Skip to content

Evaluation of Office-Based Sheathed Flexible Nasopharyngoscopy

Evaluation of Office-Based Sheathed Flexible Nasopharyngoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01669278
Enrollment
0
Registered
2012-08-20
Start date
Unknown
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2016-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Otorhinolaryngologic Diseases

Keywords

sheath, flexible, endoscopy, otolaryngology, office

Brief summary

The processing of standard flexible nasopharyngoscopes is a time-consuming and costly process. The goal of this study is to determine the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of sheathed flexible endoscope in an office setting.

Detailed description

Methods: Randomized, single-blinded, controlled trial Setting: Office practice of two academic otolaryngologists at a community hospital. Primary Outcomes: Patient pain and discomfort, Optical quality Secondary Outcomes: Physician and nursing staff satisfaction Cost-analysis Comparison: No-sheath flexible nasopharyngoscopy versus sheathed flexible nasopharyngoscopy

Interventions

DEVICEEndosheath

Flexible sheathed nasopharyngolaryngoscopy

Sponsors

University of Alberta
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
17 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients presenting to the Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery service with complaints warranting flexible endoscopy

Exclusion criteria

* Known sinonasal masses or nasal polyposis * Unable to complete VAS surveys * Significant septal deviation * Unable to tolerate in-office flexible nasopharyngoscopy * Patients who refuse consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient pain and discomfort1 hourPatient Pain and Discomfort i. Patient's reported level of pain based on International Association for the Study of Pain definitions of pain on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale ii. Patient's reported level of discomfort on a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Optical quality1 hourImage quality of flexible endoscopy with or without endosheath.
Physician and staff satisfaction1 weekPhysician and support staff satisfaction with easy and efficiency of sheathed scopes.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026