Skip to content

Exploring the Efficacy and Safety of Siponimod in Patients With Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (EXPAND)

A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled Variable Treatment Duration Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Siponimod (BAF312) in Patients With Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis Followed by Extended Treatment With Open-label BAF312.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01665144
Enrollment
1651
Registered
2012-08-15
Start date
2012-12-20
Completion date
2023-03-31
Last updated
2024-06-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Keywords

Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Brief summary

Evaluate the safety and efficacy of Siponimod (BAF312) versus placebo in a variable treatment duration in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (Core Part) followed by extended treatment with open-label BAF312 to obtain data on long-term safety, tolerability and efficacy (Extension Part).

Detailed description

This study had two parts, a Core Part and an Extension Part. The Core Part of the study was a randomized, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group study in patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). Eligible patients were randomized (2:1) to receive either siponimod or placebo. The duration of the Core Part of the study was variable for each patient, given that this was an event-driven study and terminated when a pre-defined number of confirmed disability progression (CDP) events had occurred irrespective of duration of individual patient participation. Patients who had 6-month CDP during the Treatment Epoch of the Core Part were provided with options that included starting treatment with open label siponimod as rescue medication. Patients who were eligible to enter the Extension Part received open label siponimod.

Interventions

DRUGBAF312

0.25, 0.5, 1, and 2 mg film-coated tablets

DRUGPlacebo

Film-coated tablets

Sponsors

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Prior history of relapsing remitting MS * SPMS defined as progressive increase of disability over at least 6 months * EDSS score of 3.0 to 6.5 * No relapse of corticosteroid treatment within 3 months

Exclusion criteria

* Women of child bearing potential must use reliable forms of contraception. * Diagnosis of Macular edema during screening period * Any medically unstable condition determined by investigator. * Unable to undergo MRI scans * Hypersensitivity to any study drugs or drugs of similar class

