Rheumatoid Arthritis
Conditions
Brief summary
This multicenter observational study will evaluate the use of RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) in monotherapy in patients with active moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis unable to use methotrexate. Eligible patients initiated on RoActemra/Actemra treatment will be followed for 6 months.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adult patients, \>/= 18 years of age * Moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis according to the revised (1987) ACR criteria * Patients who for any reason do not take methotrexate and for whom the treating physician has made a decision to prescribe RoActemra/Actemra as monotherapy; patients who commenced RoActemra/Actemra as monotherapy within 8 weeks prior to the enrolment visit may be included * Concomitant treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) or corticosteroids (orally or intra-articularly) is allowed
Exclusion criteria
* Patients who have received RoActemra/Actemra more than 8 weeks prior to enrolment visit * Previous RoActemra/Actemra treatment in a clinical trial or for compassionate use * Concomitant DMARD treatment for rheumatoid arthritis (e.g. hyroxychloroquine, sulfasalazine, methotrexate, leflunomide, gold compounds, cyclosporine) * Treatment with any investigational agent within 4 weeks (or 5 half-lives of investigational agent, whichever is longer) before starting RoActemra/Actemra treatment * History of autoimmune disease or any joint inflammatory disease other than rheumatoid arthritis
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Treatment at Month 6 | Month 6 |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Swollen Joint Count (SJC) | Baseline, Month 3, Month 6 | Number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 28 joints and identifying when swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no swelling = 0, swelling =1; total was calculated by adding all the joints for a maximum score of 28. A reduction in number of swollen joints compared to baseline indicates improvement. |
| Tender Joint Count (TJC) | Baseline, Month 3, Month 6 | Number of tender joints was determined by examining 28 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1; total was calculated by adding all the joints for a maximum score of 28. A reduction in number of tender joints compared to baseline indicates improvement. |
| Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [CRP]) | Baseline, Month 3, Month 6 | DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated from the SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count, CRP (milligram per liter \[mg/L\]) and patient global assessment (PtGA) of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 millimeter \[mm\] Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\]) where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated using the following formula: DAS28-4 (CRP) = 0.56\*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36\*ln(CRP+1) + 0.014\*PtGA + 0.96. Total score range: 0 to 10, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (CRP) less than or equal to (\<= 3.2) implied low disease activity and greater than (\>) 3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (CRP) less than (\<) 2.6 = clinical remission. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on DAS28-4 (CRP) | Month 3 and Month 6 | DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated from the SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count, CRP (mg/L) and PtGA of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated using the following formula: DAS28-4 (CRP) = 0.56\*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36\*ln(CRP+1) + 0.014\*PtGA + 0.96. Total score range: 0 to 10, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (CRP) \<= 3.2 implied low disease activity and \> 3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (CRP) \< 2.6 = clinical remission. |
| Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) | Baseline, Month 3, Month 6 | DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (millimeter per hour \[mm/hour\]), and PtGA of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28-4 (ESR) = 0.56\*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70\*ln(ESR) + 0.014\*PtGA. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) \<= 3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) \<2.6 = clinical remission. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on DAS28-4 (ESR) | Month 3 and Month 6 | DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and PtGA of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28-4 (ESR) = 0.56\*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70\*ln(ESR) + 0.014\*PtGA. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) \<= 3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) \<2.6 = clinical remission. |
| Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28-4 (CRP) | Month 3 and Month 6 | The DAS28-4 (CRP) \[described in Outcome Measure 5\] based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as good, moderate, or no response depending on the extent of change from baseline in DAS28 score and the level of disease activity (low, moderate or high) reached. Good responders: change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 \<= 3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 in the range of \>3.2 to \<=5.1 or change from baseline in the range of \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with DAS28 in the range of \>3.2 to \<=5.1 or change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 \>5.1 or change from baseline in the range of \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with DAS28 \<=3.2; non-responders: change from baseline \<= 0.6 or change from baseline in the range of \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with DAS28 \>5.1 or change from baseline \<=0.6 with DAS28 \<=3.2 or in the range of \>3.2 to \<=5.1. |
| Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response Based on DAS28-4 (ESR) | Month 3 and Month 6 | The DAS28-4 (ESR) \[described in Outcome Measure 7\] based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as good, moderate, or no response depending on the extent of change from baseline in DAS28 score and the level of disease activity (low, moderate or high) reached. Good responders: change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 \<= 3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 in the range of \>3.2 to \<=5.1 or change from baseline in the range of \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with DAS28 in the range of \>3.2 to \<=5.1 or change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 \>5.1 or change from baseline in the range of \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with DAS28 \<=3.2; non-responders: change from baseline \<= 0.6 or change from baseline in the range of \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with DAS28 \>5.1 or change from baseline \<=0.6 with DAS28 \<=3.2 or in the range of \>3.2 to \<=5.1. |
| Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) | Baseline, Month 3, Month 6 | The SDAI is the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGA and physician global assessment (PGA) assessed on 0-10 centimeter (cm) VAS; 0 = no disease activity and 10 = worst disease activity, and CRP (mg/dL). SDAI total score = 0-86. SDAI \<=3.3 indicates clinical remission, \>3.4 to 11 = low disease activity, \>11 to 26 = moderate disease activity, and \>26 = high (or severe) disease activity. |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on SDAI | Month 3 and Month 6 | The SDAI is the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGA and PGA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS; 0 = no disease activity and 10 = worst disease activity, and CRP (mg/dL). SDAI total score = 0-86. SDAI \<=3.3 indicates clinical remission, \>3.4 to 11 = low disease activity, \>11 to 26 = moderate disease activity, and \>26 = high (or severe) disease activity. |
| Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) | Baseline, Month 3, Month 6 | The CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGA and PGA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS; 0 = no disease activity and 10 = worst disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI \<= 2.8 indicates clinical remission, \>2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \>10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and \>22 = high (or severe) disease activity. |
| Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications of Tocilizumab | Baseline to Month 6 | Dose modification is any change in dose; this also included participants who stopped treatment with tocilizumab. |
| Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response | Baseline to Month 6 | ACR response: improvement in tender or swollen joint counts and improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria: 1) PGA of disease activity, 2) PtGA of disease activity, 3) patient's assessment of pain, 4) patient's assessment of functional disability via a health assessment questionnaire, and 5) CRP at each visit. ACR response is based on 66/68 total joint count. |
| Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity Score | Baseline, Month 3, Month 6 | Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity. |
| Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity | Baseline, Month 3, Month 6 | Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity. |
| Percentage of Participants in a PGA of Disease Activity Score Category | Baseline, Month 3, Month 6 | A categorical scale (Lickert scale) with the following categories: none, mild, moderate, severe and maximal was used to evaluate disease activity in clinical practice. |
| Patient Global Assessment of Pain | Baseline, Month 3, Month 6 | Patient Global Assessment of Pain was assessed using a 100 mm VAS (0 to 100) where 0 = no pain to 100 = worst possible pain. |
| Percentage of Participants With Morning Stiffness | Baseline, Month 3, Month 6 | The percentage of participants with morning stiffness (yes, no, or do not know) was assessed at each visit. |
| Percentage of Participants With Duration of Morning Stiffness | Baseline, Month 3, Month 6 | Duration of morning stiffness was defined as the time elapsed when participant woke up in the morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness. Duration was recorded as less than (\<) 30 minutes, 30 to 60 minutes, 60 to 120 minutes, 120 to 240 minutes, more than (\>) 240 minutes, or whole day. |
| Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Months 3 and 6 | Baseline, Month 3 and Month 6 | HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty. |
| Percentage of Participants With Concomitant Corticosteroids Treatment | Baseline to Month 6 | — |
| Number of Participants With Use of Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) During the Study | Baseline to Month 6 | — |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on CDAI | Month 3 and Month 6 | The CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGA and PGA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS; 0 = no disease activity and 10 = worst disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI \<= 2.8 indicates clinical remission, \>2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \>10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and \>22 = high (or severe) disease activity. |
Countries
Denmark, Norway, Sweden
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Tocilizumab Participants with rheumatoid arthritis who were considered for or treated with tocilizumab monotherapy within the clinical routine were observed for a period of 6 months. | 107 |
| Total | 107 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 11 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 10 |
| Overall Study | Other | 8 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Tocilizumab |
