Adenocarcinoma of the Prostate, Recurrent Prostate Cancer, Stage IIA Prostate Cancer, Stage IIB Prostate Cancer, Stage III Prostate Cancer, Stage I Prostate Cancer
Conditions
Brief summary
This clinical trial studies high-dose stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in treating patients with low-, intermediate-, or high-risk localized prostate cancer. SBRT may be able to send x-rays directly to the tumor and cause less damage to normal tissue
Detailed description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To assess treatment related gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity for patients who undergo SBRT for localized prostate cancer. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. Follow quality of life after SBRT using Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) and American Urological Association (AUA) scores. II. Assess biochemical control after high-dose SBRT. OUTLINE: Patients undergo 5 fractions of prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy over 10-12 days with at least 40 hours between each fraction in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 1.5, 4, 8, and 12 months, every 6 months for 4 years, and then annually thereafter.
Interventions
Undergo SBRT
Ancillary studies
Correlative studies
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* The patient must have prostate adenocarcinoma proven by histologic diagnosis * The patient must have clinical stage T1a-T3b with localized prostate cancer considered low, intermediate, or high risk as defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines; any patient whom is defined as high-risk must undergo screening with computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the abdomen and pelvis as well as bone scan prior to enrollment for staging purposes; low and intermediate risk patients do not require imaging for staging unless they have a focal symptom warranting investigation * Performance status - Karnofsky performance status (PS) \>= 70 * Life expectancy of \> 5 years, in the opinion of and as documented by the investigator * Patients must either already have fiducials already placed within the prostate, or otherwise be candidates for prostate fiducial placement (no bleeding disorders which may cause excessive bleeding with fiducial placement, INR \< 2.0). * Patients must have prostate-specific antigen (PSA) drawn within the 90 days prior to enrollment * Men must agree to use adequate contraception (double barrier method of birth control or abstinence) for the duration of study participation and for 12 months after completing treatment * Subjects must have the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent document
Exclusion criteria
* Prior treatment toxicities must be resolved to =\< grade 1 according to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 * Patients who are receiving any other investigational agents * Evidence of metastatic disease prior to radiation * Patients with uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, cardiac arrhythmia, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements * Prior pelvic radiation therapy * Patients whom are planned to receive pelvic nodal radiation are excluded * Weight \> 350 lbs * Contraindications to placement of fiducials required for high-precision image guidance (e.g. bleeding disorders which may cause excessive bleeding with placement, requirement for coumadin, international normalized ratio \[INR\] \> 2.0) * Patients unable to maintain a full bladder during treatment * Previous prostatectomy * Inflammatory bowel disease * AUA score \> 15 in spite of optimal therapy
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Patients With Treatment Related GI and/or GU Toxicity as Assessed by the NCI CTCTAE Version 4.0 | 1.5 months | Number of patients with excessive GI and/or GU toxicity, defined as a grade 3 GU toxicity rate of ≥15% according to the NCI CTCTAE version 4.0 |
| Number of Patients With Treatment Related GI and GU Toxicity as Assessed by the NCI CTCTAE Version 4.0 | 4 months | Number of patients with excessive GI and/or GU toxicity, defined as a grade 3 GU toxicity rate of ≥15% according to the NCI CTCTAE version 4.0 |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Baseline and 1.5 months | Quality of life (QOL) from baseline as assessed by scores of the EPIC Questionnaire. Scores for each domain (urinary incontinence, bowel, sexual, hormonal) range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better clinical assessment. |
| Quality of Life as Assessed by Change in AUA Scores | Baseline and 1.5 months | Quality of life (QOL) as assessed by changes in AUA scores ranging between 0 to 35, with higher scores indicating a worse clinical assessment. |
| Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Relapse Free Survival as Measured by Serum PSA | Baseline and 1.5 months | Percentage of Participants with biochemical failure. Biochemical failure is defined as a rise in PSA of 2.0 ng/dl above the post-treatment nadir. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Subjects were recruited from regional hospitals from July 2012 thru Jan 2015.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Treatment (SBRT) Patients undergo 5 fractions of prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy over 10-20 days with at least 40 hours between each fraction in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
stereotactic body radiation therapy: Undergo SBRT
quality-of-life assessment: Ancillary studies
