Schizophrenia
Conditions
Keywords
Schizophrenia, Paliperidone, Paliperidone extended-release (ER)
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to explore the efficacy of flexibly dosed paliperidone extended-release (ER) in participants with schizophrenia (psychiatric disorder with symptoms of emotional instability, detachment from reality, often with delusions and hallucinations, and withdrawal into the self) who were previously unsuccessfully treated with other oral antipsychotics.
Detailed description
This is a single arm (one group of participants), multi-center, 6-month study to explore the tolerability, safety and efficacy of flexibly dosed paliperidone ER in participants with schizophrenia previously unsuccessfully treated with an oral antipsychotic medication. Antipsychotic medications are drugs that are helpful in the treatment of psychosis and have a capacity to ameliorate thought disorders. Unsuccessfully treated means that, despite the participant was treated with an adequate dose of an appropriate oral antipsychotic for an adequate period of time, previous treatment is considered unsuccessful due to lack of efficacy, lack of tolerability or safety, lack of compliance and/or other reasons. Throughout the study the investigators will adjust the dosage of each participant based on the individual needs. In general, the recommended paliperidone ER dose will be 6 milligram once daily. Participants can be either in- or outpatients and they may take their study drug with or without food. Participants who will complete this 6-month study and would like to continue will be eligible to be enrolled in an extension phase until paliperidone ER is available.
Interventions
Paliperidone extended-release (ER) tablet in dose range of 3 to 12 milligram (mg) per day will be given orally for 6 months as per Investigator's discretion.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Participant diagnosed with schizophrenia * Participant's previous treatment of schizophrenia is considered unsuccessful * Participant is healthy on the basis of a physical examination and vital signs * Women must be postmenopausal, surgically sterile, abstinent, or, if sexually active, agree to practice an effective method of birth control before entry and throughout the study * Be willing and able to fill out self-administered questionnaires
Exclusion criteria
* Have used clozapine or Risperdal CONSTA during the last month, or have received any other conventional drug used to treat psychosis during the last 3 months * Judged to be at high risk for adverse events, violence or self-harm * Inability to swallow the study medication whole with the aid of water * Pregnant or breast-feeding female * History or current symptoms of tardive dyskinesia (involuntary movements of the facial muscles and tongue)
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 26 | Baseline and Week 26 | The PANSS is a 30-item scale designed to assess various symptoms of schizophrenia including delusions, grandiosity, blunted affect, poor attention, and poor impulse control. The 30 symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale that ranges from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme psychopathology). The PANSS total score consists of the sum of all 30 PANSS items and ranges from 30 to 210. Higher scores indicate worsening. Data for two groups is presented here, based on the reason to switch: lack of efficacy and lack of tolerability, compliance or other who switched from other previous antipsychotic drugs to paliperidone. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 20 Percent (%) Improvement in PANSS Total Score at Week 26 | Week 26 | The PANSS is a 30-item scale designed to assess various symptoms of schizophrenia including delusions, grandiosity, blunted affect, poor attention, and poor impulse control. The 30 symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale that ranges from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme psychopathology). The PANSS total score consists of the sum of all 30 PANSS items and ranges from 30 to 210. Higher scores indicate worsening. Percentage of participants with greater than or equal to 20 % improvement in PANSS total score is reported here. Data for two groups is presented here, based on the reason to switch: lack of efficacy and lack of tolerability, compliance or other who switched from other previous antipsychotic drugs to paliperidone. |
| Change From Baseline in PANSS Total Positive Subscale Score at Week 26 | Baseline and Week 26 | The Positive Subscale of PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) assesses seven positive-symptoms of schizophrenia. Positive symptoms refer to an excess of or distortion of normal functions. The symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale, ranging from 7 (absent) to 49 (extreme psychopathology). Data for two groups is presented here, based on the reason to switch: lack of efficacy and lack of tolerability, compliance or other who switched from other previous antipsychotic drugs to paliperidone. |
| Change From Baseline in PANSS Total Negative Subscale Score at Week 26 | Baseline and Week 26 | The Negative Subscale of PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) assesses seven negative-symptoms of schizophrenia. Negative symptoms represent a diminution or loss of normal functions. The symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale, ranging from 7 (absent) to 49 (extreme psychopathology). Data for two groups is presented here, based on the reason to switch: lack of efficacy and lack of tolerability, compliance or other who switched from other previous antipsychotic drugs to paliperidone. |
| Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 26 | Baseline and Week 26 | The CGI rating scale is a 7-point global assessment that measures the clinician's impression of the severity of illness exhibited by a participant. A rating of 1 indicates to normal, not at all ill and a rating of 7 indicates among the most extremely ill participants. Higher scores indicate worsening. Data for two groups is presented here, based on the reason to switch: lack of efficacy and lack of tolerability, compliance or other who switched from other previous antipsychotic drugs to paliperidone. |
