Skip to content

Long Term Efficacy and Safety of Eryfotona AK-NMSC® in Patients With Actinic Keratosis

A Randomised Double-blind Parallel-group Study to Evaluate the Long-term Effects of Eryfotona AK-NMSC® Cream in the Treatment of Cancerization Field in Patients With Actinic Keratosis.

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01656226
Enrollment
50
Registered
2012-08-02
Start date
2012-07-31
Completion date
2014-01-31
Last updated
2013-10-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Actinic Keratosis

Keywords

Actinic Keratosis, AK

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of Eryfotona AK-NMSC® topical application vs Sunscreen on cancerization field of actinic keratosis patients after 6 months of treatment.

Interventions

DEVICEEryfotona AK-NMSC® cream

Cream, to be applied according to COLIPA standard at 2 mg/cm² in head and neck, twice a day before exposing to sun light morning and around lunchtime (about 4-6 hours later), for up to 6 months.

OTHERSunscreen SPF 50+

Cream, to be applied according to COLIPA standard at 2 mg/cm² in head and neck, twice a day before exposing to sun light morning and around lunchtime (about 4-6 hours later), for up to 6 months.

Sponsors

ISDIN
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Current diagnosis of AK, with ≥4 lesions located in the same anatomical district (within a contiguous 50 cm2 area on the face, bold scalp or forehead); 2. Female or male \>18 years of age; 3. Skin type I or II according to Fitzpatrick; 4. Patient has confirmed his/her willingness to participate in this study;.

Exclusion criteria

1. Topical drug therapy for AK within the past 3 months or for photoaging in the last 6 months, or had lesion-directed therapy within 2 cm2 of the selected AK area during the previous month; 2. Suitable for surgical, photodynamic or any other topical treatment in the next 6 months; 3. Subjects who suffer/ had suffered from skin cancer or show an early stage of skin cancer or have a genetic predisposition for skin cancer; 4. Other skin disease that requires treatment with other medications in the treatment area or in the distance of 3 cm; 5. Immunosuppression or current treatment for cancer; 6. Clinically unstable medical condition; 7. High risk group for HIV infection or presentation of other infectious diseases 8. Presentation of contact allergies or allergies to compounds of the test substances; 9. Smoker (more than forty cigarettes per day) or heavy drinker (more than three standard drinks per day); 10. Psychiatric disease that may interfere with follow up of study procedures; 11. Participation in other clinical trials up to 30 days prior to day 1 of the study 12. Prior treatment with study medication in the area to be treated; 13. Considered by the investigator, for any other reason, to be an unsuitable candidate for the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of patients with partial clearance of AK lesions6 monthsComparison between treatment groups at the end of the treatment period

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total number of AK lesions in the treated area (including all lesions present at baseline as well as subclinical lesions which appeared during therapy)6 monthsComparison between treatment groups at the end of the treatment period
Percentage of patients with improvement (clinical and dermoscopic assessment) of the target area as for the erythema, scaling, pigmentation and follicular plugs6 monthsComparison between treatment groups at the end of the treatment period
Percentage of patients with changes in the Investigator Global Improvement Index6 monthsComparison between treatment groups at the end of the treatment period
Percentage of patients with changes in Baseline Severity Index (BSI)6 monthsComparison between treatment groups at the end of the treatment period
Percentage of patients with improvement in the target AK lesion by using RCM score.6 monthsComparison between treatment groups at the end of the treatment period
Percentage of patients with clearance and improvement of AK lesions6 monthsComparison between treatment groups at the end of the treatment period
Percentage of patients compliant to treatment6 monthsComparison between treatment groups at the end of the treatment period
Percentage of patients which report satisfaction to local tolerability6 monthsComparison between treatment groups over time and at the end of the treatment period
Number of patients with AEs and local AEs (skin reactions)6 monthsComparison between treatment groups over time and at the end of the treatment period
Percentage of patients which report satisfaction to treatment6 monthsComparison between treatment groups at the end of the treatment period
Percentage of patients with improvement in the cancerization filed by RCM score6 monthsComparison between treatment groups at the end of the treatment period Validation of a new RCM score

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026