Skip to content

An Observational Study of RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab) in Monotherapy in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis

HAQIMONO a Non-interventional National Multicenter Study, Observing RA Patients Treated With Tocilizumab in Mono-therapy, i.e. Without Combination With DMARD

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01669902
Enrollment
107
Registered
2012-08-21
Start date
2012-04-30
Completion date
2014-09-30
Last updated
2015-11-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Brief summary

This multicenter observational study will evaluate the use of RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) in monotherapy in patients with active moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis unable to use methotrexate. Eligible patients initiated on RoActemra/Actemra treatment will be followed for 6 months.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients, \>/= 18 years of age * Moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis according to the revised (1987) ACR criteria * Patients who for any reason do not take methotrexate and for whom the treating physician has made a decision to prescribe RoActemra/Actemra as monotherapy; patients who commenced RoActemra/Actemra as monotherapy within 8 weeks prior to the enrolment visit may be included * Concomitant treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) or corticosteroids (orally or intra-articularly) is allowed

Exclusion criteria

* Patients who have received RoActemra/Actemra more than 8 weeks prior to enrolment visit * Previous RoActemra/Actemra treatment in a clinical trial or for compassionate use * Concomitant DMARD treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (e.g. hyroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, methotrexate, leflunomide, gold compounds, cyclosporine) * Treatment with any investigational agent within 4 weeks (or 5 half-lives of investigational agent, whichever is longer) before starting RoActemra/Actemra treatment * History of autoimmune disease or any joint inflammatory disease other than rheumatoid arthritis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Treatment at Month 6Month 6

