Skip to content

Study of Nivolumab (BMS-936558) vs. Everolimus in Pre-Treated Advanced or Metastatic Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma (CheckMate 025)

A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study of Nivolumab (BMS-936558) vs. Everolimus in Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Who Have Received Prior Anti-Angiogenic Therapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01668784
Enrollment
821
Registered
2012-08-20
Start date
2012-10-09
Completion date
2021-07-19
Last updated
2022-08-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Advanced or Metastatic (Medically or Surgically Unresectable) Clear-cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to compare the clinical benefit, as measured by duration of overall survival, of Nivolumab vs. Everolimus in subjects with advanced or metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma who have received prior anti-angiogenic therapy

Interventions

BIOLOGICALNivolumab
DRUGEverolimus

Sponsors

Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Men & women ≥18 years of age * Histologic confirmation of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with clear-cell component * Advanced/metastatic RCC * Measurable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 criteria * Received 1 or 2 prior anti-angiogenic therapy regimens in advanced or metastatic setting * No more than 3 total prior systemic treatment regimens in the advanced or metastatic setting, and evidence of progression on or after last treatment regimen received and within 6 months of enrollment * Karnofsky Performance Score ≥70%

Exclusion criteria

* Any Central Nervous System (CNS) metastases or history of CNS metastases * Prior therapy with an Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor * Any active known or suspected autoimmune disease * Uncontrolled adrenal insufficiency * Active chronic liver disease * Prior malignancy active within past 3 years, except for locally curable cancers Other protocol-defined inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS) at Primary EndpointRandomization until 398 deaths, up to May 2015 (approximately 30 months)Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death. Participants that had not died were censored at last known date alive. Median OS time was calculated using Kaplan-Meier Estimates. Interim analysis for the Primary Endpoint occurred after 398 deaths (70% of the total OS events needed for final analysis). At that time the data monitoring committee noted that the pre-specified boundary for OS (nominal significance level p \< 0.0148) was crossed while no new safety signals that would affect continuation of the study were found. The study was stopped early by the Sponsor, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) and the interim analysis became the final analysis. As a result, participants in the everolimus groups could be assessed for a crossover to nivolumab treatment if they met all inclusion criteria.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Investigator-assessed Duration of Objective ResponseFrom randomization to date of disease progression or death or censoring if no progression or death occurred (approximately 105 months)Duration of objective response is defined as the time from study start date to response, CR or partial response, PR) to the date of the first documented tumor progression as determined by the investigator (per RECIST 1.1 criteria or clinical) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. For participants who neither progress nor die, the duration of objective response were censored at the same time they were censored for the primary definition. CR=Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm.; PR=At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, the baseline sum diameters used as reference. Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates.
Investigator-assessed Time to Objective ResponseRandomization to date of first response (approximately 105 months)Time to objective response is defined as the time from randomization to first response (complete response, CR or partial response, PR). CR=Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm.; PR=At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, the baseline sum diameters used as reference.
Investigator-assessed Time of Progression-free Survival (PFS)from randomization up to disease progression or death (approximately up to 105 Months)PFS=time from randomization to date of first documented tumor progression as determined by investigator (per RECIST 1.1 criteria or clinical) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants who die without a reported prior progression and without subsequent anti-cancer therapy were considered to have progressed on the date of their death. Participants who did not progress or die were censored on the date of their last evaluable tumor assessment. Participants who did not have any on-study tumor assessments and did not die were censored on the date they were randomized. Participants who received any subsequent anti-cancer therapy without a prior reported progression were censored at the last evaluable tumor assessment prior to or on initiation date of the subsequent anti-cancer therapy. Progressive disease: \>=20% increase in sum of target lesion diameters and sum must show absolute increase of \>=5mm; smallest sum on study as reference. Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates.
