Skip to content

FACBC Outcomes for Post Prostatectomy

Advanced Molecular Imaging With Anti-3-[18F]FACBC PET-CT to Improve the Selection and Outcomes of Prostate Cancer Patients Receiving Post-prostatectomy Radiotherapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01666808
Enrollment
165
Registered
2012-08-16
Start date
2012-09-30
Completion date
2022-04-18
Last updated
2023-08-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Brief summary

Investigators will perform a study with 162 patients in whom there is a strong suspicion of prostate cancer that has returned to the body after having a prostatectomy. Half of these patients will have radiotherapy decision-making and delivery per the usual routine, and half of these patients will have the radiotherapy decision and volumes guided by the FACBC test (anti-1-amino-3-\[18F\]fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid (anti-3- \[18F\]FACBC). The major goal of the investigation is to see whether the FACBC improves the selection and the cancer control rates of post-surgery patients with a rising PSA who undergo radiotherapy.

Detailed description

Prostate cancer is the most common solid tumor, with approximately 200,000 new cases diagnosed per year. Several different local therapies are available for treatment, including surgery and radiotherapy Significant advances have been made in the technical aspects of surgery and of radiotherapy which have improved both the cancer control outcomes as well as the morbidity of treatment. Despite these significant advances, approximately 30% of patients treated with definitive local therapy experience recurrent disease. Recurrent disease after prostatectomy usually manifests with rising PSA (blood test for prostate cancer). The PSA level is often of limited use in differentiating local recurrence (ie. recurrence in the prostate bed) from recurrence outside of the prostate bed ( extra-prostatic recurrence). One PET radiotracer which has shown promise in the staging and restaging of patients with prostate carcinoma is anti-1-amino-3-\[18F\]fluorocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid (anti-3-\[18F\]FACBC) which is a synthetic amino acid analog. FACBC demonstrated higher accuracy compared with 111Indium-capromab-pendetide in the restaging of patients with suspected recurrent prostate carcinoma. The major goal in this proposed investigation is to use advanced molecular imaging to better guide post-prostatectomy decision making, in terms of guiding the decision to deliver radiotherapy, and in terms of the exact areas treated with radiotherapy. Investigators will perform a study with 162 patients in whom there is a strong suspicion of prostate cancer that has returned to the body after having a prostatectomy. Half of these patients will have radiotherapy decision-making and delivery per the usual routine, and half of these patients will have the radiotherapy decision and volumes guided by the FACBC test. The major goal of the investigation is to see whether the FACBC improves the selection and the cancer control rates of post-surgery patients with a rising PSA who undergo radiotherapy.

Interventions

DRUGFACBC

FACBC is given intravenously prior to PET scan, radiotherapy decisions and treatment guided by PET findings

RADIATIONRadiation therapy

External beam radiotherapy to prostate bed +/- pelvic lymph nodes; final dose of 66.6 Gy.

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
Emory University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to 95 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adenocarcinoma of the prostate, post radical-prostatectomy Detectable PSA * ECOG/Zubrod Performance Status of 0-2 * Negative technetium 99-m MDP or F-18 PET bone scan for skeletal metastasis * CT or MR scan of abdomen and pelvis which does not suggest presence of metastatic disease outside of the pelvis * Willingness to undergo pelvic radiotherapy.