laboratory biomarker analysis: Correlative studies | 35 |
| Total | 35 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | competing secondary disease | 2 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Treatment (SBRT) |
|---|---|
| Age, Customized 50-59 yrs | 6 Participants |
| Age, Customized 60-69 yrs | 12 Participants |
| Age, Customized 70-79 yrs | 15 Participants |
| Age, Customized 80-89 yrs | 2 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 0 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 33 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 2 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 10 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 25 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 35 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 35 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 1 / 35 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 34 / 35 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 1 / 35 |
Outcome results
Number of Patients With Treatment Related GI and GU Toxicity as Assessed by the NCI CTCTAE Version 4.0
Number of patients with excessive GI and/or GU toxicity, defined as a grade 3 GU toxicity rate of ≥15% according to the NCI CTCTAE version 4.0
Time frame: 4 months
Population: Per protocol
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment (SBRT) | Number of Patients With Treatment Related GI and GU Toxicity as Assessed by the NCI CTCTAE Version 4.0 | 0 Participants |
Number of Patients With Treatment Related GI and GU Toxicity as Assessed by the NCI CTCTAE Version 4.0
Number of patients with excessive GI and/or GU toxicity, defined as a grade 3 GU toxicity rate of ≥15% according to the NCI CTCTAE version 4.0
Time frame: 8 months
Population: Per protocol
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment (SBRT) | Number of Patients With Treatment Related GI and GU Toxicity as Assessed by the NCI CTCTAE Version 4.0 | 0 Participants |
Number of Patients With Treatment Related GI and GU Toxicity as Assessed by the NCI CTCTAE Version 4.0
Number of patients with excessive GI and/or GU toxicity, defined as a grade 3 GU toxicity rate of ≥15% according to the NCI CTCTAE version 4.0
Time frame: 12 months
Population: All patients that received treatment
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment (SBRT) | Number of Patients With Treatment Related GI and GU Toxicity as Assessed by the NCI CTCTAE Version 4.0 | 0 Participants |
Number of Patients With Treatment Related GI and/or GU Toxicity as Assessed by the NCI CTCTAE Version 4.0
Number of patients with excessive GI and/or GU toxicity, defined as a grade 3 GU toxicity rate of ≥15% according to the NCI CTCTAE version 4.0
Time frame: 1.5 months
Population: All patients that received treatment
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment (SBRT) | Number of Patients With Treatment Related GI and/or GU Toxicity as Assessed by the NCI CTCTAE Version 4.0 | 1 Participants |
Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Relapse Free Survival as Measured by Serum PSA
Percent measurement of biochemical failure will be defined as a rise in PSA of 2.0 ng/dl above the post-treatment nadir.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months
Population: participants who had a PSA value up to the reporting time interval. Not every patient had all of the PSA values collected due to missed test visits.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment (SBRT) | Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Relapse Free Survival as Measured by Serum PSA | 96.5 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Relapse Free Survival as Measured by Serum PSA
Percentage of Participants with biochemical failure. Biochemical failure is defined as a rise in PSA of 2.0 ng/dl above the post-treatment nadir.
Time frame: Baseline and 1.5 months
Population: participants who had a PSA values up to the reporting time interval. Not every patient had all of the PSA values collected due to missed test visits.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment (SBRT) | Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Relapse Free Survival as Measured by Serum PSA | 100 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Relapse Free Survival as Measured by Serum PSA
Biochemical failure will be defined as a rise in PSA of 2.0 ng/dl above the post-treatment nadir.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 months
Population: participants who had a PSA value up to the reporting time interval. Not every patient had all of the PSA values collected due to missed test visits.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment (SBRT) | Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Relapse Free Survival as Measured by Serum PSA | 100 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Relapse Free Survival as Measured by Serum PSA
Biochemical failure will be defined as a rise in PSA of 2.0 ng/dl above the post-treatment nadir.
Time frame: Baseline and 8 months
Population: participants who had a PSA value up to the reporting time interval. Not every patient had all of the PSA values collected due to missed test visits.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment (SBRT) | Percentage of Participants With Biochemical Relapse Free Survival as Measured by Serum PSA | 96.5 percentage of participants |
Quality of Life as Assessed by Change in AUA Scores
Quality of life (QOL) as assessed by changes in AUA scores ranging between 0 to 35, with higher scores indicating a worse clinical assessment.