Overall Survival (OS) by Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression LevelRandomization to date of death or date of last contact for patients without documentation of death, up to May 2015 (approximately 30 months)Quantifiable PD-L1 expression=percent of tumor cell membrane staining in a minimum of 100 evaluable tumor cells per Dako PD-L1 IHC assay. If the PD-L1 staining could not be quantified it was classified as: indeterminate=tumor cell membrane staining hampered for reasons attributed to biology of tumor biopsy specimen and not due to improper sample preparation or handling; not evaluable=tumor biopsy specimen was not optimally collected or prepared. Not evaluable determined from H&E process before the tumor biopsy specimen was sent for evaluation or from H&E process during PD-L1 evaluation; baseline PD-L1 expression=if more than one tumor biopsy specimen was available, the most recently collected specimen with a quantifiable result. If all specimens for a given participant are either indeterminate or not evaluable, then the PD-L1 expression was considered indeterminate as long as at least one specimen is indeterminate. Otherwise, PD-L1 expression was considered not evaluable.
Investigator-assessed Objective Response Rate (ORR)from randomization up to disease progression or death (approximately up to 105 Months)ORR is defined as Percentage of participants with a best response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) divided by number of randomized participants. CR=Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm.; PR=At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, the baseline sum diameters used as reference. Tumor assessments began at 8 weeks following randomization and continued every 8 weeks for the first year, then every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression or death. CIs used Clopper and Pearson.
Percentage of Participants With Disease-related Symptom Progression (DRSP)from randomization up to disease progression or death (approximately up to 105 Months)Disease-related symptom progression rate (DRSPR)=a decrease of two points in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index - Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) questionnaire relative to the participant's baseline FKSI-DRS score with no later increase above this threshold observed during the course of the study. The 9 items of the FKSI-DRS were summarized into a symptom scale ranging in score from 0 to 36, with 0 being the worst possible score and 36 being the best possible score. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 2 units was considered disease-related symptom progression only if it was the last one available for the participant. In order to consider a questionnaire received as valid, over 50% of the items were to be completed. Calculated by the Clopper-Pearson method for each treatment group.
Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid TestsDay 1 to 30 days post study completion (approximately 106 months)Aspartate aminotransferase, AST. Alanine aminotransaminase, ALT. Total bilirubin, tBIL. Thyroid stimulating hormone, TSH. Upper limit of normal (ULN). Units per Liter (U/L). Results reported in International System of Units (SI).
Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsDay 1 to 30 days post study completion (approximately 106 months)Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) version 4.0 in International System of Units (SI); Gr 3=Severe, Gr 4= Potentially Life-threatening or disabling. Hematology parameters=Hemoglobin (Gr 3: \< 8.0 g/dL), Platelet Count (Gr 3: 25.0 -\< 50.0\*10\^9 c/L; Gr 4: \< 25.0\*10\^9 c/L), Leukocyte Count (Gr 3: 1.0 -\< 2.0\*10\^3 c/µL; Gr4: \< 1.0\*10\^3 c/µL), Absolute Lymphocyte Count (Gr 3: 0.2 -\< 0.5\*10\^3 c/µL; Gr 4: \< 0.2\*10\^3 c/µL), Absolute Neutrophil Count (Gr 3: 0.5 - \< 1.0\*10\^3 c/µL; Gr 4: \< 0.5\*10\^3 c/µL). Liver Function parameters=Alkaline Phosphatase (Gr 3: \> 5.0 - 20.0 U/L \* ULN; Gr 4: \> 20.0 U/L \* ULN), AST (Gr 3: \> 5.0 - 20.0 U/L \* ULN; Gr 4: \> 20.0 U/L \* ULN), ALT (Gr 3: \> 5.0 - 20.0 U/L \* ULN; Gr 4: \> 20.0 U/L \* ULN), tBIL (Gr 3: \> 3.0 - 10.0 mg/dL \* ULN; Gr 4: \> 10.0 mg/dL \* ULN). Renal parameter=Creatinine (Grade: Gr3: \> 3.0 - 6.0 mg/dL \*ULN; Gr4: \> 6.0 mg/dL \*ULN). Cells per microliter (c/µL). Cells per Liter (c/L). Grams per deciliter (g/dL). Milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL).
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse EventsDay of first dose to 30 days post study completion (approximately 106 months)Adverse event (AE) defined: any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. Serious adverse event (SAE) defined: a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Brazil, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Norway, Poland, Romania, Russia, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

