Skip to content

A Phase II Trial to Compare a Liquid-frozen and a Freeze-dried Formulation of IMVAMUNE (MVA-BN®) Smallpox Vaccine in Vaccinia-naïve Healthy Subjects

A Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter Phase II Trial to Compare the Immunogenicity and Safety of a Liquid-frozen and a Freeze-dried Formulation of IMVAMUNE® (MVA-BN®) Smallpox Vaccine in Vaccinia-naïve Healthy Subjects

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01668537
Enrollment
651
Registered
2012-08-20
Start date
2013-03-31
Completion date
2014-06-30
Last updated
2020-10-12

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Smallpox

Brief summary

A randomized, double-blind, multicenter Phase II trial to compare the immunogenicity and safety of a liquid-frozen and a freeze-dried formulation of IMVAMUNE (MVA-BN®) smallpox vaccine in vaccinia-naïve healthy subjects

Interventions

BIOLOGICALLF formulation of IMVAMUNE®
BIOLOGICALFD formulation of IMVAMUNE®

Sponsors

Bavarian Nordic
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 55 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Male and female subjects, 18-55 years of age 2. The subject has read, signed and dated informed consent form, having been advised of the risks and benefits of the trial in a language understood by the subject and prior to performance of any trial specific procedures and has signed the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) authorization form 3. Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 18.5 and \< 35 4. Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must have used an acceptable method of contraception for 30 days prior to the first vaccination, must agree to use an acceptable method of contraception during the trial, and must avoid becoming pregnant for at least 28 days after the last vaccination. A woman is considered of childbearing potential unless post-menopausal or with a history of hysterectomy. (Acceptable contraception methods are restricted to abstinence, barrier contraceptives, intrauterine contraceptive devices or licensed hormonal products) 5. WOCBP must have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening (SCR) and a negative urine pregnancy test within 24 hours prior to each vaccination 6. White blood cells ≥ 2500/mm3 and \< ULN 7. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) within normal limits 8. Hemoglobin within normal limits 9. Platelets within normal limits 10. Adequate renal function defined as a calculated Creatinine Clearance (CrCl) \> 60 ml/min as estimated by the Cockcroft-Gault equation: * For men: (140 - age in years) x (body weight in kg) ÷ (serum creatinine in mg/dl x 72) = CrCl (ml/min) * For women: multiply the result by 0.85 = CrCl (ml/min) 11. Adequate hepatic function defined as: * Total bilirubin ≤ 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) in the absence of other evidence of significant liver disease * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and alkaline phosphatase \< 1.5 x ULN 12. Troponin I \< 2 x ULN 13. Electrocardiogram (ECG) without clinically significant findings, e.g. any kind of atrioventricular or intraventricular conditions or blocks such as complete left or right bundle branch block, AV node block, QTc or PR prolongation, premature atrial contractions or other atrial arrhythmia, sustained ventricular arrhythmia, two premature ventricular contractions (PVC) in a row, ST elevation consistent with ischemia

