Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety Doxorubicin Transdrug Study in Patients Suffering From Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Multicentre, Randomised, Controlled, Open-label Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Doxorubicin Transdrug™ to Best Standard of Care in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. ReLive Study.

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01655693
Acronym
ReLive
Enrollment
397
Registered
2012-08-02
Start date
2012-06-30
Completion date
2019-05-31
Last updated
2021-06-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Carcinoma, Hepatocellular

Keywords

Intermediate/advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, After failure or intolerance to Sorafenib.

Brief summary

The purpose of this phase III study is to determine whether Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) is effective in the treatment of patients suffering from advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) after failure or intolerance to Sorafenib. Patients with HCC with or without cirrhosis and with good liver functions are eligible. Only those who can not benefit from treatment for which efficacy is demonstrated are eligible. These patients are usually proposed either best standard of care (BSC) or participation to clinical trials. Patients eligible for the RELIVE study will receive either DT at 20 mg/m2 or DT at 30 mg/m2 or the BSC.

Detailed description

Doxorubicin-Transdrug™ (DT) is a nanoparticle formulation of doxorubicin.In in vitro and in vivo models, DT was shown to overcome the multidrug resistance (MDR) and to be more effective than doxorubicin on both sensitive and resistant tumour models and in particular in the X/myc bi-transgenic MDR murine model of HCC.

Interventions

DRUGDoxorubicin 20 mg/m2
DRUGDoxorubicin 30 mg/m2

Sponsors

Valerio Therapeutics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or non-pregnant, non-breast feeding female; * Aged ≥ 18 years; * Patient with: * advanced HCC (BCLC-C according to BCLC staging classification) having progressed under Sorafenib therapy or intolerant to Sorafenib, or; * intermediate HCC (BCLC-B) non eligible or non responders to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and having progressed under or intolerant to Sorafenib therapy * Patients with porta hepatis lymph nodes, extrahepatic metastases, or portal/suprahepatic vein thrombosis without extension in inferior/superior vena cava, are eligible; * HCC diagnosed according to the American Association for Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and/or European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria: * Radiological Criteria applicable in cirrhotic liver: * Nodule ≥ 10 mm: one imaging technique among MRI and CT-scan showing typical appearances for HCC defined as arterial enhancement and rapid washout in portal venous or delayed phase; * If appearance not typical for HCC on initial imaging: second contrast enhanced study (CT or MRI) showing typical appearances for HCC defined as arterial enhancement and rapid wash-out in portal venous or delayed phase; * And/Or cyto-histology criteria (e.g. in case of atypical lesions for HCC at imaging, absence of cirrhosis); * Without cirrhosis or with a non decompensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh score from A5 to B7 included); * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status 0 or 1; * Laboratory tests as follows: * Platelets ≥ 50,000 /mm3 * Neutrophil count ≥ 1000/mm3 * Hemoglobin ≥ 10g/dL * Serum transaminases \< 5 upper limit normal (ULN) (NCI/common toxicity criteria (CTC) grades 0, 1, or 2) * Alkaline phosphatases \< 5 ULN (NCI/CTC grades 0, 1, or 2) * Serum bilirubin \< 35 micromolar (µM)/L (or 2.0 mg/dL); * Signed and dated written informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