|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 56.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.3 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 84 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 23 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 13 / 107 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 10 / 107 |
Outcome results
Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Treatment at Month 6
Time frame: Month 6
Population: Safety Analysis Set
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants on Tocilizumab Treatment at Month 6 | 76.6 percentage of participants |
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Months 3 and 6
HAQ-DI: participant-reported assessment of ability to perform tasks in 8 categories of daily living activities: dress/groom; arise; eat; walk; reach; grip; hygiene; and common activities over past week. Each item scored on 4-point scale from 0 to 3: 0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do. Overall score was computed as the sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains answered. Total possible score range 0-3 where 0 = least difficulty and 3 = extreme difficulty.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3 and Month 6
Population: The FAS (HAQ) included all data from all participants who had at least a baseline value and one follow up value (Month 3 or Month 6) for HAQ.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Months 3 and 6 | Baseline (n=82) | 1.29 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.62 |
| Tocilizumab | Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Months 3 and 6 | Change at Month 3 (n=72) | -0.29 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.53 |
| Tocilizumab | Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Months 3 and 6 | Change at Month 6 (n=58) | -0.21 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.59 |
Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI)
The CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGA and PGA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS; 0 = no disease activity and 10 = worst disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI \<= 2.8 indicates clinical remission, \>2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \>10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and \>22 = high (or severe) disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Population: The FAS (CDAI) included all data from all participants who had at least a baseline value and one follow up value (Month 3 or Month 6) for CDAI. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) | Baseline (n=35) | 21.3 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 10.9 |
| Tocilizumab | Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) | Month 3 (n=33) | 10.9 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.9 |
| Tocilizumab | Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) | Month 6 (n=24) | 10.4 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.1 |
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [CRP])
DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated from the SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count, CRP (milligram per liter \[mg/L\]) and patient global assessment (PtGA) of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 millimeter \[mm\] Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\]) where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated using the following formula: DAS28-4 (CRP) = 0.56\*square root (sqrt) (TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36\*ln(CRP+1) + 0.014\*PtGA + 0.96. Total score range: 0 to 10, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (CRP) less than or equal to (\<= 3.2) implied low disease activity and greater than (\>) 3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (CRP) less than (\<) 2.6 = clinical remission.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Population: The FAS (DAS28-4 \[CRP\]) included all data from all participants who had at least a baseline value and one follow up value (Month 3 or Month 6) for DAS28-4 \[CRP\] assessment. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [CRP]) | Month 3 (n=69) | 3.17 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.34 |
| Tocilizumab | Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [CRP]) | Month 6 (n=60) | 2.98 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.21 |
| Tocilizumab | Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and C-Reactive Protein (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [CRP]) | Baseline (n=83) | 4.76 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.31 |
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR])
DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (millimeter per hour \[mm/hour\]), and PtGA of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28-4 (ESR) = 0.56\*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70\*ln(ESR) + 0.014\*PtGA. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) \<= 3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) \<2.6 = clinical remission.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Population: The FAS (DAS28-4 \[ESR\]) included all data from all participants who had at least a baseline value and one follow up value (Month 3 or Month 6) for DAS28-4 \[ESR\] assessment. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) | Baseline (n=59) | 5.03 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.39 |
| Tocilizumab | Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) | Month 3 (n=49) | 2.98 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.41 |
| Tocilizumab | Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (4 Variables) (DAS28-4 [ESR]) | Month 6 (n=45) | 2.64 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.34 |
Number of Participants With an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Response
ACR response: improvement in tender or swollen joint counts and improvement in 3 of the following 5 criteria: 1) PGA of disease activity, 2) PtGA of disease activity, 3) patient's assessment of pain, 4) patient's assessment of functional disability via a health assessment questionnaire, and 5) CRP at each visit. ACR response is based on 66/68 total joint count.