Exclusion criteria

1. Typical vaccinia scar 2. Known or suspected history of smallpox vaccination 3. History of vaccination with any poxvirus-based vaccine 4. US Military service before 1991 or after January 2003 5. Pregnant or breast-feeding women 6. Uncontrolled serious infection, i.e. not responding to antimicrobial therapy 7. History of any serious medical condition, which in the opinion of the investigator would compromise the safety of the subject or would limit the subject's ability to complete the trial in the opinion of the investigator 8. History of or active autoimmune disease, persons with vitiligo or thyroid disease taking thyroid hormone replacement are not excluded 9. Known or suspected impairment of immunologic function including, but not limited to, clinically significant liver disease, diabetes mellitus, moderate to severe kidney impairment 10. History of malignancy, other than squamous cell or basal cell skin cancer, unless there has been surgical excision that is considered to have achieved cure. Subjects with history of skin cancer must not be vaccinated at the previous tumor site 11. History or clinical manifestation of clinically significant and severe hematological, pulmonary, central nervous, cardiovascular or gastrointestinal disorders 12. Clinically significant mental disorder not adequately controlled by medical treatment 13. History of coronary heart disease, myocardial infarction, angina, congestive heart failure, cardiomyopathy, stroke or transient ischemic attack, uncontrolled high blood pressure, or any other heart condition under the care of a doctor 14. History of an immediate family member (father, mother, brother, or sister) who has had onset of ischemic heart disease before the age of 50 years 15. Twenty percent or greater risk of developing a myocardial infarction or coronary death within the next 10 years using the National Cholesterol Education Program's Risk Assessment Tool: http://hin.nhlbi.nih.gov/atpiii/calculator.asp NOTE: This criterion applies only to subjects 20 years of age and older 16. Active or history of chronic alcohol abuse and/or intravenous and/or nasal drug abuse (within the past 6 months) 17. Known allergy to IMVAMUNE® vaccine and its constituents, e.g. tris(hydroxymethyl)-amino methane, including known allergy to egg or aminoglycoside (gentamycin) 18. History of anaphylaxis or severe allergic reaction to any vaccine 19. Acute disease (illness with or without a fever) at the time of enrollment 20. Body Temperature ≥ 100.4°F (38.0°C) at the time of enrollment 21. Having received any vaccinations or planned vaccinations with a live vaccine within 30 days prior or after trial vaccination 22. Having received any vaccinations or planned vaccinations with a killed vaccine within 14 days prior or after trial vaccination 23. Chronic systemic administration (defined as more than 14 days) of \> 5 mg prednisone (or equivalent)/day or any other immune-modifying drugs during a period starting from three months prior to administration of the vaccine and ending at last physical trial visit (Visit 5) 24. Post organ transplant subjects whether or not receiving chronic immunosuppressive therapy 25. Administration or planned administration of immunoglobulins and/or any blood products during a period starting from three months prior to administration of the vaccine and ending at last physical trial visit (Visit 5) 26. Use of any investigational or non-registered drug or vaccine other than the trial vaccine within 30 days preceding the first dose of the trial vaccine or planned administration of such a drug during the trial period (with the day of the FU call being considered the last day of the trial period). 27. Trial personnel

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
ELISA GMTWeek 6Geometric Mean Titers (GMT) based on vaccinia-specific Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Titers below the detection limit are included with a value of '1'

