Advanced or Metastatic (Medically or Surgically Unresectable) Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of the study is to compare the clinical benefit, as measured by duration of overall survival, of Nivolumab vs. Everolimus in subjects with advanced or metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma who have received prior anti-angiogenic therapy
Interventions
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Men & women ≥18 years of age * Histologic confirmation of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with clear-cell component * Advanced/metastatic RCC * Measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria * Received 1 or 2 prior anti-angiogenic therapy regimens in advanced or metastatic setting * No more than 3 total prior systemic treatment regimens in the advanced or metastatic setting, and evidence of progression on or after last treatment regimen received and within 6 months of enrollment * Karnofsky Performance Score ≥70%
Exclusion criteria
* Any Central Nervous System (CNS) metastases or history of CNS metastases * Prior therapy with an Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor * Any active known or suspected autoimmune disease * Uncontrolled adrenal insufficiency * Active chronic liver disease * Prior malignancy active within past 3 years, except for locally curable cancers Other protocol-defined inclusion/
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Survival (OS) at Primary Endpoint | Randomization until 398 deaths, up to May 2015 (approximately 30 months) | Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death. Participants that had not died were censored at last known date alive. Median OS time was calculated using Kaplan-Meier Estimates. Interim analysis for the Primary Endpoint occurred after 398 deaths (70% of the total OS events needed for final analysis). At that time the data monitoring committee noted that the pre-specified boundary for OS (nominal significance level p \< 0.0148) was crossed while no new safety signals that would affect continuation of the study were found. The study was stopped early by the Sponsor, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) and the interim analysis became the final analysis. As a result, participants in the everolimus groups could be assessed for a crossover to nivolumab treatment if they met all inclusion criteria. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Investigator-assessed Duration of Objective Response | From randomization to date of disease progression or death or censoring if no progression or death occurred (approximately 105 months) | Duration of objective response is defined as the time from study start date to response, CR or partial response, PR) to the date of the first documented tumor progression as determined by the investigator (per RECIST 1.1 criteria or clinical) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. For participants who neither progress nor die, the duration of objective response were censored at the same time they were censored for the primary definition. CR=Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm.; PR=At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, the baseline sum diameters used as reference. Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates. |
| Investigator-assessed Time to Objective Response | Randomization to date of first response (approximately 105 months) | Time to objective response is defined as the time from randomization to first response (complete response, CR or partial response, PR). CR=Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm.; PR=At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, the baseline sum diameters used as reference. |
| Investigator-assessed Time of Progression-free Survival (PFS) | from randomization up to disease progression or death (approximately up to 105 Months) | PFS=time from randomization to date of first documented tumor progression as determined by investigator (per RECIST 1.1 criteria or clinical) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants who die without a reported prior progression and without subsequent anti-cancer therapy were considered to have progressed on the date of their death. Participants who did not progress or die were censored on the date of their last evaluable tumor assessment. Participants who did not have any on-study tumor assessments and did not die were censored on the date they were randomized. Participants who received any subsequent anti-cancer therapy without a prior reported progression were censored at the last evaluable tumor assessment prior to or on initiation date of the subsequent anti-cancer therapy. Progressive disease: \>=20% increase in sum of target lesion diameters and sum must show absolute increase of \>=5mm; smallest sum on study as reference. Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates. |