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With 3-month Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) Events as Measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)Baseline, every 3 month up to the maximum of approximately 3 yearsThe EDSS uses an ordinal scale to assess neurologic impairment in MS based on a neurological examination. Scores in each of 7 functional systems (Visual, Brain Stem, Pyramidal, Cerebellar, Sensory, Bowel & Bladder, and Cerebral) and an ambulation score were combined to determine the EDSS steps, ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS). 3-month confirmed disability progression is defined as an increase of score of 1 point in patients with baseline score of 3.0 to 5.0 and 0.5 point increase with baseline score of 5.5 to 6.5 sustained for at least 3 months.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in T2 Lesion VolumeBaseline, Month 12 and Month 24Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the brain were performed every 12 months. MRI evaluation during the Core Part included the total volume of T2 lesions. Each MRI scan was reviewed by a local neurologist and by a central blinded MRI reading center. The change from baseline in T2 lesion volume was analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with visit as a categorical factor and an unstructured covariance matrix and with adjustment for baseline covariates.
Percentage of Participants With 6-month Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) Events as Measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)Baseline, every 3 months up to the maximum of approximately 3 yearsThe EDSS uses an ordinal scale to assess neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis (MS) based on a neurological examination. Scores in each of 7 functional systems (Visual, Brain Stem, Pyramidal, Cerebellar, Sensory, Bowel & Bladder, and Cerebral) and an ambulation score were combined to determine the EDSS steps, ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS). 6-month confirmed disability progression is defined as an increase of score of 1 point in patients with baseline score of 3.0 to 5.0 and 0.5 point increase with baseline score of 5.5 to 6.5 sustained for at least 6 months. This outcome measure was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model.
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) for Confirmed RelapsesUp to maximum approximately 3 yearsMultiple sclerosis (MS) relapse was defined as appearance of a new neurological abnormality or worsening of previously stable or improving pre-existing neurological abnormality, separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical demyelinating event. Additionally, the abnormality had to be present for at least 24 hours and occur in the absence of fever (\<37.5°C) or known infection. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS, as defined in the study protocol, performed by the Independent EDSS Rater. ARR was defined as the average number of confirmed relapses per year. ARR was analyzed using a negative binomial regression model.
Percentage of Participants With First Relapse Events as Measured by Time to First Confirmed RelapseUp to maximum approximately 3 yearsMultiple sclerosis (MS) relapse was defined as appearance of a new neurological abnormality or worsening of previously stable or improving pre-existing neurological abnormality, separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical demyelinating event. Additionally, the abnormality had to be present for at least 24 hours and occur in the absence of fever (\<37.5°C) or known infection. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS, as defined in the study protocol, performed by the Independent EDSS Rater. Time to first relapse was defined as the time from Day 1 until the start of relapse symptoms. Patients without relapse were censored at the latest known date to be at risk. This outcome measure was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model.
Percentage of Patients With Relapse (Confirmed Relapse and Any Relapse)Up to maximum approximately 3 yearsMultiple sclerosis (MS) relapse was defined as appearance of a new neurological abnormality or worsening of previously stable or improving pre-existing neurological abnormality, separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical demyelinating event. Additionally, the abnormality had to be present for at least 24 hours and occur in the absence of fever (\<37.5°C) or known infection. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS, as defined in the study protocol, performed by the Independent EDSS Rater.
Change From Baseline in MSWS-12 Converted ScoreBaseline, Month 12 and Month 24The Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12) version 2 is a patient-rated measure of walking consisting of 12 items. Walking limitations were reported by the patients using categories, generating a total transformed score ranging from 0-100. Higher scores reflected greater impairment. The change from baseline in MSWS-12 converted score was analyzed using a repeated measures model.
Percentage of Participants With 3-month Confirmed Worsening in T25W of at Least 20% From BaselineBaseline, every 3 months up to the maximum of approximately 3 yearsThe Timed 25-Foot Walk Test (T25W) measured the time, in seconds, to walk 25 feet (7.62 meters). A 3-month confirmed worsening of at least 20% from baseline in the T25W was defined as an increase from baseline sustained for at least 3 months. This outcome measure was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model.
Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions Per Patient Per YearBaseline, Month 12 and Month 24Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the brain were performed every 12 months. MRI evaluation during the Core Part included the number of new or enlarging T2 lesions. Each MRI scan was reviewed by a local neurologist and by a central blinded MRI reading center. The number of new or enlarging T2 lesions compared to previous scan was analyzed using a repeated measures negative binomial regression model.
Percent Brain Volume Change (PBVC) Relative to BaselineBaseline, Month 12 and Month 24Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the brain were performed every 12 months. MRI evaluation during the Core Part included the percentage change in brain volume. Each MRI scan was reviewed by a local neurologist and by a central blinded MRI reading center. PBVC relative to baseline was analyzed using a repeated measures model (for normally distributed data) with visit as a categorical factor.
Number of Participants With 3-month CDP Events as Measured by EDSS in the Subgroup of SPMS Patients With/Without Superimposed RelapsesBaseline, every 3 months up to the maximum of approximately 3 yearsThe Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) assesses neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis (MS). EDSS scale ranges from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS). Confirmed disability is defined as an increase of score of 1 point in patients with baseline score of 3.0 to 5.0 and 0.5 point increase with baseline score of 5.5 to 6.5. The definition of 3-month confirmed disability progression (CDP) was an increase from baseline in EDSS as defined before sustained for at least 3 months. The following secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) groups were defined for the analysis of this endpoint: * Without superimposed relapses in the 2 years prior to study start (baseline definition) * With superimposed relapses in the 2 years prior to study start (baseline definition) * Without superimposed relapses during the Core Part of study (post-treatment) * With superimposed relapses during the Core Part of study (post-treatment) Data was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazard model
Number of Participants With 3-month CDP Events as Measured by EDSS in the Subgroup of Rapidly and Not Rapidly Evolving PatientsBaseline, every 3 months up to the maximum of approximately 3 yearsThe Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) assesses neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis (MS). EDSS scale ranges from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS). Confirmed disability is defined as an increase of score of 1 point in patients with baseline score of 3.0 to 5.0 and 0.5 point increase with baseline score of 5.5 to 6.5. The definition of 3-month confirmed disability progression (CDP) was an increase from baseline in EDSS as defined before sustained for at least 3 months. Rapidly evolving patients are defined as subjects with 1.5 or greater EDSS change in the 2 years prior to or at study start and disability progression in the 2 years prior to study start was not adjudicated. Data was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazard model.
Number of Participants With 3-month CDP Events as Measured by EDSS in the Subgroup of Patients With and Without Moderate/Severe Disease CourseBaseline, every 3 months up to the maximum of approximately 3 yearsThe Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) assesses neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis (MS). EDSS scale ranges from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS). Confirmed disability is defined as an increase of score of 1 point in patients with baseline score of 3.0 to 5.0 and 0.5 point increase with baseline score of 5.5 to 6.5. The definition of 3-month confirmed disability progression (CDP) was an increase from baseline in EDSS as defined before sustained for at least 3 months. Moderate or severe course of disease is defined as global Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score (MSSS) of 4 or more at baseline. Data was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazard model.
Number of T1 Gd-enhancing Lesions Per Patient Per ScanBaseline, Month 12 and Month 24Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the brain were performed every 12 months. MRI evaluation during the Core Part included the number of T1 gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing lesions. Each MRI scan was reviewed by a local neurologist and by a central blinded MRI reading center. The number of T1 Gd-enhancing lesions per patient per scan was analyzed using a negative binomial regression model.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Czechia, Estonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Latvia, Lithuania, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey (Türkiye), United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants took part in 294 investigative sites in 31 countries.