| Change From Baseline in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Scale at Week 26 | Baseline and Week 26 | The PSP scale assesses the degree of dysfunction within 4 domains of behavior: socially useful activities, personal and social relationships, self-care and disturbing and aggressive behavior. The score ranges from 1 to 100, divided into 10 equal intervals to rate the degree of difficulty (1, absent to 6, very severe) in each of the 4 domains. Participants with a score of 71 to 100 have a mild degree of difficulty; from 31 to 70, varying degrees of disability; less or equal to 30, functioning so poorly as to require intensive supervision. Data for two groups is presented here, based on the reason to switch: lack of efficacy and lack of tolerability, compliance or other who switched from other previous antipsychotic drugs to paliperidone. |
| Change From Baseline in Sleep Quality at Week 26 | Baseline and Week 26 | Sleep quality was assessed by an 11-point visual analog scale that rates how well participants sleep. Participants indicated on the scale (from 0 to 100 millimeter) how well they have slept in the previous 7 days (from 0: very badly to 100: very well). Data for two groups is presented here, based on the reason to switch: lack of efficacy and lack of tolerability, compliance or other who switched from other previous antipsychotic drugs to paliperidone. |
| Change From Baseline in Daytime Drowsiness at Week 26 | Baseline and Week 26 | Daytime Drowsiness was assessed by an 11-point visual analog scale that rates how well participants sleep. Participants indicated on the scale (from 0 to 100 millimeter) how often they have felt drowsy within the previous 7 days (from 0: not at all to 100:all the time). Data for two groups is presented here, based on the reason to switch: lack of efficacy and lack of tolerability, compliance or other who switched from other previous antipsychotic drugs to paliperidone. |
| Number of Participants Within Each Category of Patient Satisfaction Score | Baseline and Week 26 | Participants were interviewed at baseline and at the end of the trial (Week 26) to assess their satisfaction with the current treatment on a 5-point scale (very good, good, reasonable, moderate or poor). Data for two groups is presented here, based on the reason to switch: lack of efficacy and lack of tolerability, compliance or other who switched from other previous antipsychotic drugs to paliperidone. |
Participant flow
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy Paliperidone extended-release (ER) tablet in dose range of 3 to 12 milligram (mg) per day was given orally for 6 months as per Investigator's discretion to participants who transitioned to Paliperidone ER from other oral antipsychotics for the main reason of lack of efficacy. | 520 |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other Paliperidone extended-release (ER) tablet in dose range of 3 to 12 milligram (mg) per day was given orally for 6 months as per Investigator's discretion to participants who transitioned to Paliperidone ER from other oral antipsychotics for the main reason of lack of tolerability, compliance or other reasons. | 597 |
| Total | 1,117 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Adverse Event | 40 | 37 |
| Overall Study | Adverse event and lack of efficacy (LOE) | 3 | 0 |
| Overall Study | Death | 1 | 3 |
| Overall Study | Lack of Efficacy | 17 | 16 |
| Overall Study | LOE and other reason unspecified | 1 | 0 |
| Overall Study | LOE and Participant non-compliant | 0 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Lost to Follow-up | 24 | 36 |
| Overall Study | Other | 8 | 11 |
| Overall Study | Participant ineligible to continue trial | 1 | 1 |
| Overall Study | Participant non-compliant | 16 | 20 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 36 | 53 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Paliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy | Total | Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized >= 35 to < 45 years | 152 Participants | 304 Participants | 152 Participants |
| Age, Customized >= 45 to < 55 years | 83 Participants | 170 Participants | 87 Participants |
| Age, Customized >= 55 to < 65 years | 33 Participants | 67 Participants | 34 Participants |
| Age, Customized >= 65 to < 75 years | 6 Participants | 13 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Age, Customized Greater than 75 years | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Age, Customized Greater than or equal to (>=) 25 to < 35 years | 153 Participants | 344 Participants | 191 Participants |
| Age, Customized Less than (<) 25 years | 92 Participants 11.63 | 217 Participants | 125 Participants 11.9 |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 192 Participants | 460 Participants | 268 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 328 Participants | 657 Participants | 329 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 208 / 512 | 239 / 587 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 35 / 512 | 29 / 587 |
Outcome results
Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 26