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Swollen Joint Count (SJC)Baseline, Month 3, Month 6Number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 28 joints and identifying when swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no swelling = 0, swelling =1; total was calculated by adding all the joints for a maximum score of 28. A reduction in number of swollen joints compared to baseline indicates improvement.
Tender Joint Count (TJC)Baseline, Month 3, Month 6Number of tender joints was determined by examining 28 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1; total was calculated by adding all the joints for a maximum score of 28. A reduction in number of tender joints compared to baseline indicates improvement.
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [CRP])Baseline, Month 3, Month 6DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated from the SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count, CRP (milligram per liter \[mg/L\]) and patient global assessment (PtGA) of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 millimeter \[mm\] Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\]) where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated using the following formula: DAS28-4 (CRP) = 0.56\*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36\*ln(CRP+1) + 0.014\*PtGA + 0.96. Total score range: 0 to 10, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (CRP) less than or equal to (\<= 3.2) implied low disease activity and greater than (\>) 3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (CRP) less than (\<) 2.6 = clinical remission.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on DAS28-4 (CRP)Month 3 and Month 6DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated from the SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count, CRP (mg/L) and PtGA of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated using the following formula: DAS28-4 (CRP) = 0.56\*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36\*ln(CRP+1) + 0.014\*PtGA + 0.96. Total score range: 0 to 10, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (CRP) \<= 3.2 implied low disease activity and \> 3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (CRP) \< 2.6 = clinical remission.
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])Baseline, Month 3, Month 6DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (millimeter per hour \[mm/hour\]), and PtGA of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28-4 (ESR) = 0.56\*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70\*ln(ESR) + 0.014\*PtGA. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) \<= 3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) \<2.6 = clinical remission.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on DAS28-4 (ESR)Month 3 and Month 6DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and PtGA of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28-4 (ESR) = 0.56\*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70\*ln(ESR) + 0.014\*PtGA. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) \<= 3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) \<2.6 = clinical remission.
Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28-4 (CRP)Month 3 and Month 6The DAS28-4 (CRP) \[described in Outcome Measure 5\] based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as good, moderate, or no response depending on the extent of change from baseline in DAS28 score and the level of disease activity (low, moderate or high) reached. Good responders: change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 \<= 3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 in the range of \>3.2 to \<=5.1 or change from baseline in the range of \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with DAS28 in the range of \>3.2 to \<=5.1 or change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 \>5.1 or change from baseline in the range of \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with DAS28 \<=3.2; non-responders: change from baseline \<= 0.6 or change from baseline in the range of \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with DAS28 \>5.1 or change from baseline \<=0.6 with DAS28 \<=3.2 or in the range of \>3.2 to \<=5.1.
Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response Based on DAS28-4 (ESR)Month 3 and Month 6The DAS28-4 (ESR) \[described in Outcome Measure 7\] based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as good, moderate, or no response depending on the extent of change from baseline in DAS28 score and the level of disease activity (low, moderate or high) reached. Good responders: change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 \<= 3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 in the range of \>3.2 to \<=5.1 or change from baseline in the range of \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with DAS28 in the range of \>3.2 to \<=5.1 or change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 \>5.1 or change from baseline in the range of \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with DAS28 \<=3.2; non-responders: change from baseline \<= 0.6 or change from baseline in the range of \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with DAS28 \>5.1 or change from baseline \<=0.6 with DAS28 \<=3.2 or in the range of \>3.2 to \<=5.1.
Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)Baseline, Month 3, Month 6The SDAI is the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGA and physician global assessment (PGA) assessed on 0-10 centimeter (cm) VAS; 0 = no disease activity and 10 = worst disease activity, and CRP (mg/dL). SDAI total score = 0-86. SDAI \<=3.3 indicates clinical remission, \>3.4 to 11 = low disease activity, \>11 to 26 = moderate disease activity, and \>26 = high (or severe) disease activity.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on SDAIMonth 3 and Month 6The SDAI is the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGA and PGA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS; 0 = no disease activity and 10 = worst disease activity, and CRP (mg/dL). SDAI total score = 0-86. SDAI \<=3.3 indicates clinical remission, \>3.4 to 11 = low disease activity, \>11 to 26 = moderate disease activity, and \>26 = high (or severe) disease activity.
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)Baseline, Month 3, Month 6The CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGA and PGA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS; 0 = no disease activity and 10 = worst disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI \<= 2.8 indicates clinical remission, \>2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \>10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and \>22 = high (or severe) disease activity.
Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications of TocilizumabBaseline to Month 6Dose modification is any change in dose; this also included participants who stopped treatment with tocilizumab.
Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) ResponseBaseline to Month 6ACR response: improvement in tender or swollen joint counts and improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria: 1) PGA of disease activity, 2) PtGA of disease activity, 3) patient's assessment of pain, 4) patient's assessment of functional disability via a health assessment questionnaire, and 5) CRP at each visit. ACR response is based on 66/68 total joint count.
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity ScoreBaseline, Month 3, Month 6Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity.
Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease ActivityBaseline, Month 3, Month 6Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity.
Percentage of Participants in a PGA of Disease Activity Score CategoryBaseline, Month 3, Month 6A categorical scale (Lickert scale) with the following categories: none, mild, moderate, severe and maximal was used to evaluate disease activity in clinical practice.
Patient Global Assessment of PainBaseline, Month 3, Month 6Patient Global Assessment of Pain was assessed using a 100 mm VAS (0 to 100) where 0 = no pain to 100 = worst possible pain.
Percentage of Participants With Morning StiffnessBaseline, Month 3, Month 6The percentage of participants with morning stiffness (yes, no, or do not know) was assessed at each visit.
Percentage of Participants With Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline, Month 3, Month 6Duration of morning stiffness was defined as the time elapsed when participant woke up in the morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness. Duration was recorded as less than (\<) 30 minutes, 30 to 60 minutes, 60 to 120 minutes, 120 to 240 minutes, more than (\>) 240 minutes, or whole day.
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Months 3 and 6Baseline, Month 3 and Month 6HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.
Percentage of Participants With Concomitant Corticosteroids TreatmentBaseline to Month 6
Number of Participants With Use of Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) During the StudyBaseline to Month 6
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on CDAIMonth 3 and Month 6The CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGA and PGA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS; 0 = no disease activity and 10 = worst disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI \<= 2.8 indicates clinical remission, \>2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \>10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and \>22 = high (or severe) disease activity.