Pre-assignment details

Core Part recruitment completed; eligible patients moved to Extension Part (EP) providing treatment up to additional 7 years. Projected full 7-year final visits for majority patients first quarter 2023. Novartis closed EP slightly earlier than planned (not based on safety issues) to accommodate changes in study operations at a point when objective to provide long-term safety/efficacy data in patients treated up to 7 years met. Consequently, EP considered completed.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Siponimod (BAF312)
Participants started on Day 1 and were uptitrated from 0.25 mg to 2 mg of BAF312 orally over a period of 6 days. After Day 7, participants continued on 2 mg BAF312 daily for a variable duration.
1,105
Placebo
Matching placebo to BAF312 was administered orally during the Core Part of the trial.
546
Total1,651

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Core PartAdverse Event45180
Core PartDeath310
Core PartLack of Efficacy16110
Core PartLost to Follow-up980
Core PartNew therapy for study indication210
Core PartNon-compliance with study treatment500
Core PartPhysician Decision1310
Core PartProgressive disease840
Core PartProtocol deviation310
Core PartTechnical problems200
Core PartWithdrawal by Subject96770
Extension PartAdverse Event104059
Extension PartDeath2004
Extension PartLack of Efficacy37012
Extension PartLost to Follow-up905
Extension PartMissing1206
Extension PartNew therapy for study indication302
Extension PartPatient/guardian decision180098
Extension PartPhysician Decision29013
Extension PartProgressive disease36014
Extension PartProtocol deviation300
Extension PartStudy closed early42019
Extension PartTechnical problems2008

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalSiponimod (BAF312)
Age, Continuous48.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.94
48.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.87
48.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.84
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
18 Participants49 Participants31 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants10 Participants7 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
12 Participants29 Participants17 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
513 Participants1563 Participants1050 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
323 Participants992 Participants669 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
223 Participants659 Participants436 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
4 / 1,0994 / 54633 / 1,517
other
Total, other adverse events
778 / 1,099348 / 5461,267 / 1,517
serious
Total, serious adverse events
196 / 1,09983 / 546610 / 1,517

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants With 3-month Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) Events as Measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)

The EDSS uses an ordinal scale to assess neurologic impairment in MS based on a neurological examination. Scores in each of 7 functional systems (Visual, Brain Stem, Pyramidal, Cerebellar, Sensory, Bowel & Bladder, and Cerebral) and an ambulation score were combined to determine the EDSS steps, ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS). 3-month confirmed disability progression is defined as an increase of score of 1 point in patients with baseline score of 3.0 to 5.0 and 0.5 point increase with baseline score of 5.5 to 6.5 sustained for at least 3 months.

Time frame: Baseline, every 3 month up to the maximum of approximately 3 years

Population: The Full analysis set (FAS), which comprised all randomized patients with assigned treatments who took at least one dose of study medication, was considered for the analysis. Only participants from the FAS with non-missing covariates were analyzed for this outcome.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Siponimod (BAF312)Percentage of Participants With 3-month Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) Events as Measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)26.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 3-month Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) Events as Measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)31.7 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.013495% CI: [0.65, 0.95]Cox proportional hazards model
Secondary

Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) for Confirmed Relapses

Multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse was defined as appearance of a new neurological abnormality or worsening of previously stable or improving pre-existing neurological abnormality, separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical demyelinating event. Additionally, the abnormality had to be present for at least 24 hours and occur in the absence of fever (\<37.5°C) or known infection. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS, as defined in the study protocol, performed by the Independent EDSS Rater. ARR was defined as the average number of confirmed relapses per year. ARR was analyzed using a negative binomial regression model.