The PANSS is a 30-item scale designed to assess various symptoms of schizophrenia including delusions, grandiosity, blunted affect, poor attention, and poor impulse control. The 30 symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale that ranges from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme psychopathology). The PANSS total score consists of the sum of all 30 PANSS items and ranges from 30 to 210. Higher scores indicate worsening. Data for two groups is presented here, based on the reason to switch: lack of efficacy and lack of tolerability, compliance or other who switched from other previous antipsychotic drugs to paliperidone.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Population: Intent to Treat (ITT) population for efficacy included all the participants who received paliperidone extended-release (ER) at least once and who had at least 1 post baseline efficacy assessment. N (number of participants analyzed) signifies the participants evaluable for this measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy | Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 26 | Baseline | 85.19 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 24.97 |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy | Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 26 | Week 26 | -26.60 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.24 |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other | Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 26 | Baseline | 65.45 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 28.48 |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other | Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score at Week 26 | Week 26 | -20.52 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 30.05 |
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 26
The CGI rating scale is a 7-point global assessment that measures the clinician's impression of the severity of illness exhibited by a participant. A rating of 1 indicates to normal, not at all ill and a rating of 7 indicates among the most extremely ill participants. Higher scores indicate worsening. Data for two groups is presented here, based on the reason to switch: lack of efficacy and lack of tolerability, compliance or other who switched from other previous antipsychotic drugs to paliperidone.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Population: ITT population for efficacy included all the participants who received paliperidone ER at least once and who had at least 1 post baseline efficacy assessment. N (number of participants analyzed) signifies the participants evaluable for this measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy | Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 26 | Baseline | 4.24 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 0.83 |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy | Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 26 | Week 26 | -1.12 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.28 |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other | Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 26 | Baseline | 3.29 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.12 |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other | Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score at Week 26 | Week 26 | -0.98 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 1.3 |
Change From Baseline in Daytime Drowsiness at Week 26
Daytime Drowsiness was assessed by an 11-point visual analog scale that rates how well participants sleep. Participants indicated on the scale (from 0 to 100 millimeter) how often they have felt drowsy within the previous 7 days (from 0: not at all to 100:all the time). Data for two groups is presented here, based on the reason to switch: lack of efficacy and lack of tolerability, compliance or other who switched from other previous antipsychotic drugs to paliperidone.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Population: ITT population for efficacy included all the participants who received paliperidone ER at least once and who had at least 1 post baseline efficacy assessment. N (number of participants analyzed) signifies the participants evaluable for this measure and 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy | Change From Baseline in Daytime Drowsiness at Week 26 | Baseline (n= 507, 581 ) | 32.80 millimeter (mm) | Standard Deviation 27.56 |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy | Change From Baseline in Daytime Drowsiness at Week 26 | Week 26 (n= 504, 574) | -9.52 millimeter (mm) | Standard Deviation 32.29 |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other | Change From Baseline in Daytime Drowsiness at Week 26 | Baseline (n= 507, 581 ) | 34.54 millimeter (mm) | Standard Deviation 28.61 |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other | Change From Baseline in Daytime Drowsiness at Week 26 | Week 26 (n= 504, 574) | -11.54 millimeter (mm) | Standard Deviation 34.53 |
Change From Baseline in PANSS Total Negative Subscale Score at Week 26
The Negative Subscale of PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) assesses seven negative-symptoms of schizophrenia. Negative symptoms represent a diminution or loss of normal functions. The symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale, ranging from 7 (absent) to 49 (extreme psychopathology). Data for two groups is presented here, based on the reason to switch: lack of efficacy and lack of tolerability, compliance or other who switched from other previous antipsychotic drugs to paliperidone.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Population: ITT population for efficacy included all the participants who received paliperidone ER at least once and who had at least 1 post baseline efficacy assessment. N (number of participants analyzed) signifies the participants evaluable for this measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy | Change From Baseline in PANSS Total Negative Subscale Score at Week 26 | Baseline | 22.73 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.86 |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy | Change From Baseline in PANSS Total Negative Subscale Score at Week 26 | Week 26 | -6.93 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.96 |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other | Change From Baseline in PANSS Total Negative Subscale Score at Week 26 | Baseline | 16.90 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.13 |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other | Change From Baseline in PANSS Total Negative Subscale Score at Week 26 | Week 26 | -5.32 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 8.12 |