803 Participants Treated

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Nivolumab
Nivolumab at 3 mg/kg solution provided intravenously every 2 weeks until documented disease progression, discontinuation due to toxicity, withdrawal of consent or the study ends.
410
Everolimus
Everolimus provided in 10 mg tablets by mouth daily until documented disease progression, discontinuation due to toxicity, withdrawal of consent or the study ends.
411
Total821

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Randomized (Pre-treatment)Disease Progression01
Randomized (Pre-treatment)No Longer Meets Study Criteria21
Randomized (Pre-treatment)participant requested to be treated a local facility01
Randomized (Pre-treatment)Poor/Non-Compliance10
Randomized (Pre-treatment)Request to Discontinue Study Treatment03
Randomized (Pre-treatment)Withdrawal by Subject18
Treatment PeriodAdministrative Reason by Sponsor51
Treatment PeriodAdverse Event Unrelated to Study Drug1414
Treatment PeriodDeath11
Treatment PeriodDisease Progression316293
Treatment PeriodMaximal Clinical Benefit33
Treatment PeriodOther28
Treatment PeriodRequest to Discontinue Study Treatment1421
Treatment PeriodStudy Drug Toxicity4653
Treatment PeriodWithdrawal by Subject53

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEverolimusTotalNivolumab
Age, Continuous61.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.43
61.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.66
60.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.87
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
32 Participants74 Participants42 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants5 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
7 Participants20 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
367 Participants720 Participants353 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
107 Participants202 Participants95 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
304 Participants619 Participants315 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
324 / 406342 / 397
other
Total, other adverse events
392 / 406379 / 397
serious
Total, serious adverse events
248 / 406243 / 397

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival (OS) at Primary Endpoint

Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death. Participants that had not died were censored at last known date alive. Median OS time was calculated using Kaplan-Meier Estimates. Interim analysis for the Primary Endpoint occurred after 398 deaths (70% of the total OS events needed for final analysis). At that time the data monitoring committee noted that the pre-specified boundary for OS (nominal significance level p \< 0.0148) was crossed while no new safety signals that would affect continuation of the study were found. The study was stopped early by the Sponsor, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) and the interim analysis became the final analysis. As a result, participants in the everolimus groups could be assessed for a crossover to nivolumab treatment if they met all inclusion criteria.

Time frame: Randomization until 398 deaths, up to May 2015 (approximately 30 months)

Population: All randomized participants; any participants that was randomized to any treatment group in the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
NivolumabOverall Survival (OS) at Primary Endpoint25.00 months
EverolimusOverall Survival (OS) at Primary Endpoint19.55 months
p-value: 0.001898.52% CI: [0.57, 0.93]Log Rank
Secondary

Investigator-assessed Duration of Objective Response

Duration of objective response is defined as the time from study start date to response, CR or partial response, PR) to the date of the first documented tumor progression as determined by the investigator (per RECIST 1.1 criteria or clinical) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. For participants who neither progress nor die, the duration of objective response were censored at the same time they were censored for the primary definition. CR=Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm.; PR=At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, the baseline sum diameters used as reference. Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates.

Time frame: From randomization to date of disease progression or death or censoring if no progression or death occurred (approximately 105 months)

Population: All randomized participants with a response; any participants that were randomized to any treatment group in the study and that had a response.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
NivolumabInvestigator-assessed Duration of Objective Response13.11 months
EverolimusInvestigator-assessed Duration of Objective Response10.18 months
Secondary

Investigator-assessed Objective Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is defined as Percentage of participants with a best response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) divided by number of randomized participants. CR=Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm.; PR=At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, the baseline sum diameters used as reference. Tumor assessments began at 8 weeks following randomization and continued every 8 weeks for the first year, then every 12 weeks thereafter until disease progression or death. CIs used Clopper and Pearson.