Time frame: Up to maximum approximately 3 years

Population: All participants in the FAS

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Siponimod (BAF312)Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) for Confirmed Relapses0.071 relapses/year
PlaceboAnnualized Relapse Rate (ARR) for Confirmed Relapses0.160 relapses/year
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.337, 0.587]Negative binomial regression model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in MSWS-12 Converted Score

The Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12) version 2 is a patient-rated measure of walking consisting of 12 items. Walking limitations were reported by the patients using categories, generating a total transformed score ranging from 0-100. Higher scores reflected greater impairment. The change from baseline in MSWS-12 converted score was analyzed using a repeated measures model.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 and Month 24

Population: Participants from the FAS with an available value for the MSWS-12 converted score at baseline and at least one post-baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Siponimod (BAF312)Change From Baseline in MSWS-12 Converted ScoreMonth 121.53 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.678
Siponimod (BAF312)Change From Baseline in MSWS-12 Converted ScoreMonth 244.16 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.848
PlaceboChange From Baseline in MSWS-12 Converted ScoreMonth 123.36 score on a scaleStandard Error 0.908
PlaceboChange From Baseline in MSWS-12 Converted ScoreMonth 245.38 score on a scaleStandard Error 1.167
Comparison: Month 12p-value: 0.076495% CI: [-3.85, 0.19]Repeated measures model
Comparison: Month 24p-value: 0.367195% CI: [-3.89, 1.44]Repeated measures model
Secondary

Change From Baseline in T2 Lesion Volume

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the brain were performed every 12 months. MRI evaluation during the Core Part included the total volume of T2 lesions. Each MRI scan was reviewed by a local neurologist and by a central blinded MRI reading center. The change from baseline in T2 lesion volume was analyzed using a mixed model for repeated measures (MMRM) with visit as a categorical factor and an unstructured covariance matrix and with adjustment for baseline covariates.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 and Month 24

Population: Participants from the FAS with at least one post-baseline MRI scan and non-missing covariates for the model.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Siponimod (BAF312)Change From Baseline in T2 Lesion VolumeMonth 12204.9 mm^3Standard Error 67.47
Siponimod (BAF312)Change From Baseline in T2 Lesion VolumeMonth 24162.9 mm^3Standard Error 73.9
Siponimod (BAF312)Change From Baseline in T2 Lesion VolumeAverage over Month 12 and Month 24183.9 mm^3Standard Error 66.33
PlaceboChange From Baseline in T2 Lesion VolumeMonth 12818.0 mm^3Standard Error 87.29
PlaceboChange From Baseline in T2 Lesion VolumeMonth 24940.4 mm^3Standard Error 97.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in T2 Lesion VolumeAverage over Month 12 and Month 24879.2 mm^3Standard Error 85.43
Comparison: Month 12p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-800.2, -426]Mixed model for repeated measures
Comparison: Month 24p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-990.6, -564.4]Mixed model for repeated measures
Comparison: Average over Month 12 and Month 24p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-877.3, -513.3]Mixed model for repeated measures
Secondary

Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions Per Patient Per Year

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the brain were performed every 12 months. MRI evaluation during the Core Part included the number of new or enlarging T2 lesions. Each MRI scan was reviewed by a local neurologist and by a central blinded MRI reading center. The number of new or enlarging T2 lesions compared to previous scan was analyzed using a repeated measures negative binomial regression model.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 and Month 24

Population: Participants from the FAS with at least one post-baseline MRI scan and non-missing values for the covariates included in the model.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Siponimod (BAF312)Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions Per Patient Per YearMonth 240.489 T2 lesions/patient/year
Siponimod (BAF312)Number of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions Per Patient Per YearMonth 121.003 T2 lesions/patient/year
PlaceboNumber of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions Per Patient Per YearMonth 123.776 T2 lesions/patient/year
PlaceboNumber of New or Enlarging T2 Lesions Per Patient Per YearMonth 243.437 T2 lesions/patient/year
Comparison: Month 12p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.215, 0.328]Regression model
Comparison: Month 24p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.103, 0.196]Regression model
Secondary

Number of Participants With 3-month CDP Events as Measured by EDSS in the Subgroup of Patients With and Without Moderate/Severe Disease Course

The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) assesses neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis (MS). EDSS scale ranges from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS). Confirmed disability is defined as an increase of score of 1 point in patients with baseline score of 3.0 to 5.0 and 0.5 point increase with baseline score of 5.5 to 6.5. The definition of 3-month confirmed disability progression (CDP) was an increase from baseline in EDSS as defined before sustained for at least 3 months. Moderate or severe course of disease is defined as global Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score (MSSS) of 4 or more at baseline. Data was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazard model.

