Dietary Modification
Conditions
Keywords
Diet Control before Colonoscopy
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and the acceptability of low-residue diet package (Enimaclin®) as diet control before colonoscopy.
Detailed description
In this study, we investigate a randomized, single-blinded, comparative study to evaluate the efficacy and the acceptability of low-residue diet package (Enimaclin®) as diet control before colonoscopy.
Interventions
Enimaclin Colomil ® (Glico Co., Japan Osaka),a low-residue diet package for each meal. The duration of study is one day before colonoscopy.
Self-controlled low residue diet.
Normal volume of PEG-ELS
Low volume PEG-ELS
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Male or female * Outpatient or healthy volunteer for health examination, 20\ 75 years old * Eligible for oral bowel preparation * BMI (Body Mass Index) ≤ 30
Exclusion criteria
* Patients with severe constipation (as fewer than three stools per week) * Patients with bowel obstruction * Patients contraindicated with treatment drug * Patients who need emergency medication * Ineligible for bowel preparation * Pregnant or breast-feeding * Patients with known allergies to treatment drug or low-residue diet package * Patients who are ineligible to enroll
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Total Volume of Purgatives That Ingested | 1 day | The total volume of PEG-ELS (Liter) that ingested or could be ingested by examinee before colonoscopy |
| Segmental Cleansing Level at Colonoscopy (Right Segment Preparation Failure) | 1 day | Segmental score of Ottawa bowel preparation scale was analyzed. The proportion of right segment preparation failure, defined as segmental score as 3 poor or 4 inadequate, was presented. |
| Overall Cleansing Level at Colonoscopy by Aronchick Scale | 1 day | The overall proportion of participants scored as Excellent or Good by Aronchick scale. Description of Aronchick scale:It categorized colon cleansing into 5 level: Excellent, good, fair, poor, inadequate. It is categorical and cannot be summed. We will present |
| Overall Cleansing Level at Colonoscopy by Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale | 1 day | Ottawa preparation scale: Colon is defined into 3 segments: Right(cecum, ascending), mid(transverse, descending), rectosigmoid. Each is scored from 0 to 4, 0 is best and 4 is worst. Fluid quantity of whole is scored as 0, small; 1, moderate; 2 large amount. The scale will be summation of the clearness of 3 segments of colon and overall fluid quantity. It ranged from 0 to 14, 0 is the most clean colon and 14 is the most dirty one. Segment score will be analyzed separately as continuous variable. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Satisfaction of Different Low Residual Diet and Bowel Preparation Protocol | 1 day | It represented the percentage of participants who is satisfied with the protocol. |
| Convenience of Different Low Residual Diet and Bowel Preparation Protocol | 1 day | It represented the percentage of participants who thinks the protocol is easy to use. |
| Willingness to Choose the Same Protocol After Different Low Residual Diet and PEG-ELS Protocol | 1 day | It represent the proportion of participants who wanted to choose the same protocol as they received in this trial. |
Countries
Taiwan
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Recruitment period: 14 months Recruitment location: GI outpatient clinic
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Low-residue Diet Package (Enimaclin®) and 2L PEG Low-residue diet package with normal amount of 2L PEG-ELS | 60 |
| Self-controlled Diet and 2L PEG Self-controlled diet with normal amount of 2L PEG-ELS | 60 |
| Low-residue Diet (Enimaclin®) Package and 1.5L PEG Low-residue diet package with normal amount of 1.5L PEG-ELS | 60 |
| Total | 180 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Self-controlled Diet and 2L PEG | Low-residue Diet (Enimaclin®) Package and 1.5L PEG | Low-residue Diet Package (Enimaclin®) and 2L PEG | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 11 Participants | 6 Participants | 6 Participants | 23 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 49 Participants | 54 Participants | 54 Participants | 157 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 51.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7 | 53.0 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11 | 52.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.6 | 52.3 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4 |
| Region of Enrollment Taiwan | 60 participants | 60 participants | 60 participants | 180 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 29 Participants | 24 Participants | 28 Participants | 81 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 31 Participants | 36 Participants | 32 Participants | 99 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 60 | 1 / 60 | 0 / 60 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 60 | 0 / 60 | 0 / 60 |
Outcome results
Overall Cleansing Level at Colonoscopy by Aronchick Scale
The overall proportion of participants scored as Excellent or Good by Aronchick scale. Description of Aronchick scale:It categorized colon cleansing into 5 level: Excellent, good, fair, poor, inadequate. It is categorical and cannot be summed. We will present
Time frame: 1 day
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Low-residue Diet Package and 2L PEG | Overall Cleansing Level at Colonoscopy by Aronchick Scale | 91.7 percentage of participants |
| Self-controlled Diet and 2L PEG | Overall Cleansing Level at Colonoscopy by Aronchick Scale | 76.7 percentage of participants |
| Low-residue Diet Package Plus 1.5L PEG | Overall Cleansing Level at Colonoscopy by Aronchick Scale | 78.3 percentage of participants |
Overall Cleansing Level at Colonoscopy by Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale
Ottawa preparation scale: Colon is defined into 3 segments: Right(cecum, ascending), mid(transverse, descending), rectosigmoid. Each is scored from 0 to 4, 0 is best and 4 is worst. Fluid quantity of whole is scored as 0, small; 1, moderate; 2 large amount. The scale will be summation of the clearness of 3 segments of colon and overall fluid quantity. It ranged from 0 to 14, 0 is the most clean colon and 14 is the most dirty one. Segment score will be analyzed separately as continuous variable.
