Skip to content

Sup-ER Splint for Children With Birth Related Brachial Plexus Injury

Sup-ER Splinting: Does Early Passive Positioning in Supination and External Rotation in Children With Birth Related Brachial Plexus Injury Have Benefit?

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01663428
Enrollment
0
Registered
2012-08-13
Start date
2012-07-31
Completion date
2019-08-31
Last updated
2017-11-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Birth Related Brachial Plexus Injury, Obstetrical Brachial Plexus Palsy

Keywords

birth related brachial plexus injury, brachial plexus, splint

Brief summary

This study evaluates the ability of a newly designed splint called Sup-ER Splint to improve the arm function and anatomy of children with birth related brachial plexus injuries.

Detailed description

The brachial plexus is a group of 5 nerves from the spinal cord that provide the movement and sensation of an upper extremity. In some difficult deliveries, traction on the shoulder may lead to damage to the brachial plexus and will result in an arm that is paralyzed. This is called 'birth related brachial plexus injury' (BRBPI). This may occur in up to 1/1000 births and the nerves may be injured minimally to severely. About 2/3 of children with this injury will recover to quite functional levels simply by maintaining looseness of joints while their nerves slowly heal. Some children have nerve injuries severe enough that they require surgical reconstruction with nerve grafts and nerve transfers to achieve even adequate function. One almost universally common outcome, even in children with otherwise good recovery, is that the motions of external rotation of the shoulder and supination of the forearm are weaker, later to recover, and often incomplete. Even beyond these direct functional weaknesses, because the arm is positioned poorly, joint contractures and imbalance of these motions can interfere with other upper extremity movements like elbow flexion, even when elbow flexion itself is well recovered. More importantly, lack of full motion leads to long term changes in the structure, growth, and posture of the shoulder requiring further musculoskeletal surgery, or a child with permanent deformity or disability. Surgery cannot completely correct this deformity. Any gains in active and passive range of motion during the first year of life may improve these long-term shoulder outcomes. The investigators have instituted a program of early passive repositioning mostly using a custom Sup-ER (Supination and External Rotation) splint during early growth and development to improve arm position and range of motion where ER and Sup are weak. In compliant patients in a pilot study, the speed and strength of recovery of ER and Supination are improved compared to historical controls. It is a novel splint and protocol designed by the investigators and has significantly changed the care received by patients in BC. This study will evaluate the use of Sup-ER splint in multiple centres over a five year period by assessing the arm function at common time points in recovery.

Interventions

OTHERSup-ER Splint
OTHERCurrently accepted treatment

Sponsors

Children's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia
CollaboratorOTHER
University of British Columbia
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Weeks to 8 Weeks
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Diagnosis of brachial plexus injury at birth. * Significant deficit in external rotation and/or supination of the affected limb based on clinical assessment using the Toronto Active Movement Scale at 6 weeks of age: External Rotation ≤ 2 and/or Supination ≤ 2 * Tightness in Passive Range of Motion of external rotation: any angle of less than 180°. * Age 6-8 weeks for complete protocol fulfillment.

Exclusion criteria

* Neuromuscular disorder. * Unwillingness or inability to comply with the requirements of this protocol.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Toronto Active Movement Scale1 year of age

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Alpha angle (glenoid version) and posterior displacement of humeral head (PDHH)6 months of ageThe Alpha angle (glenoid version) and posterior displacement of humeral head (PDHH) will be measured at baseline and 6 months of age by ultrasound.

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026