Time frame: Baseline, every 3 months up to the maximum of approximately 3 years

Population: Participants from the FAS in each subgroup with an available value for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Siponimod (BAF312)Number of Participants With 3-month CDP Events as Measured by EDSS in the Subgroup of Patients With and Without Moderate/Severe Disease CourseWith moderate or severe course of disease232 Participants
Siponimod (BAF312)Number of Participants With 3-month CDP Events as Measured by EDSS in the Subgroup of Patients With and Without Moderate/Severe Disease CourseWithout moderate or severe course of disease56 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With 3-month CDP Events as Measured by EDSS in the Subgroup of Patients With and Without Moderate/Severe Disease CourseWith moderate or severe course of disease141 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With 3-month CDP Events as Measured by EDSS in the Subgroup of Patients With and Without Moderate/Severe Disease CourseWithout moderate or severe course of disease32 Participants
Comparison: With moderate or severe course of disease95% CI: [0.65, 0.99]Cox proportional hazard model
Comparison: Without moderate or severe course of disease95% CI: [0.47, 1.13]Cox proportional hazard model
Secondary

Number of Participants With 3-month CDP Events as Measured by EDSS in the Subgroup of Rapidly and Not Rapidly Evolving Patients

The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) assesses neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis (MS). EDSS scale ranges from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS). Confirmed disability is defined as an increase of score of 1 point in patients with baseline score of 3.0 to 5.0 and 0.5 point increase with baseline score of 5.5 to 6.5. The definition of 3-month confirmed disability progression (CDP) was an increase from baseline in EDSS as defined before sustained for at least 3 months. Rapidly evolving patients are defined as subjects with 1.5 or greater EDSS change in the 2 years prior to or at study start and disability progression in the 2 years prior to study start was not adjudicated. Data was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazard model.

Time frame: Baseline, every 3 months up to the maximum of approximately 3 years

Population: Participants from the FAS in each subgroup with an available value for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Siponimod (BAF312)Number of Participants With 3-month CDP Events as Measured by EDSS in the Subgroup of Rapidly and Not Rapidly Evolving PatientsRapidly evolving patients82 Participants
Siponimod (BAF312)Number of Participants With 3-month CDP Events as Measured by EDSS in the Subgroup of Rapidly and Not Rapidly Evolving PatientsNot rapidly evolving patients206 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With 3-month CDP Events as Measured by EDSS in the Subgroup of Rapidly and Not Rapidly Evolving PatientsRapidly evolving patients60 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With 3-month CDP Events as Measured by EDSS in the Subgroup of Rapidly and Not Rapidly Evolving PatientsNot rapidly evolving patients113 Participants
Comparison: Rapidly evolving patients95% CI: [0.46, 0.91]Cox proportional hazard model
Comparison: Not rapidly evolving patients95% CI: [0.69, 1.09]Cox proportional hazard model
Secondary

Number of Participants With 3-month CDP Events as Measured by EDSS in the Subgroup of SPMS Patients With/Without Superimposed Relapses

The Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) assesses neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis (MS). EDSS scale ranges from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS). Confirmed disability is defined as an increase of score of 1 point in patients with baseline score of 3.0 to 5.0 and 0.5 point increase with baseline score of 5.5 to 6.5. The definition of 3-month confirmed disability progression (CDP) was an increase from baseline in EDSS as defined before sustained for at least 3 months. The following secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) groups were defined for the analysis of this endpoint: * Without superimposed relapses in the 2 years prior to study start (baseline definition) * With superimposed relapses in the 2 years prior to study start (baseline definition) * Without superimposed relapses during the Core Part of study (post-treatment) * With superimposed relapses during the Core Part of study (post-treatment) Data was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazard model