| Overall Survival (OS) by Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression Level | Randomization to date of death or date of last contact for patients without documentation of death, up to May 2015 (approximately 30 months) | Quantifiable PD-L1 expression=percent of tumor cell membrane staining in a minimum of 100 evaluable tumor cells per Dako PD-L1 IHC assay. If the PD-L1 staining could not be quantified it was classified as: indeterminate=tumor cell membrane staining hampered for reasons attributed to biology of tumor biopsy specimen and not due to improper sample preparation or handling; not evaluable=tumor biopsy specimen was not optimally collected or prepared. Not evaluable determined from H&E process before the tumor biopsy specimen was sent for evaluation or from H&E process during PD-L1 evaluation; baseline PD-L1 expression=if more than one tumor biopsy specimen was available, the most recently collected specimen with a quantifiable result. If all specimens for a given participant are either indeterminate or not evaluable, then the PD-L1 expression was considered indeterminate as long as at least one specimen is indeterminate. Otherwise, PD-L1 expression was considered not evaluable. |
| Investigator-assessed Objective Response Rate (ORR) | from randomization up to disease progression or death (approximately up to 105 Months) | ORR is defined as Percentage of participants with a best response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) divided by number of randomized participants. CR=Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm.; PR=At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, the baseline sum diameters used as reference. Tumor assessments began at 8 weeks following randomization and continued every 8 weeks for the first year, then every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression or death. CIs used Clopper and Pearson. |
| Percentage of Participants With Disease-related Symptom Progression (DRSP) | from randomization up to disease progression or death (approximately up to 105 Months) | Disease-related symptom progression rate (DRSPR)=a decrease of two points in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index - Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) questionnaire relative to the participant's baseline FKSI-DRS score with no later increase above this threshold observed during the course of the study. The 9 items of the FKSI-DRS were summarized into a symptom scale ranging in score from 0 to 36, with 0 being the worst possible score and 36 being the best possible score. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 2 units was considered disease-related symptom progression only if it was the last one available for the participant. In order to consider a questionnaire received as valid, over 50% of the items were to be completed. Calculated by the Clopper-Pearson method for each treatment group. |
| Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid Tests | Day 1 to 30 days post study completion (approximately 106 months) | Aspartate aminotransferase, AST. Alanine aminotransaminase, ALT. Total bilirubin, tBIL. Thyroid stimulating hormone, TSH. Upper limit of normal (ULN). Units per Liter (U/L). Results reported in International System of Units (SI). |
| Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Day 1 to 30 days post study completion (approximately 106 months) | Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) version 4.0 in International System of Units (SI); Gr 3=Severe, Gr 4= Potentially Life-threatening or disabling. Hematology parameters=Hemoglobin (Gr 3: \< 8.0 g/dL), Platelet Count (Gr 3: 25.0 -\< 50.0\*10\^9 c/L; Gr 4: \< 25.0\*10\^9 c/L), Leukocyte Count (Gr 3: 1.0 -\< 2.0\*10\^3 c/µL; Gr4: \< 1.0\*10\^3 c/µL), Absolute Lymphocyte Count (Gr 3: 0.2 -\< 0.5\*10\^3 c/µL; Gr 4: \< 0.2\*10\^3 c/µL), Absolute Neutrophil Count (Gr 3: 0.5 - \< 1.0\*10\^3 c/µL; Gr 4: \< 0.5\*10\^3 c/µL). Liver Function parameters=Alkaline Phosphatase (Gr 3: \> 5.0 - 20.0 U/L \* ULN; Gr 4: \> 20.0 U/L \* ULN), AST (Gr 3: \> 5.0 - 20.0 U/L \* ULN; Gr 4: \> 20.0 U/L \* ULN), ALT (Gr 3: \> 5.0 - 20.0 U/L \* ULN; Gr 4: \> 20.0 U/L \* ULN), tBIL (Gr 3: \> 3.0 - 10.0 mg/dL \* ULN; Gr 4: \> 10.0 mg/dL \* ULN). Renal parameter=Creatinine (Grade: Gr3: \> 3.0 - 6.0 mg/dL \*ULN; Gr4: \> 6.0 mg/dL \*ULN). Cells per microliter (c/µL). Cells per Liter (c/L). Grams per deciliter (g/dL). Milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). |
| Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events | Day of first dose to 30 days post study completion (approximately 106 months) | Adverse event (AE) defined: any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. Serious adverse event (SAE) defined: a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. |
Countries
Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russia, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Pre-assignment details
803 Participants Treated
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Nivolumab Nivolumab at 3 mg/kg solution provided intravenously every 2 weeks until documented disease progression, discontinuation due to toxicity, withdrawal of consent or the study ends. | 410 |
| Everolimus Everolimus provided in 10 mg tablets by mouth daily until documented disease progression, discontinuation due to toxicity, withdrawal of consent or the study ends. | 411 |
| Total | 821 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Randomized (Pre-treatment) | Disease Progression | 0 | 1 |