* Cirrhosis with a Child-Pugh score B8-C15; * Untreated chronic hepatitis B; * Patients eligible for curative treatments (transplantation, surgical resection, percutaneous treatment); * Patients eligible for palliative treatments with demonstrated efficacy: TACE, Sorafenib; Patients who failed to Sorafenib treatment or intolerant to sorafenib are eligible and can be included if Sorafenib has been stopped at least 2 weeks before randomization; * Prior history of malignancy with the exception of adequately treated basal cell carcinoma or in situ cervical cancer in complete remission since five years at least; * HCC developed on transplanted liver; * HIV infection; * Risk of variceal bleeding; * Oxygen saturation (SaO2) \< 95%; * Presence of a significant acute or chronic respiratory disease defined as NCI/CTCAE \> grade 2; * Presence of recent (\< 6 months) or current cardiac failure (class III or IV New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification), recent (\< 6 months) acute coronary syndrome, clinically significant ECG abnormalities or recent (less than 6 months) acute vascular diseases (stroke, myocardial infarction (MI)…); * Prior cumulative dose of 300 mg/m² of doxorubicin or equivalent; * Patients currently treated with immunosuppressive agents that cannot be stopped; * Patients whose medical or surgical conditions are unstable and may not allow the study completion or compliance, and specially patients with uncontrolled diabetes; * Uncontrolled systemic infection; * Patients with a life expectancy of less than 2 months; * Patients who have received an experimental drug in another clinical trial in the last 30 days prior to randomization in the present clinical trial; * Women of child-bearing age who are unwilling or unable to use an effective contraception method during the study treatment period and for 6 months after the last administration of study drug, and their male partner(s) refusing to use a condom (if applicable); * Men who are unwilling or unable to use a condom during the study treatment period and for 6 months after the last administration of study drug, and their female partner(s) refusing to use one of the appropriate effective contraception methods (if applicable); * Patients unwilling or unable to comply with protocol requirements and scheduled visits.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS)Time from date of randomization to the date of death from any cause with initial assessment up to 24 months and follow-up assessment up to 45 months.OS is defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of death from any cause.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free Survival (PFS)Time from date of randomization to date of first documented progression or death from any cause, which ever came first, assessed up to 20 months.PFS is defined as time from the date of randomisation to the date of the first documented progression or death from any cause. PFS determined by independent radiological review according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumour (RECIST) 1.1 is determine by at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is considered progression.
Objective Response Rate (ORR)Time from date of first treatment cycle to date of last cycle of treatment for the full duration of study treatment up to 24 months.ORR is defined as percent of patients whose best overall response is complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) during the study treatment period and based on the evaluation of independent radiological review according to RECIST 1.1 for target lesions and assessed by MRI: CR is disappearance of all targets extra nodal lesions and the regression of all nodal lesions to \< 10 mm; PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters; stable disease is neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters while on study. PD is at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is considered progression.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Change in Respiratory FunctionTime from baseline assessment to time of death, disease progression, or withdrawal of patient from the study.Number of participants with any clinically significant abnormal change in respiratory function test over the study to include carbon monoxide diffusing capacity to measure lung function, forced expiratory volume in 1 second to measure ability to expel air from your lungs, total lung capacity to measure total amount of air in the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible, and vital capacity to measure the greatest volume of air that can be expelled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. Clinically significant abnormal changes in respiratory function was determined by the investigator.
Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Considered Related to Treatment Categorized by Severity, Withdrawal From Study, or DeathTime from date of initial treatment to date of death, disease progression, or participant withdrawal from the study.The number of participants experiencing TEAEs considered related to treatment and categorized by severity of all related TEAEs according to National Cancer Institute/Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) v4.0 and resulting in patient withdrawal from study or death.
Number of Participants Experiencing Clinically Significant Changes in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) and the Severity of the EventTime from baseline assessment to time of death, disease progression, or withdrawal of patient from the study.Number of participants that experienced a change from baseline in LVEF with severity of LVEF noted as follows: Normal: 100 - 50%, 0 - 9% drop from baseline resting ejection fraction (EF), Grade 2 = 50 - 40%, 10 - 19% drop from baseline resting EF; Grade 3 = 39 - 20%, \>20% drop from baseline; Grade 4 = \<20%. LVEF was monitored every other month. LVEF measures how much blood the left ventricle of the heart pumps out with each contraction and is used to assess the severity of left ventricle dysfunction in the heart. Clinical significance changes were determined by the investigator.
Number of Participants Experiencing Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Changes From BaselineTime from baseline assessment to time of death, disease progression, or withdrawal of patient from the study.Number of participants experiencing clinically significant abnormal ECG changes from baseline over the course of the study. ECG were completed every month before each infusion. ECG will detect changes in heart rhythm. Clinically significant abnormal changes in ECG were determined by the investigator.
Number of Participants With Cardiovascular and Respiratory Events Related to Study DrugTime from date of initial treatment to date of death, disease progression, or patient withdrawal from the study.The number of participants with cardiovascular and respiratory adverse events (AEs) were assessed according to National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) criteria version 4.0, using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). The AE numbers reported are those considered related to treatment. Related AEs are those that are judged unlikely, possibly, probably or definitely related to the study or study drug by the investigator.
Number of Participants Experiencing a Reduction of Oxygen Saturation (SaO2) During and After Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) InfusionTime from start of infusion to resolution of reduction in oxygen saturation.Number of participants experiencing an SaO2 reduction defined as a decrease =\< 90% during or after DT infusion until resolution to =\>93%. Participants had continuous monitoring of SaO2 saturation with pulse oximeter during 6 hour infusion and up to 24 hour after infusion start. SaO2 measures the amount of oxygen (in percent) bound to hemoglobin in red blood cells. SaO2 saturation was only monitored and reported in the DT infusion group. Reduction in SaO2 could result in modify DT dosing regimen. Decreases in SaO2 are a known and expected occurrence with DT infusions, and close monitoring of SaO2 was specified by the protocol to protect patients from potential respiratory distress during infusions.

