Alcohol Dependence
Conditions
Keywords
craving, dopamine, citalopram, ssri
Brief summary
Alcohol use disorders (AUDs) are highly prevalent among U.S. civilians, and even more prevalent in the U.S. Veteran population. AUDs are frequently co-morbid with depressive symptoms in psychiatric clinical populations, resulting in an increased severity of both conditions. Indeed, returning Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF)/Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) Veterans have extraordinarily high rates of alcohol misuse and co-morbid psychiatric symptoms, indicating that future Veteran clinical populations will be particularly affected by AUDs. While FDA-approved medications are available to treat AUDs, their efficacy is low compared to available psychosocial treatments. Despite the lack of evidence for efficacy from controlled trials, antidepressants are frequently prescribed to clinical populations (including Veterans) with active AUDs. A better understanding of patient-level clinical variables that may confer poor response to treatment with antidepressants would allow clinicians better tools to distinguish those alcohol-dependent Veterans likely to do worse with antidepressant treatment.
Detailed description
Description of Proposed Study A. Scientific Basis: Alcohol abuse and dependence represent a spectrum of maladaptive behaviors with enormous public health impact, especially for the U.S. Veteran population. Depressive symptoms are frequently comorbid with alcohol use disorders, but despite the frequent use of serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) in clinical practice, clinical trials with these agents for alcohol use disorders have yielded mixed results concerning their impact on drinking behavior. The characterization of alcohol-dependent subjects on the basis of demographic variables, severity of addiction, and psychiatric symptomatology has revealed a divergence in response to treatment with SSRIs among different subtypes of alcoholics (less severe Type A vs. more severe Type B alcohol dependence. Type A alcoholics have exhibited a trend toward decreased drinking behavior in clinical trials with SSRIs, whereas type B alcoholics showed a trend in the opposite direction. The literature does not offer an explanation for this divergence, and therefore, it is not clear how these research findings can be applied clinically. As intravenous (iv) citalopram infusion (40 mg) bypasses hepatic metabolism, a single infusion produces a clinically relevant concentration in human brain, and the brain concentration remains stable for up to 4 h post-infusion, and is well-tolerated. A single infusion reduces striatal dopamine receptor binding potential by a magnitude comparable to the effect of chronic oral citalopram treatment, as measured by positron emission tomography (PET). The subjective experience of craving for alcohol in alcohol-dependent individuals has been associated with decreased dopamine receptor availability in the striatum via PET. Significance of the research: Alcohol abuse and dependence occur at a higher rate in Veterans than in the overall U.S. population, and the presence of comorbid depressive symptoms amplifies the health risks to affected Veterans. While FDA-approved medications are available to treat alcohol dependence, their overall efficacy is low compared to available psychosocial treatments. Given that SSRIs are frequently utilized in Veteran populations with depressive symptoms and alcohol use disorders, there is the certainty that many Veterans with Type B alcohol dependence are receiving a pharmacological intervention that may exacerbate their drinking behavior, thereby increasing morbidity. A better understanding of patient-level clinical variables that may confer poor response to treatment with SSRIs would allow clinicians better tools to distinguish those alcohol-dependent Veterans likely to do worse, and prevent what was intended to be a beneficial medical intervention from worsening a Veteran's clinical course. This research is well-suited to a Veteran population because of the high proportion of Veterans with alcohol dependence. C. Program Objectives: The nominee has a strong background in clinical addiction psychiatry, and he seeks to accomplish two objectives through the proposed training program: 1) to become an expert in the field of human alcohol addiction research, and 2) to learn techniques of PET research. The nominee's work environment at the West Los Angeles Veterans Administration Medical Center (WLAVA), in collaboration with colleagues at UCLA provides an ideal infrastructure for this