| Randomized (Pre-treatment) | No Longer Meets Study Criteria | 2 | 1 |
| Randomized (Pre-treatment) | participant requested to be treated a local facility | 0 | 1 |
| Randomized (Pre-treatment) | Poor/Non-Compliance | 1 | 0 |
| Randomized (Pre-treatment) | Request to Discontinue Study Treatment | 0 | 3 |
| Randomized (Pre-treatment) | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 8 |
| Treatment Period | Administrative Reason by Sponsor | 5 | 1 |
| Treatment Period | Adverse Event Unrelated to Study Drug | 14 | 14 |
| Treatment Period | Death | 1 | 1 |
| Treatment Period | Disease Progression | 316 | 293 |
| Treatment Period | Maximal Clinical Benefit | 3 | 3 |
| Treatment Period | Other | 2 | 8 |
| Treatment Period | Request to Discontinue Study Treatment | 14 | 21 |
| Treatment Period | Study Drug Toxicity | 46 | 53 |
| Treatment Period | Withdrawal by Subject | 5 | 3 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Everolimus | Total | Nivolumab |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 61.9 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.43 | 61.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.66 | 60.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.87 |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants | 1 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 32 Participants | 74 Participants | 42 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 4 Participants | 5 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 7 Participants | 20 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 367 Participants | 720 Participants | 353 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 107 Participants | 202 Participants | 95 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 304 Participants | 619 Participants | 315 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 324 / 406 | 342 / 397 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 392 / 406 | 379 / 397 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 248 / 406 | 243 / 397 |
Outcome results
Overall Survival (OS) at Primary Endpoint
Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death. Participants that had not died were censored at last known date alive. Median OS time was calculated using Kaplan-Meier Estimates. Interim analysis for the Primary Endpoint occurred after 398 deaths (70% of the total OS events needed for final analysis). At that time the data monitoring committee noted that the pre-specified boundary for OS (nominal significance level p \< 0.0148) was crossed while no new safety signals that would affect continuation of the study were found. The study was stopped early by the Sponsor, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) and the interim analysis became the final analysis. As a result, participants in the everolimus groups could be assessed for a crossover to nivolumab treatment if they met all inclusion criteria.
Time frame: Randomization until 398 deaths, up to May 2015 (approximately 30 months)
Population: All randomized participants; any participants that was randomized to any treatment group in the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Nivolumab | Overall Survival (OS) at Primary Endpoint | 25.00 months |
| Everolimus | Overall Survival (OS) at Primary Endpoint | 19.55 months |
Investigator-assessed Duration of Objective Response
Duration of objective response is defined as the time from study start date to response, CR or partial response, PR) to the date of the first documented tumor progression as determined by the investigator (per RECIST 1.1 criteria or clinical) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. For participants who neither progress nor die, the duration of objective response were censored at the same time they were censored for the primary definition. CR=Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm.; PR=At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, the baseline sum diameters used as reference. Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates.
Time frame: From randomization to date of disease progression or death or censoring if no progression or death occurred (approximately 105 months)
Population: All randomized participants with a response; any participants that were randomized to any treatment group in the study and that had a response.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Nivolumab | Investigator-assessed Duration of Objective Response | 13.11 months |
| Everolimus | Investigator-assessed Duration of Objective Response | 10.18 months |
Investigator-assessed Objective Response Rate (ORR)
ORR is defined as Percentage of participants with a best response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) divided by number of randomized participants. CR=Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm.; PR=At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, the baseline sum diameters used as reference. Tumor assessments began at 8 weeks following randomization and continued every 8 weeks for the first year, then every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression or death. CIs used Clopper and Pearson.
