Skip to content

Does Alkalinization Reduce Perceived Pain Levels During Sentinel Lymph Node Imaging?

Does Alkalinization of Technetium-99m Sulfur Colloid Reduce Perceived Pain Levels During Non-breast Sentinel Lymphoscintigraphy?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01660412
Acronym
buffering SLN
Enrollment
60
Registered
2012-08-08
Start date
2012-08-01
Completion date
2016-12-30
Last updated
2017-11-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pain

Keywords

Pain, Alkalinization, Technetium 99m Sulfur Colloid, sentinel lymphoscintigraphy?

Brief summary

Pain during nuclear medicine breast lymphnode detection procedures has been reported as high as 8.8/10. Using Sodium Bicarbonate to alkalinize the radio-pharmaceutical injection, pain can safely be reduced from 6.6/10 to 4.7/10, during breast lymph node detection procedures. In sites other then the breast, using Bicarbonate to make the injection's pH closer to natural, attempts to lower the pain levels will be performed. Hypothesis: The perceived pain level during non breast sentinel lymph node techniques can be reduced by raising the pH of the injectate (Tc-99m SC) to near the physiologic level of pH 7.40.

Interventions

DRUGStandard of Care First

For the second injection, and randomly after that, Sodium Bicarbonate will be compounded with Tc-99m SC, to raise the pH up to \ 7.40.

DRUGph Altered first

For the first injection, Sodium Bicarbonate will be compounded with Tc-99m SC, to raise the pH up to \ 7.40. For the second injection, the standard of care will be given, and randomly after that either standard of care, or pH altered will be given.

Sponsors

Howard J Barnhard, Resident Research Endowment.
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
UAMS DEPT of Radiology.
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
University of Arkansas
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 122 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients presenting for SLN imaging for melanoma or who have had an excisional biopsy for melanoma of the thorax and appendicular structures; * Patients scheduled to receive two or more injections of Tc-99m SC for the purpose of clinical management of melanoma or who have had an excisional biopsy for melanoma of the thorax and appendicular structures.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients presenting for SLN imaging of lesions involving the breast, ear, nose, and genitourinary regions; * Patients scheduled to receive only a single injection of Tc-99m SC; * Pregnant or breast feeding women.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Perceived Pain Levelimmediately after administration (<1 min) of each injection (up to total 5 minutes)Immediately after receiving an injection, subjects will rate their perceived pain level, using a validated measure. Subject was asked to quantify the pain of every injection using a validated scale from 0 through 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being severe pain that is disabling. The effect of treatment was estimated by taking the difference of the mean buffered and SOC pain scores and a paired t-test was used to test whether the mean difference was significantly different from 0. Perceived pain levels assessed after each injection were averaged for each participant.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Each Participant received four injections. We tested four different injection sites. Each participant received all four injections at one site.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
All Study Participants
Subjects were randomized into 1 of 2 sequence groups (A and B): Sequence group A. The first injection administered was the standard-of-care (SOC) solution followed by the pH-altered solution. The remaining injections were randomly assigned as either SOC solution or pH-altered. Sequence group B. The first injection administered was the pHaltered solution followed by the SOC solution. The remaining injections were randomly assigned as either SOC solution or pH-altered.
57
Total57

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation03

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicAll Study Participants
Age, Continuous57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6
Region of Enrollment
United States
57 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
26 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
31 Participants
Weight159.9 lbs
STANDARD_DEVIATION 46.1

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 600 / 60
other
Total, other adverse events
11 / 600 / 60
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 600 / 60

Outcome results

Primary

Perceived Pain Level

Immediately after receiving an injection, subjects will rate their perceived pain level, using a validated measure. Subject was asked to quantify the pain of every injection using a validated scale from 0 through 10, with 0 being no pain and 10 being severe pain that is disabling. The effect of treatment was estimated by taking the difference of the mean buffered and SOC pain scores and a paired t-test was used to test whether the mean difference was significantly different from 0. Perceived pain levels assessed after each injection were averaged for each participant.

Time frame: immediately after administration (<1 min) of each injection (up to total 5 minutes)

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Standard of Care InjectionPerceived Pain Level5.81 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.24
PH Altered InjectionPerceived Pain Level4.39 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.45
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.85, 2]t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026