Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of PRO-155 Versus Nevanac in Post Phacoemulsification

Phase 2 Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of the Ophthalmic Solution PRO-155 Versus Nevanac 0.1% Ophthalmic Solution in Post Phacoemulsification Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01657266
Enrollment
160
Registered
2012-08-06
Start date
2013-12-31
Completion date
2015-04-30
Last updated
2018-10-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cataract, Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery

Keywords

bromfenac, nepafenac, cataract, phacoemulsification cataract surgery

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate efficacy and safety of the ophthalmic solution PRO-155 in patients post phacoemulsification.

Detailed description

Postsurgical inflammation is an inevitable condition after cataract surgery. The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is a safe option for treating ocular inflammation. This is a phase II randomized double-blind clinical trial. The aim is to compare and to evaluate efficacy and safety of two ophthalmic solutions in patients post phacoemulsification. Patients will be randomized to receive either PRO-155 or Nevanac for 60 days.

Interventions

Pre-medication (before surgery) and maintenance treatment.

Pre-medication (before surgery) and maintenance treatment.

Sponsors

Laboratorios Sophia S.A de C.V.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients older than 18 years who require cataract surgery * Both genders * Provide informed consent * Normal Laboratory results

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with visual acuity of 20/40 or less in the contralateral eye of the surgery * Patients with any trans-surgical complication * Patients with a cataract \>NC4, C4 or P4 classified with the system LOCS * Patients with any active corneal pathology * Patients under any steroidal treatment (topic, systemic or inhaled)14 days prior surgery or NSAIDs 7 days before the surgery (except low-dose aspirin) * Patients with IOP \<5 or \>21 mmHg * Patients that have ocular pain, cellularity or flare at the moment of selection * Patients with ocular exfoliation, trauma or any inflammatory disease * Patients with diabetic retinopathy that need treatment or uncontrolled diabetes mellitus * Patients who are planning cataract surgery of the contralateral eye 14 days after surgery of the study eye * Patients with history of hypersensitivity or contraindication for any drug used in the study * Patients under anticoagulant treatment * Contact lens users * Pregnant patients, at risk of pregnancy or breastfeeding * Patients without birth control treatment * Patients with any active toxicomania (alcoholism, cigarette, cannabis or others) * Patients who had participated in any clinical trial in the last 90 days * Legal or mentally disabled patients who could not give informed consent * Patients who cannot comply with all study requirements

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Cellularity in Anterior Chamberday 30Change from Percentage of Cellularity in anterior chamber after 30 days of treatment.
Flare in Anterior Chamberday 30Percentage of Participants with flare in anterior chamber after 30 days of treatment

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Patients Without Ocular Painday 30percentage of patients without pain, would be measured using the Visual Analog Pain Scale
Mean Aqueous Concentration of Intervention Drugbefore surgerya nurse was instructed to instill five drops of the research product into each patient's eye in the hour before surgery. The concentration of the drug was determined for aqueous humor sample (0.15 mL) with a 30-gauge needle on a TB syringe after completion of the paracentesis. The paracentesis was performed after first incision during the phacoemulsification.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Epithelial Defects Detected With Fluoresceinmeasurements will be made at days 1, 5, 7 and 30The percentage of patients presenting epithelial defects with fluorescein staining will be evaluated
Epithelial Defects Detected With Green Lissaminemeasurements will be made at days 1, 5, 7 and 30the percentage of patients presenting epithelial defects evaluated with green lysine will be reported
Intraocular Pressureday 30Change from Baseline in the intraocular pressure after 30 days of treatment
Retinal Thicknessday 30 and 60Change from Baseline in retinal thickness after 30 days of treatment. A third measurement will be done at 60 day after day surgery.