Exclusion criteria

* Contraindications to radiotherapy (including active inflammatory bowel disease or prior pelvic XRT) * Inability to undergo anti-3-\[18F\]FACBC PET-CT * Age under 18 * Metastatic disease outside of pelvis on any imaging or biopsy * Prior invasive malignancy (except non-melanomatous skin cancer) unless disease free for a minimum of 3 years * Severe acute co-morbidity, defined as follows: * Unstable angina and/or congestive heart failure requiring hospitalization in the last 3 months * Transmural myocardial infarction within the last 6 months * Acute bacterial or fungal infection requiring intravenous antibiotics at the time of registration * Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease exacerbation or other respiratory illness requiring hospitalization or precluding study therapy at the time of registration * Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS) based upon current CDC definition; note, however, that HIV testing is not required for entry into this protocol. The need to exclude patients with AIDS from this protocol is necessary because the treatments involved in this protocol may be significantly immunosuppressive. Protocol-specific requirements may also exclude immunocompromised patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Failure-free Survival3-Year post-interventionDefinition of failure is: serum PSA value of 0.2ng/mL or more above the postradiotherapy nadir followed by another higher value, a continued rise in the serum PSA despite radiotherapy (RT), initiation of systemic therapy after completion of RT, or clinical progression.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Decision Changes Regarding Whole-pelvis Versus Local FieldsAverage of 1 week post-interventionNumber of decision changes regarding whole-pelvis versus local fields. This outcome was assessed immediately after the consensus reading of the Fluciclovine PET/CT was completed by nuclear medicine, an average of 1 week post intervention.
Total Number of Decision ChangesAverage of 1 week post-interventionTotal number of radiotherapy decision changes regarding radiotherapy vs no radiotherapy and regarding whole pelvis vs local fields. This outcome was assessed immediately after the consensus reading of the Fluciclovine PET/CT was completed by nuclear medicine, an average of 1 week post intervention.
Prostate Bed Clinical Target Volume (CTV)Average of 1 month post-interventionAbsolute volume pre- vs post-PET. This outcome was assessed after radiotherapy treatment planning was completed by radiation oncology, an average of 1 month post-intervention.
Prostate Bed Planning Target Volume (PTV)Average of 1 month post-interventionAbsolute volume were measured pre- vs post-PET. This outcome was assessed after radiotherapy treatment planning was completed by radiation oncology, an average of 1 month post-intervention.
PTV Dosimetric EndpointsAverage of 1 month post-interventionStandard radiotherapy dosimetric endpoints used to evaluate target coverage. Planning target volume (PTV) at V100 and V110 refer to %volume of the structure receiving 100% and 110% of the prescription dose, respectively, pre and post positron emission tomography (PET). This outcome was assessed after radiotherapy treatment planning was completed by radiation oncology, an average of 1 month post-intervention.
Rectum Dosimetric EndpointsAverage of 1 month post-interventionStandard radiotherapy dosimetric endpoints used to evaluate normal tissue doses, in this case, the rectum. V40 and V65 refer to the %volume of the structure receiving 40 Gy and 65 Gy, respectively, pre and post positron emission tomography (PET) volumes were compared. This outcome was assessed after radiotherapy treatment planning was completed by radiation oncology, an average of 1 month post-intervention.
Decision Changes Regarding Radiotherapy Versus no RadiotherapyAverage of 1 week post-interventionNumber of decision changes regarding radiotherapy versus no radiotherapy based on F-Fluciclovine PET/CT guidance. This outcome was assessed immediately after the consensus reading of the Fluciclovine PET/CT was completed by nuclear medicine, an average of 1 week post intervention.
Rate of ≥ Grade 2 GU (Genitourinary [Renal or Urinary]) Toxicity3-Year post-interventionProvider-reported maximum acute (\<90 days Post-Intervention) and late (≥90 days and up to 3-Years post-intervention) genitourinary toxicity based on CTCAE v4.0 criteria.
Rate of ≥ Grade 2 GI (Gastrointestinal) Toxicity3-Year post-interventionProvider-reported maximum acute (\<90 days Post-Intervention) and late (≥90 days and up to 3-Years post-intervention) gastrointestinal toxicity ≥ Grade 2 based on CTCAE v4.0 criteria.
Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice (EPIC) GU (Genitourinary) Domain Score3-Year post-interventionPatient-reported maximum genitourinary toxicity based on standard EPIC-CP questionnaire. EPIC GU domain score has a total score range 0-12. Higher score correlates with worse outcome. EPIC GU score includes the incontinence domain score and the irritative/obstructive.
Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) GI (Gastrointestinal) Domain Score3-Year post-interventionPatient-reported maximum gastrointestinal toxicity based on standard EPIC-CP questionnaire. Total score range 0-12. Higher score correlates with worse outcome.
Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Sexual Domain Score3-Year post-interventionPatient-reported maximum sexual function toxicity based on standard EPIC-CP questionnaire. Total score range 0-12. Higher score correlates with worse outcome.
Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Total Score3-Year post-interventionPatient-reported maximum overall (genitourinary, gastrointestinal, and sexual function) toxicity based on standard EPIC-CP questionnaire. Total score range 0-60. Higher score correlates with worse outcome.
Bladder Dosimetric EndpointsAverage of 1 month post-interventionStandard radiotherapy dosimetric endpoints are used to evaluate normal tissue doses, in this case, the bladder. V40 and V65 refer to the %volume of the structure receiving 40 Gy and 65 Gy, respectively, pre and post positron emission tomography (PET) volumes were compared. This outcome was assessed after radiotherapy treatment planning was completed by radiation oncology, an average of 1 month post-intervention.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
FACBC PET Scan
A trial group in which anti-3-\[18F\]FACBC PET-CT is used to guide radiotherapy decisions and radiotherapy treatment volumes. FACBC: FACBC is given intravenously prior to PET scan
83
Conventional-Only Imaging
A control group whose treatment decisions will be made based on conventional imaging - bone scan and abdominopelvic CT and/or MR scan.
82
Total165