Countries

Austria, Belgium, Egypt, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Lebanon, Spain, Turkey (Türkiye), United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 541 patients were screened, and 397 patients were randomized a 1:1:1 allocation at 69 sites in 11 countries worldwide. The randomization was performed using an interactive web response system (IWRS) with stratification based on region. Enrollment of first patient was June 15, 2012. Data cutoff was May 28, 2017 (24 months) for initial study and May 10, 2019, for follow-up period (45 months).

Pre-assignment details

Of the 144 patients who failed screening, the most common reason for screen failure was meeting liver function exclusion criteria.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) at 20 mg/m2
DT was infused over 6 hours through the intravenous (IV) route at dose of 20 mg/m2 on Day 1 and was repeated every 4 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
130
Doxorubicin Transdrug at 30 mg/m2
DT was infused over 6 hours through the IV route at dose of 30 mg/m2 on Day 1 and was repeated every 4 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
133
Best Standard of Care
Patients randomized in the control group received treatment according to the investigator's choice, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
134
Total397

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event3113
Overall StudyAggravation of Liver Dysfunction540
Overall StudyDeath8912
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up101
Overall StudyNon-Compliance007
Overall StudyNo Respect of Criteria for Continuing Treatment130
Overall StudyOther8615
Overall StudyProgression of Disease927658
Overall StudyProtocol Violation103
Overall StudyScreening Failure100
Overall StudySerious Adverse Event31511
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject3220