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Eventsup to 32 weeksOccurrence, relationship to the trial vaccine and intensity of any Serious Adverse Event (SAE).
Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)up to 32 weeksOccurrence, relationship to the trial vaccine and intensity of any Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI). AESIs were defined as any cardiac symptoms and ECG changes determined to be clinically significant or cardiac enzyme troponin I elevated above 2 x the Upper Limit of Normal
Number of Participants With Related Grade >=3 Adverse Eventswithin 29 days after vaccinationOccurrence of any Grade \>=3 Adverse Events related to the trial vaccine.
Number of Participants With Unsolicited Adverse Eventswithin 29 days after vaccinationOccurrence, relationship to the trial vaccine and intensity of unsolicited treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs).
Number of Participants With Solicited Local Averse Events8 days after any vaccinationOccurrence and intensity of solicited local AEs (redness, swelling, induration, pruritus and pain) during the 8-day period (day of vaccination and the following 7 days) after any vaccination. Events were graded by intensity (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe).
Number of Participants With Solicited General Adverse Eventswithin 8 days after any vaccinationOccurrence, intensity and relationship to the trial vaccines of solicited general AEs (pyrexia, headache, myalgia, nausea, fatigue and chills) during the 8-day period (day of vaccination and the following 7 days) after any vaccination. Events were graded by intensity (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe).
ELISA GMTswithin 8 weeksGeometric Mean Titers (GMT) at all immunogenicity sampling time points based on vaccinia-specific Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). For the calculation of GMTs all measurements are included as they provide meaningful information even if below the detection limit (DL). Disregarding these measurements would highly bias the reported GMTs. We imputed values \<DL as a value of '1' and the GMT and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
Correlation ELISA vs PRNT Titerswithin 8 weeksPearson Correlation Coefficient between the ELISA titers and the PRNT titers at weeks 4, 6 and 8 based on the log10 transformed titer values
PRNT GMTswithin 8 weeksGeometric Mean Titers (GMT) at all immunogenicity sampling time points based on vaccinia-specific Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test (PRNT). For the calculation of GMTs all measurements are included as they provide meaningful information even if below the detection limit (DL). Disregarding these measurements would highly bias the reported GMTs. We imputed values \<DL as a value of '1' and the GMT and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion by ELISAWeek 6Seroconversion rate based on vaccinia-specific Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Seroconversion is defined as the appearance of antibody titers ≥ detection limit (50) for initially seronegative subjects, or a doubling or more of the antibody titer compared to Baseline titer for initially seropositive subjects.
Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion by PRNTWeek 6Seroconversion rate based on vaccinia-specific Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test (PRNT). Seroconversion is defined as the appearance of antibody titers ≥ detection limit (2) for initially seronegative subjects, or a doubling or more of the antibody titer compared to Baseline titer for initially seropositive subjects.
ELISPOT Magnitudes of Responsewithin 8 weeksMagnitudes of response of IFNγ producing T-cells measured by vaccinica-specific ELISPOT. Spot Forming Units below the detection limit are included as a value of '1'.
Percentage of Participants With Response by ELISPOTwithin 8 weeksResponse rates regarding IFNγ producing T-cells measured by vaccinia-specific ELISPOT. A response to the vaccine was defined as either the appearance of a positive signal for participants without a positive signal at Baseline or an increase by a factor of at least 1.7 of the SFU/1 x 10E6 PBMC compared to the Baseline SFU/1 x 10E6 PBMC for participants with a positive signal at Baseline.
Percentage of Responders by ELISPOTwithin 8 weeksResponder rate measured by vaccinia specific ELISPOT. A participant was defined as a responder to the vaccine determined by ELISPOT if the participant had at least 1 post-baseline visit determined to be a response. A response to the vaccine was defined as either the appearance of a positive signal for participants without a positive signal at Baseline or an increase by a factor of at least 1.7 of the SFU/1 x 10E6 PBMC compared to the Baseline SFU/1 x 10E6 PBMC for participants with a positive signal at Baseline.
PRNT GMTWeek 6Geometric Mean Titers (GMT) based on vaccinia-specific Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test (PRNT). Titers below the detection limit are included with a value of '1'

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
LF Formulation
Liquid Frozen formulation of MVA-BN® 2 doses of 1 x 10E8 TCID50, s.c., 4 weeks apart LF formulation of MVA-BN®
327
FD Formulation
Freeze Dried formulation of MVA-BN® 2 doses of 1 x 10E8 TCID50, s.c., 4 weeks apart FD formulation of MVA-BN®
324
Total651

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up136
Overall StudyOther23
Overall StudyReason Precludes Participation10
Overall StudyRequest to Discontinue Prematurely11
Overall StudySubject unwilling/unable to comply50

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLF FormulationTotalFD Formulation
Age, Continuous27.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.36
27.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.28
27.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.21
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
95 Participants190 Participants95 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
232 Participants461 Participants229 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
4 Participants5 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
78 Participants145 Participants67 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
5 Participants10 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants2 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
239 Participants486 Participants247 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
327 participants651 participants324 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
178 Participants348 Participants170 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
149 Participants303 Participants154 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 3270 / 324
other
Total, other adverse events
115 / 327114 / 324
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 3272 / 324

Outcome results

Primary

ELISA GMT

Geometric Mean Titers (GMT) based on vaccinia-specific Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Titers below the detection limit are included with a value of '1'

Time frame: Week 6

Population: Per Protocol Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
LF FormulationELISA GMT875.1 Titer
FD FormulationELISA GMT1099.6 Titer
95% CI: [0.707, 0.896]
Secondary

Correlation ELISA vs PRNT Titers

Pearson Correlation Coefficient between the ELISA titers and the PRNT titers at weeks 4, 6 and 8 based on the log10 transformed titer values