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up915
Overall StudyNo radiotherapy given, due to extrapelvic uptake on PET scan40
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject31

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicFACBC PET ScanConventional-Only ImagingTotal
Age, Continuous61 years61 years61 years
Ave PSA before radiotherapy0.34 ng/mL0.34 ng/mL0.34 ng/mL
Gleason score ≥823 Participants29 Participants52 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
30 Participants29 Participants59 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
52 Participants52 Participants104 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
83 participants82 participants165 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
83 Participants82 Participants165 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 831 / 82
other
Total, other adverse events
71 / 8376 / 82
serious
Total, serious adverse events
5 / 838 / 82

Outcome results

Primary

Failure-free Survival

Definition of failure is: serum PSA value of 0.2ng/mL or more above the postradiotherapy nadir followed by another higher value, a continued rise in the serum PSA despite radiotherapy (RT), initiation of systemic therapy after completion of RT, or clinical progression.

Time frame: 3-Year post-intervention

Population: This outcome evaluated the failure-free survival difference (among those who received radiotherapy) between the trial group (in which FACBC PET scan was used) versus the control group (in which conventional-only imaging was used).~FACBC PET Group: 83 enrolled subjects minus 3 withdrawals minus 4 patients not receiving radiotherapy due to PET findings = 76 participants.~Conventional Imaging Group: 82 enrolled minus 1 withdrawal = 81 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FACBC PET ScanFailure-free Survival75.5 Percentage of participants
Conventional-Only ImagingFailure-free Survival63.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Bladder Dosimetric Endpoints

Standard radiotherapy dosimetric endpoints are used to evaluate normal tissue doses, in this case, the bladder. V40 and V65 refer to the %volume of the structure receiving 40 Gy and 65 Gy, respectively, pre and post positron emission tomography (PET) volumes were compared. This outcome was assessed after radiotherapy treatment planning was completed by radiation oncology, an average of 1 month post-intervention.

Time frame: Average of 1 month post-intervention

Population: Note that no participants were analyzed in the Conventional group Post-PET since they did not receive the PET intervention.~FACBC PET Group: 83 enrolled subjects minus 3 withdrawals minus 4 patients not receiving radiotherapy due to PET findings = 76 participants.~Conventional Imaging Group: 82 enrolled minus 1 withdrawal = 81 participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FACBC PET ScanBladder Dosimetric EndpointsBladder, V40 pre-PET68.92 percentage of volumeStandard Deviation 14.94
FACBC PET ScanBladder Dosimetric EndpointsBladder, V40 post-PET69.10 percentage of volumeStandard Deviation 14.7
FACBC PET ScanBladder Dosimetric EndpointsBladder, V65 pre-PET49.68 percentage of volumeStandard Deviation 17.31
FACBC PET ScanBladder Dosimetric EndpointsBladder, V65 post-PET50.29 percentage of volumeStandard Deviation 19.92
Conventional-Only ImagingBladder Dosimetric EndpointsBladder, V40 pre-PET68.95 percentage of volumeStandard Deviation 18.04
Conventional-Only ImagingBladder Dosimetric EndpointsBladder, V65 pre-PET50.99 percentage of volumeStandard Deviation 19.35
Secondary

Decision Changes Regarding Radiotherapy Versus no Radiotherapy

Number of decision changes regarding radiotherapy versus no radiotherapy based on F-Fluciclovine PET/CT guidance. This outcome was assessed immediately after the consensus reading of the Fluciclovine PET/CT was completed by nuclear medicine, an average of 1 week post intervention.