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicDoxorubicin Transdrug at 30 mg/m2TotalDoxorubicin Transdrug (DT) at 20 mg/m2Best Standard of Care
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
71 Participants228 Participants80 Participants77 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
62 Participants169 Participants50 Participants57 Participants
Alcohol Consumption
Active Alcohol Consumption
6 Participants28 Participants11 Participants11 Participants
Alcohol Consumption
No Significant Alcohol Consumption
127 Participants369 Participants119 Participants123 Participants
Child Pugh Class
Child Pugh A
109 Participants336 Participants114 Participants113 Participants
Child Pugh Class
Child Pugh B
24 Participants60 Participants15 Participants21 Participants
Child Pugh Class
Child Pugh C
0 Participants1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
HCC History - Aetiology of Underlying Liver Disease
Alcohol
60 Participants192 Participants64 Participants68 Participants
HCC History - Aetiology of Underlying Liver Disease
Autoimmune
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
HCC History - Aetiology of Underlying Liver Disease
Hemochromatosis
6 Participants13 Participants3 Participants4 Participants
HCC History - Aetiology of Underlying Liver Disease
Hepatitis B Virus
16 Participants37 Participants7 Participants14 Participants
HCC History - Aetiology of Underlying Liver Disease
Hepatitis C Virus
40 Participants118 Participants40 Participants38 Participants
HCC History - Aetiology of Underlying Liver Disease
Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
21 Participants58 Participants14 Participants23 Participants
HCC History - Aetiology of Underlying Liver Disease
Other
12 Participants19 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
HCC History - Aetiology of Underlying Liver Disease
Primary Biliary Cirrhosis
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
HCC History - Aetiology of Underlying Liver Disease
Unknown
14 Participants56 Participants26 Participants16 Participants
HCC History-Cirrhosis
No
35 Participants102 Participants36 Participants31 Participants
HCC History-Cirrhosis
Unknown
2 Participants5 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
HCC History-Cirrhosis
Yes
96 Participants290 Participants93 Participants101 Participants
HCC History - Cyto Histology
No
46 Participants138 Participants50 Participants42 Participants
HCC History - Cyto Histology
Yes
87 Participants259 Participants80 Participants92 Participants
HCC History - Disease Duration30.5 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 35.86
30.1 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 29.83
28.1 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.04
31.5 months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 28.38
HCC History - Extra Hepatic Spread - Distant Metastases
No
61 Participants182 Participants64 Participants57 Participants
HCC History - Extra Hepatic Spread - Distant Metastases
Unknown
4 Participants12 Participants2 Participants6 Participants
HCC History - Extra Hepatic Spread - Distant Metastases
Yes
68 Participants203 Participants64 Participants71 Participants
HCC History - Extra Hepatic Spread - Porta Hepatic Lymph Nodes
No
104 Participants301 Participants99 Participants98 Participants
HCC History - Extra Hepatic Spread - Porta Hepatic Lymph Nodes
Unknown
10 Participants22 Participants7 Participants5 Participants
HCC History - Extra Hepatic Spread - Porta Hepatic Lymph Nodes
Yes
19 Participants74 Participants24 Participants31 Participants
HCC History - Macroscopic Vascular Invasion
Macroscopic Portal Vein or Portal Branch Vascular Invasion - No
92 Participants269 Participants82 Participants95 Participants
HCC History - Macroscopic Vascular Invasion
Macroscopic Portal Vein or Portal Branch Vascular Invasion - Yes
41 Participants128 Participants48 Participants39 Participants
HCC History - Macroscopic Vascular Invasion
Supra-hepatic Vascular Invasion Vein - No
125 Participants370 Participants121 Participants124 Participants
HCC History - Macroscopic Vascular Invasion
Supra-hepatic Vascular Invasion Vein - Yes
8 Participants27 Participants9 Participants10 Participants
HCC History - Macroscopic Vascular Invasion
Vascular Invasion (Portal and/or Supra Hepatic) - No
90 Participants259 Participants80 Participants89 Participants
HCC History - Macroscopic Vascular Invasion
Vascular Invasion (Portal and/or Supra Hepatic) - Yes
43 Participants138 Participants50 Participants45 Participants
HCC History - Nodule in the Liver
Infiltrate HCC
17 Participants38 Participants8 Participants13 Participants
HCC History - Nodule in the Liver
Multiple Nodules
106 Participants319 Participants102 Participants111 Participants
HCC History - Nodule in the Liver
Single Nodule
5 Participants28 Participants15 Participants8 Participants
HCC History - Nodule in the Liver
Unknown
5 Participants12 Participants5 Participants2 Participants
Medical History Active
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
8 Participants30 Participants13 Participants9 Participants
Medical History Active
Diabetes Mellitus
26 Participants60 Participants17 Participants17 Participants
Medical History Active
Hypercholestrolaemia
14 Participants35 Participants12 Participants9 Participants
Medical History Active
Hypertension
82 Participants239 Participants73 Participants84 Participants
Medical History Active
Thrombocytopenia
15 Participants30 Participants7 Participants8 Participants
Medical History Active
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
15 Participants78 Participants28 Participants35 Participants
Medical History Active
Varices Oesophageal
24 Participants53 Participants14 Participants15 Participants
Previous Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Treatments
Loco-regional Treatment
84 Participants252 Participants84 Participants84 Participants
Previous Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Treatments
Other Systemic Anticancer Therapy
73 Participants221 Participants68 Participants80 Participants
Previous Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Treatments
Radiotherapy
14 Participants37 Participants14 Participants9 Participants
Previous Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Treatments
Sorafenib
133 Participants397 Participants130 Participants134 Participants
Previous Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Treatments
Surgery/Resection
49 Participants130 Participants41 Participants40 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
3 Participants6 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
3 Participants6 Participants1 Participants2 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants3 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
North African
2 Participants8 Participants6 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
3 Participants7 Participants1 Participants3 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Unknown
1 Participants3 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
119 Participants364 Participants120 Participants125 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Europe
120 Participants357 Participants118 Participants119 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Middle East
11 Participants33 Participants10 Participants12 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
2 Participants7 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
27 Participants57 Participants12 Participants18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
106 Participants340 Participants118 Participants116 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
118 / 122119 / 120113 / 134
other
Total, other adverse events
110 / 122112 / 12097 / 134
serious
Total, serious adverse events
37 / 12237 / 12048 / 134

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival (OS)

OS is defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of death from any cause.

