 3 and 6Month 6 (n=0)NA mm
Secondary

Number of Participants Achieving a Response According to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Criteria

Response was determined using EULAR criteria based upon DAS28 absolute scores at the assessment visit and the DAS28 improvement from Baseline. Participants with a score less than or equal to (≤) 3.2 and DAS28 improvement of greater than (\>) 1.2 points were assessed as having a 'good' response. Participants with a score ≤3.2 and DAS28 improvement of \>0.6 to ≤1.2 points, score of \>3.2 and ≤5.1 with DAS28 improvement of \>0.6 to ≤1.2 points, score of \>3.2 and ≤5.1 with DAS28 improvement of \>1.2 points, score of \>5.1 and DAS28 improvement of \>1.2 points were assessed as having a 'moderate' response. Participants with a score ≤3.2 and DAS28 improvement of ≤ 0.6 points, score of \>3.2 and ≤5.1 with DAS28 improvement of ≤ 0.6 points, score of \>5.1 and DAS28 improvement of \>0.6 to ≤1.2 points, score of \>5.1 and DAS28 improvement of ≤ 0.6 points were assessed as having a 'no' response.

Time frame: Baseline up to Month 6

Population: ITT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsNumber of Participants Achieving a Response According to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) CriteriaGood response23 participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsNumber of Participants Achieving a Response According to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) CriteriaModerate response16 participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsNumber of Participants Achieving a Response According to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) CriteriaNo response4 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Different Types of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)

The CDAI was calculated as \[SJC (28 joints) + TJC (28 joints) + VAS patient global assessment of disease activity + VAS physician global assessment of disease activity\]. VAS assessments: 0 cm =no disease activity to 100 cm=maximum disease activity'. CDAI scores ranged from 0 to 76, with higher scores indicating increased disease activity. CDAI score ≤ 2.8 is 'remission', score \> 2.8 and ≤ 10 is 'low disease activity', score \> 10 and ≤ 22 is 'moderate disease activity', score \> 22 is 'high disease activity'. CDAI was reported as 'not available' for participants with no data on physical/patient global assessment of disease activity.

Time frame: Baseline up to Month 6

Population: ITT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Different Types of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)Remission1 participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Different Types of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)Low disease activity19 participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Different Types of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)Moderate disease activity11 participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Different Types of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)High disease activity3 participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Different Types of Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)Not available9 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Different Types of Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)

The SDAI was calculated as \[SJC (28 joints) + TJC (28 joints) + VAS patient global assessment of disease activity + VAS physician global assessment of disease activity+CRP level(milligram/deciliter {mg/dL})\]. VAS assessments: 0 centimeters (cm)=no disease activity to 10 cm=maximum disease activity'. Scores ranged from 0 to 86, with higher scores also indicating increased disease activity. SDAI score ≤ 3.3 is 'remission', score \> 3.3 and ≤ 11 is 'low disease activity', score \> 11 and ≤ 26 is 'moderate disease activity', score \> 26 is 'high disease activity'. SDAI was reported as 'not available' for participants with no data on physical/patient global assessment of disease activity.

Time frame: Baseline up to Month 6

Population: ITT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Different Types of Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)Remission1 participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Different Types of Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)Low disease activity19 participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Different Types of Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)Moderate disease activity10 participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Different Types of Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)High disease activity4 participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Different Types of Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)Not available9 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Reduction/Withdrawal of Disease-modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) and/or Corticosteroids

Participants with reduction/withdrawal of DMARDs and corticosteroids at baseline (before trial period) and up to Month 6 (during trial period) were reported.

Time frame: Baseline, up to Month 6

Population: ITT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Reduction/Withdrawal of Disease-modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) and/or CorticosteroidsDMARDS: Baseline16 participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Reduction/Withdrawal of Disease-modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) and/or CorticosteroidsDMARDS: up to Month 61 participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Reduction/Withdrawal of Disease-modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) and/or CorticosteroidsCorticosteroid: Baseline1 participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsNumber of Participants With Reduction/Withdrawal of Disease-modifying Anti-rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) and/or CorticosteroidsCorticosteroid: up to Month 61 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving a Response According to ACR Criteria

ACR20/50/70 percent (%) response is defined as a ≥ 20%/50%/70% improvement (reduction) compared with baseline for both TJC28 and SJC28, as well as for three of the additional five ACR core set variables: Participant's assessment of pain over the previous 24 hours: using a VAS, left end of the line 0 cm=no pain to right end of the line 10 cm=unbearable pain; Patient's global assessment of disease activity and physician's global assessment of disease activity over the previous 24 hours using a VAS where left end of the line 0=no disease activity to right end of the line 100=maximum disease activity; health assessment questionnaire: 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do; and acute-phase reactant \[either C-reactive protein or erythrocyte sedimentation rate\].