Time frame: Average of 1 week post-intervention

Population: This outcome evaluated number of decision changes regarding the overall use of radiotherapy in the FACBC PET scan group only.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FACBC PET ScanDecision Changes Regarding Radiotherapy Versus no Radiotherapy4 Number of decision changes
Secondary

Decision Changes Regarding Whole-pelvis Versus Local Fields

Number of decision changes regarding whole-pelvis versus local fields. This outcome was assessed immediately after the consensus reading of the Fluciclovine PET/CT was completed by nuclear medicine, an average of 1 week post intervention.

Time frame: Average of 1 week post-intervention

Population: This outcome evaluated number of decision changes regarding changes from whole-pelvis to local fields and vice versa (local fields to whole pelvis) in the FACBC PET scan group only.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FACBC PET ScanDecision Changes Regarding Whole-pelvis Versus Local Fields24 Number of decision changes
Secondary

Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) GI (Gastrointestinal) Domain Score

Patient-reported maximum gastrointestinal toxicity based on standard EPIC-CP questionnaire. Total score range 0-12. Higher score correlates with worse outcome.

Time frame: 3-Year post-intervention

Population: Radiotherapy-treated patients in both the FACBC PET scan and the Conventional-imaging only groups.~FACBC PET Group: 83 enrolled subjects minus 3 withdrawals minus 4 patients not receiving radiotherapy due to PET findings = 76 participants.~Conventional Imaging Group: 82 enrolled minus 1 withdrawal = 81 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FACBC PET ScanExpanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) GI (Gastrointestinal) Domain Score1.20 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.99
Conventional-Only ImagingExpanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) GI (Gastrointestinal) Domain Score1.41 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.21
Secondary

Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Sexual Domain Score

Patient-reported maximum sexual function toxicity based on standard EPIC-CP questionnaire. Total score range 0-12. Higher score correlates with worse outcome.

Time frame: 3-Year post-intervention

Population: Radiotherapy-treated patients in both the FACBC PET scan and the Conventional-imaging only groups.~FACBC PET Group: 83 enrolled subjects minus 3 withdrawals minus 4 patients not receiving radiotherapy due to PET findings = 76 participants.~Conventional Imaging Group: 82 enrolled minus 1 withdrawal = 81 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FACBC PET ScanExpanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Sexual Domain Score6.04 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.14
Conventional-Only ImagingExpanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Sexual Domain Score7.37 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.79
Secondary

Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Total Score

Patient-reported maximum overall (genitourinary, gastrointestinal, and sexual function) toxicity based on standard EPIC-CP questionnaire. Total score range 0-60. Higher score correlates with worse outcome.

Time frame: 3-Year post-intervention

Population: Radiotherapy-treated patients in both the FACBC PET scan and the Conventional-imaging only groups.~FACBC PET Group: 83 enrolled subjects minus 3 withdrawals minus 4 patients not receiving radiotherapy due to PET findings = 76 participants.~Conventional Imaging Group: 82 enrolled minus 1 withdrawal = 81 participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FACBC PET ScanExpanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Total Score13.90 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.98
Conventional-Only ImagingExpanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) Total Score17.02 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.78
Secondary

Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice (EPIC) GU (Genitourinary) Domain Score

Patient-reported maximum genitourinary toxicity based on standard EPIC-CP questionnaire. EPIC GU domain score has a total score range 0-12. Higher score correlates with worse outcome. EPIC GU score includes the incontinence domain score and the irritative/obstructive.

Time frame: 3-Year post-intervention

Population: Radiotherapy-treated patients in both the FACBC PET scan and the Conventional-imaging only groups.~FACBC PET Group: 83 enrolled subjects minus 3 withdrawals minus 4 patients not receiving radiotherapy due to PET findings = 76 participants.~Conventional Imaging Group: 82 enrolled minus 1 withdrawal = 81 participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FACBC PET ScanExpanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice (EPIC) GU (Genitourinary) Domain ScoreEPIC GU-incontinence domain score2.99 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.1
FACBC PET ScanExpanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice (EPIC) GU (Genitourinary) Domain ScoreEPIC GU - irritative/obstructive1.80 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.02
Conventional-Only ImagingExpanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice (EPIC) GU (Genitourinary) Domain ScoreEPIC GU-incontinence domain score3.50 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.02
Conventional-Only ImagingExpanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite for Clinical Practice (EPIC) GU (Genitourinary) Domain ScoreEPIC GU - irritative/obstructive2.66 score on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Secondary

Prostate Bed Clinical Target Volume (CTV)

Absolute volume pre- vs post-PET. This outcome was assessed after radiotherapy treatment planning was completed by radiation oncology, an average of 1 month post-intervention.