Countries

Mexico

Participant flow

Recruitment details

160 subjects were recruited, 12 of whom were excluded, 10 because they did not meet the selection criteria and 2 refused to participate. The remaining 148 were randomly assigned to one of the 2 study groups, 73 to bromfenac and 75 to napaphenac.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PRO-155
Bromfenac 0.09% (0.9mg/mL) Ophthalmic solution Pre-medication: 1 drop each 15 minutes during 1 hour before surgery in the affected eye Maintenance therapy: 1 drop 3 times a day for 30 days PRO-155: Pre-medication (before surgery) and maintenance treatment.
69
Nevanac
Nepafenac 0.1% (1mg/mL) Ophthalmic Suspension Pre-medication: 1 drop each 15 minutes during 1 hour before surgery in the affected eye Maintenance therapy: 1 drop 3 times a day for 30 days Nevanac: Pre-medication (before surgery) and maintenance treatment.
70
Total139

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyAdverse Event23
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up22

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPRO-155NevanacTotal
Age, Continuous67.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.1
68.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
67.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.3
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
69 Participants70 Participants139 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Mexico
69 participants70 participants139 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
41 Participants39 Participants80 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
28 Participants31 Participants59 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 732 / 75
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 732 / 75

Outcome results

Primary

Flare in Anterior Chamber

Percentage of Participants with flare in anterior chamber after 30 days of treatment

Time frame: day 30

Population: Mexican patients patients who underwent cataract surgery in only 1 eye, by phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PRO-155Flare in Anterior ChamberDay 131.4 Percentage of Participants with flare
PRO-155Flare in Anterior ChamberDay 300 Percentage of Participants with flare
NevanacFlare in Anterior ChamberDay 131.5 Percentage of Participants with flare
NevanacFlare in Anterior ChamberDay 300 Percentage of Participants with flare
Primary

Percentage of Cellularity in Anterior Chamber

Change from Percentage of Cellularity in anterior chamber after 30 days of treatment.

Time frame: day 30

Population: Mexican patients patients who underwent cataract surgery in only 1 eye, by phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PRO-155Percentage of Cellularity in Anterior ChamberDay 300 Percentage of Cellularity
PRO-155Percentage of Cellularity in Anterior ChamberDay 164.2 Percentage of Cellularity
NevanacPercentage of Cellularity in Anterior ChamberDay 300 Percentage of Cellularity
NevanacPercentage of Cellularity in Anterior ChamberDay 164.3 Percentage of Cellularity
p-value: 1Pearson´s Chi-square test
Secondary

Mean Aqueous Concentration of Intervention Drug

a nurse was instructed to instill five drops of the research product into each patient's eye in the hour before surgery. The concentration of the drug was determined for aqueous humor sample (0.15 mL) with a 30-gauge needle on a TB syringe after completion of the paracentesis. The paracentesis was performed after first incision during the phacoemulsification.

Time frame: before surgery

Population: We enrolled patients of both sexes (aged \>18 years) with a diagnosis of cataract according to the Lens Opacities Classification System III ≤ NC4, C4 and, P4 in one eye were eligible for enrollment. Eligible patients must have had a best-corrected visual acuity of 6/60 (20/200) Snellen score.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PRO-155Mean Aqueous Concentration of Intervention Drug207.5 ng/mLStandard Deviation 152.3
NevanacMean Aqueous Concentration of Intervention Drug314.4 ng/mLStandard Deviation 146.5
Secondary

Percentage of Patients Without Ocular Pain

percentage of patients without pain, would be measured using the Visual Analog Pain Scale

Time frame: day 30

Population: Mexican patients patients who underwent cataract surgery in only 1 eye, by phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PRO-155Percentage of Patients Without Ocular PainDay 16.1 percentage of patients
PRO-155Percentage of Patients Without Ocular PainDay 301.5 percentage of patients
NevanacPercentage of Patients Without Ocular PainDay 15.7 percentage of patients
NevanacPercentage of Patients Without Ocular PainDay 301.6 percentage of patients
Other Pre-specified

Epithelial Defects Detected With Fluorescein

The percentage of patients presenting epithelial defects with fluorescein staining will be evaluated

