Skip to content

Regional Versus Systemic Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer

A Prospective Randomized Trial of Regional Versus Systemic Continuous Gemcitabine Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01665625
Enrollment
90
Registered
2012-08-15
Start date
2012-08-31
Completion date
2016-02-29
Last updated
2012-08-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer

Keywords

Pancreatic cancer, Intra-arterial infusion, Gemcitabine

Brief summary

Systemic chemotherapy with cytotoxic drug is of limited effectiveness in advanced pancreatic cancer patients. Gemcitabine has been used as the first-line drug for advance pancreatic cancer for over two decades and combinations of gemcitabine with different chemotherapeutic drugs have been investigated to improve the outcomes of pancreatic cancer. However, no substantial improvement in patient survival has been achieved. Locoregional chemotherapy via intra-arterial perfusion or chemoemoblization takes advantage of the increasing local drug concentrations and reducing systemic toxicities. In this study, the investigators hypothesis that artery infusion chemotherapy had a better antitumor effect than systemic chemotherapy. The investigators will analyze and evaluate the effect and safety of an implanted percutaneous left subclavian artery port-catheter drug delivery system for regional chemotherapy of inoperable pancreatic carcinoma.

Interventions

PROCEDUREregional interventional chemotherapy group

The patients in experimental group were monitored by X-ray imaging. A 0.038 super-sliding guide wire was inserted after successful puncture, and when site of the pancreatic carcinoma was reconfirmed by conventional angiography, a 5F cobra catheter was used to place the port-catheter drug delivery system in the celiac artery (pancreatic head) or the hepatic artery (pancreatic body and tail). Finally, the port-catheter was embedded under the left upper chest.

Sponsors

Air Force Military Medical University, China
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Signed written informed consent * Karnofsky score \> 60, * Expected survival \> 3 months, * Liver, kidney function and routine blood test within normal range * No serious cardiopulmonary dysfunction * No acute infection

Exclusion criteria

* Pregnant or lactating women * Uncontrolled internal diseases * Past or the presence of other malignancy * Those who had received immunosuppressive therapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
overall surviva36 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Benefit Rate12 months
The median progression-free survival PFS12 months
Drug Toxicity18 monthsThe grading standards of the World Health Organization for acute and subacute toxicity of anticancer drugs will be used to grade toxicity.
surgical complications18 monthsMajor surgical complications included allergic reaction to the contrast agent, local hematoma, pneumothorax, puncture site bleeding, wound infection, delayed healing or cracking, port-catheter blockage, and necrosis of the tissue surrounding the port-catheter.

Countries

China

Contacts

Primary ContactJun Tie, PH.D., MD
tiejun7776@163.com+86-29-84771528

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026