Time frame: Time from date of randomization to the date of death from any cause with initial assessment up to 24 months and follow-up assessment up to 45 months.

Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) Population: All randomized patients. The DT at 20 mg/m2 and 30 mg/m2 are combined into DT pooled experimental group for comparison with the BSC group. The primary analysis per protocol is DT pooled versus BSC and not individual DT groups.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEDIAN)
Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) 20 mg/m2 GroupOverall Survival (OS)OS up to 24 Months10.1 months
Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) 20 mg/m2 GroupOverall Survival (OS)OS up to 45 Months9.8 months
Doxorubicin Transdrug at 30 mg/m2Overall Survival (OS)OS up to 24 Months8.9 months
Doxorubicin Transdrug at 30 mg/m2Overall Survival (OS)OS up to 45 Months8.8 months
Doxorubicin Transdrug PooledOverall Survival (OS)OS up to 45 Months8.9 months
Doxorubicin Transdrug PooledOverall Survival (OS)OS up to 24 Months9.1 months
Best Standard of Care (BSC)Overall Survival (OS)OS up to 45 Months9.0 months
Best Standard of Care (BSC)Overall Survival (OS)OS up to 24 Months9.0 months
Comparison: Initial 24 month assessment: the primary aim was to demonstrate the superiority of DT pooled (20 mg/m2 and 30 mg/m2) compared to BSC treatment and not individual DT groups per protocol. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The comparison of treatment groups (pooled DT groups versus BSC group) was performed using a non-stratified log-rank test as the primary analysis. The Cox model and Wilcoxon test was used for sensitivity analysis.p-value: >0.991Log Rank
Comparison: Follow-up 45 month assessment: the primary aim was to demonstrate the superiority of DT pooled (20 mg/m2 and 30 mg/m2) compared to BSC treatment and not individual DT groups per protocol. OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The comparison of treatment groups (pooled DT groups versus BSC group) was performed using a non-stratified log-rank test as the primary analysis. The Cox model and Wilcoxon test was used for sensitivity analysis.p-value: 0.796Log Rank
Secondary

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is defined as percent of patients whose best overall response is complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) during the study treatment period and based on the evaluation of independent radiological review according to RECIST 1.1 for target lesions and assessed by MRI: CR is disappearance of all targets extra nodal lesions and the regression of all nodal lesions to \< 10 mm; PR is at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters; stable disease is neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD), taking as reference the smallest sum of diameters while on study. PD is at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is considered progression.

Time frame: Time from date of first treatment cycle to date of last cycle of treatment for the full duration of study treatment up to 24 months.

Population: ITT population: all randomized patients. The DT at 20 mg/m2 and 30 mg/m2 are combined into DT pooled experimental group for comparison with the BSC group. The primary analysis is the DT pooled versus BCS. This was only analyzed for the initial study.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) 20 mg/m2 GroupObjective Response Rate (ORR)Not Evaluable33 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) 20 mg/m2 GroupObjective Response Rate (ORR)Stable Disease39 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) 20 mg/m2 GroupObjective Response Rate (ORR)Partial Response0 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) 20 mg/m2 GroupObjective Response Rate (ORR)Progressive Disease58 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) 20 mg/m2 GroupObjective Response Rate (ORR)Complete Response0 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug at 30 mg/m2Objective Response Rate (ORR)Progressive Disease63 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug at 30 mg/m2Objective Response Rate (ORR)Partial Response2 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug at 30 mg/m2Objective Response Rate (ORR)Stable Disease41 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug at 30 mg/m2Objective Response Rate (ORR)Not Evaluable27 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug at 30 mg/m2Objective Response Rate (ORR)Complete Response0 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug PooledObjective Response Rate (ORR)Complete Response0 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug PooledObjective Response Rate (ORR)Progressive Disease121 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug PooledObjective Response Rate (ORR)Not Evaluable60 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug PooledObjective Response Rate (ORR)Partial Response2 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug PooledObjective Response Rate (ORR)Stable Disease80 Participants
Best Standard of Care (BSC)Objective Response Rate (ORR)Stable Disease31 Participants
Best Standard of Care (BSC)Objective Response Rate (ORR)Not Evaluable62 Participants
Best Standard of Care (BSC)Objective Response Rate (ORR)Progressive Disease40 Participants
Best Standard of Care (BSC)Objective Response Rate (ORR)Partial Response1 Participants
Best Standard of Care (BSC)Objective Response Rate (ORR)Complete Response0 Participants
Comparison: The comparisons between groups (pooled DT 20 mg/m2 and 30mg/m2 versus BSC) used Fisher's exact test.p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Secondary