Time frame: from randomization up to disease progression or death (approximately up to 105 Months)

Population: All randomized participants; any participants that was randomized to any treatment group in the study.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
NivolumabInvestigator-assessed Objective Response Rate (ORR)25.9 percentage of participants
EverolimusInvestigator-assessed Objective Response Rate (ORR)6.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Investigator-assessed Time of Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS=time from randomization to date of first documented tumor progression as determined by investigator (per RECIST 1.1 criteria or clinical) or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Participants who die without a reported prior progression and without subsequent anti-cancer therapy were considered to have progressed on the date of their death. Participants who did not progress or die were censored on the date of their last evaluable tumor assessment. Participants who did not have any on-study tumor assessments and did not die were censored on the date they were randomized. Participants who received any subsequent anti-cancer therapy without a prior reported progression were censored at the last evaluable tumor assessment prior to or on initiation date of the subsequent anti-cancer therapy. Progressive disease: \>=20% increase in sum of target lesion diameters and sum must show absolute increase of \>=5mm; smallest sum on study as reference. Based on Kaplan-Meier Estimates.

Time frame: from randomization up to disease progression or death (approximately up to 105 Months)

Population: All randomized participants; any participants that was randomized to any treatment group in the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
NivolumabInvestigator-assessed Time of Progression-free Survival (PFS)4.21 months
EverolimusInvestigator-assessed Time of Progression-free Survival (PFS)4.50 months
p-value: 0.03495% CI: [0.72, 0.99]Log Rank
Secondary

Investigator-assessed Time to Objective Response

Time to objective response is defined as the time from randomization to first response (complete response, CR or partial response, PR). CR=Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \< 10 mm.; PR=At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, the baseline sum diameters used as reference.

Time frame: Randomization to date of first response (approximately 105 months)

Population: All randomized participants with a response; any participants that was randomized to any treatment group in the study and that had a response.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
NivolumabInvestigator-assessed Time to Objective Response3.55 months
EverolimusInvestigator-assessed Time to Objective Response3.71 months
Secondary

Number of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid Tests

Aspartate aminotransferase, AST. Alanine aminotransaminase, ALT. Total bilirubin, tBIL. Thyroid stimulating hormone, TSH. Upper limit of normal (ULN). Units per Liter (U/L). Results reported in International System of Units (SI).

Time frame: Day 1 to 30 days post study completion (approximately 106 months)

Population: To all treated participants with evaluable measurements

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NivolumabNumber of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid TestsALT or AST > 5.0*ULN20 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid TestsALT or AST>3.0*ULN, tBIL>2.0 ULN, 1day3 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid TestsALT or AST>3.0*ULN, tBIL>2.0 ULN,30day4 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid TestsALT or AST > 20.0*ULN2 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid TestsTSH > ULN159 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid TestsALT or AST > 10.0*ULN9 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid TestsTSH < LLN60 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid TestsTotal Bilirubin > 2.0*ULN6 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid TestsALT or AST > 3.0*ULN32 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid TestsALT or AST>3.0*ULN, tBIL>2.0 ULN, 1day0 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid TestsALT or AST > 3.0*ULN15 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid TestsALT or AST > 5.0*ULN7 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid TestsALT or AST > 10.0*ULN1 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid TestsALT or AST > 20.0*ULN0 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid TestsTotal Bilirubin > 2.0*ULN2 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid TestsALT or AST>3.0*ULN, tBIL>2.0 ULN,30day1 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid TestsTSH > ULN78 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants Meeting Marked Laboratory Abnormality Criteria in Specific Liver and Thyroid TestsTSH < LLN60 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI Units

Common Terminology Criteria (CTC) version 4.0 in International System of Units (SI); Gr 3=Severe, Gr 4= Potentially Life-threatening or disabling. Hematology parameters=Hemoglobin (Gr 3: \< 8.0 g/dL), Platelet Count (Gr 3: 25.0 -\< 50.0\*10\^9 c/L; Gr 4: \< 25.0\*10\^9 c/L), Leukocyte Count (Gr 3: 1.0 -\< 2.0\*10\^3 c/µL; Gr4: \< 1.0\*10\^3 c/µL), Absolute Lymphocyte Count (Gr 3: 0.2 -\< 0.5\*10\^3 c/µL; Gr 4: \< 0.2\*10\^3 c/µL), Absolute Neutrophil Count (Gr 3: 0.5 - \< 1.0\*10\^3 c/µL; Gr 4: \< 0.5\*10\^3 c/µL). Liver Function parameters=Alkaline Phosphatase (Gr 3: \> 5.0 - 20.0 U/L \* ULN; Gr 4: \> 20.0 U/L \* ULN), AST (Gr 3: \> 5.0 - 20.0 U/L \* ULN; Gr 4: \> 20.0 U/L \* ULN), ALT (Gr 3: \> 5.0 - 20.0 U/L \* ULN; Gr 4: \> 20.0 U/L \* ULN), tBIL (Gr 3: \> 3.0 - 10.0 mg/dL \* ULN; Gr 4: \> 10.0 mg/dL \* ULN). Renal parameter=Creatinine (Grade: Gr3: \> 3.0 - 6.0 mg/dL \*ULN; Gr4: \> 6.0 mg/dL \*ULN). Cells per microliter (c/µL). Cells per Liter (c/L). Grams per deciliter (g/dL). Milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL).