Time frame: Baseline to Month 6
Population: Data for ACR response was not reported because in clinical practice the 66/68 joint evaluation needed for this is not performed in the Sweden, Denmark and Norway, the 28 joint count is performed instead.
Number of Participants With Use of Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) During the Study
Time frame: Baseline to Month 6
Population: Safety Analysis Set
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Number of Participants With Use of Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARDs) During the Study | 1 participants |
Patient Global Assessment of Pain
Patient Global Assessment of Pain was assessed using a 100 mm VAS (0 to 100) where 0 = no pain to 100 = worst possible pain.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Population: The FAS (VAS pain) included all data from all participants who had at least a baseline value and one follow up value (Month 3 or Month 6) for VAS pain. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Patient Global Assessment of Pain | Baseline (n=83) | 60.5 mm | Standard Deviation 22.3 |
| Tocilizumab | Patient Global Assessment of Pain | Month 3 (n=73) | 38.4 mm | Standard Deviation 24.5 |
| Tocilizumab | Patient Global Assessment of Pain | Month 6 (n=68) | 39.9 mm | Standard Deviation 27.1 |
Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity Score
Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Population: The FAS (VAS disease activity \[patient\]) included all data from all participants who had at least a baseline value and one follow up value (Month 3 or Month 6) for VAS disease activity (patient). n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity Score | Baseline (n=87) | 61.6 mm | Standard Deviation 21.4 |
| Tocilizumab | Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity Score | Month 3 (n=77) | 41.3 mm | Standard Deviation 25.9 |
| Tocilizumab | Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity Score | Month 6 (n=69) | 41.6 mm | Standard Deviation 26.3 |
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on CDAI
The CDAI is the numerical sum of 4 outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGA and PGA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS; 0 = no disease activity and 10 = worst disease activity. CDAI total score = 0-76. CDAI \<= 2.8 indicates clinical remission, \>2.8 to 10 = low disease activity, \>10 to 22 = moderate disease activity, and \>22 = high (or severe) disease activity.
Time frame: Month 3 and Month 6
Population: FAS (CDAI). N (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on CDAI | Month 3 (n=33): Clinical remission | 12.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on CDAI | Month 3 (n=24): Clinical remission | 16.7 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on DAS28-4 (CRP)
DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated from the SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count, CRP (mg/L) and PtGA of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28-4 (CRP) was calculated using the following formula: DAS28-4 (CRP) = 0.56\*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.36\*ln(CRP+1) + 0.014\*PtGA + 0.96. Total score range: 0 to 10, higher score indicated more disease activity. DAS28-4 (CRP) \<= 3.2 implied low disease activity and \> 3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (CRP) \< 2.6 = clinical remission.
Time frame: Month 3 and Month 6
Population: FAS (DAS28-4 \[CRP\]). N (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on DAS28-4 (CRP) | Month 3 (n=69): Clinical remission | 36.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on DAS28-4 (CRP) | Month 6 (n=60): Clinical remission | 40.0 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on DAS28-4 (ESR)
DAS28-4 (ESR) was calculated from SJC and TJC using 28 joints count, ESR (mm/hour), and PtGA of disease activity (measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity). DAS28-4 (ESR) = 0.56\*sqrt(TJC28) + 0.28\*sqrt(SJC28) + 0.70\*ln(ESR) + 0.014\*PtGA. Total score range: 0-10, higher score=more disease activity. DAS28-4 (ESR) \<= 3.2 implied low disease activity and \>3.2 to 5.1 implied moderate to high disease activity, and DAS28-4 (ESR) \<2.6 = clinical remission.