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as time from the date of randomisation to the date of the first documented progression or death from any cause. PFS determined by independent radiological review according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumour (RECIST) 1.1 is determine by at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study (this includes the baseline if that is the smallest on study). In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. The appearance of one or more new lesions is considered progression.

Time frame: Time from date of randomization to date of first documented progression or death from any cause, which ever came first, assessed up to 20 months.

Population: ITT population: All randomized patients. The DT at 20 mg/m2 and 30 mg/m2 are combined into DT pooled experimental group for comparison with the BSC group. The primary analysis is DT pooled versus BSC. This was only analyzed for the initial study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) 20 mg/m2 GroupProgression-free Survival (PFS)2.3 months
Doxorubicin Transdrug at 30 mg/m2Progression-free Survival (PFS)2.3 months
Doxorubicin Transdrug PooledProgression-free Survival (PFS)2.3 months
Best Standard of Care (BSC)Progression-free Survival (PFS)2.3 months
Comparison: PFS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and plotted as curves by treatment group. For comparison between treatment groups (pooled DT 20 mg/m2 and 30 mg/m2 versus BSC) used Log-rank test as primary analysis. Hazard ratio, mean, and mean PFS rate were given with corresponding 95% CI.p-value: 0.7Log Rank
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants Experiencing a Reduction of Oxygen Saturation (SaO2) During and After Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) Infusion

Number of participants experiencing an SaO2 reduction defined as a decrease =\< 90% during or after DT infusion until resolution to =\>93%. Participants had continuous monitoring of SaO2 saturation with pulse oximeter during 6 hour infusion and up to 24 hour after infusion start. SaO2 measures the amount of oxygen (in percent) bound to hemoglobin in red blood cells. SaO2 saturation was only monitored and reported in the DT infusion group. Reduction in SaO2 could result in modify DT dosing regimen. Decreases in SaO2 are a known and expected occurrence with DT infusions, and close monitoring of SaO2 was specified by the protocol to protect patients from potential respiratory distress during infusions.

Time frame: Time from start of infusion to resolution of reduction in oxygen saturation.

Population: Safety population: All patients receiving at least one infusion for DT groups.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) 20 mg/m2 GroupNumber of Participants Experiencing a Reduction of Oxygen Saturation (SaO2) During and After Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) Infusion2 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug at 30 mg/m2Number of Participants Experiencing a Reduction of Oxygen Saturation (SaO2) During and After Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) Infusion4 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants Experiencing Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Changes From Baseline

Number of participants experiencing clinically significant abnormal ECG changes from baseline over the course of the study. ECG were completed every month before each infusion. ECG will detect changes in heart rhythm. Clinically significant abnormal changes in ECG were determined by the investigator.

Time frame: Time from baseline assessment to time of death, disease progression, or withdrawal of patient from the study.

Population: Safety Population: All patients receiving at least one infusion for DT groups and all patients for BSC group whatever treatment they received.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) 20 mg/m2 GroupNumber of Participants Experiencing Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Changes From Baseline4 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug at 30 mg/m2Number of Participants Experiencing Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Changes From Baseline6 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug PooledNumber of Participants Experiencing Clinically Significant Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Changes From Baseline5 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants Experiencing Clinically Significant Changes in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) and the Severity of the Event

Number of participants that experienced a change from baseline in LVEF with severity of LVEF noted as follows: Normal: 100 - 50%, 0 - 9% drop from baseline resting ejection fraction (EF), Grade 2 = 50 - 40%, 10 - 19% drop from baseline resting EF; Grade 3 = 39 - 20%, \>20% drop from baseline; Grade 4 = \<20%. LVEF was monitored every other month. LVEF measures how much blood the left ventricle of the heart pumps out with each contraction and is used to assess the severity of left ventricle dysfunction in the heart. Clinical significance changes were determined by the investigator.

Time frame: Time from baseline assessment to time of death, disease progression, or withdrawal of patient from the study.

