Skip to content

Comparison of Two Daily Disposable Contact Lenses Over 1-week of Wear

Comparison of Two Daily Disposable Contact Lenses Over 1-week of Wear

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01669629
Enrollment
183
Registered
2012-08-21
Start date
2012-08-31
Completion date
2012-11-30
Last updated
2018-06-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Brief summary

This is a one week 2x2 crossover study comparing delefilcon A with etafilcon A, with a primary hypothesis of comparing the handling of each lens. Additional secondary markers are measured looking at subjective comfort and vision of the lenses.

Interventions

Daily wear soft contact lens for bilateral distance vision correction use.

DEVICEetafilcon A

Daily wear soft contact lens for bilateral distance vision correction use.

Sponsors

Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The subject must be between 18 and 45 years of age (inclusive) with no presbyopic add. * The subject must read, understand, and sign the STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT and receive a fully executed copy of the form. This should be recorded on the Case Report Form (CRF). * The subject must be willing to wear the study lenses for at least 8 hours per day, 7 days per week. * The subject must be a current successful soft contact lens wearer in both eyes * The subject must appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol. * The subject's subjective refraction must result in a vertex corrected spherical contact lens prescription in the range of -1.00D to -6.00D in each eye. * The subject's refractive astigmatism must be less than or equal to 0.75D in both eyes. * The subject must have best corrected visual acuity of 20/30 (6/9) or better in each eye. * The subject must require a visual correction in both eyes (no monofit or monovision allowed). * The subject must have normal eyes with no evidence of abnormality or disease. For the purposes of this study a normal eye is defined as one having: 1. No amblyopia. 2. No evidence of lid abnormality or infection (including blepharitis/meibomitis). 3. No conjunctival abnormality or infection. 4. No clinically significant slit lamp findings (i.e. stromal edema, vascularization, infiltrates or abnormal opacities). 5. No other active ocular disease.

Exclusion criteria

* Any ocular or systemic allergies or diseases that may interfere with contact lens wear. * Any systemic disease, autoimmune disease, or use of medication, which may interfere with contact lens wear. * Clinically significant (Grade 3 or 4) corneal edema, corneal vascularization, corneal staining, or any other abnormalities of the cornea which would contraindicate contact lens wear. * Clinically significant (Grade 3 or 4) tarsal abnormalities or bulbar injection which might interfere with contact lens wear. * Any ocular infection. * Any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid gas permeable contact lens wear. * Pregnancy or lactation. * No extended wear in the last 3 months. * Diabetes. * Infectious diseases (e.g. hepatitis, tuberculosis) or an immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV). * Employee or family member of the staff of the investigational site.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subject Reported Ease of Removal6-10 DaysMeasured on a 5 point-scale of excellence (excellent, very good, good, fair and poor) per a participant. Outcome is reported as aggregate number of subjects who reported Excellent/Very Good at their 1-week visit.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Subject Reported Overall Comfort6-10 DaysMeasured on a 5 point-scale of excellence (excellent, very good, good, fair and poor) per a participant. Summary is reported as an aggregate of Excellent/Very Good at their 1-week visit.
Subject Reported Overall Vision6-10 DaysMeasured on a 5 point-scale of excellence (excellent, very good, good, fair and poor) per a participant using an aggregate summary of excellent/very good at their 1-week visit.
Binocular Snellen Visual Acuity6-10 DaysSnellen visual acuity percentage of eyes with a visual acuity of eyesight testing at a 20/20 level or better by eye.
Overall Corneal Staining6-10 DaysProportion of subjects that have corneal staining on the 0-4 the NEI/Industry Workshop guidelines scale, measured by eye. Grade 1 or higher is reported as a percentage of total eyes.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

There were 183 subjects enrolled with 183 subjects randomized.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Subjects
All subjects who were enrolled in the study.
183
Total183

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Period 1protocol deviation12

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Subjects
Age, Continuous31.61 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.061
Region of Enrollment
United States
183 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
125 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
58 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 900 / 90
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 900 / 90

Outcome results

Primary

Subject Reported Ease of Removal

Measured on a 5 point-scale of excellence (excellent, very good, good, fair and poor) per a participant. Outcome is reported as aggregate number of subjects who reported Excellent/Very Good at their 1-week visit.

Time frame: 6-10 Days

Population: Subjects analyzed were those who enrolled, randomized, and completed the study per protocol.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Delefilcon ASubject Reported Ease of Removal47.2 percentage of participants
Etafilcon ASubject Reported Ease of Removal75.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Binocular Snellen Visual Acuity

Snellen visual acuity percentage of eyes with a visual acuity of eyesight testing at a 20/20 level or better by eye.

Time frame: 6-10 Days

Population: Subjects are those who were enrolled, randomized, and completed the study per protocol. Number of subjects is total in sample due to stratification by device and binocular measurement setting only.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Delefilcon ABinocular Snellen Visual Acuity95.0 percentage of eyes
Etafilcon ABinocular Snellen Visual Acuity94.7 percentage of eyes
Secondary

Overall Corneal Staining

Proportion of subjects that have corneal staining on the 0-4 the NEI/Industry Workshop guidelines scale, measured by eye. Grade 1 or higher is reported as a percentage of total eyes.

Time frame: 6-10 Days

Population: Subjects are those who were enrolled, randomized, and completed the study per protocol. Percentage of eyes.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Delefilcon AOverall Corneal Staining19.4 percentage of eyes
Etafilcon AOverall Corneal Staining11.9 percentage of eyes
Secondary

Subject Reported Overall Comfort

Measured on a 5 point-scale of excellence (excellent, very good, good, fair and poor) per a participant. Summary is reported as an aggregate of Excellent/Very Good at their 1-week visit.

Time frame: 6-10 Days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Delefilcon ASubject Reported Overall Comfort71.1 percentage of participants
Etafilcon ASubject Reported Overall Comfort61.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Subject Reported Overall Vision

Measured on a 5 point-scale of excellence (excellent, very good, good, fair and poor) per a participant using an aggregate summary of excellent/very good at their 1-week visit.

Time frame: 6-10 Days

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Delefilcon ASubject Reported Overall Vision76.1 percentage of participants
Etafilcon ASubject Reported Overall Vision72.2 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026