Skip to content

Diabetes Outcomes and Nurse Case Manager Study

Impact of Nurse Case Management on Diabetes-related Health Outcomes in a Specialty Care Setting: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01659294
Acronym
DONCM
Enrollment
140
Registered
2012-08-07
Start date
2012-08-31
Completion date
2015-02-28
Last updated
2016-01-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 Diabetes

Keywords

Type 2 diabetes, outcomes, case management

Brief summary

This study will examine whether patients with diabetes who are either 1) newly discharged from hospital or 2) referred to an endocrinologist for management will have better diabetes outcomes when their care is managed primarily by a dedicated case manager (intervention) than by an endocrinologist (standard care) after 6 months of treatment.

Detailed description

The study will be a randomized-control trial recruiting patients with type 2 diabetes in a specialty care setting from two sources: 1. referred by family physicians with inadequate glycemic control likely requiring exogenous insulin therapy 2. referred by medical staff at Vancouver General Hospital or St. Paul's Hospital during in-patient care & about to be discharged (Appendix 1). Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned into either the NCM group or SC group.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALstandard diabetologist care

routine care by diabetologist & team

Sponsors

Sanofi
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
BCDiabetes.Ca
Lead SponsorNETWORK

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Type 2 diabetes * A1c \> 8.0 or * BP \> 140/90 or * LDL cholesterol \> 2.0 (72 mg/dl)

Exclusion criteria

* inability to speak English or to be assisted by somebody fluent in English

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
A1c6 monthschanges in A1C between NCM vs. SC
diabetes distress (DDS)6 monthschanges in diabetes distress between NCM vs. SC. Diabetes Distress (DDS) will be assessed using the 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale (DDS) developed by Polonsky and colleagues. The DDS measures emotional distress and functioning as it relates to living with diabetes. Responses are scored on a 6-point Likert scale (1=no problem to 6=serious problem). A total score is derived by taking the mean of all items. A score of \< 2 indicate low/no distress, 2 - 2.9 indicates moderate distress, and score of ≥ 3 indicates high distress.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Self-management behaviours6 monthschanges in behaviour habits between NCM vs. SC. Self-management behaviours will be assessed using items from the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities Measure-revised (SDSCA-R).This instrument measures self-care behaviors including diet, exercise, blood sugar testing and foot care. Participants are asked to report the number of days in the past week (range 0-7 days) in which he/she performed specific self-care practices. Greater number of days indicates better self-management.
Medication adherence6 monthschanges in medication adherence between NCM vs. SC. Medication adherence will be assessed using the 4-item Moriskyscale that assesses beliefs and behaviors associated with taking medications.Responses are scored on a dichotomous scale: 0=no and 1=yes. A total score is calculated by adding up all items with lower scored indicating better adherence.
blood pressure6 monthschanges in BP between NCM vs. SC. Blood pressure will be measured using an Omron Digital Blood Pressure Monitor HEM-907. Two upper arm readings are taken with the average of the two recorded.
Diabetes-specific Social Support6 monthschange in diabetes-specific social support between NCM vs. SC Diabetes-specific Social Support will be assessed with a 4-item scale developed by Tang et al. that measures amount of support and satisfaction with support from family, friends and the health care team.
Depressive Symptoms Severity6 monthschange in depressive symptoms between NCM vs. SC Depressive Symptom Severity will be assessed using the 9-item PRIME-MD Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
Patient motivation6 monthschange in patient motivation between NCM vs. SC. motivation will be measured by the 13-item Patient Activation Measure which assesses participants' self-reported knowledge, skills, and confidence an individual has when managing his/her own health.
BMI6 monthschanges in BMI between NCM vs. SC. Height and weight will be measured using the Healthometer mechanical eye level upright standard physician scale with attached stadiometer. Body mass index (BMI) are calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared.

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026