Countries

Denmark, Norway, Sweden

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Tocilizumab
Participants with rheumatoid arthritis who were considered for or treated with tocilizumab monotherapy within the clinical routine were observed for a period of 6 months.
107
Total107

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyAdverse Event11
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy10
Overall StudyOther8

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTocilizumab
Age, Continuous56.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3
Sex: Female, Male
Female
84 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
13 / 107
serious
Total, serious adverse events
10 / 107

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Treatment at Month 6

Time frame: Month 6

Population: Safety Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Treatment at Month 676.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Months 3 and 6

HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3 and Month 6

Population: The FAS (HAQ) included all data from all participants who had at least a baseline value and one follow up value (Month 3 or Month 6) for HAQ.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Months 3 and 6Baseline (n=82)1.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.62
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 3 (n=72)-0.29 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.53
TocilizumabChange From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Months 3 and 6Change at Month 6 (n=58)-0.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.59
Comparison: Change at Month 3p-value: <0.0001Wilcoxon signed rank test
Comparison: Change at Month 6p-value: 0.0357Wilcoxon signed rank test
Secondary

Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)

The CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGA and PGA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS; 0 = no disease activity and 10 = worst disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI \<= 2.8 indicates clinical remission, \>2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \>10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and \>22 = high (or severe) disease activity.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: The FAS (CDAI) included all data from all participants who had at least a baseline value and one follow up value (Month 3 or Month 6) for CDAI. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabClinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)Baseline (n=35)21.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.9
TocilizumabClinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)Month 3 (n=33)10.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.9
TocilizumabClinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)Month 6 (n=24)10.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1
Secondary

Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [CRP])

DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated from the SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count, CRP (milligram per liter \[mg/L\]) and patient global assessment (PtGA) of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 millimeter \[mm\] Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\]) where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated using the following formula: DAS28-4 (CRP) = 0.56\*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36\*ln(CRP+1) + 0.014\*PtGA + 0.96. Total score range: 0 to 10, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (CRP) less than or equal to (\<= 3.2) implied low disease activity and greater than (\>) 3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (CRP) less than (\<) 2.6 = clinical remission.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: The FAS (DAS28-4 \[CRP\]) included all data from all participants who had at least a baseline value and one follow up value (Month 3 or Month 6) for DAS28-4 \[CRP\] assessment. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabDisease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [CRP])Month 3 (n=69)3.17 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.34
TocilizumabDisease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [CRP])Month 6 (n=60)2.98 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.21
TocilizumabDisease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [CRP])Baseline (n=83)4.76 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.31
Secondary

Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])

DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (millimeter per hour \[mm/hour\]), and PtGA of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28-4 (ESR) = 0.56\*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70\*ln(ESR) + 0.014\*PtGA. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) \<= 3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) \<2.6 = clinical remission.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: The FAS (DAS28-4 \[ESR\]) included all data from all participants who had at least a baseline value and one follow up value (Month 3 or Month 6) for DAS28-4 \[ESR\] assessment. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabDisease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])Baseline (n=59)5.03 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.39
TocilizumabDisease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])Month 3 (n=49)2.98 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.41
TocilizumabDisease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])Month 6 (n=45)2.64 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.34
Secondary

Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response

ACR response: improvement in tender or swollen joint counts and improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria: 1) PGA of disease activity, 2) PtGA of disease activity, 3) patient's assessment of pain, 4) patient's assessment of functional disability via a health assessment questionnaire, and 5) CRP at each visit. ACR response is based on 66/68 total joint count.

Time frame: Baseline to Month 6

Population: Data for ACR response was not reported because in clinical practice the 66/68 joint evaluation needed for this is not performed in the Sweden, Denmark and Norway, the 28 joint count is performed instead.

