Skip to content

A Study Using Cone Beam CT for Head and Neck Cancer

A Pilot Study of Tumor and Critical Normal Tissue Motion in Head and Neck Cancer Using Cone Beam CT

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01661062
Enrollment
23
Registered
2012-08-09
Start date
2009-01-31
Completion date
2016-03-31
Last updated
2016-08-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Head and Neck Cancer

Brief summary

Cone beam CT (computed tomography) is a developing technology which allows CT images to be obtained while a patient is on the radiation treatment table.(A CT scan uses x-rays to produce detailed pictures of structures in the body.) In this study, cone beam CT scans will be obtained before individual radiation treatment sessions for head and neck cancer. The information gathered from these scans will be used by the researchers to look at patient movement as well as changes in the amount of normal and tumor tissue throughout the course of radiation therapy. The researchers will use this information to create hypothetical radiation treatment plans, which will be used as the basis for future research. The cone beam CT scan data will not be used to alter the actual radiation treatment of any of the patients enrolled on the study. In addition, tests of salivary output and swallowing and questionnaires about quality of life will be made to assess how the doses of radiation affect them.

Interventions

OTHERCone Beam Computed Tomography (CT) Scan

Cone beam CT scan is considered a noninvasive procedure (meaning that the procedure does not require breaking the skin or any tools that physically enter the body). It will add a small amount of additional radiation dose (less than 1%) to the head and neck. The increase in the amount of radiation is only a very small amount more than what patients who get standard daily imaging receive. The amount of radiation from the cone beam CT scans is not significant (less than 1%) when compared to the amount of radiation generally received for treatment of head and neck cancer.

Sponsors

University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients of all ages ≥18, both sexes, and all races will be included in this study. Pregnant females will be excluded. No other special classes of subjects (i.e., prisoners) will be entered. * Patients must be diagnosed with biopsy-proven squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. * Patients must be recommended treatment with definitive radiation therapy with concurrent chemotherapy, but without prior surgical resection of the primary tumor or lymph nodes * Patients must be recommended a treatment course of at least 30 radiation fractions * Patients must sign an informed consent form approved for this purpose by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the University of Michigan Hospital indicating that they are aware that undergoing cone beam CT of the head and neck is voluntary and has potential risks.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients must not have a history of prior radiation to the head or neck

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Rate of Movement of Normal Tissueapproximately 7 weeksThe primary outcome measure of this study is to characterize patient-specific target and normal tissue movement.
Correlation Coefficient for the Association Between Delivered Mean Parotid Dose and Salivary Flow Rate24 monthsSpearman rank-based correlation coefficients were calculated for the association between saliva flow rate and the delivered mean parotid doses at several timepoints (Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 24 months).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Improvement of Image Quality36 monthsUse acquired data to further improve cone beam CT reconstruction techniques and image quality.
The Median Delivered Dose of Radiation to the Parotid Gland7 weeks

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Cone Beam CT
For the purposes of this study patients will get CT scans every day for the length of their radiation therapy (in order to assess if CT every day provides additional information compared with CT scans performed less frequently). Radiotherapy will be delivered according to current guidelines. Imaging will be performed every day before treatment for a total of approximately 35 cone beam CT scans over the 7 week course of therapy.
18
Total18

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyCompleted Treatment Off Study3
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject2

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicCone Beam CT
Age, Continuous57 years
Disease Site
Base of Tongue
9 participants
Disease Site
Tonsil
9 participants
N Stage
N0
1 participants
N Stage
N1
0 participants
N Stage
N2a
1 participants
N Stage
N2b
10 participants
N Stage
N2c
4 participants
N Stage
N3
2 participants
Pre-Treatment Weight203 lb
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
16 Participants
T Stage
T1
2 participants
T Stage
T2
10 participants
T Stage
T3
5 participants
T Stage
T4
1 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
9 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
2 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Correlation Coefficient for the Association Between Delivered Mean Parotid Dose and Salivary Flow Rate

Spearman rank-based correlation coefficients were calculated for the association between saliva flow rate and the delivered mean parotid doses at several timepoints (Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, and 24 months).

Time frame: 24 months

Population: 36 parotid glands were evaluable from 18 patients at baseline, 34 parotid glands were evaluable at 3-6 months, 32 glands were evaluable at 12 months, 20 were evaluable at 18 months and 8 at 24 months.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Cone Beam CTCorrelation Coefficient for the Association Between Delivered Mean Parotid Dose and Salivary Flow RateBaseline-0.26 correlation coefficient
Cone Beam CTCorrelation Coefficient for the Association Between Delivered Mean Parotid Dose and Salivary Flow Rate3 Months-0.42 correlation coefficient
Cone Beam CTCorrelation Coefficient for the Association Between Delivered Mean Parotid Dose and Salivary Flow Rate6 Months-0.57 correlation coefficient
Cone Beam CTCorrelation Coefficient for the Association Between Delivered Mean Parotid Dose and Salivary Flow Rate12 Months-0.35 correlation coefficient
Cone Beam CTCorrelation Coefficient for the Association Between Delivered Mean Parotid Dose and Salivary Flow Rate18 Months-0.42 correlation coefficient
Cone Beam CTCorrelation Coefficient for the Association Between Delivered Mean Parotid Dose and Salivary Flow Rate24 Months-0.60 correlation coefficient
Primary

Rate of Movement of Normal Tissue

The primary outcome measure of this study is to characterize patient-specific target and normal tissue movement.

Time frame: approximately 7 weeks

Secondary

Improvement of Image Quality

Use acquired data to further improve cone beam CT reconstruction techniques and image quality.

Time frame: 36 months

Secondary

The Median Delivered Dose of Radiation to the Parotid Gland

Time frame: 7 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Cone Beam CTThe Median Delivered Dose of Radiation to the Parotid Gland32.4 Gy

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026