Change From Baseline in PANSS Total Positive Subscale Score at Week 26
The Positive Subscale of PANSS (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) assesses seven positive-symptoms of schizophrenia. Positive symptoms refer to an excess of or distortion of normal functions. The symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale, ranging from 7 (absent) to 49 (extreme psychopathology). Data for two groups is presented here, based on the reason to switch: lack of efficacy and lack of tolerability, compliance or other who switched from other previous antipsychotic drugs to paliperidone.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Population: ITT population for efficacy included all the participants who received paliperidone ER at least once and who had at least 1 post baseline efficacy assessment. N (number of participants analyzed) signifies the participants evaluable for this measure.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy | Change From Baseline in PANSS Total Positive Subscale Score at Week 26 | Baseline | 21.04 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.15 |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy | Change From Baseline in PANSS Total Positive Subscale Score at Week 26 | Week 26 | -7.17 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.67 |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other | Change From Baseline in PANSS Total Positive Subscale Score at Week 26 | Baseline | 15.26 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.53 |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other | Change From Baseline in PANSS Total Positive Subscale Score at Week 26 | Week 26 | -5.07 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 7.88 |
Change From Baseline in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Scale at Week 26
The PSP scale assesses the degree of dysfunction within 4 domains of behavior: socially useful activities, personal and social relationships, self-care and disturbing and aggressive behavior. The score ranges from 1 to 100, divided into 10 equal intervals to rate the degree of difficulty (1, absent to 6, very severe) in each of the 4 domains. Participants with a score of 71 to 100 have a mild degree of difficulty; from 31 to 70, varying degrees of disability; less or equal to 30, functioning so poorly as to require intensive supervision. Data for two groups is presented here, based on the reason to switch: lack of efficacy and lack of tolerability, compliance or other who switched from other previous antipsychotic drugs to paliperidone.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Population: ITT population for efficacy included all the participants who received paliperidone ER at least once and who had at least 1 post baseline efficacy assessment. N (number of participants analyzed) signifies the participants evaluable for this measure and 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy | Change From Baseline in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Scale at Week 26 | Baseline (n= 506, 583) | 55.07 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.68 |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy | Change From Baseline in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Scale at Week 26 | Week 26 (n= 501, 574) | 13.76 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.8 |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other | Change From Baseline in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Scale at Week 26 | Baseline (n= 506, 583) | 66.03 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 15.65 |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other | Change From Baseline in Personal and Social Performance (PSP) Scale at Week 26 | Week 26 (n= 501, 574) | 11.14 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.53 |
Change From Baseline in Sleep Quality at Week 26
Sleep quality was assessed by an 11-point visual analog scale that rates how well participants sleep. Participants indicated on the scale (from 0 to 100 millimeter) how well they have slept in the previous 7 days (from 0: very badly to 100: very well). Data for two groups is presented here, based on the reason to switch: lack of efficacy and lack of tolerability, compliance or other who switched from other previous antipsychotic drugs to paliperidone.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Population: ITT population for efficacy included all the participants who received paliperidone ER at least once and who had at least 1 post baseline efficacy assessment. N (number of participants analyzed) signifies the participants evaluable for this measure and 'n' signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at given time points.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy | Change From Baseline in Sleep Quality at Week 26 | Baseline (n= 507, 581) | 63.53 millimeter (mm) | Standard Deviation 27.37 |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy | Change From Baseline in Sleep Quality at Week 26 | Week 26 (n= 504, 574) | 11.57 millimeter (mm) | Standard Deviation 35.7 |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other | Change From Baseline in Sleep Quality at Week 26 | Baseline (n= 507, 581) | 67.40 millimeter (mm) | Standard Deviation 27.13 |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other | Change From Baseline in Sleep Quality at Week 26 | Week 26 (n= 504, 574) | 8.19 millimeter (mm) | Standard Deviation 35.93 |
Number of Participants Within Each Category of Patient Satisfaction Score
Participants were interviewed at baseline and at the end of the trial (Week 26) to assess their satisfaction with the current treatment on a 5-point scale (very good, good, reasonable, moderate or poor). Data for two groups is presented here, based on the reason to switch: lack of efficacy and lack of tolerability, compliance or other who switched from other previous antipsychotic drugs to paliperidone.