Time frame: within 8 weeks

Population: Per Protocol Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LF FormulationCorrelation ELISA vs PRNT TitersWeek 40.597 Pearson Correlation Coefficient
LF FormulationCorrelation ELISA vs PRNT TitersWeek 60.646 Pearson Correlation Coefficient
LF FormulationCorrelation ELISA vs PRNT TitersWeek 80.567 Pearson Correlation Coefficient
FD FormulationCorrelation ELISA vs PRNT TitersWeek 60.553 Pearson Correlation Coefficient
FD FormulationCorrelation ELISA vs PRNT TitersWeek 40.492 Pearson Correlation Coefficient
FD FormulationCorrelation ELISA vs PRNT TitersWeek 80.565 Pearson Correlation Coefficient
Secondary

ELISA GMTs

Geometric Mean Titers (GMT) at all immunogenicity sampling time points based on vaccinia-specific Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). For the calculation of GMTs all measurements are included as they provide meaningful information even if below the detection limit (DL). Disregarding these measurements would highly bias the reported GMTs. We imputed values \<DL as a value of '1' and the GMT and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

Time frame: within 8 weeks

Population: Per Protocol Analysis Set. Number Analyzed refers to the number of participants with measurements at the respective sampling time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
LF FormulationELISA GMTsWeek 01.1 Titer
LF FormulationELISA GMTsWeek 256.0 Titer
LF FormulationELISA GMTsWeek 489.6 Titer
LF FormulationELISA GMTsWeek 6875.1 Titer
LF FormulationELISA GMTsWeek 8546.4 Titer
FD FormulationELISA GMTsWeek 61099.6 Titer
FD FormulationELISA GMTsWeek 01.1 Titer
FD FormulationELISA GMTsWeek 8689.0 Titer
FD FormulationELISA GMTsWeek 4131.3 Titer
FD FormulationELISA GMTsWeek 290.4 Titer
Secondary

ELISPOT Magnitudes of Response

Magnitudes of response of IFNγ producing T-cells measured by vaccinica-specific ELISPOT. Spot Forming Units below the detection limit are included as a value of '1'.

Time frame: within 8 weeks

Population: ELISPOT Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
LF FormulationELISPOT Magnitudes of ResponseWeek 8145.5 Spot Forming Units
LF FormulationELISPOT Magnitudes of ResponseWeek 01.0 Spot Forming Units
LF FormulationELISPOT Magnitudes of ResponseWeek 2393.0 Spot Forming Units
LF FormulationELISPOT Magnitudes of ResponseWeek 488.0 Spot Forming Units
LF FormulationELISPOT Magnitudes of ResponseWeek 6235.0 Spot Forming Units
FD FormulationELISPOT Magnitudes of ResponseWeek 6315.0 Spot Forming Units
FD FormulationELISPOT Magnitudes of ResponseWeek 4133.0 Spot Forming Units
FD FormulationELISPOT Magnitudes of ResponseWeek 01.0 Spot Forming Units
FD FormulationELISPOT Magnitudes of ResponseWeek 8240.0 Spot Forming Units
FD FormulationELISPOT Magnitudes of ResponseWeek 2581.5 Spot Forming Units
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)

Occurrence, relationship to the trial vaccine and intensity of any Adverse Event of Special Interest (AESI). AESIs were defined as any cardiac symptoms and ECG changes determined to be clinically significant or cardiac enzyme troponin I elevated above 2 x the Upper Limit of Normal

Time frame: up to 32 weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)AESI1 Participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)Drug-related AESI0 Participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)AESI Grade >=30 Participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)AESI4 Participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)Drug-related AESI0 Participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)AESI Grade >=30 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Related Grade >=3 Adverse Events

Occurrence of any Grade \>=3 Adverse Events related to the trial vaccine.

Time frame: within 29 days after vaccination

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Related Grade >=3 Adverse Events0 Participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Related Grade >=3 Adverse Events1 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events

Occurrence, relationship to the trial vaccine and intensity of any Serious Adverse Event (SAE).

Time frame: up to 32 weeks

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse EventsSAE5 Participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse EventsSAE related to vaccine0 Participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse EventsSAE Grade >=33 Participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse EventsSAE2 Participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse EventsSAE related to vaccine0 Participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Serious Adverse EventsSAE Grade >=31 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Solicited General Adverse Events

Occurrence, intensity and relationship to the trial vaccines of solicited general AEs (pyrexia, headache, myalgia, nausea, fatigue and chills) during the 8-day period (day of vaccination and the following 7 days) after any vaccination. Events were graded by intensity (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe).