Time frame: Baseline and 1.5 months
Population: Participants that were able to complete the questionnaire at specific time point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by Change in AUA Scores | 9 score on a scale |
Quality of Life as Assessed by Change in AUA Scores
Quality of life (QOL) as assessed by changes in AUA scores ranging between 0 to 35, with higher scores indicating a worse clinical assessment.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 months
Population: Participants that were able to complete the questionnaire at specific time point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by Change in AUA Scores | 7.5 score on a scale |
Quality of Life as Assessed by Change in AUA Scores
Quality of life (QOL) as assessed by changes in AUA scores ranging between 0 to 35, with higher scores indicating a worse clinical assessment.
Time frame: Baseline and 8 months
Population: Participants that were able to complete the questionnaire at specific time point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by Change in AUA Scores | 6 score on a scale |
Quality of Life as Assessed by Change in AUA Scores
Quality of life (QOL) as assessed by changes in AUA scores ranging between 0 to 35, with higher scores indicating a worse clinical assessment.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months
Population: Participants that were able to complete the questionnaire at specific time point.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by Change in AUA Scores | 8 score on a scale |
Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores
Quality of life (QOL) from baseline as assessed by scores of the EPIC Questionnaire. Scores for each domain (urinary incontinence, bowel, sexual, hormonal) range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better clinical assessment.
Time frame: Baseline and 1.5 months
Population: Participants that were able to complete the questionnaire at specific time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Urinary Incontenence Domain | 83.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.5 |
| Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Bowel Domain | 90.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.4 |
| Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Sexual Function Domain | 46.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.4 |
| Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Hormonal Domain | 80.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.4 |
| After Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Hormonal Domain | 76.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 20.7 |
| After Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Urinary Incontenence Domain | 84.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.7 |
| After Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Sexual Function Domain | 36.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.3 |
| After Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Bowel Domain | 83.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.7 |
Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores
Quality of life (QOL) from baseline as assessed by scores of the EPIC Questionnaire. Scores for each domain (urinary incontinence, bowel, sexual, hormonal) range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better clinical assessment.
Time frame: Baseline and 4 months
Population: Participants that were able to complete the questionnaire at specific time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Urinary Incontenence Domain | 83.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.5 |
| Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Bowel Domain | 90.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.4 |
| Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Sexual Function Domain | 46.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.4 |
| Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Hormonal Domain | 80.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.4 |
| After Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Hormonal Domain | 79.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 22.6 |
| After Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Urinary Incontenence Domain | 85.0 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.3 |
| After Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Sexual Function Domain | 33.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 31.1 |
| After Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Bowel Domain | 85.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 21.1 |
Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores
Quality of life (QOL) from baseline as assessed by scores of the EPIC Questionnaire. Scores for each domain (urinary incontinence, bowel, sexual, hormonal) range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better clinical assessment.
Time frame: Baseline and 8 months
Population: Participants that were able to complete the questionnaire at specific time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Urinary Incontenence Domain | 83.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.5 |
| Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Bowel Domain | 90.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.4 |
| Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Sexual Function Domain | 46.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.4 |
| Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Hormonal Domain | 80.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.4 |
| After Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Hormonal Domain | 82.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.7 |
| After Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Urinary Incontenence Domain | 85.7 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.3 |
| After Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Sexual Function Domain | 37.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 29 |
| After Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Bowel Domain | 86.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.3 |
Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores
Quality of life (QOL) from baseline as assessed by scores of the EPIC Questionnaire. Scores for each domain (urinary incontinence, bowel, sexual, hormonal) range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better clinical assessment.
Time frame: Baseline and 12 months
Population: Participants that were able to complete the questionnaire at specific time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Urinary Incontenence Domain | 83.2 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 16.5 |
| Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Bowel Domain | 90.5 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.4 |
| Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Sexual Function Domain | 46.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.4 |
| Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Hormonal Domain | 80.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.4 |
| After Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Hormonal Domain | 87.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 12.3 |
| After Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Urinary Incontenence Domain | 83.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.4 |
| After Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Sexual Function Domain | 37.1 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.5 |
| After Treatment (SBRT) | Quality of Life as Assessed by EPIC Scores | Bowel Domain | 86.3 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 18.4 |