Time frame: Day 1 to 30 days post study completion (approximately 106 months)

Population: To all treated participants with evaluable measurements

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsCreatinine, Grade 43 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsPlatelet Count, Grade 40 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsLeukocytes, Grade 30 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsLymphocytes (absolute), Grade 328 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsLymphocytes (absolute), Grade 43 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsAlanine Aminotransferase, Grade 312 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsBilirubin Total, Grade 33 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsHemoglobin, Grade 333 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsHyponatremia, Grade 326 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsHyponatremia, Grade 41 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsPlatelet Count, Grade 31 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsLeukocytes, Grade 41 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsAbsolute Neutrophil Count, Grade 30 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsAbsolute Neutrophil Count, Grade 40 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsAlkaline Phosphatase, Grade 311 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsAspartate Aminotransferase, Grade 39 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsAspartate Aminotransferase, Grade 42 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsAlanine Aminotransferase, Grade 41 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsCreatinine, Grade 35 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsHypercalcemia, Grade 37 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsHypercalcemia, Grade 44 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsHypocalcemia, Grade 32 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsHypocalcemia, Grade 41 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsHyperkalemia, Grade 311 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsHyperkalemia, Grade 43 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsHypokalemia, Grade 35 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsHypermagnesmia, Grade 33 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsHypomagnesmia, Grade 31 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsAbsolute Neutrophil Count, Grade 41 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsPlatelet Count, Grade 36 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsHyperkalemia, Grade 40 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsAlkaline Phosphatase, Grade 33 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsLeukocytes, Grade 31 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsHypocalcemia, Grade 34 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsLymphocytes (absolute), Grade 343 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsAspartate Aminotransferase, Grade 36 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsAbsolute Neutrophil Count, Grade 32 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsAspartate Aminotransferase, Grade 40 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsHyponatremia, Grade 41 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsAlanine Aminotransferase, Grade 33 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsBilirubin Total, Grade 32 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsCreatinine, Grade 35 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsHypocalcemia, Grade 40 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsHypercalcemia, Grade 31 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsHypermagnesmia, Grade 30 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsAlanine Aminotransferase, Grade 40 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsHyponatremia, Grade 322 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsHypokalemia, Grade 33 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsHemoglobin, Grade 361 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsCreatinine, Grade 41 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsPlatelet Count, Grade 41 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsHyperkalemia, Grade 37 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsLeukocytes, Grade 40 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsLymphocytes (absolute), Grade 46 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsHypomagnesmia, Grade 30 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Abnormal Hematology and Serum Chemistry Laboratory Parameters by Worse CTC Grade - SI UnitsHypercalcemia, Grade 41 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse Events

Adverse event (AE) defined: any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. Serious adverse event (SAE) defined: a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization.

Time frame: Day of first dose to 30 days post study completion (approximately 106 months)

Population: All treated participants; all participants who received at least one dose of nivolumab or everolimus

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse EventsDiscontinued due to Drug-related AEs40 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse EventsDiscontinued due to AEs85 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse EventsAdverse Events398 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse EventsSAEs211 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse EventsDrug related SAEs51 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse EventsDrug related AEs327 Participants
NivolumabNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse EventsDeaths324 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse EventsDrug related SAEs55 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse EventsDiscontinued due to Drug-related AEs51 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse EventsSAEs177 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse EventsDiscontinued due to AEs82 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse EventsDrug related AEs353 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse EventsAdverse Events387 Participants
EverolimusNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse Events, Death, Discontinuation Due to Adverse EventsDeaths342 Participants
Secondary