Time frame: Baseline, every 3 months up to the maximum of approximately 3 years

Population: Participants from the FAS in each subgroup with an available value for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Siponimod (BAF312)Number of Participants With 3-month CDP Events as Measured by EDSS in the Subgroup of SPMS Patients With/Without Superimposed RelapsesWithout superimposed relapses at baseline190 Participants
Siponimod (BAF312)Number of Participants With 3-month CDP Events as Measured by EDSS in the Subgroup of SPMS Patients With/Without Superimposed RelapsesWith superimposed relapses at baseline98 Participants
Siponimod (BAF312)Number of Participants With 3-month CDP Events as Measured by EDSS in the Subgroup of SPMS Patients With/Without Superimposed RelapsesWithout superimposed relapses post-treatment237 Participants
Siponimod (BAF312)Number of Participants With 3-month CDP Events as Measured by EDSS in the Subgroup of SPMS Patients With/Without Superimposed RelapsesWith superimposed relapses post-treatment51 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With 3-month CDP Events as Measured by EDSS in the Subgroup of SPMS Patients With/Without Superimposed RelapsesWith superimposed relapses post-treatment51 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With 3-month CDP Events as Measured by EDSS in the Subgroup of SPMS Patients With/Without Superimposed RelapsesWithout superimposed relapses at baseline101 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With 3-month CDP Events as Measured by EDSS in the Subgroup of SPMS Patients With/Without Superimposed RelapsesWithout superimposed relapses post-treatment122 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With 3-month CDP Events as Measured by EDSS in the Subgroup of SPMS Patients With/Without Superimposed RelapsesWith superimposed relapses at baseline72 Participants
Comparison: Without superimposed relapses at baseline95% CI: [0.68, 1.11]Cox proportional hazard model
Comparison: With superimposed relapses at baseline95% CI: [0.49, 0.91]Cox proportional hazard model
Comparison: Without superimposed relapses post-treatment95% CI: [0.69, 1.06]Cox proportional hazard model
Comparison: With superimposed relapses post-treatment95% CI: [0.53, 1.19]Cox proportional hazard model
Secondary

Number of T1 Gd-enhancing Lesions Per Patient Per Scan

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the brain were performed every 12 months. MRI evaluation during the Core Part included the number of T1 gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing lesions. Each MRI scan was reviewed by a local neurologist and by a central blinded MRI reading center. The number of T1 Gd-enhancing lesions per patient per scan was analyzed using a negative binomial regression model.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 and Month 24

Population: Participants from the FAS with at least one post-baseline MRI scan and non-missing values for the covariates included in the model.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Siponimod (BAF312)Number of T1 Gd-enhancing Lesions Per Patient Per ScanMonth 120.080 T1 Gd-enhancing lesions/patient/scan
Siponimod (BAF312)Number of T1 Gd-enhancing Lesions Per Patient Per ScanMonth 240.074 T1 Gd-enhancing lesions/patient/scan
PlaceboNumber of T1 Gd-enhancing Lesions Per Patient Per ScanMonth 120.640 T1 Gd-enhancing lesions/patient/scan
PlaceboNumber of T1 Gd-enhancing Lesions Per Patient Per ScanMonth 240.418 T1 Gd-enhancing lesions/patient/scan
Comparison: Month 12p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.083, 0.191]Negative binomial regression model
Comparison: Month 24p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.087, 0.362]Negative binomial regression model
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With 3-month Confirmed Worsening in T25W of at Least 20% From Baseline

The Timed 25-Foot Walk Test (T25W) measured the time, in seconds, to walk 25 feet (7.62 meters). A 3-month confirmed worsening of at least 20% from baseline in the T25W was defined as an increase from baseline sustained for at least 3 months. This outcome measure was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model.

Time frame: Baseline, every 3 months up to the maximum of approximately 3 years

Population: Participants from the FAS with non-missing covariates for the model.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Siponimod (BAF312)Percentage of Participants With 3-month Confirmed Worsening in T25W of at Least 20% From Baseline39.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 3-month Confirmed Worsening in T25W of at Least 20% From Baseline41.4 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.439895% CI: [0.8, 1.1]Cox proportional hazards model
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With 6-month Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) Events as Measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)

The EDSS uses an ordinal scale to assess neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis (MS) based on a neurological examination. Scores in each of 7 functional systems (Visual, Brain Stem, Pyramidal, Cerebellar, Sensory, Bowel & Bladder, and Cerebral) and an ambulation score were combined to determine the EDSS steps, ranging from 0 (normal) to 10 (death due to MS). 6-month confirmed disability progression is defined as an increase of score of 1 point in patients with baseline score of 3.0 to 5.0 and 0.5 point increase with baseline score of 5.5 to 6.5 sustained for at least 6 months. This outcome measure was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model.