Time frame: Month 3 and Month 6
Population: FAS (DAS28-4 \[ESR\]). N (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on DAS28-4 (ESR) | Month 3 (n=49): Clinical remission | 38.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on DAS28-4 (ESR) | Month 6 (n=45) : Clinical remission | 57.8 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on SDAI
The SDAI is the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGA and PGA assessed on 0-10 cm VAS; 0 = no disease activity and 10 = worst disease activity, and CRP (mg/dL). SDAI total score = 0-86. SDAI \<=3.3 indicates clinical remission, \>3.4 to 11 = low disease activity, \>11 to 26 = moderate disease activity, and \>26 = high (or severe) disease activity.
Time frame: Month 3 and Month 6
Population: FAS (SDAI). N (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on SDAI | Month 3 (n=31): Clinical remission | 12.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants Achieving Clinical Remission Based on SDAI | Month 6 (n=24): Clinical remission | 16.7 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants in a PGA of Disease Activity Score Category
A categorical scale (Lickert scale) with the following categories: none, mild, moderate, severe and maximal was used to evaluate disease activity in clinical practice.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Population: FAS (categorical scale \[physician\]) included all data from all participants who had at least a baseline value and one follow up value (Month 3 or Month 6) for rheumatoid arthritis illness categorical scale (physician). n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants in a PGA of Disease Activity Score Category | Baseline: Mild (n=51) | 2.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants in a PGA of Disease Activity Score Category | Baseline: Moderate (n=51) | 56.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants in a PGA of Disease Activity Score Category | Baseline: Severe (n=51) | 33.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants in a PGA of Disease Activity Score Category | Baseline: Maximal (n=51) | 7.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants in a PGA of Disease Activity Score Category | Month 3: None (n=46) | 8.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants in a PGA of Disease Activity Score Category | Month 3: Mild (n=46) | 52.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants in a PGA of Disease Activity Score Category | Month 3: Moderate (n=46) | 28.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants in a PGA of Disease Activity Score Category | Month 3: Severe (n=46) | 10.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants in a PGA of Disease Activity Score Category | Month 6: None (n=41) | 7.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants in a PGA of Disease Activity Score Category | Month 6: Mild (n=46) | 78.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants in a PGA of Disease Activity Score Category | Month 6: Moderate (n=46) | 4.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants in a PGA of Disease Activity Score Category | Month 6: Severe (n=46) | 9.8 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Concomitant Corticosteroids Treatment
Time frame: Baseline to Month 6
Population: Safety Analysis Set
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Concomitant Corticosteroids Treatment | 26.2 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications of Tocilizumab
Dose modification is any change in dose; this also included participants who stopped treatment with tocilizumab.
Time frame: Baseline to Month 6
Population: Safety Analysis Set
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Dose Modifications of Tocilizumab | 36.4 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Duration of Morning Stiffness
Duration of morning stiffness was defined as the time elapsed when participant woke up in the morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness. Duration was recorded as less than (\<) 30 minutes, 30 to 60 minutes, 60 to 120 minutes, 120 to 240 minutes, more than (\>) 240 minutes, or whole day.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Population: FAS (morning stiffness). N (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Duration of Morning Stiffness | Baseline: <30 minutes (n=49) | 10.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Duration of Morning Stiffness | Baseline: 30 to 60 minutes (n=49) | 24.5 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Duration of Morning Stiffness | Baseline: 60 to 120 minutes (n=49) | 32.