Time frame: Average of 1 month post-intervention

Population: Note that no participants were analyzed in the Conventional group Post-PET since they did not receive the PET intervention.~FACBC PET Group: 83 enrolled subjects minus 3 withdrawals minus 4 patients not receiving radiotherapy due to PET findings = 76 participants.~Conventional Imaging Group: 82 enrolled minus 1 withdrawal = 81 participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FACBC PET ScanProstate Bed Clinical Target Volume (CTV)Pre-PET134.14 mLStandard Deviation 45.6
FACBC PET ScanProstate Bed Clinical Target Volume (CTV)Post-PET135.61 mLStandard Deviation 45.51
Conventional-Only ImagingProstate Bed Clinical Target Volume (CTV)Pre-PET137.18 mLStandard Deviation 51.36
Secondary

Prostate Bed Planning Target Volume (PTV)

Absolute volume were measured pre- vs post-PET. This outcome was assessed after radiotherapy treatment planning was completed by radiation oncology, an average of 1 month post-intervention.

Time frame: Average of 1 month post-intervention

Population: Note that no participants were analyzed in the Conventional group Post-PET since they did not receive the PET intervention.~FACBC PET Group: 83 enrolled subjects minus 3 withdrawals minus 4 patients not receiving radiotherapy due to PET findings = 76 participants.~Conventional Imaging Group: 82 enrolled minus 1 withdrawal = 81 participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FACBC PET ScanProstate Bed Planning Target Volume (PTV)Pre-PET324.50 mLStandard Deviation 79.82
FACBC PET ScanProstate Bed Planning Target Volume (PTV)Post-PET329.54 mLStandard Deviation 81.34
Conventional-Only ImagingProstate Bed Planning Target Volume (PTV)Pre-PET327.71 mLStandard Deviation 88.61
Secondary

PTV Dosimetric Endpoints

Standard radiotherapy dosimetric endpoints used to evaluate target coverage. Planning target volume (PTV) at V100 and V110 refer to %volume of the structure receiving 100% and 110% of the prescription dose, respectively, pre and post positron emission tomography (PET). This outcome was assessed after radiotherapy treatment planning was completed by radiation oncology, an average of 1 month post-intervention.

Time frame: Average of 1 month post-intervention

Population: Note that no participants were analyzed in the Conventional group Post-PET since they did not receive the PET intervention.~FACBC PET Group: 83 enrolled subjects minus 3 withdrawals minus 4 patients not receiving radiotherapy due to PET findings = 76 participants.~Conventional Imaging Group: 82 enrolled minus 1 withdrawal = 81 participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FACBC PET ScanPTV Dosimetric EndpointsPTV2/PTV, V100% pre PET96.98 percentage of volumeStandard Deviation 1.56
FACBC PET ScanPTV Dosimetric EndpointsPTV2/PTV, V100% post PET96.62 percentage of volumeStandard Deviation 1.54
FACBC PET ScanPTV Dosimetric EndpointsPTV2/PTV, V110% pre PET2.60 percentage of volumeStandard Deviation 7.81
FACBC PET ScanPTV Dosimetric EndpointsPTV2/PTV, V110% post PET1.09 percentage of volumeStandard Deviation 6.11
Conventional-Only ImagingPTV Dosimetric EndpointsPTV2/PTV, V100% pre PET96.36 percentage of volumeStandard Deviation 1.67
Conventional-Only ImagingPTV Dosimetric EndpointsPTV2/PTV, V110% pre PET0.42 percentage of volumeStandard Deviation 1.89
Secondary

Rate of ≥ Grade 2 GI (Gastrointestinal) Toxicity

Provider-reported maximum acute (\<90 days Post-Intervention) and late (≥90 days and up to 3-Years post-intervention) gastrointestinal toxicity ≥ Grade 2 based on CTCAE v4.0 criteria.