Overall Survival (OS) by Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression Level

Quantifiable PD-L1 expression=percent of tumor cell membrane staining in a minimum of 100 evaluable tumor cells per Dako PD-L1 IHC assay. If the PD-L1 staining could not be quantified it was classified as: indeterminate=tumor cell membrane staining hampered for reasons attributed to biology of tumor biopsy specimen and not due to improper sample preparation or handling; not evaluable=tumor biopsy specimen was not optimally collected or prepared. Not evaluable determined from H&E process before the tumor biopsy specimen was sent for evaluation or from H&E process during PD-L1 evaluation; baseline PD-L1 expression=if more than one tumor biopsy specimen was available, the most recently collected specimen with a quantifiable result. If all specimens for a given participant are either indeterminate or not evaluable, then the PD-L1 expression was considered indeterminate as long as at least one specimen is indeterminate. Otherwise, PD-L1 expression was considered not evaluable.

Time frame: Randomization to date of death or date of last contact for patients without documentation of death, up to May 2015 (approximately 30 months)

Population: PD-L1 quantifiable participants; All randomized participants with quantifiable PD-L1 expression at baseline

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
NivolumabOverall Survival (OS) by Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression LevelParticipant PD-L1 expression >=1%5.36 months
NivolumabOverall Survival (OS) by Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression LevelParticipant PD-L1 expression <1%3.94 months
EverolimusOverall Survival (OS) by Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression LevelParticipant PD-L1 expression >=1%4.17 months
EverolimusOverall Survival (OS) by Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression LevelParticipant PD-L1 expression <1%4.67 months
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Disease-related Symptom Progression (DRSP)

Disease-related symptom progression rate (DRSPR)=a decrease of two points in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index - Disease Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) questionnaire relative to the participant's baseline FKSI-DRS score with no later increase above this threshold observed during the course of the study. The 9 items of the FKSI-DRS were summarized into a symptom scale ranging in score from 0 to 36, with 0 being the worst possible score and 36 being the best possible score. A single measure reporting a decrease of at least 2 units was considered disease-related symptom progression only if it was the last one available for the participant. In order to consider a questionnaire received as valid, over 50% of the items were to be completed. Calculated by the Clopper-Pearson method for each treatment group.

Time frame: from randomization up to disease progression or death (approximately up to 105 Months)

Population: All randomized participants; any participants that was randomized to any treatment group in the study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
NivolumabPercentage of Participants With Disease-related Symptom Progression (DRSP)Disease-related Symptom Progression Rate (DRSPR)44.6 percentage of participants
NivolumabPercentage of Participants With Disease-related Symptom Progression (DRSP)DRSPR Including Death and Investigator Progression95.5 percentage of participants
EverolimusPercentage of Participants With Disease-related Symptom Progression (DRSP)Disease-related Symptom Progression Rate (DRSPR)54.6 percentage of participants
EverolimusPercentage of Participants With Disease-related Symptom Progression (DRSP)DRSPR Including Death and Investigator Progression99.4 percentage of participants
Post Hoc

Extended Collection to Post Hoc Overall Survival (OS)

Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death. Participants that had not died were censored at last known date alive. Median OS time was calculated using Kaplan-Meier Estimates. Interim analysis for the Primary Endpoint occurred after 398 deaths (70% of the total OS events needed for final analysis). At that time the data monitoring committee noted that the pre-specified boundary for OS (nominal significance level p \< 0.0148) was crossed while no new safety signals that would affect continuation of the study were found. The study was stopped early by the Sponsor, Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS) and the interim analysis became the final analysis. As a result, participants in the everolimus groups could be assessed for a crossover to nivolumab treatment if they met all inclusion criteria. This outcome measure represents an updated version of the primary endpoint to include additional data collection that has occurred after the primary completion date.

Time frame: from randomization up to disease progression or death (approximately up to 105 months)

Population: All Randomized Participants

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
NivolumabExtended Collection to Post Hoc Overall Survival (OS)25.82 Months
EverolimusExtended Collection to Post Hoc Overall Survival (OS)19.55 Months
p-value: 0.000195% CI: [0.63, 0.86]Log Rank

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 23, 2026