Time frame: within 8 days after any vaccination

Population: Subjects of the Full Analysis Set with at least one completed diary card

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsMyalgia : All68 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsFatigue : Grade =315 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsMyalgia : Grade >=224 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsBody Temperature increased : Related22 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsMyalgia : Grade =31 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsMyalgia : Related59 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsMyalgia : Related Grade =31 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsBody Temperature increased : Related Grade =33 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsChills : All38 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsFatigue : Related106 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsChills : Grade >=214 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsHeadache : All125 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsChills : Grade =32 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsBody Temperature increased : All23 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsChills : Related34 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsHeadache : Grade >=237 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsChills : Related Grade =32 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsFatigue : Grade >=239 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsNausea : All57 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsHeadache : Grade =38 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsNausea : Grade >=219 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsBody Temperature increased : Grade >=27 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsNausea : Related53 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsHeadache : Related110 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsNausea : Related Grade =34 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsNausea : Grade =34 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsFatigue : All113 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsHeadache : Related Grade =36 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsFatigue : Related Grade =314 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsBody Temperature increased : Grade =33 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsFatigue : Related Grade =39 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsNausea : Grade >=218 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsFatigue : All102 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsFatigue : Grade >=239 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsFatigue : Grade =39 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsBody Temperature increased : All33 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsBody Temperature increased : Grade >=28 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsBody Temperature increased : Grade =32 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsBody Temperature increased : Related30 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsBody Temperature increased : Related Grade =32 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsHeadache : All112 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsHeadache : Grade >=227 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsHeadache : Grade =37 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsHeadache : Related94 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsHeadache : Related Grade =36 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsMyalgia : All59 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsMyalgia : Grade >=218 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsMyalgia : Related47 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsMyalgia : Related Grade =33 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsChills : All35 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsChills : Grade >=210 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsChills : Grade =35 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsChills : Related33 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsChills : Related Grade =34 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsNausea : All51 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsNausea : Grade =32 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsNausea : Related44 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsNausea : Related Grade =32 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsFatigue : Related95 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited General Adverse EventsMyalgia : Grade =35 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Solicited Local Averse Events

Occurrence and intensity of solicited local AEs (redness, swelling, induration, pruritus and pain) during the 8-day period (day of vaccination and the following 7 days) after any vaccination. Events were graded by intensity (1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe).

Time frame: 8 days after any vaccination

Population: Subjects of the Full Analysis Set with at least one completed diary card

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited Local Averse EventsInjection site swelling : All210 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited Local Averse EventsInjection site induration : Grade >=273 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited Local Averse EventsInjection site erythema : All247 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited Local Averse EventsInjection site induration : Grade =35 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited Local Averse EventsInjection site swelling : Grade >=294 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited Local Averse EventsInjection site pruritus : All177 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited Local Averse EventsInjection site erythema : Grade =316 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited Local Averse EventsInjection site pruritus : Grade >=238 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited Local Averse EventsInjection site swelling : Grade =310 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited Local Averse EventsInjection site pruritus : Grade =37 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited Local Averse EventsInjection site pain : All274 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited Local Averse EventsInjection site erythema : Grade >=2140 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited Local Averse EventsInjection site pain : Grade >=2138 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited Local Averse EventsInjection site induration : All211 participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited Local Averse EventsInjection site pain : Grade =322 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited Local Averse EventsInjection site induration : All213 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited Local Averse EventsInjection site erythema : Grade =347 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited Local Averse EventsInjection site pain : Grade =335 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited Local Averse EventsInjection site erythema : All255 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited Local Averse EventsInjection site erythema : Grade >=2181 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited Local Averse EventsInjection site swelling : All223 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited Local Averse EventsInjection site swelling : Grade >=2125 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited Local Averse EventsInjection site swelling : Grade =323 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited Local Averse EventsInjection site pruritus : Grade =311 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited Local Averse EventsInjection site induration : Grade >=296 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited Local Averse EventsInjection site induration : Grade =36 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited Local Averse EventsInjection site pruritus : All189 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited Local Averse EventsInjection site pruritus : Grade >=247 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited Local Averse EventsInjection site pain : All290 participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Solicited Local Averse EventsInjection site pain : Grade >=2167 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Unsolicited Adverse Events

Occurrence, relationship to the trial vaccine and intensity of unsolicited treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs).