Population: Safety Population: All patients receiving at least one infusion for DT groups and all patients for BSC group whatever treatment they received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) 20 mg/m2 GroupNumber of Participants Experiencing Clinically Significant Changes in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) and the Severity of the EventAt Least One Grade 3-4 Value1 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) 20 mg/m2 GroupNumber of Participants Experiencing Clinically Significant Changes in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) and the Severity of the EventAt Least One Abnormal Value1 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug at 30 mg/m2Number of Participants Experiencing Clinically Significant Changes in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) and the Severity of the EventAt Least One Abnormal Value4 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug at 30 mg/m2Number of Participants Experiencing Clinically Significant Changes in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) and the Severity of the EventAt Least One Grade 3-4 Value1 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug PooledNumber of Participants Experiencing Clinically Significant Changes in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) and the Severity of the EventAt Least One Abnormal Value2 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug PooledNumber of Participants Experiencing Clinically Significant Changes in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) and the Severity of the EventAt Least One Grade 3-4 Value1 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Considered Related to Treatment Categorized by Severity, Withdrawal From Study, or Death

The number of participants experiencing TEAEs considered related to treatment and categorized by severity of all related TEAEs according to National Cancer Institute/Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI-CTCAE) v4.0 and resulting in patient withdrawal from study or death.

Time frame: Time from date of initial treatment to date of death, disease progression, or participant withdrawal from the study.

Population: Safety Population: All patients receiving at least one infusion for DT groups and all patients for BSC group whatever treatment they received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) 20 mg/m2 GroupNumber of Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Considered Related to Treatment Categorized by Severity, Withdrawal From Study, or DeathTEAEs79 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) 20 mg/m2 GroupNumber of Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Considered Related to Treatment Categorized by Severity, Withdrawal From Study, or DeathSevere TEAEs26 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) 20 mg/m2 GroupNumber of Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Considered Related to Treatment Categorized by Severity, Withdrawal From Study, or DeathSerious TEAEs13 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) 20 mg/m2 GroupNumber of Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Considered Related to Treatment Categorized by Severity, Withdrawal From Study, or DeathTEAEs Leading to Withdrawal5 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) 20 mg/m2 GroupNumber of Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Considered Related to Treatment Categorized by Severity, Withdrawal From Study, or DeathTEAEs Leading to Death1 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug at 30 mg/m2Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Considered Related to Treatment Categorized by Severity, Withdrawal From Study, or DeathSevere TEAEs46 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug at 30 mg/m2Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Considered Related to Treatment Categorized by Severity, Withdrawal From Study, or DeathTEAEs Leading to Death2 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug at 30 mg/m2Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Considered Related to Treatment Categorized by Severity, Withdrawal From Study, or DeathSerious TEAEs18 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug at 30 mg/m2Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Considered Related to Treatment Categorized by Severity, Withdrawal From Study, or DeathTEAEs Leading to Withdrawal9 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug at 30 mg/m2Number of Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Considered Related to Treatment Categorized by Severity, Withdrawal From Study, or DeathTEAEs98 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug PooledNumber of Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Considered Related to Treatment Categorized by Severity, Withdrawal From Study, or DeathTEAEs Leading to Withdrawal9 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug PooledNumber of Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Considered Related to Treatment Categorized by Severity, Withdrawal From Study, or DeathSevere TEAEs31 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug PooledNumber of Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Considered Related to Treatment Categorized by Severity, Withdrawal From Study, or DeathTEAEs58 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug PooledNumber of Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Considered Related to Treatment Categorized by Severity, Withdrawal From Study, or DeathSerious TEAEs13 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug PooledNumber of Participants Experiencing Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Considered Related to Treatment Categorized by Severity, Withdrawal From Study, or DeathTEAEs Leading to Death1 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Cardiovascular and Respiratory Events Related to Study Drug

The number of participants with cardiovascular and respiratory adverse events (AEs) were assessed according to National Cancer Institute (NCI)-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) criteria version 4.0, using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). The AE numbers reported are those considered related to treatment. Related AEs are those that are judged unlikely, possibly, probably or definitely related to the study or study drug by the investigator.

Time frame: Time from date of initial treatment to date of death, disease progression, or patient withdrawal from the study.