training. He will be mentored by renowned experts in these areas, Drs. Arthur Brody, and Edythe London. The mentors have several NIH and VA grant-funded ongoing studies in alcohol and other addictive disorders research with strong ties to the VA PET research infrastructure. As part of training, the nominee will attend several courses and workshops at UCLA in foundational neuroimaging topics with relevance to PET (statistics, neuroimaging, neuroanatomy), as well as courses in the neurobiological bases of addiction. He will also attend annual conferences in Alcohol Dependence (Research Society on Alcoholism annual meeting) and neuroimaging (e.g., Society for Nuclear Medicine annual meeting), and meet with mentors regularly. The nominee plans to submit an NIH R01 and/or VA Merit Review grant toward the end of the award period. Long term, he plans to found an independent research career studying neuropharmacological approaches to treating and understanding substance use disorders, focusing primarily on alcohol. D. Project Design and Methods: This project proposes to study 20 individuals in each of 3 groups (Type A alcohol dependence, Type B alcohol dependence, and healthy control subjects) for a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, within-subjects, outpatient study with iv citalopram (40 mg and saline, in counter-balanced order) and \[18F\]fallypride PET scanning. Participants should be in good physical health, have no history of complicated alcohol withdrawal symptoms (e.g., seizures, delirium tremens), be 21-55 years of age, and taking no psychoactive medications. Typology among alcohol-dependent subjects will be assessed after Kampman et al. (2007). The project aims: 1) To determine whether iv citalopram (40 mg) affects measures of craving for alcohol compared to a blinded saline iv control infusion; 2) to determine the change in striatal dopamine receptor D2/3 receptor availability (measured as binding potential for the radiotracer) with iv citalopram (40 mg) as compared to iv saline by \[18F\]fallypride PET scanning; and 3) to assess whether changes in striatal D2/3 receptor availability with iv citalopram (40 mg, compared to iv saline control) is related to measures of craving for alcohol among subjects. E. Description of Intervention(s)/Treatment(s): Through Internet advertising, interested participants will be invited to call a phone number for anonymous phone screening, and individuals who pass phone screening will be invited to the WLAVA for a screening visit. Potential subjects will meet criteria for alcohol dependence (via SCID; except for control subjects), will have no current psychotropic medication use, will be in good physical health (as assessed by clinical history and physical examination and laboratory assay), and have no current dependence on other substances of abuse (SCID; aside from nicotine). After screening, qualified participants will be invited to participate in a structural magnetic resonance imaging (sMRI scan) for PET scan registration purposes, and two day-long experimental sessions at WLAVA, where they will undergo infusions with iv citalopram (40 mg and saline, double blinded); at least one week will separate infusion days to allow for participants to return to baseline functioning between sessions. After each infusion, participants will undergo \ 30 min of paper- and computer-based questionnaires designed to assess measures of mood and other psychiatric symptoms, and \ 15 min of assessment of both baseline and cue-induced craving for alcohol. Subsequently, participants will undergo \[18F\]fallypride PET scanning (\ 2h) to assess striatal D2/3 receptor availability. After completion of both infusions and PET scans, participants will be discharged from the study. Participants will be compensated for their participation according to VA research guidelines.
Interventions
citalopram, 40 mg IV, vs. saline control, each to be administered in a double-blinded, within-subjects design.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
Must be U.S. Veteran Alcohol Dependence: * Age between 21 and 55; * Meeting DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for alcohol dependence; * Report drinking at least 48 standard drinks in a 30-day period, during the 90 days before enrollment, and * Must have had at least 2 days of heavy drinking (at least 5 drinks/day for men, 4 drinks/day for women) in the last 30 days Healthy Control: * Age between 21 and 55; * No Axis I DSM-IV diagnosis (except for nicotine dependence); * Report drinking less than 10 drinks weekly over the past 90 days prior to study entry by Timeline Followback Method (TLFB).