Time frame: within 29 days after vaccination

Population: Full Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Unsolicited Adverse EventsTEAE313 Participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Unsolicited Adverse EventsDrug-Related TEAE207 Participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Unsolicited Adverse EventsTEAE Grade >=36 Participants
LF FormulationNumber of Participants With Unsolicited Adverse EventsDrug-Related TEAE Grade >=30 Participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Unsolicited Adverse EventsDrug-Related TEAE Grade >=31 Participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Unsolicited Adverse EventsTEAE310 Participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Unsolicited Adverse EventsTEAE Grade >=35 Participants
FD FormulationNumber of Participants With Unsolicited Adverse EventsDrug-Related TEAE207 Participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Response by ELISPOT

Response rates regarding IFNγ producing T-cells measured by vaccinia-specific ELISPOT. A response to the vaccine was defined as either the appearance of a positive signal for participants without a positive signal at Baseline or an increase by a factor of at least 1.7 of the SFU/1 x 10E6 PBMC compared to the Baseline SFU/1 x 10E6 PBMC for participants with a positive signal at Baseline.

Time frame: within 8 weeks

Population: ELISPOT Analysis Set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LF FormulationPercentage of Participants With Response by ELISPOTWeek 466.0 percentage of subjects
LF FormulationPercentage of Participants With Response by ELISPOTWeek 295.0 percentage of subjects
LF FormulationPercentage of Participants With Response by ELISPOTWeek 688.0 percentage of subjects
LF FormulationPercentage of Participants With Response by ELISPOTWeek 884.0 percentage of subjects
FD FormulationPercentage of Participants With Response by ELISPOTWeek 892.3 percentage of subjects
FD FormulationPercentage of Participants With Response by ELISPOTWeek 297.9 percentage of subjects
FD FormulationPercentage of Participants With Response by ELISPOTWeek 480.2 percentage of subjects
FD FormulationPercentage of Participants With Response by ELISPOTWeek 694.4 percentage of subjects
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion by ELISA

Seroconversion rate based on vaccinia-specific Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Seroconversion is defined as the appearance of antibody titers ≥ detection limit (50) for initially seronegative subjects, or a doubling or more of the antibody titer compared to Baseline titer for initially seropositive subjects.

Time frame: Week 6

Population: Per Protocol Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LF FormulationPercentage of Participants With Seroconversion by ELISA100.0 percentage of subjects
FD FormulationPercentage of Participants With Seroconversion by ELISA100.0 percentage of subjects
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion by ELISA

Seroconversion rates at all post-baseline immunogenicity sampling time points based on vaccinia-specific Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA). Seroconversion is defined as the appearance of antibody titers ≥ detection limit (50) for initially seronegative subjects, or a doubling or more of the antibody titer compared to Baseline titer for initially seropositive subjects. Percentages based on number of subjects with data available.

Time frame: within 8 weeks

Population: Per Protocol Analysis Set. Number Analyzed refers to the number of participants with measurements at the respective sampling time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LF FormulationPercentage of Participants With Seroconversion by ELISAWeek 283.5 percentage of subjects
LF FormulationPercentage of Participants With Seroconversion by ELISAWeek 491.9 percentage of subjects
LF FormulationPercentage of Participants With Seroconversion by ELISAWeek 6100.0 percentage of subjects
LF FormulationPercentage of Participants With Seroconversion by ELISAWeek 8100.0 percentage of subjects
FD FormulationPercentage of Participants With Seroconversion by ELISAWeek 8100.0 percentage of subjects
FD FormulationPercentage of Participants With Seroconversion by ELISAWeek 291.5 percentage of subjects
FD FormulationPercentage of Participants With Seroconversion by ELISAWeek 6100.0 percentage of subjects
FD FormulationPercentage of Participants With Seroconversion by ELISAWeek 497.0 percentage of subjects
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion by PRNT

Seroconversion rate based on vaccinia-specific Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test (PRNT). Seroconversion is defined as the appearance of antibody titers ≥ detection limit (2) for initially seronegative subjects, or a doubling or more of the antibody titer compared to Baseline titer for initially seropositive subjects.