Time frame: from randomization up to disease progression or death (approximately up to 105 Months)
Population: All randomized participants; any participants that was randomized to any treatment group in the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Nivolumab | Investigator-assessed Objective Response Rate (ORR) | 25.9 percentage of participants |
| Everolimus | Investigator-assessed Objective Response Rate (ORR) | 6.1 percentage of participants |
Investigator-assessed Time of Progression-free Survival (PFS)
PFS=time from randomization to date of first documented tumor progression as determined by investigator (per RECIST 1.1 criteria or clinical) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants who die without a reported prior progression and without subsequent anti-cancer therapy were considered to have progressed on the date of their death. Participants who did not progress or die were censored on the date of their last evaluable tumor assessment. Participants who did not have any on-study tumor assessments and did not die were censored on the date they were randomized. Participants who received any subsequent anti-cancer therapy without a prior reported progression were censored at the last evaluable tumor assessment prior to or on initiation date of the subsequent anti-cancer therapy. Progressive disease: \>=20% increase in sum of target lesion diameters and sum must show absolute increase of \>=5mm; smallest sum on study as reference. Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates.
Time frame: from randomization up to disease progression or death (approximately up to 105 Months)
Population: All randomized participants; any participants that was randomized to any treatment group in the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Nivolumab | Investigator-assessed Time of Progression-free Survival (PFS) | 4.21 months |
| Everolimus | Investigator-assessed Time of Progression-free Survival (PFS) | 4.50 months |
Investigator-assessed Time to Objective Response
Time to objective response is defined as the time from randomization to first response (complete response, CR or partial response, PR). CR=Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm.; PR=At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, the baseline sum diameters used as reference.
Time frame: Randomization to date of first response (approximately 105 months)
Population: All randomized participants with a response; any participants that was randomized to any treatment group in the study and that had a response.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Nivolumab | Investigator-assessed Time to Objective Response | 3.55 months |
| Everolimus | Investigator-assessed Time to Objective Response | 3.71 months |
Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid Tests
Aspartate aminotransferase, AST. Alanine aminotransaminase, ALT. Total bilirubin, tBIL. Thyroid stimulating hormone, TSH. Upper limit of normal (ULN). Units per Liter (U/L). Results reported in International System of Units (SI).
Time frame: Day 1 to 30 days post study completion (approximately 106 months)
Population: To all treated participants with evaluable measurements
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid Tests | ALT or AST > 5.0*ULN | 20 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid Tests | ALT or AST>3.0*ULN, tBIL>2.0 ULN, 1day | 3 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid Tests | ALT or AST>3.0*ULN, tBIL>2.0 ULN,30day | 4 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid Tests | ALT or AST > 20.0*ULN | 2 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid Tests | TSH > ULN | 159 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid Tests | ALT or AST > 10.0*ULN | 9 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid Tests | TSH < LLN | 60 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid Tests | Total Bilirubin > 2.0*ULN | 6 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid Tests | ALT or AST > 3.0*ULN | 32 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid Tests | ALT or AST>3.0*ULN, tBIL>2.0 ULN, 1day | 0 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid Tests | ALT or AST > 3.0*ULN | 15 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid Tests | ALT or AST > 5.0*ULN | 7 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid Tests | ALT or AST > 10.0*ULN | 1 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid Tests | ALT or AST > 20.0*ULN | 0 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid Tests | Total Bilirubin > 2.0*ULN | 2 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid Tests | ALT or AST>3.0*ULN, tBIL>2.0 ULN,30day | 1 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid Tests | TSH > ULN | 78 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid Tests | TSH < LLN | 60 Participants |
Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units
Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) version 4.0 in International System of Units (SI); Gr 3=Severe, Gr 4= Potentially Life-threatening or disabling. Hematology parameters=Hemoglobin (Gr 3: \< 8.0 g/dL), Platelet Count (Gr 3: 25.0 -\< 50.0\*10\^9 c/L; Gr 4: \< 25.0\*10\^9 c/L), Leukocyte Count (Gr 3: 1.0 -\< 2.0\*10\^3 c/µL; Gr4: \< 1.0\*10\^3 c/µL), Absolute Lymphocyte Count (Gr 3: 0.2 -\< 0.5\*10\^3 c/µL; Gr 4: \< 0.2\*10\^3 c/µL), Absolute Neutrophil Count (Gr 3: 0.5 - \< 1.0\*10\^3 c/µL; Gr 4: \< 0.5\*10\^3 c/µL). Liver Function parameters=Alkaline Phosphatase (Gr 3: \> 5.0 - 20.0 U/L \* ULN; Gr 4: \> 20.0 U/L \* ULN), AST (Gr 3: \> 5.0 - 20.0 U/L \* ULN; Gr 4: \> 20.0 U/L \* ULN), ALT (Gr 3: \> 5.0 - 20.0 U/L \* ULN; Gr 4: \> 20.0 U/L \* ULN), tBIL (Gr 3: \> 3.0 - 10.0 mg/dL \* ULN; Gr 4: \> 10.0 mg/dL \* ULN). Renal parameter=Creatinine (Grade: Gr3: \> 3.0 - 6.0 mg/dL \*ULN; Gr4: \> 6.0 mg/dL \*ULN). Cells per microliter (c/µL). Cells per Liter (c/L). Grams per deciliter (g/dL). Milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL).