Time frame: 3-Year post-intervention

Population: All patients in both the FACBC PET scan and the Conventional-imaging only groups.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
FACBC PET ScanRate of ≥ Grade 2 GI (Gastrointestinal) ToxicityNumber of patients with Acute GI toxicity16 Participants
FACBC PET ScanRate of ≥ Grade 2 GI (Gastrointestinal) ToxicityNumber of patients with Late GI toxicity6 Participants
Conventional-Only ImagingRate of ≥ Grade 2 GI (Gastrointestinal) ToxicityNumber of patients with Acute GI toxicity11 Participants
Conventional-Only ImagingRate of ≥ Grade 2 GI (Gastrointestinal) ToxicityNumber of patients with Late GI toxicity10 Participants
Secondary

Rate of ≥ Grade 2 GU (Genitourinary [Renal or Urinary]) Toxicity

Provider-reported maximum acute (\<90 days Post-Intervention) and late (≥90 days and up to 3-Years post-intervention) genitourinary toxicity based on CTCAE v4.0 criteria.

Time frame: 3-Year post-intervention

Population: All patients in both the FACBC PET scan and the Conventional-imaging only groups.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
FACBC PET ScanRate of ≥ Grade 2 GU (Genitourinary [Renal or Urinary]) ToxicityNumber of patients with Acute GU toxicity18 Participants
FACBC PET ScanRate of ≥ Grade 2 GU (Genitourinary [Renal or Urinary]) ToxicityNumber of patients with Late GU toxicity36 Participants
Conventional-Only ImagingRate of ≥ Grade 2 GU (Genitourinary [Renal or Urinary]) ToxicityNumber of patients with Acute GU toxicity21 Participants
Conventional-Only ImagingRate of ≥ Grade 2 GU (Genitourinary [Renal or Urinary]) ToxicityNumber of patients with Late GU toxicity42 Participants
Secondary

Rectum Dosimetric Endpoints

Standard radiotherapy dosimetric endpoints used to evaluate normal tissue doses, in this case, the rectum. V40 and V65 refer to the %volume of the structure receiving 40 Gy and 65 Gy, respectively, pre and post positron emission tomography (PET) volumes were compared. This outcome was assessed after radiotherapy treatment planning was completed by radiation oncology, an average of 1 month post-intervention.

Time frame: Average of 1 month post-intervention

Population: Note that no participants were analyzed in the Conventional group Post-PET since they did not receive the PET intervention.~FACBC PET Group: 83 enrolled subjects minus 3 withdrawals minus 4 patients not receiving radiotherapy due to PET findings = 76 participants.~Conventional Imaging Group: 82 enrolled minus 1 withdrawal = 81 participants.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
FACBC PET ScanRectum Dosimetric EndpointsRectum, V40 pre PET45.01 percentage of volumeStandard Deviation 10
FACBC PET ScanRectum Dosimetric EndpointsRectum, V40 post PET45.07 percentage of volumeStandard Deviation 9.78
FACBC PET ScanRectum Dosimetric EndpointsRectum, V65 pre PET18.35 percentage of volumeStandard Deviation 7.78
FACBC PET ScanRectum Dosimetric EndpointsRectum, V65 post PET18.48 percentage of volumeStandard Deviation 7.78
Conventional-Only ImagingRectum Dosimetric EndpointsRectum, V40 pre PET45.03 percentage of volumeStandard Deviation 10.89
Conventional-Only ImagingRectum Dosimetric EndpointsRectum, V65 pre PET19.31 percentage of volumeStandard Deviation 7.82
Secondary

Total Number of Decision Changes

Total number of radiotherapy decision changes regarding radiotherapy vs no radiotherapy and regarding whole pelvis vs local fields. This outcome was assessed immediately after the consensus reading of the Fluciclovine PET/CT was completed by nuclear medicine, an average of 1 week post intervention.

Time frame: Average of 1 week post-intervention

Population: This outcome evaluated number of all radiotherapy-related decision changes in the FACBC PET scan group only.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
FACBC PET ScanTotal Number of Decision Changes28 Number of decision changes

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 23, 2026