Time frame: 1 day
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low-residue Diet Package and 2L PEG | Overall Cleansing Level at Colonoscopy by Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale | 2.58 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.15 |
| Self-controlled Diet and 2L PEG | Overall Cleansing Level at Colonoscopy by Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale | 3.22 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.08 |
| Low-residue Diet Package Plus 1.5L PEG | Overall Cleansing Level at Colonoscopy by Ottawa Bowel Preparation Scale | 2.97 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 2.79 |
Segmental Cleansing Level at Colonoscopy (Right Segment Preparation Failure)
Segmental score of Ottawa bowel preparation scale was analyzed. The proportion of right segment preparation failure, defined as segmental score as 3 poor or 4 inadequate, was presented.
Time frame: 1 day
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Low-residue Diet Package and 2L PEG | Segmental Cleansing Level at Colonoscopy (Right Segment Preparation Failure) | 1.7 percentage of participants |
| Self-controlled Diet and 2L PEG | Segmental Cleansing Level at Colonoscopy (Right Segment Preparation Failure) | 15.0 percentage of participants |
| Low-residue Diet Package Plus 1.5L PEG | Segmental Cleansing Level at Colonoscopy (Right Segment Preparation Failure) | 6.7 percentage of participants |
Total Volume of Purgatives That Ingested
The total volume of PEG-ELS (Liter) that ingested or could be ingested by examinee before colonoscopy
Time frame: 1 day
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low-residue Diet Package and 2L PEG | Total Volume of Purgatives That Ingested | 1.96 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.16 |
| Self-controlled Diet and 2L PEG | Total Volume of Purgatives That Ingested | 1.98 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.12 |
| Low-residue Diet Package Plus 1.5L PEG | Total Volume of Purgatives That Ingested | 1.61 Liter | Standard Deviation 0.27 |
Convenience of Different Low Residual Diet and Bowel Preparation Protocol
It represented the percentage of participants who thinks the protocol is easy to use.
Time frame: 1 day
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Low-residue Diet Package and 2L PEG | Convenience of Different Low Residual Diet and Bowel Preparation Protocol | 88.3 percentage of participants |
| Self-controlled Diet and 2L PEG | Convenience of Different Low Residual Diet and Bowel Preparation Protocol | 76.7 percentage of participants |
| Low-residue Diet Package Plus 1.5L PEG | Convenience of Different Low Residual Diet and Bowel Preparation Protocol | 93.3 percentage of participants |
Satisfaction of Different Low Residual Diet and Bowel Preparation Protocol
It represented the percentage of participants who is satisfied with the protocol.
Time frame: 1 day
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Low-residue Diet Package and 2L PEG | Satisfaction of Different Low Residual Diet and Bowel Preparation Protocol | 73.3 Percentage of participants |
| Self-controlled Diet and 2L PEG | Satisfaction of Different Low Residual Diet and Bowel Preparation Protocol | 36.7 Percentage of participants |
| Low-residue Diet Package Plus 1.5L PEG | Satisfaction of Different Low Residual Diet and Bowel Preparation Protocol | 76.7 Percentage of participants |
Willingness to Choose the Same Protocol After Different Low Residual Diet and PEG-ELS Protocol
It represent the proportion of participants who wanted to choose the same protocol as they received in this trial.
Time frame: 1 day
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Low-residue Diet Package and 2L PEG | Willingness to Choose the Same Protocol After Different Low Residual Diet and PEG-ELS Protocol | 93.3 percentage of participants |
| Self-controlled Diet and 2L PEG | Willingness to Choose the Same Protocol After Different Low Residual Diet and PEG-ELS Protocol | 90.0 percentage of participants |
| Low-residue Diet Package Plus 1.5L PEG | Willingness to Choose the Same Protocol After Different Low Residual Diet and PEG-ELS Protocol | 95.0 percentage of participants |