Time frame: Day 1 to 30 days post study completion (approximately 106 months)
Population: To all treated participants with evaluable measurements
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Creatinine, Grade 4 | 3 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Platelet Count, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Leukocytes, Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Lymphocytes (absolute), Grade 3 | 28 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Lymphocytes (absolute), Grade 4 | 3 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Alanine Aminotransferase, Grade 3 | 12 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Bilirubin Total, Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Hemoglobin, Grade 3 | 33 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Hyponatremia, Grade 3 | 26 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Hyponatremia, Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Platelet Count, Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Leukocytes, Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Absolute Neutrophil Count, Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Absolute Neutrophil Count, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Alkaline Phosphatase, Grade 3 | 11 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Aspartate Aminotransferase, Grade 3 | 9 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Aspartate Aminotransferase, Grade 4 | 2 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Alanine Aminotransferase, Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Creatinine, Grade 3 | 5 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Hypercalcemia, Grade 3 | 7 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Hypercalcemia, Grade 4 | 4 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Hypocalcemia, Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Hypocalcemia, Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Hyperkalemia, Grade 3 | 11 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Hyperkalemia, Grade 4 | 3 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Hypokalemia, Grade 3 | 5 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Hypermagnesmia, Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Hypomagnesmia, Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Absolute Neutrophil Count, Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Platelet Count, Grade 3 | 6 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Hyperkalemia, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Alkaline Phosphatase, Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Leukocytes, Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Hypocalcemia, Grade 3 | 4 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Lymphocytes (absolute), Grade 3 | 43 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Aspartate Aminotransferase, Grade 3 | 6 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Absolute Neutrophil Count, Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Aspartate Aminotransferase, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Hyponatremia, Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Alanine Aminotransferase, Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Bilirubin Total, Grade 3 | 2 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Creatinine, Grade 3 | 5 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Hypocalcemia, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Hypercalcemia, Grade 3 | 1 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Hypermagnesmia, Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Alanine Aminotransferase, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Hyponatremia, Grade 3 | 22 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Hypokalemia, Grade 3 | 3 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Hemoglobin, Grade 3 | 61 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Creatinine, Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Platelet Count, Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Hyperkalemia, Grade 3 | 7 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Leukocytes, Grade 4 | 0 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Lymphocytes (absolute), Grade 4 | 6 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Hypomagnesmia, Grade 3 | 0 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units | Hypercalcemia, Grade 4 | 1 Participants |
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events
Adverse event (AE) defined: any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. Serious adverse event (SAE) defined: a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization.
