Skip to content

NWP09 in Children With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)

A Multicenter, Dose-optimized, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Study To Evaluate The Efficacy Of Nwp09 In Pediatric Patients With Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (Adhd) In A Laboratory Classroom

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT01654250
Enrollment
90
Registered
2012-07-31
Start date
2012-07-31
Completion date
2012-10-31
Last updated
2016-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Keywords

ADHD, methylphenidate extended-release

Brief summary

The safety and efficacy of a chewable formulation of extended-release methylphenidate will be studied in children with ADHD

Interventions

DRUGNWP09

Methylphenidate, variable dose, daily dosing, 1 week duration

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo

Sponsors

Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
6 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Children aged 6 to 12 years with ADHD who require pharmacologic treatment for this condition

Exclusion criteria

* Other serious illnesses or conditions that would put the patient at particular risk for safety events or would interfere with treatment/assessment of ADHD

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP)-Combined Scores-Average of All Post-Dose Time-Points0.75 up to 13 hours post-doseThe SKAMP scale measured the manifestations of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) using an independent observer rating of the participant's impairment in classroom observed behaviors. SKAMP combined score comprised of 13 items (including subscales: attention with items 1-4, deportment with items 5-8, quality of work with items 9-11 and compliance with items 12-13). The SKAMP composite score was obtained by summing up each item score where each item was rated on a 7-point impairment scale (0=normal to 6=maximal impairment) for a total possible combined score of 0 to 78; where higher score signified worst impairment. Average of all post dose SKAMP-combined scores measured at 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 hours post-dose was calculated.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Onset and Duration of Clinical Effect0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 13 hours post-doseOnset and duration of clinical effect was determined using SKAMP combined rating scale at each post-dose time point. Onset of effect was defined as first assessment time showing statistical significance (i.e. p was less than or equal to \[=\<\] 0.05) between NWP09 and placebo and duration of effect was defined as the as last consecutive time-point at which difference was statistically significant between NWP09 and placebo. SKAMP scale measured the manifestations of ADHD using an independent observer rating of the participant's impairment in classroom observed behaviors. SKAMP combined score was comprised of 13 items \[subscales: attention (1-4 items), deportment (5-8 items), quality of work (9-11 items) and compliance (12-13 items)\]. SKAMP combined score was obtained by summing up each item score where each item was rated on a 7-point impairment scale (0=normal to 6=maximal impairment) for total possible combined score of 0 to 78; where higher score signified worst impairment.
Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP) SKAMP Attention and Deportment Subscale Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-Dose0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 13 hours post-doseSKAMP scale measured the manifestations of ADHD using an independent observer rating of the participant's impairment in classroom observed behaviors. The SKAMP subscales were obtained by summing the individual items as follows: Attention (items 1-4) and Deportment (items 5-8), where each item was rated on a 7-point scale (0=normal to 6=maximal impairment). SKAMP attention subscale was reported which evaluates concentration in the classroom and comprises of 4 items, with a total possible score for of 0 to 24; higher score indicates worst impairment. SKAMP deportment subscale was reported which assesses behavior in the classroom and comprises of 4 items, with a total possible score for each sub-scale of 0 to 24; higher score indicates worst impairment.
Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-Dose0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 post-doseThe PERMP score measured the manifestations of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. The PERMP is a 10-minute written test, on 80 math problems, performed as seatwork in the classroom. At the end of the 10- minute math test , the PERMP score of the number of math problems attempted plus the number of math problems answered correctly in a 10-minute session was used to measure participant's performance. The total score range from 0-160 with higher scores indicating better performance.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I)Day 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43The CGI-I measured the participant's disease improvement relative to baseline as followed: 1= very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6= much worse, and 7=very much worse. This outcome measure was analyzed during open label phase in entire study population prior to randomization into two treatment groups.
Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresBaseline, Day 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43CPRS was used to measure features associated with ADHD and was used to compare scores during the dose optimization period i.e. 1-6 weeks. The assessment was performed by parent or guardian. CPRS consisted of 27 questions graded on a scale from 0 (not true at all) to 3 (very much true). Raw scores were converted to t-scores and t-scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. The participant received normalized t-scores on the following scales: oppositional, cognitive problems/inattention, hyperactivity, anxious-shy, perfectionism, social problems, psychosomatic, ADHD index, restless-impulse, emotional liability, conner's global index, inattentive, hyperactive-impulsive and diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders IV (DSM-IV). This outcome measure was analyzed during open label phase in entire study population prior to randomization into two treatment groups.
Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)Baseline, Day 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43CGI-S scale was used to measure features associated with ADHD. The assessment was performed by the investigator of the study research team. The CGI-S classified the participant's current disease status as: 1 = normal, not at all ill, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, and 7 = among the most extremely ill participants. This outcome measure was analyzed during open label phase in entire study population prior to randomization into two treatment groups.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Total 90 participants were enrolled in this study, out of which 86 participants were randomized.