Time frame: Week 6

Population: Per Protocol Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LF FormulationPercentage of Participants With Seroconversion by PRNT99.0 percentage of subjects
FD FormulationPercentage of Participants With Seroconversion by PRNT100.0 percentage of subjects
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion by PRNT

Seroconversion rates at all post-baseline immunogenicity sampling time points based on vaccinia-specific Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test (PRNT). Seroconversion is defined as the appearance of antibody titers ≥ detection limit (2) for initially seronegative subjects, or a doubling or more of the antibody titer compared to Baseline titer for initially seropositive subjects. Percentages based on number of subjects with data available.

Time frame: within 8 weeks

Population: Per Protocol Analysis Set. Number Analyzed refers to the number of participants with measurements at the respective sampling time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
LF FormulationPercentage of Participants With Seroconversion by PRNTWeek 699.0 percentage of subjects
LF FormulationPercentage of Participants With Seroconversion by PRNTWeek 484.8 percentage of subjects
LF FormulationPercentage of Participants With Seroconversion by PRNTWeek 8100.0 percentage of subjects
LF FormulationPercentage of Participants With Seroconversion by PRNTWeek 280.1 percentage of subjects
FD FormulationPercentage of Participants With Seroconversion by PRNTWeek 899.7 percentage of subjects
FD FormulationPercentage of Participants With Seroconversion by PRNTWeek 491.5 percentage of subjects
FD FormulationPercentage of Participants With Seroconversion by PRNTWeek 6100.0 percentage of subjects
FD FormulationPercentage of Participants With Seroconversion by PRNTWeek 287.3 percentage of subjects
Secondary

Percentage of Responders by ELISPOT

Responder rate measured by vaccinia specific ELISPOT. A participant was defined as a responder to the vaccine determined by ELISPOT if the participant had at least 1 post-baseline visit determined to be a response. A response to the vaccine was defined as either the appearance of a positive signal for participants without a positive signal at Baseline or an increase by a factor of at least 1.7 of the SFU/1 x 10E6 PBMC compared to the Baseline SFU/1 x 10E6 PBMC for participants with a positive signal at Baseline.

Time frame: within 8 weeks

Population: ELISPOT Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
LF FormulationPercentage of Responders by ELISPOT100 percentage of subjects
FD FormulationPercentage of Responders by ELISPOT100 percentage of subjects
Secondary

PRNT GMT

Geometric Mean Titers (GMT) based on vaccinia-specific Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test (PRNT). Titers below the detection limit are included with a value of '1'

Time frame: Week 6

Population: Per Protocol Analysis Set

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
LF FormulationPRNT GMT81.8 Titer
FD FormulationPRNT GMT101.2 Titer
Secondary

PRNT GMTs

Geometric Mean Titers (GMT) at all immunogenicity sampling time points based on vaccinia-specific Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test (PRNT). For the calculation of GMTs all measurements are included as they provide meaningful information even if below the detection limit (DL). Disregarding these measurements would highly bias the reported GMTs. We imputed values \<DL as a value of '1' and the GMT and corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

Time frame: within 8 weeks

Population: Per Protocol Analysis Set. Number Analyzed refers to the number of participants with measurements at the respective sampling time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)
LF FormulationPRNT GMTsWeek 681.8 Titer
LF FormulationPRNT GMTsWeek 859.7 Titer
LF FormulationPRNT GMTsWeek 01.1 Titer
LF FormulationPRNT GMTsWeek 27.1 Titer
LF FormulationPRNT GMTsWeek 49.3 Titer
FD FormulationPRNT GMTsWeek 412.5 Titer
FD FormulationPRNT GMTsWeek 210.4 Titer
FD FormulationPRNT GMTsWeek 876.1 Titer
FD FormulationPRNT GMTsWeek 6101.2 Titer
FD FormulationPRNT GMTsWeek 01.0 Titer

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 12, 2026