Population: Safety Population: All patients receiving at least one infusion for DT groups and all patients for BSC group whatever treatment they received.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) 20 mg/m2 GroupNumber of Participants With Cardiovascular and Respiratory Events Related to Study DrugRespiratory Rate Decreased1 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) 20 mg/m2 GroupNumber of Participants With Cardiovascular and Respiratory Events Related to Study DrugRespiratory, Thoracic, and Mediastinal Disorders17 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) 20 mg/m2 GroupNumber of Participants With Cardiovascular and Respiratory Events Related to Study DrugRespiratory Rate Increased2 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) 20 mg/m2 GroupNumber of Participants With Cardiovascular and Respiratory Events Related to Study DrugOxygen Saturation Decreased2 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) 20 mg/m2 GroupNumber of Participants With Cardiovascular and Respiratory Events Related to Study DrugCardiac Disorders4 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) 20 mg/m2 GroupNumber of Participants With Cardiovascular and Respiratory Events Related to Study DrugEjection Fraction Decreased1 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) 20 mg/m2 GroupNumber of Participants With Cardiovascular and Respiratory Events Related to Study DrugBlood Pressure Increased0 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) 20 mg/m2 GroupNumber of Participants With Cardiovascular and Respiratory Events Related to Study DrugVascular Disorders8 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug at 30 mg/m2Number of Participants With Cardiovascular and Respiratory Events Related to Study DrugOxygen Saturation Decreased7 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug at 30 mg/m2Number of Participants With Cardiovascular and Respiratory Events Related to Study DrugCardiac Disorders5 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug at 30 mg/m2Number of Participants With Cardiovascular and Respiratory Events Related to Study DrugVascular Disorders8 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug at 30 mg/m2Number of Participants With Cardiovascular and Respiratory Events Related to Study DrugBlood Pressure Increased1 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug at 30 mg/m2Number of Participants With Cardiovascular and Respiratory Events Related to Study DrugRespiratory, Thoracic, and Mediastinal Disorders20 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug at 30 mg/m2Number of Participants With Cardiovascular and Respiratory Events Related to Study DrugRespiratory Rate Increased5 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug at 30 mg/m2Number of Participants With Cardiovascular and Respiratory Events Related to Study DrugRespiratory Rate Decreased1 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug at 30 mg/m2Number of Participants With Cardiovascular and Respiratory Events Related to Study DrugEjection Fraction Decreased0 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug PooledNumber of Participants With Cardiovascular and Respiratory Events Related to Study DrugRespiratory Rate Increased0 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug PooledNumber of Participants With Cardiovascular and Respiratory Events Related to Study DrugBlood Pressure Increased0 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug PooledNumber of Participants With Cardiovascular and Respiratory Events Related to Study DrugRespiratory Rate Decreased0 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug PooledNumber of Participants With Cardiovascular and Respiratory Events Related to Study DrugVascular Disorders6 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug PooledNumber of Participants With Cardiovascular and Respiratory Events Related to Study DrugEjection Fraction Decreased0 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug PooledNumber of Participants With Cardiovascular and Respiratory Events Related to Study DrugOxygen Saturation Decreased1 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug PooledNumber of Participants With Cardiovascular and Respiratory Events Related to Study DrugRespiratory, Thoracic, and Mediastinal Disorders13 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug PooledNumber of Participants With Cardiovascular and Respiratory Events Related to Study DrugCardiac Disorders1 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Change in Respiratory Function

Number of participants with any clinically significant abnormal change in respiratory function test over the study to include carbon monoxide diffusing capacity to measure lung function, forced expiratory volume in 1 second to measure ability to expel air from your lungs, total lung capacity to measure total amount of air in the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible, and vital capacity to measure the greatest volume of air that can be expelled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. Clinically significant abnormal changes in respiratory function was determined by the investigator.

Time frame: Time from baseline assessment to time of death, disease progression, or withdrawal of patient from the study.

Population: Safety Population: All patients receiving at least one infusion for DT groups and all patients for BSC group whatever treatment they received.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
Doxorubicin Transdrug (DT) 20 mg/m2 GroupNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Change in Respiratory Function13 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug at 30 mg/m2Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Change in Respiratory Function8 Participants
Doxorubicin Transdrug PooledNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormal Change in Respiratory Function0 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 8, 2026