Pre-assignment details

The study consisted of an open-label (OL) dose-optimization phase (1 to 6 weeks), and a placebo-controlled, double blind (DB) for 1 week with no dose adjustments.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)
Placebo-matched to NWP09 chewable tablet once daily optimized dose (optimized during the 1 to 6 weeks OL phase at a starting dose of 20 milligram \[mg\] and titrated at 10 or 20 mg increments, based on clinical response and tolerability to a maximum daily dose of 60 mg per day) for 1 week.
43
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)
NWP09 chewable tablet once daily optimized dose (optimized during the 1 to 6 weeks OL phase at a starting dose of 20 mg and titrated at 10 or 20 mg increments, based on clinical response and tolerability to a maximum daily dose of 60 mg per day) for 1 week.
42
Total85

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up10

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlacebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Total
Age, Continuous9.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.62
9.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.71
9.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.69
Sex: Female, Male
Female
20 Participants12 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
23 Participants30 Participants53 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
31 / 4433 / 42
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 440 / 42

Outcome results

Primary

Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP)-Combined Scores-Average of All Post-Dose Time-Points

The SKAMP scale measured the manifestations of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) using an independent observer rating of the participant's impairment in classroom observed behaviors. SKAMP combined score comprised of 13 items (including subscales: attention with items 1-4, deportment with items 5-8, quality of work with items 9-11 and compliance with items 12-13). The SKAMP composite score was obtained by summing up each item score where each item was rated on a 7-point impairment scale (0=normal to 6=maximal impairment) for a total possible combined score of 0 to 78; where higher score signified worst impairment. Average of all post dose SKAMP-combined scores measured at 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 hours post-dose was calculated.

Time frame: 0.75 up to 13 hours post-dose

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication (either NWP09 or matching placebo) and had at least 1 post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP)-Combined Scores-Average of All Post-Dose Time-Points19.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.39
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP)-Combined Scores-Average of All Post-Dose Time-Points12.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 1.41
Comparison: Treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point, and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-10.9, -3.1]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Onset and Duration of Clinical Effect

Onset and duration of clinical effect was determined using SKAMP combined rating scale at each post-dose time point. Onset of effect was defined as first assessment time showing statistical significance (i.e. p was less than or equal to \[=\<\] 0.05) between NWP09 and placebo and duration of effect was defined as the as last consecutive time-point at which difference was statistically significant between NWP09 and placebo. SKAMP scale measured the manifestations of ADHD using an independent observer rating of the participant's impairment in classroom observed behaviors. SKAMP combined score was comprised of 13 items \[subscales: attention (1-4 items), deportment (5-8 items), quality of work (9-11 items) and compliance (12-13 items)\]. SKAMP combined score was obtained by summing up each item score where each item was rated on a 7-point impairment scale (0=normal to 6=maximal impairment) for total possible combined score of 0 to 78; where higher score signified worst impairment.

Time frame: 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 13 hours post-dose