Secondary

Number of Participants With Use of Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) During the Study

Time frame: Baseline to Month 6

Population: Safety Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabNumber of Participants With Use of Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) During the Study1 participants
Secondary

Patient Global Assessment of Pain

Patient Global Assessment of Pain was assessed using a 100 mm VAS (0 to 100) where 0 = no pain to 100 = worst possible pain.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: The FAS (VAS pain) included all data from all participants who had at least a baseline value and one follow up value (Month 3 or Month 6) for VAS pain. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabPatient Global Assessment of PainBaseline (n=83)60.5 mmStandard Deviation 22.3
TocilizumabPatient Global Assessment of PainMonth 3 (n=73)38.4 mmStandard Deviation 24.5
TocilizumabPatient Global Assessment of PainMonth 6 (n=68)39.9 mmStandard Deviation 27.1
Secondary

Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity Score

Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: The FAS (VAS disease activity \[patient\]) included all data from all participants who had at least a baseline value and one follow up value (Month 3 or Month 6) for VAS disease activity (patient). n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabPatient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity ScoreBaseline (n=87)61.6 mmStandard Deviation 21.4
TocilizumabPatient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity ScoreMonth 3 (n=77)41.3 mmStandard Deviation 25.9
TocilizumabPatient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity ScoreMonth 6 (n=69)41.6 mmStandard Deviation 26.3
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on CDAI

The CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGA and PGA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS; 0 = no disease activity and 10 = worst disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI \<= 2.8 indicates clinical remission, \>2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \>10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and \>22 = high (or severe) disease activity.

Time frame: Month 3 and Month 6

Population: FAS (CDAI). N (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on CDAIMonth 3 (n=33): Clinical remission12.1 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on CDAIMonth 3 (n=24): Clinical remission16.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on DAS28-4 (CRP)

DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated from the SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count, CRP (mg/L) and PtGA of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated using the following formula: DAS28-4 (CRP) = 0.56\*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36\*ln(CRP+1) + 0.014\*PtGA + 0.96. Total score range: 0 to 10, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (CRP) \<= 3.2 implied low disease activity and \> 3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (CRP) \< 2.6 = clinical remission.

Time frame: Month 3 and Month 6

Population: FAS (DAS28-4 \[CRP\]). N (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on DAS28-4 (CRP)Month 3 (n=69): Clinical remission36.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on DAS28-4 (CRP)Month 6 (n=60): Clinical remission40.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on DAS28-4 (ESR)

DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and PtGA of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28-4 (ESR) = 0.56\*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70\*ln(ESR) + 0.014\*PtGA. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) \<= 3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) \<2.6 = clinical remission.

Time frame: Month 3 and Month 6

Population: FAS (DAS28-4 \[ESR\]). N (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on DAS28-4 (ESR)Month 3 (n=49): Clinical remission38.8 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on DAS28-4 (ESR)Month 6 (n=45) : Clinical remission57.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on SDAI

The SDAI is the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGA and PGA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS; 0 = no disease activity and 10 = worst disease activity, and CRP (mg/dL). SDAI total score = 0-86. SDAI \<=3.3 indicates clinical remission, \>3.4 to 11 = low disease activity, \>11 to 26 = moderate disease activity, and \>26 = high (or severe) disease activity.

Time frame: Month 3 and Month 6

Population: FAS (SDAI). N (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on SDAIMonth 3 (n=31): Clinical remission12.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on SDAIMonth 6 (n=24): Clinical remission16.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants in a PGA of Disease Activity Score Category

A categorical scale (Lickert scale) with the following categories: none, mild, moderate, severe and maximal was used to evaluate disease activity in clinical practice.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: FAS (categorical scale \[physician\]) included all data from all participants who had at least a baseline value and one follow up value (Month 3 or Month 6) for rheumatoid arthritis illness categorical scale (physician). n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants in a PGA of Disease Activity Score CategoryBaseline: Mild (n=51)2.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants in a PGA of Disease Activity Score CategoryBaseline: Moderate (n=51)56.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants in a PGA of Disease Activity Score CategoryBaseline: Severe (n=51)33.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants in a PGA of Disease Activity Score CategoryBaseline: Maximal (n=51)7.8 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants in a PGA of Disease Activity Score CategoryMonth 3: None (n=46)8.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants in a PGA of Disease Activity Score CategoryMonth 3: Mild (n=46)52.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants in a PGA of Disease Activity Score CategoryMonth 3: Moderate (n=46)28.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants in a PGA of Disease Activity Score CategoryMonth 3: Severe (n=46)10.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants in a PGA of Disease Activity Score CategoryMonth 6: None (n=41)7.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants in a PGA of Disease Activity Score CategoryMonth 6: Mild (n=46)78.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants in a PGA of Disease Activity Score CategoryMonth 6: Moderate (n=46)4.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants in a PGA of Disease Activity Score CategoryMonth 6: Severe (n=46)9.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Concomitant Corticosteroids Treatment