Time frame: Baseline and Week 26
Population: ITT population for efficacy included all the participants who received paliperidone ER at least once and who had at least 1 post baseline efficacy assessment.N (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure and n signifies those participants who were evaluated for this measure at specified time point.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy | Number of Participants Within Each Category of Patient Satisfaction Score | Very Good: Baseline (n= 507, 583) | 8 participants | 32.74 |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy | Number of Participants Within Each Category of Patient Satisfaction Score | Good: Baseline (n= 507, 583) | 74 participants | — |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy | Number of Participants Within Each Category of Patient Satisfaction Score | Reasonable: Baseline (n= 507, 583) | 256 participants | — |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy | Number of Participants Within Each Category of Patient Satisfaction Score | Moderate: Baseline (n= 507, 583) | 158 participants | — |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy | Number of Participants Within Each Category of Patient Satisfaction Score | Poor: Baseline (n= 507, 583) | 11 participants | — |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy | Number of Participants Within Each Category of Patient Satisfaction Score | Very Good: Week 26 (n=492, 563) | 120 participants | — |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy | Number of Participants Within Each Category of Patient Satisfaction Score | Good: Week 26 (n=492, 563) | 173 participants | — |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy | Number of Participants Within Each Category of Patient Satisfaction Score | Reasonable: Week 26 (n=492, 563) | 112 participants | — |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy | Number of Participants Within Each Category of Patient Satisfaction Score | Moderate: Week 26 (n=492, 563) | 70 participants | — |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy | Number of Participants Within Each Category of Patient Satisfaction Score | Poor: Week 26 (n=492, 563) | 17 participants | — |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other | Number of Participants Within Each Category of Patient Satisfaction Score | Reasonable: Week 26 (n=492, 563) | 94 participants | — |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other | Number of Participants Within Each Category of Patient Satisfaction Score | Very Good: Baseline (n= 507, 583) | 21 participants | 34.67 |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other | Number of Participants Within Each Category of Patient Satisfaction Score | Very Good: Week 26 (n=492, 563) | 156 participants | — |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other | Number of Participants Within Each Category of Patient Satisfaction Score | Good: Baseline (n= 507, 583) | 151 participants | — |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other | Number of Participants Within Each Category of Patient Satisfaction Score | Poor: Week 26 (n=492, 563) | 10 participants | — |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other | Number of Participants Within Each Category of Patient Satisfaction Score | Reasonable: Baseline (n= 507, 583) | 305 participants | — |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other | Number of Participants Within Each Category of Patient Satisfaction Score | Good: Week 26 (n=492, 563) | 253 participants | — |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other | Number of Participants Within Each Category of Patient Satisfaction Score | Moderate: Baseline (n= 507, 583) | 97 participants | — |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other | Number of Participants Within Each Category of Patient Satisfaction Score | Moderate: Week 26 (n=492, 563) | 50 participants | — |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other | Number of Participants Within Each Category of Patient Satisfaction Score | Poor: Baseline (n= 507, 583) | 9 participants | — |
Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 20 Percent (%) Improvement in PANSS Total Score at Week 26
The PANSS is a 30-item scale designed to assess various symptoms of schizophrenia including delusions, grandiosity, blunted affect, poor attention, and poor impulse control. The 30 symptoms are rated on a 7-point scale that ranges from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme psychopathology). The PANSS total score consists of the sum of all 30 PANSS items and ranges from 30 to 210. Higher scores indicate worsening. Percentage of participants with greater than or equal to 20 % improvement in PANSS total score is reported here. Data for two groups is presented here, based on the reason to switch: lack of efficacy and lack of tolerability, compliance or other who switched from other previous antipsychotic drugs to paliperidone.
Time frame: Week 26
Population: ITT population for efficacy included all the participants who received paliperidone ER at least once and who had at least 1 post baseline efficacy assessment. N (number of participants analyzed) signifies the participants evaluable for this measure.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Efficacy | Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 20 Percent (%) Improvement in PANSS Total Score at Week 26 | 72.83 percentage of participants |
| Paliperidone ER: Lack of Tolerability, Compliance or Other | Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to 20 Percent (%) Improvement in PANSS Total Score at Week 26 | 71.87 percentage of participants |