Time frame: Day of first dose to 30 days post study completion (approximately 106 months)
Population: All treated participants; all participants who received at least one dose of nivolumab or everolimus
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events | Discontinued due to Drug-related AEs | 40 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events | Discontinued due to AEs | 85 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events | Adverse Events | 398 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events | SAEs | 211 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events | Drug related SAEs | 51 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events | Drug related AEs | 327 Participants |
| Nivolumab | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events | Deaths | 324 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events | Drug related SAEs | 55 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events | Discontinued due to Drug-related AEs | 51 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events | SAEs | 177 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events | Discontinued due to AEs | 82 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events | Drug related AEs | 353 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events | Adverse Events | 387 Participants |
| Everolimus | Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events | Deaths | 342 Participants |
Overall Survival (OS) by Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression Level
Quantifiable PD-L1 expression=percent of tumor cell membrane staining in a minimum of 100 evaluable tumor cells per Dako PD-L1 IHC assay. If the PD-L1 staining could not be quantified it was classified as: indeterminate=tumor cell membrane staining hampered for reasons attributed to biology of tumor biopsy specimen and not due to improper sample preparation or handling; not evaluable=tumor biopsy specimen was not optimally collected or prepared. Not evaluable determined from H&E process before the tumor biopsy specimen was sent for evaluation or from H&E process during PD-L1 evaluation; baseline PD-L1 expression=if more than one tumor biopsy specimen was available, the most recently collected specimen with a quantifiable result. If all specimens for a given participant are either indeterminate or not evaluable, then the PD-L1 expression was considered indeterminate as long as at least one specimen is indeterminate. Otherwise, PD-L1 expression was considered not evaluable.
Time frame: Randomization to date of death or date of last contact for patients without documentation of death, up to May 2015 (approximately 30 months)
Population: PD-L1 quantifiable participants; All randomized participants with quantifiable PD-L1 expression at baseline
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nivolumab | Overall Survival (OS) by Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression Level | Participant PD-L1 expression >=1% | 5.36 months |
| Nivolumab | Overall Survival (OS) by Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression Level | Participant PD-L1 expression <1% | 3.94 months |
| Everolimus | Overall Survival (OS) by Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression Level | Participant PD-L1 expression >=1% | 4.17 months |
| Everolimus | Overall Survival (OS) by Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression Level | Participant PD-L1 expression <1% | 4.67 months |
Percentage of Participants With Disease-related Symptom Progression (DRSP)
Disease-related symptom progression rate (DRSPR)=a decrease of two points in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index - Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) questionnaire relative to the participant's baseline FKSI-DRS score with no later increase above this threshold observed during the course of the study. The 9 items of the FKSI-DRS were summarized into a symptom scale ranging in score from 0 to 36, with 0 being the worst possible score and 36 being the best possible score. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 2 units was considered disease-related symptom progression only if it was the last one available for the participant. In order to consider a questionnaire received as valid, over 50% of the items were to be completed. Calculated by the Clopper-Pearson method for each treatment group.
Time frame: from randomization up to disease progression or death (approximately up to 105 Months)
Population: All randomized participants; any participants that was randomized to any treatment group in the study.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nivolumab | Percentage of Participants With Disease-related Symptom Progression (DRSP) | Disease-related Symptom Progression Rate (DRSPR) | 44.6 percentage of participants |
| Nivolumab | Percentage of Participants With Disease-related Symptom Progression (DRSP) | DRSPR Including Death and Investigator Progression | 95.5 percentage of participants |
| Everolimus | Percentage of Participants With Disease-related Symptom Progression (DRSP) | Disease-related Symptom Progression Rate (DRSPR) | 54.6 percentage of participants |
| Everolimus | Percentage of Participants With Disease-related Symptom Progression (DRSP) | DRSPR Including Death and Investigator Progression | 99.4 percentage of participants |
Extended Collection to Post Hoc Overall Survival (OS)
Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death. Participants that had not died were censored at last known date alive. Median OS time was calculated using Kaplan-Meier Estimates. Interim analysis for the Primary Endpoint occurred after 398 deaths (70% of the total OS events needed for final analysis). At that time the data monitoring committee noted that the pre-specified boundary for OS (nominal significance level p \< 0.0148) was crossed while no new safety signals that would affect continuation of the study were found. The study was stopped early by the Sponsor, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) and the interim analysis became the final analysis. As a result, participants in the everolimus groups could be assessed for a crossover to nivolumab treatment if they met all inclusion criteria. This outcome measure represents an updated version of the primary endpoint to include additional data collection that has occurred after the primary completion date.
Time frame: from randomization up to disease progression or death (approximately up to 105 months)
Population: All Randomized Participants
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Nivolumab | Extended Collection to Post Hoc Overall Survival (OS) | 25.82 Months |
| Everolimus | Extended Collection to Post Hoc Overall Survival (OS) | 19.55 Months |