Time frame: Baseline to Month 6

Population: Safety Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Concomitant Corticosteroids Treatment26.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications of Tocilizumab

Dose modification is any change in dose; this also included participants who stopped treatment with tocilizumab.

Time frame: Baseline to Month 6

Population: Safety Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Dose Modifications of Tocilizumab36.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Duration of Morning Stiffness

Duration of morning stiffness was defined as the time elapsed when participant woke up in the morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness. Duration was recorded as less than (\<) 30 minutes, 30 to 60 minutes, 60 to 120 minutes, 120 to 240 minutes, more than (\>) 240 minutes, or whole day.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: FAS (morning stiffness). N (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline: <30 minutes (n=49)10.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline: 30 to 60 minutes (n=49)24.5 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline: 60 to 120 minutes (n=49)32.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline: 120 to 240 minutes (n=49)20.4 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline: >240 minutes (n=49)6.1 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Duration of Morning StiffnessBaseline: whole day (n=49)6.1 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3: <30 minutes (n=38)28.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3: 30 to 60 minutes (n=38)28.9 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3: 60 to 120 minutes (n=38)23.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3: 120 to 240 minutes (n=38)15.8 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3: >240 minutes (n=38)0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 3: whole day (n=38)2.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6: <30 minutes (n=25)44.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6: 30 to 60 minutes (n=25)28.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6: 60 to 120 minutes (n=25)4.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6: 120 to 240 minutes (n=25)20.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6: >240 minutes (n=25)0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Duration of Morning StiffnessMonth 6: whole day (n=25)4.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response Based on DAS28-4 (ESR)

The DAS28-4 (ESR) \[described in Outcome Measure 7\] based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as good, moderate, or no response depending on the extent of change from baseline in DAS28 score and the level of disease activity (low, moderate or high) reached. Good responders: change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 \<= 3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 in the range of \>3.2 to \<=5.1 or change from baseline in the range of \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with DAS28 in the range of \>3.2 to \<=5.1 or change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 \>5.1 or change from baseline in the range of \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with DAS28 \<=3.2; non-responders: change from baseline \<= 0.6 or change from baseline in the range of \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with DAS28 \>5.1 or change from baseline \<=0.6 with DAS28 \<=3.2 or in the range of \>3.2 to \<=5.1.

Time frame: Month 3 and Month 6

Population: FAS (DAS28-4 \[ESR\]). N (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With EULAR Response Based on DAS28-4 (ESR)Month 3: Good response (n=49)51.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With EULAR Response Based on DAS28-4 (ESR)Month 3: Moderate response (n=49)34.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With EULAR Response Based on DAS28-4 (ESR)Month 3: No response (n=49)14.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With EULAR Response Based on DAS28-4 (ESR)Month 6: Good response (n=45)55.6 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With EULAR Response Based on DAS28-4 (ESR)Month 6: Moderate response (n=45)31.1 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With EULAR Response Based on DAS28-4 (ESR)Month 6: No response (n=45)13.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28-4 (CRP)

The DAS28-4 (CRP) \[described in Outcome Measure 5\] based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as good, moderate, or no response depending on the extent of change from baseline in DAS28 score and the level of disease activity (low, moderate or high) reached. Good responders: change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 \<= 3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 in the range of \>3.2 to \<=5.1 or change from baseline in the range of \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with DAS28 in the range of \>3.2 to \<=5.1 or change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 \>5.1 or change from baseline in the range of \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with DAS28 \<=3.2; non-responders: change from baseline \<= 0.6 or change from baseline in the range of \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with DAS28 \>5.1 or change from baseline \<=0.6 with DAS28 \<=3.2 or in the range of \>3.2 to \<=5.1.

