Skip to content

Warmed, Humidified Carbon Dioxide Insufflation vs Standard Carbon Dioxide in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Warmed, Humidified Carbon Dioxide Insufflation vs Standard Carbon Dioxide in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: a Double-blinded Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01667848
Enrollment
148
Registered
2012-08-17
Start date
2011-07-31
Completion date
2013-09-30
Last updated
2023-10-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cholecystolithiasis

Keywords

pain

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of warmed, humidified carbon dioxide Insufflation vs standard carbon dioxide in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Detailed description

Patients undergoing warmed, humidified carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation for laparoscopic cholecystectomy will have less postoperative pain than patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with standard CO2 insufflation. The study design is a double-blind, prospective, randomized study comparing patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy with standard CO2 insufflation vs those receiving warmed, humidified CO2. Main variables included postoperative pain (rated with a visual analog scales) and analgesic requirements.

Interventions

DEVICEOptitherm® device activated

The use of Optitherm® device, which was attached to the insufflation equipment in all of the patients but was only activated by the single scrub nurse in those patients randomized to group B.

DEVICEOptitherm® device inactivated

The use of Optitherm® device, which was attached to the insufflation equipment in all of the patients but was inactivated in group A.

Sponsors

Kepler University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of cholecystolithiasis

Exclusion criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of cholecystolithiasis with cholecystitis

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain (Rated With a Visual Analog Scale for Pain)operation daypostoperative pain (rated with a visual analog scale for pain) and analgesic requirements at operation day. The visual analog scale for pain ranged from 0-10 (0 is no pain, 10 is Maximum of pain)

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Core Temperatureone day postoperativly

Countries

Austria

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Approval from the local institutional ethics committee was obtained on June 2011. Between July 1st, 2011 and December 28nd, 2013, a total of 148 patients were scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the General Hospital in Linz, Austria

Pre-assignment details

Patients converted intraoperative to open cholecystectomy or those undergoing a concomitant procedure were excluded from the study. Irregularities of the study protocol (absence of rectal probe, missing consent form, conversion to open cholecystectomy) entailed in exclusion of the study. Patients with acute cholecystitis were excluded of the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Group A: Insufflation With Cold Gas
Insufflation with cold gas during laparoskopic cholecystectomy
67
Group B
Insufflation with warm gas during laparoskopic cholecystectomy
81
Total148

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicGroup A: Insufflation With Cold GasGroup BTotal
Age, Continuous55.87 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.44
55.68 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.93
55.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.14
Region of Enrollment
Austria
67 participants81 participants148 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
46 Participants57 Participants103 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
21 Participants24 Participants45 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 670 / 81
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 670 / 81

Outcome results

Primary

Pain (Rated With a Visual Analog Scale for Pain)

postoperative pain (rated with a visual analog scale for pain) and analgesic requirements at operation day. The visual analog scale for pain ranged from 0-10 (0 is no pain, 10 is Maximum of pain)

Time frame: operation day

Primary

Pain (Rated With a Visual Analog Scale for Pain)

postoperative pain (rated with a visual analog scale for pain) and analgesic requirements at operation day. The visual analog scale for pain ranged from 0-10 (0 is no pain, 10 is Maximum of pain)

Time frame: first postoperative day

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A: Insufflation With Cold GasPain (Rated With a Visual Analog Scale for Pain)2.22 units on a scale 0-10Standard Deviation 0.97
Group BPain (Rated With a Visual Analog Scale for Pain)1.92 units on a scale 0-10Standard Deviation 0.84
Secondary

Core Temperature

Time frame: one day postoperativly

Secondary

Core Temperature

core temperature during laparoscopic cholecystectomy using a rectal probe

Time frame: during operation

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Group A: Insufflation With Cold GasCore Temperature36.85 degree celsiusStandard Deviation 0.46
Group BCore Temperature37.07 degree celsiusStandard Deviation 0.35

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026