Skip to content

Comparison of Weaning on Pressure Support vs. Proportional Assist Ventilation: A Pilot Study

Is Respiratory Rate an Adequate Indicator of Respiratory Distress During Weaning? A Comparison of Weaning on Pressure Support vs. Proportional Assist Ventilation.

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01666054
Enrollment
54
Registered
2012-08-16
Start date
2009-03-31
Completion date
2013-07-31
Last updated
2016-04-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Weaning From Mechanical Ventilation

Keywords

Weaning, mechanical ventilation, Proportional Assist Ventilation

Brief summary

The study hypothesis is that reducing patient-ventilator asynchrony will reduce time required to wean from mechanical ventilation. The purpose of this pilot study is (1) to assess study feasibility in terms of recruitment, protocol adherence and efficacy of the intervention for reducing asynchrony, (2) to assess baseline rates of asynchrony and outcomes in the control arm in order to perform sample size calculations, if needed, for further, larger studies designed to detect differences in weaning time in specific, predefined populations and (3) to examine how often ineffective triggering (and therefore reduced ventilator respiratory rate) at higher levels of pressure support lead to a false conclusion that higher levels of support are needed to diminish respiratory distress.

Detailed description

Previous research has shown that approximately twenty-five percent of patients capable of triggering the ventilator in assisted modes have high rates of patient-ventilator asynchrony, and that such patients have a longer duration of mechanical ventilation. It is not known whether asynchrony is a cause of weaning failure or simply a marker of more severe respiratory failure. The most common type of asynchrony, ineffective triggering, may be both a marker of respiratory disease and a cause of delayed weaning. During ineffective triggering, the patient's inspiratory effort fails to trigger a ventilator breath, and thus the respiratory rate displayed on the ventilator underestimates the patient's true, intrinsic respiratory rate. Since ineffective triggering is more common at higher levels of pressure support than lower levels, an increase in respiratory rate during weaning of pressure support may indicate the development of respiratory distress or simply the abolition of ineffective triggering. Ineffective triggering may also cause delayed weaning because respiratory muscle energy is wasted on non-supported breaths. Proportional assist ventilation (PAV) is an FDA- and HPB-approved mode of ventilation in which the ventilator applies pressure in proportion to patient effort. Using PAV, patient-ventilator interaction may be optimized and ineffective triggering greatly reduced. Since the patient and ventilator respiratory rates are generally equivalent, a reduction in respiratory rate with increasing ventilatory support is less likely to be false positive indication of the need for greater assistance. In this study, patients with difficulty weaning from mechanical ventilation will be randomized to weaning with one of two weaning protocols: Proportional Assist Ventilation (PAV) weaning algorithm (intervention arm) vs. Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) weaning algorithm (control arm).

Interventions

OTHERPSV

Pressure Support Ventilation will be used until patient is extubated

OTHERPAV

Proportional Assist Ventilation will be used until patient is extubated.

Sponsors

Medtronic - MITG
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
University of Western Ontario, Canada
CollaboratorOTHER
London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 18 years or greater * Mechanically ventilated patients who are ready to begin weaning according to prespecified eligibility criteria, and tolerate thirty minutes of pressure support ventilation (PSV), but are not ready for extubation, defined as an frequency to tidal volume (f/Vt) greater-than (\>) 105 after two minutes of constant positive airway pressure (CPAP) * Reason for intubation partially or completely reversed

Exclusion criteria

* Tolerating PSV 5 greater-than (\>)2 hrs (Weaned) * Plan to extubate today * Extubated today * Considering Withdrawal of life support (less-than (\<)48hrs) * Neurosurgical patient * High SC injury/ progressive NMD * Tracheostomy at time of ICU admission * Has met all weaning eligibility and been on Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) \>36 hours

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Duration of weaningFrom time of randomization up to 28 daysDuration of weaning will be assessed as (a) the time elapsed from study randomization until the patient successfully passes a spontaneous breathing trial, (b) time from randomization to successful extubation, and (c) number of ventilator-free days, defined as the number of days alive and free of mechanical ventilation during the 28 days post randomization. All patients enrolled in the study will be followed until discharge from ICU. A prior subgroup analysis is planned for patients with a high asynchrony index at baseline.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in asynchrony index from baselineMeasurement of flow, airway pressure, and estimate of respiratory muscle pressure recorded at baseline then again, at high and at low levels of support during the first seven days of the weaning protocolAsynchrony index (percent (%) of asynchronous breaths) measured by visual inspection of flow and airway pressure tracings at baseline (just prior to randomization) and at high and low levels of support in both Proportional Assist Ventilation (PAV) and Pressure Support Ventilation (PSV) weaning algorithms. These measurements are recorded during the first seven days post randomization.
Change in sedative drug administration from baselineDaily dose of sedative drugs administered at baseline and day 1, 3, and 7 of study protocolTotal dose of sedative and narcotic drugs (converted into lorazepam and morphine equivalents) administered on day 0 (baseline) and day 1, 3 and 7 of study protocol, as percentage of baseline dose
DeliriumUp to 28 days post randomizationIncidence of a positive delirium screening assessment (using Confusion Assessment Method - Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) or Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist (ICDSC)) at baseline, and duration of delirium as a percentage of time in ICU post randomization.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Tolerance of weaning modeDaily, up to 28 days post randomizationNumber of hours spent daily on prescribed weaning mode (PAV or PSV)
Indication for increased ventilatory supportDailyRespiratory therapists will indicate on a checklist what signs of respiratory distress were present that led to an increase in level of support from the ventilator.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026