Skip to content

Effects of Core Stabilization Approach on Patients With Upper Extremity Injuries

Does Core Stabilization Enhance Neuromuscular Control and Functional Status of the Upper Extremity?

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01659112
Enrollment
27
Registered
2012-08-07
Start date
2008-03-31
Completion date
2010-03-31
Last updated
2012-10-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Upper Extremity Injuries

Keywords

core stabilization, upper extremity, kinetic chain, movement

Brief summary

The purpose of the study is to determine the effects of the addition of core stabilization exercises to a traditional upper extremity rehabilitation program in upper extremity injuries.

Detailed description

Abnormal movement patterns are one of the most challenging problems during rehabilitation of the patients with upper extremity injuries. They usually decrease the functional status of the upper extremity and prevent isolated muscle activations. Dysfunction of the kinetic chain system plays an important role in the development of these movement patterns. Thus, multi-segmental rehabilitation strategies has recently gained considerable importance in upper extremity rehabilitation. Core stabilization is one of the most popular rehabilitation approaches preferred to enhance functional stability of the kinetic chain system and dynamic postural alignment during activities. The purpose of this study is to determine the effects of core stabilization approach on functional status of the upper extremity and the amount of abnormal movement patterns. In addition, the factors affecting the abnormal movement patterns will be determined.

Interventions

OTHERCore Stabilization

A 6-week (3 days a week) exercise intervention including progressive core exercises was performed.

OTHERTraditional upper extremity rehabilitation

A 6-week (3 days a week) exercise intervention of the injured joint based on the recovery process was performed.

Sponsors

Hacettepe University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Traumatic distal segment injuries (elbow and wrist) * Patients in their subacute stage.

Exclusion criteria

* Multiple joint problems * Bilateral extremity problems * Reflex sympathetic dystrophy * Trunk and lower extremity problems * Non-union fractures * Malignant ans systemic diseases

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Upper extremity functional status30 minutesPain Range of motion Endurance Fatigue severity DASH

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measurement of abnormal movement patterns1 hourVideo analysis during two daily living activities (hand to mouth and opening doorknob) was recorded for both injured and uninjured extremity before and after the intervention.

Other

MeasureTime frame
Trunk muscle strength5 minutes

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026