Time frame: measurements will be made at days 1, 5, 7 and 30

Population: Mexican patients patients who underwent cataract surgery in only 1 eye, by phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PRO-155Epithelial Defects Detected With FluoresceinDay 154.4 percentage of patients with defects
PRO-155Epithelial Defects Detected With FluoresceinDay 732.5 percentage of patients with defects
PRO-155Epithelial Defects Detected With FluoresceinDay 1515.6 percentage of patients with defects
PRO-155Epithelial Defects Detected With FluoresceinDay 306 percentage of patients with defects
NevanacEpithelial Defects Detected With FluoresceinDay 308.5 percentage of patients with defects
NevanacEpithelial Defects Detected With FluoresceinDay 178.5 percentage of patients with defects
NevanacEpithelial Defects Detected With FluoresceinDay 1536.1 percentage of patients with defects
NevanacEpithelial Defects Detected With FluoresceinDay 764.4 percentage of patients with defects
Other Pre-specified

Epithelial Defects Detected With Green Lissamine

the percentage of patients presenting epithelial defects evaluated with green lysine will be reported

Time frame: measurements will be made at days 1, 5, 7 and 30

Population: Mexican patients who underwent cataract surgery in only 1 eye, by phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PRO-155Epithelial Defects Detected With Green LissamineDay 1521.6 percentage of patients with defects
PRO-155Epithelial Defects Detected With Green LissamineDay 162.5 percentage of patients with defects
PRO-155Epithelial Defects Detected With Green LissamineDay 3014.8 percentage of patients with defects
PRO-155Epithelial Defects Detected With Green LissamineDay 741.4 percentage of patients with defects
NevanacEpithelial Defects Detected With Green LissamineDay 3028.2 percentage of patients with defects
NevanacEpithelial Defects Detected With Green LissamineDay 767.3 percentage of patients with defects
NevanacEpithelial Defects Detected With Green LissamineDay 186 percentage of patients with defects
NevanacEpithelial Defects Detected With Green LissamineDay 1557.4 percentage of patients with defects
Other Pre-specified

Intraocular Pressure

Change from Baseline in the intraocular pressure after 30 days of treatment

Time frame: day 30

Population: Mexican patients who underwent cataract surgery in only 1 eye, by phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PRO-155Intraocular PressureDay 1513.81 mmHgStandard Deviation 1.64
PRO-155Intraocular PressureDay 3014.10 mmHgStandard Deviation 1.78
PRO-155Intraocular PressureDay 014.07 mmHgStandard Deviation 1.82
PRO-155Intraocular PressureDay 114.66 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.61
PRO-155Intraocular PressureDay 714.13 mmHgStandard Deviation 1.97
NevanacIntraocular PressureDay 714.54 mmHgStandard Deviation 1.85
NevanacIntraocular PressureDay 1513.91 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.03
NevanacIntraocular PressureDay 115.83 mmHgStandard Deviation 2.77
NevanacIntraocular PressureDay 3013.77 mmHgStandard Deviation 1.97
NevanacIntraocular PressureDay 014.23 mmHgStandard Deviation 1.9
Other Pre-specified

Retinal Thickness

Change from Baseline in retinal thickness after 30 days of treatment. A third measurement will be done at 60 day after day surgery.

Time frame: day 30 and 60

Population: Mexican patients who underwent cataract surgery in only 1 eye, by phacoemulsification with intraocular lens implantation.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PRO-155Retinal Thicknessfield A1 day 0247.24 μmStandard Deviation 32.9
PRO-155Retinal Thicknessfield A1 day 30252.06 μmStandard Deviation 24.95
PRO-155Retinal Thicknessfield A1 day 60254.06 μmStandard Deviation 2.78
NevanacRetinal Thicknessfield A1 day 0250.87 μmStandard Deviation 34.42
NevanacRetinal Thicknessfield A1 day 30264.08 μmStandard Deviation 34.1
NevanacRetinal Thicknessfield A1 day 60260.13 μmStandard Deviation 33.93

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026