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Craving for Alcohol in Alcohol Dependence With Citalopram Compared to Placebo | 5 minutes after 1 hour of infusion intervention | To assess whether craving for alcohol in alcohol dependence is affected by iv citalopram, compared to placebo. Cue-induced craving for alcohol was assessed using the Alcohol Urge Questionnaire, composed of 8 questions with responses on a 0 (none) to 7 (severe or highest level) which when scored provide an estimate of the level of craving for alcohol for the participant. A maximum score is thus 56, indicating the highest level of craving for alcohol, whereas the minimum score of 0 indicates no appreciable craving for alcohol. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Striatal Dopamine Receptor Availability in Alcohol Dependence With Citalopram, Compared to Placebo | 2-3 hours after 1 hour citalopram or placebo infusion | relative binding potential of dopamine D2/3 receptor specific tracer compared to cerebellum, where there is known to be almost no dopamine receptors. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Alcohol-dependent (AD) and healthy control (HC) participants were screened via the SCID-IV, excluding any participants with any Axis I psychiatric diagnosis within the last 6 months (aside from and alcohol dependence in the AD group). Fourteen potential AD and seventeen potential HC participants were enrolled and screened.
Pre-assignment details
Enrolled participants who did not start study procedures either decided not to participate or failed screening.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Alcohol Dependent DSM-IV alcohol dependent | 10 |
| Healthy Control participants with no Axis I illness or substance use disorder | 10 |
| Total | 20 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 | FG002 | FG003 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study | Physician Decision | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Overall Study | Withdrawal by Subject | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Healthy Control | Alcohol Dependent | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | 41 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.9 | 38 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.6 | 39.5 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race African American | 5 Participants | 4 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race Asian | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 2 Participants |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized Race White | 4 Participants | 5 Participants | 9 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 10 Participants | 10 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 5 Participants | 2 Participants | 7 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 5 Participants | 8 Participants | 13 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 20 | 0 / 20 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 7 / 20 | 12 / 20 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 20 | 0 / 20 |
Outcome results
Craving for Alcohol in Alcohol Dependence With Citalopram Compared to Placebo
To assess whether craving for alcohol in alcohol dependence is affected by iv citalopram, compared to placebo. Cue-induced craving for alcohol was assessed using the Alcohol Urge Questionnaire, composed of 8 questions with responses on a 0 (none) to 7 (severe or highest level) which when scored provide an estimate of the level of craving for alcohol for the participant. A maximum score is thus 56, indicating the highest level of craving for alcohol, whereas the minimum score of 0 indicates no appreciable craving for alcohol.
Time frame: 5 minutes after 1 hour of infusion intervention
Population: All participants completed both arms
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alcohol Dependent Citalopram Infusion | Craving for Alcohol in Alcohol Dependence With Citalopram Compared to Placebo | 21 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 14.6 |
| Alcohol Dependent Placebo | Craving for Alcohol in Alcohol Dependence With Citalopram Compared to Placebo | 30.4 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 17.9 |
| Healthy Control Citalopram Infusion | Craving for Alcohol in Alcohol Dependence With Citalopram Compared to Placebo | 10.8 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 4.5 |
| Healthy Control Placebo Infusion | Craving for Alcohol in Alcohol Dependence With Citalopram Compared to Placebo | 10.6 score on a scale | Standard Deviation 3.7 |
Striatal Dopamine Receptor Availability in Alcohol Dependence With Citalopram, Compared to Placebo
relative binding potential of dopamine D2/3 receptor specific tracer compared to cerebellum, where there is known to be almost no dopamine receptors.
Time frame: 2-3 hours after 1 hour citalopram or placebo infusion
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alcohol Dependent Citalopram Infusion | Striatal Dopamine Receptor Availability in Alcohol Dependence With Citalopram, Compared to Placebo | 22.4 striatal binding potential ratio | Standard Deviation 4 |
| Alcohol Dependent Placebo | Striatal Dopamine Receptor Availability in Alcohol Dependence With Citalopram, Compared to Placebo | 25.7 striatal binding potential ratio | Standard Deviation 5.1 |
| Healthy Control Citalopram Infusion | Striatal Dopamine Receptor Availability in Alcohol Dependence With Citalopram, Compared to Placebo | 22.5 striatal binding potential ratio | Standard Deviation 3.8 |
| Healthy Control Placebo Infusion | Striatal Dopamine Receptor Availability in Alcohol Dependence With Citalopram, Compared to Placebo | 21.3 striatal binding potential ratio | Standard Deviation 4.7 |