Time frame: Month 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Population: ITT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Achieving a Response According to ACR CriteriaACR20: Month 116.7 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Achieving a Response According to ACR CriteriaACR20: Month 248.7 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Achieving a Response According to ACR CriteriaACR20: Month 365.8 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Achieving a Response According to ACR CriteriaACR20: Month 475.0 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Achieving a Response According to ACR CriteriaACR20: Month 584.8 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Achieving a Response According to ACR CriteriaACR20: Month 684.6 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Achieving a Response According to ACR CriteriaACR50: Month 14.8 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Achieving a Response According to ACR CriteriaACR50: Month 215.4 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Achieving a Response According to ACR CriteriaACR50: Month 331.6 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Achieving a Response According to ACR CriteriaACR50: Month 461.2 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Achieving a Response According to ACR CriteriaACR50: Month 563.7 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Achieving a Response According to ACR CriteriaACR50: Month 665.3 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Achieving a Response According to ACR CriteriaACR70: Month 12.4 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Achieving a Response According to ACR CriteriaACR70: Month 20.0 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Achieving a Response According to ACR CriteriaACR70: Month 37.9 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Achieving a Response According to ACR CriteriaACR70: Month 430.6 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Achieving a Response According to ACR CriteriaACR70: Month 548.5 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants Achieving a Response According to ACR CriteriaACR70: Month 653.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Anti-Citrullinated Cyclic Peptide (Anti-CCP) Status

Percentage of participants with anti-CCP status were reported as positive, negative and unknown.

Time frame: Baseline up to Day 5

Population: ITT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Anti-Citrullinated Cyclic Peptide (Anti-CCP) StatusNegative11.6 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Anti-Citrullinated Cyclic Peptide (Anti-CCP) StatusUnknown7 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Anti-Citrullinated Cyclic Peptide (Anti-CCP) StatusPositive81.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Reduction of at Least 2.6 Units in DAS28 From Baseline

The DAS28 score is a measure of the participants' disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) \[28 joints\], swollen joint count (SJC) \[28 joints\], participant's global assessment (PtGA) of disease activity \[visual analog scale (VAS): 0 millimeter (mm)=no disease activity to 100 mm=maximum disease activity\] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR). DAS28 was calculated using following formulas: DAS28-ESR = 0.56\*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70\*natural logarithm (ln) (ESR) + 0.014\*PtGA of disease activity. A total possible score of 0 to approximately 10, with higher score indicating worse disease activity. A reduction of at least 2.6 units from Baseline in DAS28 was considered as significant clinical improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

Population: ITT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With a Reduction of at Least 2.6 Units in DAS28 From BaselineMonth 16.8 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With a Reduction of at Least 2.6 Units in DAS28 From BaselineMonth 212.5 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With a Reduction of at Least 2.6 Units in DAS28 From BaselineMonth 325.6 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With a Reduction of at Least 2.6 Units in DAS28 From BaselineMonth 441.7 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With a Reduction of at Least 2.6 Units in DAS28 From BaselineMonth 555.9 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With a Reduction of at Least 2.6 Units in DAS28 From BaselineMonth 663 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Different Body Mass Index (BMI)

BMI was calculated by weight divided by height squared and measured as kilogram per square meter (kg/m\^2). BMI from 16 to 18.5 = underweight, BMI from 18.5 to 25= normal weight, BMI from 25 to 30= overweight, BMI from 30 to 40 = obese.

Time frame: Baseline up to Day 5

Population: ITT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Different Body Mass Index (BMI)Underweight25.6 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Different Body Mass Index (BMI)Normal weight39.5 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Different Body Mass Index (BMI)Overweight14 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Different Body Mass Index (BMI)Obese20.9 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With RA Diagnosis

Percentage of participants was reported based on the timing RA was diagnosed. Timings included more than 5 years, less than 5 years. Participants with unknown timing were reported under unknown.

Time frame: Baseline up to Day 5

Population: ITT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With RA DiagnosisMore than 5 years39.5 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With RA DiagnosisLess than 5 years55.8 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With RA DiagnosisUnknown4.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Rheumatoid Factor Status

Percentage of participants with rheumatoid factor status was reported as positive or negative.

Time frame: Baseline up to Day 5

Population: ITT.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Rheumatoid Factor StatusPositive41.9 percentage of participants
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Rheumatoid Factor StatusNegative58.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Tocilizumab Dose Modifications

Time frame: Baseline up to Month 6

Population: ITT.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Rheumatoid Arthritis ParticipantsPercentage of Participants With Tocilizumab Dose Modifications33 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026