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Duration of Morning Stiffness | Baseline: 120 to 240 minutes (n=49) | 20.4 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Duration of Morning Stiffness | Baseline: >240 minutes (n=49) | 6.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Duration of Morning Stiffness | Baseline: whole day (n=49) | 6.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Duration of Morning Stiffness | Month 3: <30 minutes (n=38) | 28.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Duration of Morning Stiffness | Month 3: 30 to 60 minutes (n=38) | 28.9 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Duration of Morning Stiffness | Month 3: 60 to 120 minutes (n=38) | 23.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Duration of Morning Stiffness | Month 3: 120 to 240 minutes (n=38) | 15.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Duration of Morning Stiffness | Month 3: >240 minutes (n=38) | 0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Duration of Morning Stiffness | Month 3: whole day (n=38) | 2.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Duration of Morning Stiffness | Month 6: <30 minutes (n=25) | 44.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Duration of Morning Stiffness | Month 6: 30 to 60 minutes (n=25) | 28.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Duration of Morning Stiffness | Month 6: 60 to 120 minutes (n=25) | 4.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Duration of Morning Stiffness | Month 6: 120 to 240 minutes (n=25) | 20.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Duration of Morning Stiffness | Month 6: >240 minutes (n=25) | 0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Duration of Morning Stiffness | Month 6: whole day (n=25) | 4.0 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response Based on DAS28-4 (ESR)
The DAS28-4 (ESR) \[described in Outcome Measure 7\] based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as good, moderate, or no response depending on the extent of change from baseline in DAS28 score and the level of disease activity (low, moderate or high) reached. Good responders: change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 \<= 3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 in the range of \>3.2 to \<=5.1 or change from baseline in the range of \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with DAS28 in the range of \>3.2 to \<=5.1 or change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 \>5.1 or change from baseline in the range of \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with DAS28 \<=3.2; non-responders: change from baseline \<= 0.6 or change from baseline in the range of \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with DAS28 \>5.1 or change from baseline \<=0.6 with DAS28 \<=3.2 or in the range of \>3.2 to \<=5.1.
Time frame: Month 3 and Month 6
Population: FAS (DAS28-4 \[ESR\]). N (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response Based on DAS28-4 (ESR) | Month 3: Good response (n=49) | 51.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response Based on DAS28-4 (ESR) | Month 3: Moderate response (n=49) | 34.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response Based on DAS28-4 (ESR) | Month 3: No response (n=49) | 14.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response Based on DAS28-4 (ESR) | Month 6: Good response (n=45) | 55.6 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response Based on DAS28-4 (ESR) | Month 6: Moderate response (n=45) | 31.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With EULAR Response Based on DAS28-4 (ESR) | Month 6: No response (n=45) | 13.3 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28-4 (CRP)
The DAS28-4 (CRP) \[described in Outcome Measure 5\] based EULAR response criteria were used to measure individual response as good, moderate, or no response depending on the extent of change from baseline in DAS28 score and the level of disease activity (low, moderate or high) reached. Good responders: change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 \<= 3.2; moderate responders: change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 in the range of \>3.2 to \<=5.1 or change from baseline in the range of \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with DAS28 in the range of \>3.2 to \<=5.1 or change from baseline \>1.2 with DAS28 \>5.1 or change from baseline in the range of \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with DAS28 \<=3.2; non-responders: change from baseline \<= 0.6 or change from baseline in the range of \>0.6 to \<=1.2 with DAS28 \>5.1 or change from baseline \<=0.6 with DAS28 \<=3.2 or in the range of \>3.2 to \<=5.1.