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication (either NWP09 or matching placebo) and had at least 1 post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Onset and Duration of Clinical EffectHour 1017.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.58
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Onset and Duration of Clinical EffectHour 819.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.34
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Onset and Duration of Clinical EffectHour 1219.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.23
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Onset and Duration of Clinical EffectHour 1318.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.73
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Onset and Duration of Clinical EffectHour 419.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.99
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Onset and Duration of Clinical EffectHour 0.7518.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.21
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Onset and Duration of Clinical EffectHour 220.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.11
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Onset and Duration of Clinical EffectHour 28.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.88
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Onset and Duration of Clinical EffectHour 48.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 6.74
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Onset and Duration of Clinical EffectHour 1317.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.38
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Onset and Duration of Clinical EffectHour 812.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.38
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Onset and Duration of Clinical EffectHour 1014.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.26
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Onset and Duration of Clinical EffectHour 0.7510.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.79
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Onset and Duration of Clinical EffectHour 1217.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.79
Comparison: Hour 0.75 post-dose: Nominal p value-treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-12.7, -3.7]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 0.75 post-dose: Adjusted p-values were generated using a fixed sequence testing procedure from p-values which were generated from the mixed effects model.p-value: 0.133Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 2 post-dose: Nominal p value-treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-17.3, -8.3]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 2 post-dose: Adjusted p-values were generated using a fixed sequence testing procedure from p-values which were generated from the mixed effects model.p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 4 post-dose: Nominal p value-treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-16.8, -7.8]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 4 post-dose: Adjusted p-values were generated using a fixed sequence testing procedure from p-values which were generated from the mixed effects model.p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 8 post-dose: Nominal p value-treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effect and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-12.3, -3.3]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 8 post-dose: Adjusted p-values were generated using a fixed sequence testing procedure from p-values which were generated from the mixed effects model.p-value: <0.001Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 10 post-dose: Nominal p-value -treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: 0.13395% CI: [-7.9, 1.1]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 10 post-dose: Adjusted p-value were generated using a fixed sequence testing procedure from p-values generated from the mixed effects model.p-value: 0.133Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 12 post-dose: Nominal p value-treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: 0.20695% CI: [-7.4, 1.6]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 12 post-dose: Adjusted p-values are generated using a fixed sequence testing procedure from p-values which were generated from the mixed effects model.p-value: 0.133Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 13 post-dose: Nominal p value-treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: 0.49695% CI: [-6, 2.9]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 13 post-dose: Adjusted p-value were generated using a fixed sequence testing procedure from p-values generated from the mixed effects model.p-value: 0.133Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-Dose

The PERMP score measured the manifestations of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. The PERMP is a 10-minute written test, on 80 math problems, performed as seatwork in the classroom. At the end of the 10- minute math test , the PERMP score of the number of math problems attempted plus the number of math problems answered correctly in a 10-minute session was used to measure participant's performance. The total score range from 0-160 with higher scores indicating better performance.

Time frame: 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 post-dose

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication (either NWP09 or matching placebo) and had at least 1 post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 4: Problems attempted107.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 55.89
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 10: Problems attempted103.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 53.54
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 2: Problems attempted106.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 55.22
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 10: Problems corrected100.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 53.99
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 13: Problems corrected95.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 45.76
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 4: Problems corrected104.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 56.72
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 2: Problems corrected103.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 55.75
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 8: Problems attempted101.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 53.32
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 12: Problems attempted97.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 48.86
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 0.75: Problems corrected102.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 51.62
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 12: Problems corrected95.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 49.25
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 8: Problems corrected98.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 53.71
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 13: Problems attempted98.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 46.01
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 0.75: Problems attempted105.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 51.08
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 13: Problems attempted115.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 57.3
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 0.75: Problems attempted128.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 53.32
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 0.75: Problems corrected123.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 55.11
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 2: Problems corrected136.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 60.34
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 4: Problems attempted140.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 62.88
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 4: Problems corrected135.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 64.53
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 8: Problems attempted129.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 62.64
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 8: Problems corrected124.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 63.92
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 10: Problems attempted113.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 62.33
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 13: Problems corrected101.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 58.94
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 2: Problems attempted140.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 57.85
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 10: Problems corrected107.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 63.08
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 12: Problems attempted111.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 55.7
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 12: Problems corrected103.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 57.76
Comparison: Hour 0.75 post-dose (Problems attempted): Treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: 0.02495% CI: [3.4, 47.1]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 2 post-dose (Problems attempted): Treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: 0.00195% CI: [14.2, 57.9]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 4 post-dose (Problems attempted): Treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: 0.00295% CI: [12.8, 56.6]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 8 post-dose (Problems attempted): Treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: 0.00995% CI: [7.4, 51.1]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 10 post-dose (Problems attempted): Treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: 0.26195% CI: [-9.3, 34.4]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 12 post-dose (Problems attempted): Treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: 0.17595% CI: [-6.7, 37]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 13 post-dose (Problems attempted): Treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: 0.09495% CI: [-3.2, 40.5]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 0.75 post-dose (Problems correct): Treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: 0.04995% CI: [0.1, 45.1]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 2 post-dose (Problems correct): Treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: 0.00395% CI: [11.9, 56.9]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 4 post-dose (Problems correct): Treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: 0.00495% CI: [10.5, 55.4]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 8 post-dose (Problems correct): Treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: 0.01995% CI: [4.5, 49.5]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 10 (Problems correct): Treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: 0.45195% CI: [-13.9, 31.1]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 12 post-dose (Problems correct): Treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: 0.39495% CI: [-12.7, 32.2]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 13 post-dose (Problems correct): Treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: 0.46695% CI: [-14.1, 30.8]Mixed Models Analysis
Secondary

Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP) SKAMP Attention and Deportment Subscale Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-Dose

SKAMP scale measured the manifestations of ADHD using an independent observer rating of the participant's impairment in classroom observed behaviors. The SKAMP subscales were obtained by summing the individual items as follows: Attention (items 1-4) and Deportment (items 5-8), where each item was rated on a 7-point scale (0=normal to 6=maximal impairment). SKAMP attention subscale was reported which evaluates concentration in the classroom and comprises of 4 items, with a total possible score for of 0 to 24; higher score indicates worst impairment. SKAMP deportment subscale was reported which assesses behavior in the classroom and comprises of 4 items, with a total possible score for each sub-scale of 0 to 24; higher score indicates worst impairment.

Time frame: 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 13 hours post-dose

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication (either NWP09 or matching placebo) and had at least 1 post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP) SKAMP Attention and Deportment Subscale Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 0.75: Deportment Subscale4.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.91
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP) SKAMP Attention and Deportment Subscale Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 10: Deportment Subscale3.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.86
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP) SKAMP Attention and Deportment Subscale Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 4: Deportment Subscale5.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.22
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP) SKAMP Attention and Deportment Subscale Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 12: Attention Subscale3.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.91
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP) SKAMP Attention and Deportment Subscale Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 2: Deportment Subscale5.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.31
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP) SKAMP Attention and Deportment Subscale Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 12: Deportment Subscale4.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.46
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP) SKAMP Attention and Deportment Subscale Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 8: Deportment Subscale4.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.73
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP) SKAMP Attention and Deportment Subscale Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 13: Attention Subscale3.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.15
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP) SKAMP Attention and Deportment Subscale Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 2: Attention Subscale3.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.27
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP) SKAMP Attention and Deportment Subscale Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 13: Deportment Subscale3.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.3
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP) SKAMP Attention and Deportment Subscale Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 10: Attention Subscale3.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.7
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP) SKAMP Attention and Deportment Subscale Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 4: Attention Subscale3.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.92
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP) SKAMP Attention and Deportment Subscale Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 8: Attention Subscale3.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.92
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP) SKAMP Attention and Deportment Subscale Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 0.75: Attention Subscale2.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.72
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP) SKAMP Attention and Deportment Subscale Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 8: Attention Subscale2.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.82
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP) SKAMP Attention and Deportment Subscale Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 0.75: Attention Subscale1.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.35
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP) SKAMP Attention and Deportment Subscale Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 0.75: Deportment Subscale2.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.74
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP) SKAMP Attention and Deportment Subscale Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 2: Attention Subscale1.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.85
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP) SKAMP Attention and Deportment Subscale Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 2: Deportment Subscale1.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.43
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP) SKAMP Attention and Deportment Subscale Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 4: Attention Subscale1.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.48
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP) SKAMP Attention and Deportment Subscale Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 4: Deportment Subscale1.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.29
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP) SKAMP Attention and Deportment Subscale Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 8: Deportment Subscale2.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 4.33
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP) SKAMP Attention and Deportment Subscale Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 10: Attention Subscale2.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.49
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP) SKAMP Attention and Deportment Subscale Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 10: Deportment Subscale2.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.18
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP) SKAMP Attention and Deportment Subscale Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 12: Attention Subscale3.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.26
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP) SKAMP Attention and Deportment Subscale Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 12: Deportment Subscale3.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.48
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP) SKAMP Attention and Deportment Subscale Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 13: Attention Subscale3.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.35
NWP09 (OL Phase; DB Phase)Swanson, Kotin, Agler, M-Flynn, and Pelham Rating Scale (SKAMP) SKAMP Attention and Deportment Subscale Scores at Hour 0.75, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12 and 13 Post-DoseHour 13: Deportment Subscale3.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 5.48
Comparison: Hour 0.75 post-dose attention subscale: Treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: 0.00795% CI: [-2.6, -0.4]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 2 post-dose attention subscale: Treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-3.6, -1.4]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 4 post-dose attention subscale: Treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-3.4, -1.2]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 8 post-dose attention subscale: Treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: 0.00395% CI: [-2.8, -0.6]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 10 post-dose attention subscale: Treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: 0.09795% CI: [-2, 0.2]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 12 post-dose attention subscale: Treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: 0.4995% CI: [-1.5, 0.7]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 13 post-dose attention subscale: Treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: 0.16495% CI: [-1.9, 0.3]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 0.75 post-dose deportment subscale: Treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: 0.00495% CI: [-4.6, -0.9]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 2 post-dose deportment subscale: Treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-5.8, -2.1]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 4 post-dose deportment sub scale: Treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: <0.00195% CI: [-5.8, -2.1]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 8 post-dose deportment subscale: Treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: 0.04295% CI: [-3.8, -0.1]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 10 post-dose deportment sub scale: Treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: 0.11895% CI: [-3.3, 0.4]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 12 post-dose deportment sub scale: Treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: 0.34295% CI: [-2.7, 1.9]Mixed Models Analysis
Comparison: Hour 13 post-dose deportment sub scale: Treatment comparisons for observed scores were assessed using a mixed model repeated measures analysis, with treatment (NWP09/Placebo), study center, time point and time point by treatment interaction as main effects and participant intercept as a random effect.p-value: 0.96295% CI: [-1.8, 1.9]Mixed Models Analysis
Other Pre-specified

Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I)

The CGI-I measured the participant's disease improvement relative to baseline as followed: 1= very much improved, 2=much improved, 3=minimally improved, 4=no change, 5=minimally worse, 6= much worse, and 7=very much worse. This outcome measure was analyzed during open label phase in entire study population prior to randomization into two treatment groups.

Time frame: Day 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication (either NWP09 or matching placebo) and had at least 1 post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I)Day 83.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.07
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I)Day 152.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.94
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I)Day 221.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.69
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I)Day 291.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.56
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I)Day 361.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.49
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I)Day 431.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.46
Other Pre-specified

Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)

CGI-S scale was used to measure features associated with ADHD. The assessment was performed by the investigator of the study research team. The CGI-S classified the participant's current disease status as: 1 = normal, not at all ill, 2 = borderline ill, 3 = mildly ill, 4 = moderately ill, 5 = markedly ill, 6 = severely ill, and 7 = among the most extremely ill participants. This outcome measure was analyzed during open label phase in entire study population prior to randomization into two treatment groups.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication (either NWP09 or matching placebo) and had at least 1 post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)Baseline4.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.66
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)Day 83.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.29
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)Day 153.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.16
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)Day 222.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.05
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)Day 292.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 1.02
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)Day 362.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.82
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S)Day 432.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 0.89
Other Pre-specified

Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) Scores

CPRS was used to measure features associated with ADHD and was used to compare scores during the dose optimization period i.e. 1-6 weeks. The assessment was performed by parent or guardian. CPRS consisted of 27 questions graded on a scale from 0 (not true at all) to 3 (very much true). Raw scores were converted to t-scores and t-scores have a mean of 50 ± 10 where higher scores are indicative of greater problems. The participant received normalized t-scores on the following scales: oppositional, cognitive problems/inattention, hyperactivity, anxious-shy, perfectionism, social problems, psychosomatic, ADHD index, restless-impulse, emotional liability, conner's global index, inattentive, hyperactive-impulsive and diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders IV (DSM-IV). This outcome measure was analyzed during open label phase in entire study population prior to randomization into two treatment groups.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 8, 15, 22, 29, 36, 43