Time frame: Month 3 and Month 6

Population: FAS (DAS28-4 \[CRP\]). N (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28-4 (CRP)Month 3: Moderate response (n=69)33.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28-4 (CRP)Month 3: Good response (n=69)43.5 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28-4 (CRP)Month 3: No response (n=69)23.2 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28-4 (CRP)Month 6: Good response (n=60)43.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28-4 (CRP)Month 6: Moderate response (n=60)33.3 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28-4 (CRP)Month 6: No response (n=60)23.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Morning Stiffness

The percentage of participants with morning stiffness (yes, no, or do not know) was assessed at each visit.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: FAS (morning stiffness) included all data from all participants who had at least a baseline value and one follow up value (Month 3 or 6) for morning stiffness. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Morning StiffnessBaseline: Yes (n=89)55.1 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Morning StiffnessBaseline: No (n=89)9.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Morning StiffnessBaseline: Do Not Know (n=89)36.0 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Morning StiffnessMonth 3: Yes (n=80)47.5 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Morning StiffnessMonth 3: No (n=80)3.8 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Morning StiffnessMonth 3: Do Not Know (n=80)48.8 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Morning StiffnessMonth 6: Yes (n=68)36.8 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Morning StiffnessMonth 6: No (n=68)14.7 percentage of participants
TocilizumabPercentage of Participants With Morning StiffnessMonth 6: Do Not Know (n=68)48.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity

Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: The FAS (VAS disease activity \[physician\] included all data from all participants who had at least a baseline value and one follow up value (Month 3 or Month 6) for VAS disease activity (physician). n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabPhysician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease ActivityMonth 3 (n=37)19.1 mmStandard Deviation 17.2
TocilizumabPhysician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease ActivityBaseline (n=42)34.0 mmStandard Deviation 16.4
TocilizumabPhysician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease ActivityMonth 6 (n=30)15.2 mmStandard Deviation 14.3
Secondary

Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)

The SDAI is the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGA and physician global assessment (PGA) assessed on 0-10 centimeter (cm) VAS; 0 = no disease activity and 10 = worst disease activity, and CRP (mg/dL). SDAI total score = 0-86. SDAI \<=3.3 indicates clinical remission, \>3.4 to 11 = low disease activity, \>11 to 26 = moderate disease activity, and \>26 = high (or severe) disease activity.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: The FAS (SDAI) included all data from all participants who had at least a baseline value and one follow up value (Month 3 or Month 6) for SDAI. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabSimplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)Baseline (n=34)22.46 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.33
TocilizumabSimplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)Month 3 (n=31)11.48 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.18
TocilizumabSimplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)Month 6 (n=24)10.73 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.74
Secondary

Swollen Joint Count (SJC)

Number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 28 joints and identifying when swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no swelling = 0, swelling =1; total was calculated by adding all the joints for a maximum score of 28. A reduction in number of swollen joints compared to baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) (swollen joint counts) included all data from all participants who had at least a baseline value and one follow up value (Month 3 or Month 6) for swollen joints. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabSwollen Joint Count (SJC)Month 6 (n=63)1.8 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 2.5
TocilizumabSwollen Joint Count (SJC)Baseline (n=83)5.6 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 5.2
TocilizumabSwollen Joint Count (SJC)Month 3 (n=73)2.5 swollen joint countStandard Deviation 3.1
Secondary

Tender Joint Count (TJC)

Number of tender joints was determined by examining 28 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1; total was calculated by adding all the joints for a maximum score of 28. A reduction in number of tender joints compared to baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6

Population: The FAS (tender joint counts) included all data from all participants who had at least a baseline value and one follow up value (Month 3 or Month 6) for tender joints. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
TocilizumabTender Joint Count (TJC)Baseline (n=83)8.6 tender joint countStandard Deviation 6.9
TocilizumabTender Joint Count (TJC)Month 3 (n=73)4.5 tender joint countStandard Deviation 5.3
TocilizumabTender Joint Count (TJC)Month 6 (n=63)3.7 tender joint countStandard Deviation 4.9

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026