Time frame: Month 3 and Month 6
Population: FAS (DAS28-4 \[CRP\]). N (number of participants analyzed) = participants evaluable for this measure. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28-4 (CRP) | Month 3: Moderate response (n=69) | 33.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28-4 (CRP) | Month 3: Good response (n=69) | 43.5 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28-4 (CRP) | Month 3: No response (n=69) | 23.2 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28-4 (CRP) | Month 6: Good response (n=60) | 43.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28-4 (CRP) | Month 6: Moderate response (n=60) | 33.3 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Based on DAS28-4 (CRP) | Month 6: No response (n=60) | 23.3 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Morning Stiffness
The percentage of participants with morning stiffness (yes, no, or do not know) was assessed at each visit.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Population: FAS (morning stiffness) included all data from all participants who had at least a baseline value and one follow up value (Month 3 or 6) for morning stiffness. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Morning Stiffness | Baseline: Yes (n=89) | 55.1 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Morning Stiffness | Baseline: No (n=89) | 9.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Morning Stiffness | Baseline: Do Not Know (n=89) | 36.0 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Morning Stiffness | Month 3: Yes (n=80) | 47.5 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Morning Stiffness | Month 3: No (n=80) | 3.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Morning Stiffness | Month 3: Do Not Know (n=80) | 48.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Morning Stiffness | Month 6: Yes (n=68) | 36.8 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Morning Stiffness | Month 6: No (n=68) | 14.7 percentage of participants |
| Tocilizumab | Percentage of Participants With Morning Stiffness | Month 6: Do Not Know (n=68) | 48.5 percentage of participants |
Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity
Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity was measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS where 0=no disease activity and 100=worst disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Population: The FAS (VAS disease activity \[physician\] included all data from all participants who had at least a baseline value and one follow up value (Month 3 or Month 6) for VAS disease activity (physician). n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity | Month 3 (n=37) | 19.1 mm | Standard Deviation 17.2 |
| Tocilizumab | Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity | Baseline (n=42) | 34.0 mm | Standard Deviation 16.4 |
| Tocilizumab | Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity | Month 6 (n=30) | 15.2 mm | Standard Deviation 14.3 |
Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI)
The SDAI is the numerical sum of five outcome parameters: TJC and SJC based on a 28-joint assessment, PtGA and physician global assessment (PGA) assessed on 0-10 centimeter (cm) VAS; 0 = no disease activity and 10 = worst disease activity, and CRP (mg/dL). SDAI total score = 0-86. SDAI \<=3.3 indicates clinical remission, \>3.4 to 11 = low disease activity, \>11 to 26 = moderate disease activity, and \>26 = high (or severe) disease activity.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Population: The FAS (SDAI) included all data from all participants who had at least a baseline value and one follow up value (Month 3 or Month 6) for SDAI. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) | Baseline (n=34) | 22.46 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.33 |
| Tocilizumab | Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) | Month 3 (n=31) | 11.48 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 9.18 |
| Tocilizumab | Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) | Month 6 (n=24) | 10.73 Units on a scale | Standard Deviation 11.74 |
Swollen Joint Count (SJC)
Number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 28 joints and identifying when swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no swelling = 0, swelling =1; total was calculated by adding all the joints for a maximum score of 28. A reduction in number of swollen joints compared to baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Population: The Full Analysis Set (FAS) (swollen joint counts) included all data from all participants who had at least a baseline value and one follow up value (Month 3 or Month 6) for swollen joints. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Swollen Joint Count (SJC) | Month 6 (n=63) | 1.8 swollen joint count | Standard Deviation 2.5 |
| Tocilizumab | Swollen Joint Count (SJC) | Baseline (n=83) | 5.6 swollen joint count | Standard Deviation 5.2 |
| Tocilizumab | Swollen Joint Count (SJC) | Month 3 (n=73) | 2.5 swollen joint count | Standard Deviation 3.1 |
Tender Joint Count (TJC)
Number of tender joints was determined by examining 28 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1; total was calculated by adding all the joints for a maximum score of 28. A reduction in number of tender joints compared to baseline indicates improvement.
Time frame: Baseline, Month 3, Month 6
Population: The FAS (tender joint counts) included all data from all participants who had at least a baseline value and one follow up value (Month 3 or Month 6) for tender joints. n = participants evaluable for this measure at specified timepoint.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab | Tender Joint Count (TJC) | Baseline (n=83) | 8.6 tender joint count | Standard Deviation 6.9 |
| Tocilizumab | Tender Joint Count (TJC) | Month 3 (n=73) | 4.5 tender joint count | Standard Deviation 5.3 |
| Tocilizumab | Tender Joint Count (TJC) | Month 6 (n=63) | 3.7 tender joint count | Standard Deviation 4.9 |