Population: ITT population included all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of double-blind study medication (either NWP09 or matching placebo) and had at least 1 post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresOppositional : Baseline67.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.08
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresCognitive Problems/ Inattention: Baseline71.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.3
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresHyperactivity: Baseline79.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.18
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresAnxious-shy: Baseline57.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.06
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresPerfectionism: Baseline54.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.75
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresPsychosomatic: Baseline57.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.63
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresADHD index: Baseline73.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresRestless-Impulse: Baseline74.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.48
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresConner's Global index: Baseline73.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.25
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresInattentive: Baseline73.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.57
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresHyperactive-Impulsive: Baseline78.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.43
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresOppositional: Day 864.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.89
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresCognitive Problems/ Inattention: Day 866.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.33
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresHyperactivity: Day 873.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.81
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresAnxious-shy: Day 854.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.99
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresSocial problems: Day 855.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.06
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresRestless-Impulse: Day 869.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.51
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresEmotional Liability: Day 862.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.25
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresConner's Global index: Day 868.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.06
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresInattentive: Day 868.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.46
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresHyperactive-Impulsive: Day 873.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.24
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresDSM-IV: Day 872.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.62
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresOppositional: Day 1559.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.75
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresCognitive Problems/ Inattention: Day 1561.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.88
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresHyperactivity: Day 1568.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.58
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresAnxious-shy: Day 1552.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.55
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresPerfectionism: Day 1551.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.51
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresPsychosomatic: Day 1553.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.93
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresADHD index: Day 1563.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.7
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresEmotional Liability: Day 1557.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.84
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresHyperactive-Impulsive: Day 1567.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.86
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresDSM-IV: Day 1566.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.33
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresOppositional: Day 2255.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.27
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresHyperactivity: Day 2262.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.73
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresAnxious-shy: Day 2250.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.66
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresPsychosomatic: Day 2250.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.54
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresADHD index: Day 2259.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.18
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresRestless-Impulse: Day 2259.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.86
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresEmotional Liability: Day 2253.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.6
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresConner's Global index: Day 2258.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.17
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresHyperactive-Impulsive: Day 2263.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.48
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresDSM-IV: Day 2262.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.3
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresOppositional: Day 2952.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.28
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresCognitive Problems/ Inattention: Day 2955.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.97
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresHyperactivity: Day 2958.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.87
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresAnxious-shy: Day 2949.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.08
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresPerfectionism: Day 2948.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.63
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresADHD index: Day 2955.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.88
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresHyperactive-Impulsive: Day 2957.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.08
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresDSM-IV: Day 2957.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.1
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresCognitive Problems/ Inattention: Day 3654.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.44
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresHyperactivity: Day 3656.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.36
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresAnxious-shy: Day 3649.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.9
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresPerfectionism: Day 3646.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.08
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresSocial problems: Day 3650.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.1
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresPsychosomatic: Day 3647.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.37
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresADHD index: Day 3653.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.15
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresRestless-Impulse: Day 3654.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.79
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresEmotional Liability: Day 3649.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.76
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresConner's Global index: Day 3653.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.9
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresInattentive: Day 3654.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.49
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresHyperactive-Impulsive: Day 3655.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.15
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresRestless-Impulse: Day 4353.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.37
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresDSM-IV: Day 3655.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.96
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresOppositional: Day 4349.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.81
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresCognitive Problems/ Inattention: Day 4354.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.48
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresHyperactivity: Day 4354.4 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.63
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresPerfectionism: Day 4345.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.6
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresSocial problems: Day 4350.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.77
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresPsychosomatic: Day 4347.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.87
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresADHD index: Day 4352.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.84
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresEmotional Liability: Day 4348.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.21
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresConner's Global index: Day 4352.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.16
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresInattentive: Day 4353.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.14
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresHyperactive-Impulsive: Day 4354.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.3
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresDSM-IV: Day 4354.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.74
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresEmotional Liability: Baseline64.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.82
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresSocial problems: Baseline57.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.31
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresDSM-IV: Baseline77.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.04
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresPerfectionism: Day 852.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.8
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresPsychosomatic: Day 855.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.22
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresADHD index: Day 868.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.3
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresSocial problems: Day 1554.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.71
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresRestless-Impulse: Day 1565.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.96
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresConner's Global index: Day 1563.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 14.08
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresInattentive: Day 1563.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 13.39
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresCognitive Problems/ Inattention: Day 2259.1 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.3
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresPerfectionism: Day 2249.3 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.08
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresSocial problems: Day 2252.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.65
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresInattentive: Day 2259.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.44
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresSocial problems: Day 2951.2 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.4
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresPsychosomatic: Day 2949.7 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 12.13
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresRestless-Impulse: Day 2955.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.77
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresEmotional Liability: Day 2951.0 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.29
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresConner's Global index: Day 2954.8 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.88
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresInattentive: Day 2955.6 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.19
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresOppositional: Day 3650.5 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.42
Placebo (OL Phase; DB Phase)Conners Parent Rating Scale (CPRS) ScoresAnxious-shy: Day 4347.9 Units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.8

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 26, 2026