Time frame: Baseline, every 3 months up to the maximum of approximately 3 years

Population: Participants from the FAS with non-missing covariates for the model.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Siponimod (BAF312)Percentage of Participants With 6-month Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) Events as Measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)19.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With 6-month Confirmed Disability Progression (CDP) Events as Measured by the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS)25.5 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.005895% CI: [0.6, 0.92]Cox proportional hazards model
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With First Relapse Events as Measured by Time to First Confirmed Relapse

Multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse was defined as appearance of a new neurological abnormality or worsening of previously stable or improving pre-existing neurological abnormality, separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical demyelinating event. Additionally, the abnormality had to be present for at least 24 hours and occur in the absence of fever (\<37.5°C) or known infection. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS, as defined in the study protocol, performed by the Independent EDSS Rater. Time to first relapse was defined as the time from Day 1 until the start of relapse symptoms. Patients without relapse were censored at the latest known date to be at risk. This outcome measure was analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model.

Time frame: Up to maximum approximately 3 years

Population: Participants from the FAS with non-missing covariates for the model.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Siponimod (BAF312)Percentage of Participants With First Relapse Events as Measured by Time to First Confirmed Relapse10.7 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With First Relapse Events as Measured by Time to First Confirmed Relapse18.9 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.41, 0.7]Cox proportional hazards model
Secondary

Percentage of Patients With Relapse (Confirmed Relapse and Any Relapse)

Multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse was defined as appearance of a new neurological abnormality or worsening of previously stable or improving pre-existing neurological abnormality, separated by at least 30 days from onset of a preceding clinical demyelinating event. Additionally, the abnormality had to be present for at least 24 hours and occur in the absence of fever (\<37.5°C) or known infection. A confirmed MS relapse was defined as accompanied by a clinically-relevant change in the EDSS, as defined in the study protocol, performed by the Independent EDSS Rater.

Time frame: Up to maximum approximately 3 years

Population: All participants in the FAS

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Siponimod (BAF312)Percentage of Patients With Relapse (Confirmed Relapse and Any Relapse)Any relapse (confirmed or unconfirmed)16.7 Percentage of participants
Siponimod (BAF312)Percentage of Patients With Relapse (Confirmed Relapse and Any Relapse)Confirmed relapse10.3 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Patients With Relapse (Confirmed Relapse and Any Relapse)Any relapse (confirmed or unconfirmed)26.0 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Patients With Relapse (Confirmed Relapse and Any Relapse)Confirmed relapse18.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent Brain Volume Change (PBVC) Relative to Baseline

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the brain were performed every 12 months. MRI evaluation during the Core Part included the percentage change in brain volume. Each MRI scan was reviewed by a local neurologist and by a central blinded MRI reading center. PBVC relative to baseline was analyzed using a repeated measures model (for normally distributed data) with visit as a categorical factor.

Time frame: Baseline, Month 12 and Month 24

Population: Participants from the FAS with at least one post-baseline MRI scan and non-missing values for the covariates included in the model.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Siponimod (BAF312)Percent Brain Volume Change (PBVC) Relative to BaselineMonth 12-0.283 % change from baseline in brain volumeStandard Error 0.0264
Siponimod (BAF312)Percent Brain Volume Change (PBVC) Relative to BaselineMonth 24-0.711 % change from baseline in brain volumeStandard Error 0.0356
PlaceboPercent Brain Volume Change (PBVC) Relative to BaselineMonth 12-0.458 % change from baseline in brain volumeStandard Error 0.0341
PlaceboPercent Brain Volume Change (PBVC) Relative to BaselineMonth 24-0.839 % change from baseline in brain volumeStandard Error 0.0476
Comparison: Month 12p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.103, 0.247]Repeated measures model
Comparison: Month 24p-value: 0.019695% CI: [0.021, 0.236]Repeated measures model

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 7, 2026